Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-13891-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-13891-2014
23 Dec 2014
 | 23 Dec 2014
Status: this discussion paper is a preprint. It has been under review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS). The manuscript was not accepted for further review after discussion.

Reliability, sensitivity, and uncertainty of reservoir performance under climate variability in basins with different hydrogeologic settings

C. Mateus and D. Tullos

Abstract. This study investigated how reservoir performance varied across different hydrogeologic settings and under plausible future climate scenarios. The study was conducted in the Santiam River basin, OR, USA, comparing the North Santiam basin (NSB), with high permeability and extensive groundwater storage, and the South Santiam basin (SSB), with low permeability, little groundwater storage, and rapid runoff response. We applied projections of future temperature and precipitation from global climate models to a rainfall-runoff model, coupled with a formal Bayesian uncertainty analysis, to project future inflow hydrographs as inputs to a reservoir operations model. The performance of reservoir operations was evaluated as the reliability in meeting flood management, spring and summer environmental flows, and hydropower generation objectives. Despite projected increases in winter flows and decreases in summer flows, results suggested little evidence of a response in reservoir operation performance to a warming climate, with the exception of summer flow targets in the SSB. Independent of climate impacts, historical prioritization of reservoir operations appeared to impact reliability, suggesting areas where operation performance may be improved. Results also highlighted how hydrologic uncertainty is likely to complicate planning for climate change in basins with substantial groundwater interactions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
C. Mateus and D. Tullos
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
C. Mateus and D. Tullos
C. Mateus and D. Tullos

Viewed

Total article views: 1,545 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
879 599 67 1,545 115 119
  • HTML: 879
  • PDF: 599
  • XML: 67
  • Total: 1,545
  • BibTeX: 115
  • EndNote: 119
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Dec 2014)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024