437 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. From at-site to regional assessment of environmental flows and environmental flows variability in a Mediterranean environment A. Longobardi & P. Villani https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100764
2. Linking bait and feeding opportunities to fish foraging habitat for the assessment of environmental flows and river restoration P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144580
3. Simulating ecologically relevant hydrological indicators in a temporary river system A. De Girolamo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.034
4. Developing environmental flow recommendations for freshwater mussels using the biological traits of species guilds K. Gates et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12528
5. The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards N. POFF et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02204.x
6. Environmental Systems Simulations for Carbon, Energy, Nitrogen, Water, and Watersheds: Design Principles and Pilot Testing C. Lant et al. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-004.1
7. Incorporation of environmental flows in water allocation in Texas R. Wurbs https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1249246
8. Strategy for Adapting Environmental Flow Proposals to Situations with High Agricultural Demands D. Baeza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152106
9. Spatio-temporal effects of river regulation on habitat quality for Atlantic salmon fry W. Buddendorf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.006
10. Knowledge-based versus data-driven fuzzy habitat suitability models for river management A. Mouton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.02.005
11. Combining hydroacoustics and large-scale particle image velocimetry: Flow dynamics at Hiitolanjoki River restoration site in Southeast Finland K. Schlobies et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102291
12. Causes and consequences of the Macta basin closure, Algeria N. Kherbache & F. Molle https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2022.2089100
13. Potential causes of habitat degradation and spawning time delay of the Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis) Y. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.11.002
14. The Impact of Climate Change on Hydroecological Response in Chalk Streams A. Visser et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030596
15. Towards i5 Ecohydraulics: Field Determination of Manning’s Roughness Coefficient, Drag Force, and Macroinvertebrate Habitat Suitability for Various Stream Vegetation Types C. Theodoropoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223727
16. Application of Probabilistic Neural Networks to microhabitat suitability modelling for adult brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in Iberian rivers R. Muñoz-Mas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.05.003
17. Development of flow-duration-frequency curves for episodic low streamflow W. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104021
18. Application of the physical habitat simulation for fish species to assess environmental flows in an Atlantic Forest Stream in South-eastern Brazil M. Costa et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20140170
19. The Future of the Murray River: Amenity Re‐Considered? J. HOWARD https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2008.00524.x
20. Assessment for the Impact of International Trade on the Global Water Supply-Demand Balance Focusing on Food Consumption Y. YAMAGUCHI et al. https://doi.org/10.3370/lca.14.21
21. Towards a systems approach for river basin management—Lessons fromAustralia's largest river R. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3242
22. Integrating hydrology, hydraulics and ecological response into a flexible approach to the determination of environmental water requirements for rivers D. Hughes & D. Louw https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.004
23. Eco-hydrology of the Pangani River downstream of Nyumba ya Mungu reservoir, Tanzania T. Mwamila et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2008.06.054
24. Transferability of Monitoring Data from Neighboring Streams in a Physical Habitat Simulation B. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7084537
25. Optimizing the operation of a hydraulic dam for ecological flow requirements of the You-shui River due to a hydropower station construction W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2015.1101182
26. Comparative Assessment of Environmental Flow Estimation Methods in a Mediterranean Mountain River C. Papadaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0878-4
27. Demonstration of a methodology for setting ecological flow and water level targets A. Beaton & A. Bradford https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2013.830371
28. Development and application of a priority rated optimization model (PROM) for multi-sector water resource management systems S. Dessu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.11.014
29. Environmental Flows Assessment in Nepal: The Case of Kaligandaki River N. Suwal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218766
30. The ‘wet-dry’ in the wet-dry tropics drives river ecosystem structure and processes in northern Australia D. WARFE et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02660.x
31. Challenges to Implementing an Environmental Flow Regime in the Luvuvhu River Catchment, South Africa P. Ramulifho et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193694
32. Using flow guilds of freshwater fish in an adaptive management framework to simplify environmental flow delivery for semi‐arid riverine systems L. Baumgartner et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12023
