Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-6-1089-2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-6-1089-2009
24 Feb 2009
 | 24 Feb 2009
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal HESS but the revision was not accepted.

Influence of wave phase difference between surface soil heat flux and soil surface temperature on land surface energy balance closure

Z. Gao, R. Horton, H. P. Liu, J. Wen, and L. Wang

Abstract. The sensitivity of climate simulations to the diurnal variation in surface energy budget encourages enhanced inspection into the energy balance closure failure encountered in micrometeorological experiments. The diurnal wave phases of soil surface heat flux and temperature are theoretically characterized and compared for both moist soil and absolute dry soil surfaces, indicating that the diurnal wave phase difference between soil surface heat flux and temperature ranges from 0 to π/4 for natural soils. Assuming net radiation and turbulent heat fluxes have identical phase with soil surface temperature, we evaluate potential contributions of the wave phase difference on the surface energy balance closure. Results show that the sum of sensible heat flux (H) and latent heat flux (LE) is always less than surface available energy (Rn-G0) even if all energy components are accurately measured, their footprints are strictly matched, and all corrections are made. The energy balance closure ratio (ε) is extremely sensitive to the ratio of soil surface heat flux amplitude (A4) to net radiation flux amplitude (A1), and large value of A4/A1 causes a significant failure in surface energy balance closure. An experimental case study confirms the theoretical analysis.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Z. Gao, R. Horton, H. P. Liu, J. Wen, and L. Wang
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Z. Gao, R. Horton, H. P. Liu, J. Wen, and L. Wang
Z. Gao, R. Horton, H. P. Liu, J. Wen, and L. Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,563 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
941 534 88 1,563 111 112
  • HTML: 941
  • PDF: 534
  • XML: 88
  • Total: 1,563
  • BibTeX: 111
  • EndNote: 112
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 17 Sep 2024