Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.
Statistical downscaling of climate data to estimate streamflow in a semi-arid catchment
S. Samadi,G. J. Carbone,M. Mahdavi,F. Sharifi,and M. R. Bihamta
Abstract. Linear and non-linear statistical 'downscaling' study is done to relate large-scale climate information from a general circulation model (GCM) to local-scale river flows in west Iran. This study aims to investigate and evaluate the more promising downscaling techniques, and provides a through inter comparison study using the Karkheh catchment as an experimental site in a semi arid region for the years of 2040 to 2069. A hybrid conceptual hydrological model was used in conjunction with modeled outcomes from a General Circulation Model (GCM), HadCM3, along with two downscaling techniques, Statistical Downscaling Model (SDSM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), to determine how future streamflow may change in a semi arid catchment. The results show that the choice of a downscaling algorithm having a significant impact on the streamflow estimations for a semi-arid catchment, which are mainly, influenced, respectively, by atmospheric precipitation and temperature projections. According to the SDSM and ANN projections, daily temperature will increase up to +0.58° (+3.90%) and +0.48° (+3.48%) and daily precipitation will decrease up to −0.1mm (−2.56%) and −0.4 mm (−2.82%) respectively. Moreover streamflow changes corresponding to downscaled future projections presented a reduction in mean annual flow of −3.7 m3 s−1 and −9.47 m3 s−1 using SDSM and ANN outputs respectively. The results suggest a significant decrease of streamflow in both downscaling projections, particularly in winter. The discussion considers the performance of each statistical method for downscaling future flow at catchment scale as well as the relationship between atmospheric processes and flow variability and changes.
Received: 01 Mar 2012 – Discussion started: 17 Apr 2012
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
S. Samadi,G. J. Carbone,M. Mahdavi,F. Sharifi,and M. R. Bihamta
S. Samadi,G. J. Carbone,M. Mahdavi,F. Sharifi,and M. R. Bihamta
Viewed
Total article views: 3,086 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,907
1,074
105
3,086
125
125
HTML: 1,907
PDF: 1,074
XML: 105
Total: 3,086
BibTeX: 125
EndNote: 125
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Latest update: 16 Nov 2025
S. Samadi
Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA
G. J. Carbone
Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA
M. Mahdavi
Hydrology and Water Resource Division, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resource Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
F. Sharifi
Watershed Management and Soil Conservation Institute, Tehran, Iran
M. R. Bihamta
Faculty of Agricultural Science and Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran