Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-316
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-316
28 Jul 2016
 | 28 Jul 2016
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Seasonality of hydrological model spin-up time: a case study using the Xinanjiang model

Mohammad M. Rahman, Minjiao Lu, and Khin H. Kyi

Abstract. The internal adjustment process of a hydrological model followed by an unusual initial condition is known as the model spin-up. And the time required for a complete adjustment is termed as the model spin-up time. Model results for the duration of this spin-up progression are greatly impacted by the initial conditions, and often impractical or erroneous. The speed of this adjustment process is affected by the characteristics of the input data sets and their persistence. This study discusses the variability and seasonality of hydrological model spin-up time against the aridity of the river basin using multi-year climatologies for 18 river basins distributed relatively snow-free regions of the USA. The Xinanjiang model was run with each of all available year input data sets with two extreme initial conditions (saturated and unsaturated) and thereafter detected the model equilibrium state based on the Mahalanobis distance between the soil moisture states of two model runs. The seasonality of model spin-up was investigated by conducting multiple simulations that start from different time of a year. The basin average soil moisture memory (SMM) timescale (Rahman et al., 2015) and basin aridity index was estimated and thereafter investigated their relationship with the average model spin-up time.

Analysis suggests that the spin-up time highly varies with the simulation starting time and the dryness of the river basin. Overall, in all basins, model achieves the equilibrium state quickly while the simulation starts in late autumn (October–November). On the other hand, model equilibrates slowly while simulation starts in spring (March–May). Wet basin shows stronger variability of the model spin-up time (mean range 154 days) throughout the year as compared with that of dry basins (mean range 78 days). The mean spin-up time is shorter for wet basins (154 days) and longer for dry basins (233 days). The spin-up times are 3–7 times longer than the SMM timescale. The basin-wise mean spin-up time shows linear and exponential relationship with the SMM timescale and the basin aridity index respectively. The relationship offers predictability of model spin-up time from widely available potential evaporation and precipitation data sets.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Mohammad M. Rahman, Minjiao Lu, and Khin H. Kyi
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Mohammad M. Rahman, Minjiao Lu, and Khin H. Kyi
Mohammad M. Rahman, Minjiao Lu, and Khin H. Kyi

Viewed

Total article views: 1,515 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
971 482 62 1,515 88 113
  • HTML: 971
  • PDF: 482
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 1,515
  • BibTeX: 88
  • EndNote: 113
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jul 2016)

Cited

Discussed

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
This study showed that the model spin-up time is exponentially related with the dryness of the river basin. The study used multi-year forcing that allows to overcome the limitations in single year recursive simulation. Moreover, it detects the model equilibrium state based on Mahalanobis distance that is widely acceptable in the presence of co-linearity of datasets. Finally, it provides useful insights about the seasonality of model spin-up time that is missing in the available spin-up studies.