87 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Propagation of hydro-meteorological uncertainty in a model cascade framework to inundation prediction J. Rodríguez-Rincón et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2981-2015
2. Enhancing the SWAT model for simulating denitrification in riparian zones at the river basin scale L. Hoang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.017
3. Integrating remote sensing data with flood inundation models: how far have we got? P. Bates https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9374
4. Evaluating flood extent mapping of two hydraulic models, 1D HEC‐RAS and 2D LISFLOOD‐FP in comparison with aerial imagery observations in Gorgan flood plain, Iran O. Rahimzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12214
5. Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions F. Pappenberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.11.012
6. Remote Sensing-Derived Water Extent and Level to Constrain Hydraulic Flood Forecasting Models: Opportunities and Challenges S. Grimaldi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-016-9378-y
7. Unraveling the 2021 Central Tennessee flood event using a hierarchical multi-model inundation modeling framework S. Gangrade et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130157
8. A novel approach to model dynamic flow interactions between storm sewer system and overland surface for different land covers in urban areas T. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.014
9. Disaster risk management of debris flow based on time-series contribution mechanism (CRMCD): Nonnegligible ecological vulnerable multi-ethnic communities S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111266
10. Visualisation of spatial uncertainty in hydrological modelling K. Benke et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2011.567412
11. An urban storm-inundation simulation method based on GIS S. Zhang & B. Pan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.044
12. ROC‐based calibration of flood inundation models G. Schumann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10019
13. Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review N. Hunter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021
14. Are Feature Agreement Statistics Alone Sufficient to Validate Modelled Flood Extent Quality? A Study on Three Swedish Rivers Using Different Digital Elevation Model Resolutions N. Lim et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9816098
15. Towards an automated SAR-based flood monitoring system: Lessons learned from two case studies P. Matgen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.009
16. Sensitivity of Subjective Decisions in the GLUE Methodology for Quantifying the Uncertainty in the Flood Inundation Map for Seymour Reach in Indiana, USA Y. Jung et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6072104
17. An efficient physics-based modeling strategy for pluvial floods in urban areas with a subgrid scheme for the stormwater drainage network T. Lazzarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133617
18. An adaptive time step solution for raster-based storage cell modelling of floodplain inundation N. Hunter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.03.007
19. Systematic analysis of uncertainty in 2D flood inundation models T. Willis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104520
20. Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the river Elbe, Germany S. Vorogushyn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.006
21. Multi-objective automatic calibration of hydrodynamic models utilizing inundation maps and gauge data N. Dung et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1339-2011
22. Assessing the impact of different sources of topographic data on 1-D hydraulic modelling of floods A. Md Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-631-2015
23. An interactive Web-GIS fluvial flood forecast and alert system in operation in Portugal S. Mourato et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102201
24. Towards robust validation strategies for EO flood maps T. Landwehr et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114439
25. The influence of lateral snow redistribution processes on snow melt and sublimation in alpine regions M. Bernhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.001
26. Towards automatic calibration of 2-D flood propagation models P. Fabio et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-911-2010
27. Reducing Inconsistencies in Point Observations of Maximum Flood Inundation Level B. Parkes et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2012EI000475.1
28. Flood inundation model updating using an ensemble Kalman filter and spatially distributed measurements J. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.01.012
29. An Approach Using a 1D Hydraulic Model, Landsat Imaging and Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation for an Approximation of Flood Discharge Y. Jung et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w5041598
30. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles in flood hazard assessment E. Karamuz et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12622
31. Two-Dimensional Flood Inundation Modeling in the Godavari River Basin, India—Insights on Model Output Uncertainty V. Sharma & S. Regonda https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020191
32. Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models F. Pappenberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.04.009
33. Assimilation of spatially distributed water levels into a shallow-water flood model. Part I: Mathematical method and test case X. Lai & J. Monnier https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.058
34. Flood modelling: parameterisation and inflow uncertainty M. Mukolwe et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.12.00087
35. Constraining coupled hydrological-hydraulic flood model by past storm events and post-event measurements in data-sparse regions R. Hdeib et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.008
36. Robust Parameter Set Selection for a Hydrodynamic Model Based on Multi-Site Calibration Using Multi-Objective Optimization and Minimax Regret Approach L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2031-4
37. Evaluating uncertain flood inundation predictions with uncertain remotely sensed water stages G. Schumann et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635347
38. Towards Digital Twin in Flood Forecasting with Data Assimilation Satellite Earth Observations—A Proof-of-Concept T. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18050685
39. A Brief review of flood forecasting techniques and their applications S. Jain et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1411920
40. Improving the Computational Performance of an Operational Two-Dimensional Real-Time Flooding Forecasting System by Active-Cell and Multi-Grid Methods in Taichung City, Taiwan C. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10030319
41. Assessment of flood forecasting lead time based on generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation approach A. Heidari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0032-y
42. Real-time probabilistic forecasting of flood stages S. Chen & P. Yu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.04.008
43. Progress in integration of remote sensing–derived flood extent and stage data and hydraulic models G. Schumann et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000274