33. Change in fish community composition following weir removal, field observations, and physical habitat simulations D. Im et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3480
34. Modelling of hydrological and environmental flow dynamics over a central Himalayan river basin through satellite altimetry and recent climate projections N. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7734
35. An indicator-based framework for monitoring and assessing ecological flows downstream of dams S. Kim https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15290-5
36. Responses of epibenthic algal assemblages to water abstraction in Hong Kong streams T. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1362-z
37. Power system impacts of potential environmental constraints for hydropower in Norway A. Arvesen et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ade4e1
38. Extractable Water Index (EWI): Towards a Universal Metric for Sustainable River Extraction A. Iresh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18060707
39. A simulation framework for water allocation to meet the environmental requirements of urban rivers: model development and a case study for the Liming River in Daqing City, China W. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-008-9093-4
40. Dissolved organic carbon mobilisation in relation to variable discharges and environmental flows in a highly regulated lowland river D. Westhorpe & S. Mitrovic https://doi.org/10.1071/MF12122
41. Impacts of climate change on environmental flows in West Africa's Upper Niger Basin and the Inner Niger Delta J. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.041
42. Assessment of fluvial stressor dynamics and riverine habitat resilience to environmental flow in the middle Ganga River S. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07067-1
43. Evaluation of a typical hydrological model in relation to environmental flows M. Olsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.022
44. Hydro-Energy Potential Assessment in the Context of E-Flows for Himalayan Upland Rivers A. Modi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05788-2
45. Compensation for Agricultural Economic Losses Caused by Restoration of Healthy Eco-Hydrological Sequences of Rivers B. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061155
46. R2Cross: A Web‐Based Decision Support Tool for Instream Flows P. Oikonomou et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12939
47. Establishing hydroecological relationships to manage the impacts of groundwater abstraction D. Bradley et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12018
48. Impact of channel bar form and grain size variability on estimated stranding risk of juvenile brown trout during hydropeaking C. Hauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3552
49. Implementing environmental flows in integrated water resources management and the ecosystem approach I. Overton et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.897408
50. Incentives for ecosystem service supply in Australia's Murray–Darling Basin O. Banerjee & R. Bark https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2013.769489
51. A Framework for Analyzing Longitudinal and Temporal Variation in River Flow and Developing Flow‐Ecology Relationships1 S. Larned et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00433.x
52. The paradox of expert judgment in rivers ecological monitoring M. Feio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.004
53. Southern Quebec environmental flow assessments: spatial and temporal scales sensitivity L. Berthot et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2020.1834881
54. Ecological flows for Ecuadorian basins determined by the slope method of the mass-curve E. Arce et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/191/1/012118
55. A preliminary assessment of environmental flow in the three rivers' source region, Qinghai Tibetan Plateau, China and suggestions R. Mahmood et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105709
56. Research progress on the impact of flood discharge atomization on the ecological environment L. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04774-x
57. Spatial Distribution of Ciliate Assemblages in a Shallow Floodplain Lake with an Anaerobic Zone R. Babko et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060898
58. Unlocking flow–habitat relationships in mountain rivers of Epirus, Greece using object detection and hydrodynamic simulation C. Papadaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180703
59. Streamflow naturalization methods: a review M. Terrier et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1839080
60. Can There be Water Scarcity with Abundance of Water? Analyzing Water Stress during a Severe Drought in Finland L. Ahopelto et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061548
61. The changing role of ecohydrological science in guiding environmental flows M. Acreman et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.886019
62. Experimental floods: A new era for Spanish and Mediterranean rivers? F. Magdaleno https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.011
63. Introducing reservoir sustainability indexing to investigate reservoir operations and piloting it at the basin of Lake Urmia with sparse data S. Sadeghfam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100577
64. Early warning forecasting of river ecological flow in a typical Karst basin, southwest China: Leveraging baseflow segmentation and interpretable machine learning C. Mo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102433
