Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-414
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-414

  27 Oct 2021

27 Oct 2021

Review status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Signature and sensitivity-based comparison of conceptual and process oriented models, GR4H, MARINE and SMASH, on French Mediterranean flash floods

Abubakar Haruna1, Pierre-Andre Garambois2, Helene Roux3, Pierre Javelle2, and Maxime Jay-Allemand4 Abubakar Haruna et al.
  • 1Univ. Grenoble Alpes, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France
  • 2INRAE, Aix Marseille Université, RECOVER, 3275 Route de Cézanne, Aix-en-Provence, 13182, France
  • 3Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse (IMFT), Université de Toulouse, CNRS - Toulouse, France
  • 4Hydris Hydrologie corp., Montpellier, France

Abstract. The improvement of flood forecast ability of models is a key issue in hydrology, particularly in Mediterranean catchments that are subjected to strong convective events. This contribution compared models of different complexities, lumped GR4H, continuous SMASH and process-oriented MARINE. The objective was to understand how they simulate catchment's hydrological behavior, the differences in terms of their simulated discharge, the soil moisture, and how these can help to improve the relevance of the models. The study was applied on two Mediterranean catchments in the South of France. The methodology involved global sensitivity analysis, investigations of the response surface, calibration and validation, signature comparison at event scale, and comparison of soil moisture simulated with respect to the outputs of the surface model, SIM. The results revealed contrasted and catchment specific parameter sensitivity to the same efficiency measure and equifinality issues are highlighted via response surface plots. Higher sensitivity is found for all models to transfer parameters on the Gardon and for production parameters on the Ardeche. The exchange parameter controlling a non-conservative flow component of GR4H is found to be sensitive. All models had good calibration efficiencies, with MARINE having the highest, and GR4H being more robust in validation. At the event scale, indices of discharge showed that, the event-based MARINE was better in reproducing the peak and its timing. It is followed by SMASH, while GR4H was the least in this aspect. SMASH performed relatively better in the volume of water exported and is followed by GR4H. Regarding the soil moisture simulated by the three models and using the outputs of the operational surface model SIM as the benchmark, MARINE emerged as the most accurate in terms of both the dynamics and the amplitude. GR4H followed closely while SMASH was the least in comparison. This study paves the way for extended model hypothesis and calibration-regionalization methods testing and intercomparison in the light of multi-sourced signatures in order to assess/discriminate internal model behaviors. It highlights, in particular, the need for future investigations on combinations of vertical and lateral flow components, including groundwater exchanges, in distributed hydrological models along with new optimization methods for optimally exploiting, at the regional scale, multi-source datasets composed of both physiographic data and hydrological signatures.

Abubakar Haruna et al.

Status: open (until 04 Jan 2022)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Abubakar Haruna et al.

Abubakar Haruna et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
290 45 2 337 2 1
  • HTML: 290
  • PDF: 45
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 337
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 360 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 360 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Dec 2021
Download
Short summary
We compared three hydrological models in a flash flood modelling framework. We first identified the sensitive parameters of each model, then compared their performances in terms of outlet discharge and soil moisture simulation. We found out that resulting from the differences in their complexities/process representation, performance depends on the aspect/measure used. The study then highlights and proposed some future investigations/modifications to improve the models.