the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Quantify and reduce flood forecast uncertainty by the CHUP-BMA method
Zhen Cui
Shenglian Guo
Hua Chen
Dedi Liu
Yanlai Zhou
Chong-Yu Xu
Abstract. The Bayesian model averaging (BMA), hydrological uncertainty processor (HUP), and HUP-BMA methods have been widely used to quantify flood forecast uncertainty. This study, for the first time, introduced a copula-based HUP in the framework of BMA and proposed the CHUP-BMA method to bypass the need for normal quantile transformation of the HUP-BMA method. The proposed ensemble forecast scheme consists of 8 members (two forecast precipitation inputs, two advanced long short-term memory (LSTM) models, and two objective functions used to calibrate parameters) and is applied to the interval basin between Xiangjiaba and Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR) dam-site. The ensemble forecast performance of the HUP-BMA and CHUP-BMA methods is explored in the 6–168h forecast horizons. The TGR inflow forecasting results show that the two methods can improve the forecast accuracy over the selected member with the best forecast accuracy, and the CHUP-BMA performs much better than the HUP-BMA. Compared with the HUP-BMA method, the forecast interval width with the 90 % confidence level and continuous ranked probability score metrics of the CHUP-BMA method are highest reduced by 28.42 % and 17.86 %, respectively. The probability forecast of the CHUP-BMA method has better reliability and sharpness and is more suitable for flood ensemble forecasts, providing reliable risk information for flood control decision-making.
- Preprint
(1727 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Zhen Cui et al.
Status: open (until 13 Oct 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on hess-2023-106', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Jul 2023
reply
The paper proposes a new CHUP-BMA ensemble forecasting method by incorporating the CHUP-derived posterior distribution of the observed flow into the BMA framework. It has the advantage that the initial state constraints can be considered in the BMA while avoiding the normal quantile transformation of the HUP-BMA method. Based on deep learning, an ensemble forecasting scheme considering input, model structure, and parameter uncertainty is constructed in Three Gorges Reservoir, China, and the effectiveness of the CHUP-BMA method in reducing forecast uncertainty is verified. The study is innovative and theoretically rigorous and has promising results with solid application potential. Some questions need further discussion.
1. The sources of Figure 3 and Table 2 need to be explained to improve the reasonableness of the paper.
2. Various model inputs (e.g., rainfall, tributary flows, etc.) exist in the interval basins. The article only considers the input uncertainty of rainfall, and it is suggested to add a reason for this in subsection 3.2.1.
3. Line 255. You should briefly introduce the LSTM in subsection 3.2.2 to improve the paper's readability. In addition, it is recommended to cite references more relevant to the LSTM.
4. Deep learning parameters significantly impact forecast accuracy, so it is recommended to show the values of deep learning parameters. The study should concentrate on ensemble forecasting methods rather than deep learning models. Therefore, the model parameter values can be shown in the appendix.
5. Line 369, add a description of the member type with better forecast accuracy, i.e., the input composition, the model structure, and the objective function of the selected parameters.
6. There are numerous evaluation metrics in deterministic and probabilistic forecasting. Briefly explain the reasons for the metrics chosen in the paper.
7. Line 465, replacing 'concentration' with 'sharpness' as 'reliability (α_index), concentration (IGS),' should correspond to the name of Figure 13.
8. To improve modeling rationality, explain why observations are used as model tributary inputs in training and validation periods.
9. In the outlook, adding the construction of the CHUP-BMA method using a more flexible vine copula will make the CHUP-BMA method more competitive.Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2023-106-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Shenglian Guo, 26 Jul 2023
reply
Dear reviewer #1,
We are grateful to reviewer #1 for taking the time to read our manuscript and for their detailed and professional comments. We have provided point-by-point responses to all comments. Please refer to the supplementary document (Reply on RC1.pdf).
Sincerely yours,
July 26, 2023
Prof. Shenglian Guo
State Key Laboratory of Water R & H Engineering Science
Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430072, P. R. China
E-mail: slguo@whu.edu.cn
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Shenglian Guo, 26 Jul 2023
reply
Zhen Cui et al.
Zhen Cui et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
339 | 50 | 15 | 404 | 6 | 6 |
- HTML: 339
- PDF: 50
- XML: 15
- Total: 404
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1