Journal cover Journal topic
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.153
IF 5-year value: 5.460
IF 5-year
CiteScore value: 7.8
SNIP value: 1.623
IPP value: 4.91
SJR value: 2.092
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 123
Scimago H
h5-index value: 65
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  19 Oct 2020

19 Oct 2020

Review status
This preprint is currently under review for the journal HESS.

Comparison of statistical downscaling methods for climate change impact analysis on drought

Hossein Tabari1, Daan Buekenhout1, and Patrick Willems1,2 Hossein Tabari et al.
  • 1KU Leuven, Department of Civil Engineering, Belgium
  • 2Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic Engineering, Belgium

Abstract. General circulation models (GCMs) are the primary tools to evaluate the possible impacts of climate change; however, their results are coarse in temporal and spatial dimensions. In addition, they often show systematic biases compared to observations. Downscaling and bias correction of climate model outputs is thus required for local applications. Besides the computationally intensive strategy of dynamical downscaling, statistical downscaling offers a relatively straightforward solution by establishing relationships between small and large scale variables. This study compares four statistical downscaling methods (SDMs) of bias correction (BC), change factor of mean (CFM), quantile perturbation (QP) and event based weather generator (EBWG) to assess climate change impact on drought by the end of the 21st century (2071–2100) relative to a baseline period of 1971–2000. A set of drought related aspects is analysed: dry day frequency, dry spell duration and total precipitation. The downscaling is applied to a 14-member ensemble of CMIP6 GCMs, each powered by four future scenarios of SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5. A 25-member ensemble of CanESM5 GCM is also used to assess the significance of the climate change signals in comparison to the internal variability of the climate. While all methods show a good agreement on downscaling total precipitation, the CFM method fails to downscale dry day frequency well. The QP method outperforms the others in downscaling dry spells. Using this method, dry day frequency is projected to increase significantly in the summer months, with relative changes of up to 20.4 % in the worst-case climate change scenario. At the same time, total precipitation is projected to decrease significantly by up to 41.9 % in these months. Lastly, extreme dry spells are projected to increase in length by up to 7.4 %.

Hossein Tabari et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: open (until 29 Dec 2020)
Status: open (until 29 Dec 2020)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Hossein Tabari et al.

Hossein Tabari et al.


Total article views: 349 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
266 78 5 349 12 4 4
  • HTML: 266
  • PDF: 78
  • XML: 5
  • Total: 349
  • Supplement: 12
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 231 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 231 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1



No saved metrics found.


No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 25 Nov 2020
Publications Copernicus