65. Further down the road to sustainable environmental flows: funding, management activities and governance for six western US states E. Loehman & S. Charney https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2011.628803
66. Assessment of environmental flows under limited data availability: case study of the Acheloos River, Greece A. Efstratiadis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.804625
67. Water Security Assessment in the Typical Ecosystems of the Ghataprabha River Basin S. Jain & M. Jain https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6685
68. The measurement of water scarcity: Defining a meaningful indicator S. Damkjaer & R. Taylor https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0912-z
69. Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows A. King et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6
70. Fish assemblages in subtropical rivers: low-flow hydrology dominates hydro-ecological relationships A. Arthington et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.844345
71. Technical Solutions to Mitigate Shifting Fish Fauna Zones Impacted by Long Term Habitat Degradation in the Bistra Mărui River – Study Case D. Bănăduc et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/trser-2018-0021
72. Use of hydrological methods for assessment of environmental flow in a river reach S. Shaeri Karimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0062-6
73. Optimizing environmental flow operations based on explicit quantification of IHA parameters D. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.031
74. Development of a comprehensive framework for quantifying the impacts of climate change and human activities on river hydrological health variation S. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126566
75. How do the variations of water and sediment fluxes into the estuary influence the ecosystem? Y. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126523
76. Evaluation of three environmental flow techniques in Shoor wetland of Golpayegan, Iran J. Aazami et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-03998-z
77. Flow and water temperature simulation for habitat restoration in the Shasta River, California S. Null et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1288
78. Environmental Flow Assessment of Gorai River in Bangladesh: A comparative analysis of different hydrological methods M. Ali & M. Hasan https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09857
79. Proposed Solutions to Mitigate Flow Regulation in the Central Part of the Tagus River (Spain) D. Baeza et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17132001
80. The Land–Water–Energy Nexus of Ruzizi River Dams (Lake Kivu Outflow, African Great Lakes Region): Status, Challenges, and Perspectives F. Muvundja et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.892591
81. Impacts of Small Scale Flow Regulation on Sediment Dynamics in an Ecologically Important Upland River E. Quinlan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0423-7
82. Estimation of Hydrologic Alteration in Kaligandaki River Using Representative Hydrologic Indices G. Yuqin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040688
83. Determination of ecological flow based on probability distributions of annual and monthly flows B. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.315
84. Estimation of Low Flow Statistics for Sustainable Water Resources Management in South Australia N. Semananda & G. Hewa https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9090152
85. Native Fish Need A Natural Flow Regime C. Pennock et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10703
86. Minimizing disruptions caused by damming and ensuring the health of downstream ecosystems H. Mata‐Lima et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21516
87. Using hydrologic and hydraulically derived geometric parameters of perennial rivers to determine minimum water requirements of ecological habitats (case study: Mazandaran Sea Basin-Iran) A. Shokoohi & Y. Hong https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8076
88. Linking Water Quality and Quantity in Environmental Flow Assessment in Deteriorated Ecosystems: A Food Web View H. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070537
89. Generalized models of riverine fish hydraulic habitat D. Booker https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2016.1229141
90. Developing a software package for global desktop assessment of environmental flows V. Smakhtin & N. Eriyagama https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.04.002
91. Urban, agricultural, and environmental protection practices for sustainable water quality K. Alfredo & T. Russo https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1229
92. Functional assessment of interconnected aquatic ecosystems in the Baiyangdian Basin—An ecological-network-analysis based approach X. Mao & Z. Yang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.10.002
93. A study on operation problems of hydropower plants integrated with irrigation schemes operated in Turkey C. Koç https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2018.1427591
94. Sustainable Water Management in Urban, Agricultural, and Natural Systems T. Russo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6123934
95. Impacts of ecological water supplement projects on fish habitat suitability in a high-leakage river in China X. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130286
96. ASSESSING THE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF HYDROPOWER REGULATION ON THE FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF A LARGE ATLANTIC SALMON RIVER SYSTEM C. Birkel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2656
