Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-303
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-303
26 Jul 2016
 | 26 Jul 2016
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Can controlled drainage control agricultural nutrient emissions? Evidence from a BACI experiment combined with a dual isotope approach

Mette V. Carstensen, Jane R. Poulsen, Niels B. Ovesen, Christen D. Børgesen, Søren K. Hvid, and Brian Kronvang

Abstract. Controlled drainage combined with winter crops was investigated for the first time as a mitigation measure for reducing nitrate loss through drainage systems during a three-year period (2012–15) on a loamy soil in Denmark. The impact of controlled drainage on groundwater levels, drain flow, total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonium, nitrous oxide, total phosphorous, and phosphate when applying regulation levels of 50 and 70 cm above drain pipes were determined by using a before-after control-impact (BACI) study design. The regulation level had to be 70 cm to significantly elevate groundwater levels and reduce drain outflow and nitrate loss, which were reduced by 38–52 % (97–127 mm) and 36–48 % (6–8 kg nitrate-N ha−1) relative to conventional drainage levels, respectively. Controlled drainage did not appear to influence harvest yield or cause pollution swapping as the loss of total phosphorous, phosphate, and nitrous oxide was reduced by 44–45 %, 44–54 %, and 36–38 %, respectively. Stable isotope analysis of δ15N and δ18O in nitrate from drain water supported by measurements of nitrate, sulphate, and ammonium concentrations in drain water revealed that denitrification was not enhanced markedly at the impacted plots, except during one event where a pronounced decline in nitrate concentrations and ceased drain flow was observed.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Mette V. Carstensen, Jane R. Poulsen, Niels B. Ovesen, Christen D. Børgesen, Søren K. Hvid, and Brian Kronvang
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Mette V. Carstensen, Jane R. Poulsen, Niels B. Ovesen, Christen D. Børgesen, Søren K. Hvid, and Brian Kronvang
Mette V. Carstensen, Jane R. Poulsen, Niels B. Ovesen, Christen D. Børgesen, Søren K. Hvid, and Brian Kronvang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,401 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
949 396 56 1,401 194 85 101
  • HTML: 949
  • PDF: 396
  • XML: 56
  • Total: 1,401
  • Supplement: 194
  • BibTeX: 85
  • EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jul 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jul 2016)

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
This study investigates whether the groundwater management technique called controlled drainage can be used as a mitigation measure to reduce the N loss from fields. Controlled drainage did lead to a significant reduction of the drain water flow (38–52 %) as well as nitrate-N losses (36–48 %) compared to traditional drainage systems without affecting crop growth. Enhanced denitrification was only documented for a shorter period, thus the reduction of N loss was primarily due to reduced drain flow.