44. A multimodel data assimilation framework via the ensemble Kalman filter L. Xue & D. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014525
45. Efficient Hazard Assessment for Pluvial Floods in Urban Environments: A Benchmarking Case Study for the City of Berlin, Germany O. Seleem et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13182476
46. Detailed data is welcome, but with a pinch of salt: Accuracy, precision, and uncertainty in flood inundation modeling F. Dottori et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20406
47. Distributed whole city water level measurements from the Carlisle 2005 urban flood event and comparison with hydraulic model simulations J. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.01.026
48. Identifying robust large-scale flood risk mitigation strategies: A quasi-2D hydraulic model as a tool for the Po river A. Castellarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.02.008
49. Development of Upstream Data-Input Models to Estimate Downstream Peak Flow in Two Mediterranean River Basins of Chile R. Pizarro-Tapia et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2014.44013
50. A review of low‐cost space‐borne data for flood modelling: topography, flood extent and water level K. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10449
51. Two-Dimetional Hydraulic Simulation of Floods using the LISFLOOD-FP Raster Model (A Case Study: The Shemshak Watershed, Tehran Province) k. sadeghian et al. https://doi.org/10.52547/jwmr.11.22.165
52. Reconstructing historic Glacial Lake Outburst Floods through numerical modelling and geomorphological assessment: Extreme events in the Himalaya M. Westoby et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3617
53. Current awareness https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6195
54. Hydrodynamic modelling of a large flood‐prone river system in India with limited data S. Patro et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7375
55. Incorporating multiple observations for distributed hydrologic model calibration: An approach using a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and clustering S. Khu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.07.011
56. Improved simulation of flood flows using storage cell models N. Hunter et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2006.159.1.9
57. Floods, landscape modifications and population dynamics in anthropogenic coastal lowlands: The Polesine (northern Italy) case study D. Viero et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.121
58. Validation of Urban Flood Inundation Models Applied Using Nationally Available Data Sets: Novel Analyses of Observed High Water Information M. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002129
59. Hydraulic routing of extreme floods in a large ungauged river and the estimation of associated uncertainties: a case study of the Damodar River, India J. Sanyal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0540-7
60. Potential of remote sensing and open street data for flood mapping in poorly gauged areas: a case study in Gonaives, Haiti A. Bozza et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-016-0171-x
61. Fuzzy set approach to calibrating distributed flood inundation models using remote sensing observations F. Pappenberger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-739-2007
62. Experimental and numerical study of flood dynamics in a river-network-floodplain set-up V. Mali et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.160
63. A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas J. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514
64. Real-Time Probabilistic Flood Forecasting Using Multiple Machine Learning Methods D. Nguyen & S. Chen https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030787
65. Understanding Uncertainty in Probabilistic Floodplain Mapping in the Time of Climate Change Z. Zahmatkesh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091248
66. Testing a simple 2D hydraulic model in an urban flood experiment F. Dottori & E. Todini https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9370
67. The use of crowdsourced social media data to improve flood forecasting C. Songchon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129703
68. Impact of the timing of a SAR image acquisition on the calibration of a flood inundation model S. Gobeyn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.12.005
69. Assessment of an ASTER-generated DEM for 2D hydrodynamic flood modeling T. Tarekegn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2010.05.007
70. Low-cost inundation modelling at the reach scale with sparse data in the Lower Damodar River basin, India J. Sanyal et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.884718
71. Bayesian calibration of a flood simulator using binary flood extent observations M. Balbi & D. Lallemant https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1089-2023
72. Uncertainty assessment of a stochastic groundwater flow model using GLUE analysis A. Hassan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.08.017
73. Communicating uncertainty in flood inundation mapping: a case study K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2014.917318
74. Selecting the appropriate hydraulic model structure using low-resolution satellite imagery P. Prestininzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.09.016
75. Sensitivity and uncertainty in flood inundation modelling – concept of an analysis framework T. Weichel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-11-31-2007
76. A review on analysis of flood modelling using different numerical models K. Jodhani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.405
77. A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches S. Vorogushyn et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008475
78. Reducing the ambiguity of karst aquifer models by pattern matching of flow and transport on catchment scale S. Oehlmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-893-2015
79. Comparison of dynamic flow interaction methods between pipe system and overland in urban flood analysis X. Hao et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88246-z
80. Flood map boundary sensitivity due to combined effects of DEM resolution and roughness in relation to model performance N. Lim & S. Brandt https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2019.1604573
81. A methodology for flood susceptibility and vulnerability analysis in complex flood scenarios F. Dottori et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12234
82. Developing an effective 2-D urban flood inundation model for city emergency management based on cellular automata L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-381-2015
83. Impact of climate change on floodplain inundation and hydrological connectivity between wetlands and rivers in a tropical river catchment F. Karim et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10714
84. On the use of the diffusive wave for modelling extreme flood events with overbank flow in the floodplain R. Moussa & C. Bocquillon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.006
85. Flood inference simulation using surrogate modelling for the Yellow River multiple reservoir system M. Castro-Gama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.02.002
86. A review of the current status of flood modelling for urban flood risk management in the developing countries U. Nkwunonwo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2020.e00269
87. A GIS-Based Hydrological Modeling Approach for Rapid Urban Flood Hazard Assessment Q. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13111483