97. Effect of dam construction on changes in river's environmental flow (case study: Gorganrood river in the south of the Caspian Sea) A. Zargari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-023-02011-3
98. Flow controls on lowland river macrophytes: A review P. Franklin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.018
99. Wetland system network analysis for environmental flow allocations in the Baiyangdian Basin, China Z. Yang & X. Mao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.013
100. Discharge Alterations of the Mures River, Romania under Ensembles of Future Climate Projections and Sequential Threats to Aquatic Ecosystem by the End of the Century A. Lobanova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7062753
101. Hydro-power production and fish habitat suitability: Assessing impact and effectiveness of ecological flows at regional scale S. Ceola et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.04.002
102. Including cultural water requirements in environmental flow assessment: an example from the upper Ganga River, India C. Lokgariwar et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2013.863684
103. Multi-Objective Optimization for Analysis of Changing Trade-Offs in the Nepalese Water–Energy–Food Nexus with Hydropower Development S. Dhaubanjar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9030162
104. Regulated discharge produces substantial demographic changes on four typical fish species of a small salmonid stream M. Ovidio et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9399-8
105. Implementation of the Natural Flow Paradigm to Protect Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) in the Upper Delaware River P. Parasiewicz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3112
106. SanAntonioApp R. Navas et al. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.26.979
107. Concept and application of the usable volume for modelling the physical habitat of riverine organisms A. Mouton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.998
108. A step toward global-scale applicability and transferability of flow duration curve studies: A flow duration curve review (2000–2020) C. Leong & Y. Yokoo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126984
109. On the role of hydrological processes on the water balance of Lake Bolsena, Italy S. Di Francesco et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/lre.12120
110. Integrating ecosystem benefits for sustainable water allocation in hydroeconomic modeling D. Crespo et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267439
111. The Mexican Environmental Flow Standard: Scope, Application and Implementation M. Gómez-Balandra et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2014.51010
112. Distinctive hydrodynamic properties and ecological responses of multi-thread rivers under different degrees of multiplicity in the Upper Yellow River Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173874
113. The influence of conceptual model uncertainty on management decisions for a groundwater-dependent ecosystem in karst B. Gondwe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.023
114. Habitat response of adult fish species under the influence of ecological flow and hydrodynamic regime in perennial river system A. Baruah et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2481
115. Environmental Flows Assessment for Macroinvertebrates at the River Reach Scale in Different Degrees of Hydromorphological Alteration E. Szałkiewicz et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866526
116. Bayesian networks for environmental flow decision-making and an application in the Yellow River estuary, China A. Pang & T. Sun https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1641-2014
117. An ecological economic assessment of flow regimes in a hydropower dominated river basin: The case of the lower Zambezi River, Mozambique S. Fanaian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.033
118. Relative influence of local and landscape‐scale features on the density and habitat preferences of longfin and shortfin eels D. Booker & E. Graynoth https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2012.714389
119. Cold-regions Hydrological Indicators of Change (CHIC) for ecological flow needs assessment D. Peters et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.835489
120. Assessing the transferability of hydraulic habitat models for juvenile Atlantic salmon K. Millidine et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.012
121. Balancing services from built and natural assets via river basin trade-off analysis A. Hurford et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101144
122. Hydraulic‐habitat modelling for setting environmental river flow needs for salmonids M. DUNBAR et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00825.x
123. Environmental flows—basics for novices M. Acreman https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1160
124. Ecosystem level assessment of environmentally based flow restrictions for maintaining ecosystem integrity: a comparison of a modified peaking versus unaltered river K. Smokorowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.167
125. Optimizing flow regime for the Four Major Chinese Carps by integrating habitat suitability within reservoir operation Z. Lv et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130226
126. Closure to “Water Quality–Based Environmental Flow under Plausible Temperature and Pollution Scenarios” by Shushobhit Chaudhary, C. T. Dhanya, Arun Kumar, and Rehana Shaik S. Chaudhary et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001914
127. Urban Water Scarcity Assessment Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool Model and the Water Footprint Concept J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2025.25.6.473
