Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-57
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2018-57
13 Feb 2018
 | 13 Feb 2018
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Using StorAge Selection functions to quantify ecohydrological controls on the time-variant age of evapotranspiration, soil water, and recharge

Aaron A. Smith, Doerthe Tetzlaff, and Chris Soulsby

Abstract. Quantifying ecohydrological controls on soil water availability is essential to understand temporal variations in catchment storage. Soil water is subject to numerous time-variable fluxes (evaporation, root-uptake, and recharge), each with different water ages which in turn affect the age of water in storage. Here, we adapt StorAge Selection (SAS) function theory to investigate water flow in soils and identify soil evaporation and root-water uptake sources from depth. We use this to quantify the effects of soil-vegetation interactions on the inter-relationships between water fluxes, storage, and age. The novel modification of the SAS function framework is tested against empirical data from two contrasting soil-vegetation units in the Scottish Highlands; these are characterised by significant preferential flow, transporting younger water through the soil during high soil moisture conditions. Dominant young water fluxes, along with relatively low rainfall intensities, explain relatively stable soil water ages through time and with depth. Soil evaporation sources were more time-invariant with high preference for near-surface water, independent of soil moisture conditions, and resulting in soil evaporation water ages similar to near-surface soil waters (mean age: 50–65 days). Sources of root-water uptake were more variable: preferential near-surface water uptake occurred in wet conditions, with a deeper root-uptake source during dry soil conditions, which resulted in more variable water ages of transpiration (mean age: 56–79 days). The simple model structure provides a parsimonious means of constraining the water age of multiple fluxes from the upper part of the critical zone during time-varying conditions improving our understanding of vegetation influences on catchment scale water fluxes.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Aaron A. Smith, Doerthe Tetzlaff, and Chris Soulsby

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Aaron A. Smith, Doerthe Tetzlaff, and Chris Soulsby
Aaron A. Smith, Doerthe Tetzlaff, and Chris Soulsby

Viewed

Total article views: 3,352 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,709 574 69 3,352 188 91 95
  • HTML: 2,709
  • PDF: 574
  • XML: 69
  • Total: 3,352
  • Supplement: 188
  • BibTeX: 91
  • EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 13 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 13 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,796 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,757 with geography defined and 39 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.