128. Environmental water requirements and climate sensitivity of Australia's upland swamps J. Cairns et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178792
129. Exploring the hydromorphological response to human pressure in Tagus River (1946–2014) by complementary diagnosis K. Fazelpoor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2020.105052
130. A service and value based approach to estimating environmental flows L. Korsgaard et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2008.9635353
131. Distributive rainfall–runoff modelling to understand runoff-to-baseflow proportioning and its impact on the determination of reserve requirements of the Verlorenvlei estuarine lake, west coast, South Africa A. Watson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-2679-2019
132. Introducing environmental thresholds into water withdrawal management of mountain streams in the Kura River basin, Azerbaijan R. ABBASOV & V. SMAKHTIN https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.54.6.1068
133. PREMHYCE: An operational tool for low-flow forecasting P. Nicolle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-383-381-2020
134. Environmental flows for natural, hybrid, and novel riverine ecosystems in a changing world M. Acreman et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/130134
135. Linking environmental flows to sediment dynamics D. de Jalón et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2016.106
136. Developing environmental flows and metrics to quantify river ecosystem needs for regional water planning in Georgia, USA L. Rack et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000445
137. Vulnerability of stream biota to climate change in mediterranean climate regions: a synthesis of ecological responses and conservation challenges A. Filipe et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1244-4
138. Diatoms as indicators of the effects of river impoundment at multiple spatial scales H. Krajenbrink et al. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8092
139. An Assessment of Ice Effects on Indices for Hydrological Alteration in Flow Regimes K. Alfredsen https://doi.org/10.3390/w9120914
140. In bad waters: Water year classification in nonstationary climates S. Null & J. Viers https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20097
141. Understanding the influence of check dam and season on habitat use to develop habitat suitability criteria for overwintering tadpoles of Nanorana spp. V. Jithin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4033
142. Environmental flows from dams: the water framework directive M. Acreman et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.2009.162.1.13
143. Disaggregated monthly SWAT+ model versus daily SWAT+ model for estimating environmental flows in Peninsular Spain G. Castellanos-Osorio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129837
144. Predicting the natural flow regime: models for assessing hydrological alteration in streams D. Carlisle et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1247
145. Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management E. Anderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1381
146. Ecological Flow to Protect Aquatic Resources on the Cebadas River, Chambo River Basin M. Ilbay-Yupa et al. https://doi.org/10.18502/espoch.v1i1.9550
147. Quantitative estimation of the impacts of climate change and anthropogenic activities on inflow variations in the Poyang Lake Basin during the last 55 years R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/191/1/012080
148. A hydroecological model to assess the relative effects of groundwater abstraction and fine sediment pressures on riverine macro‐invertebrates D. Bradley et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3191
149. Accounting for flow intermittency in environmental flows design V. Acuña et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13590
150. Environmental flows stimulate estuarine plankton communities by altered salinity structure and enhanced nutrient recycling C. McNaughton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2022.108157
151. Evaluating Flow Metric‐Based Stream Classification Systems to Support the Determination of Ecological Flows in North Carolina M. Eddy et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12498
152. A new comprehensive ecological risk index for risk assessment on Luanhe River, China K. Bao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-017-9978-6
153. The Challenge of Setting “Climate Ready” Ecological Targets for Environmental Flow Planning M. Judd et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.714877
154. Environmental Flow Estimation of Brunei River Based on Climate Change S. Shams et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253211047201
155. Assessing downstream aquatic habitat availability relative to headwater reservoir management in the Henrys Fork Snake River C. Morrisett et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4175
156. Modelling basin-scale distribution of fish occurrence probability for assessment of flow and habitat conditions in rivers P. Sui et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.827791
157. An interactive multi-scale integrated assessment of future regional water availability for agricultural irrigation in East Anglia and North West England C. Henriques et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9459-0
158. The role of science in setting water resource use limits: case studies from New Zealand T. Snelder et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.793799
159. Responses of riparian trees and shrubs to flow regulation along a boreal stream in northern Sweden M. DOLORES BEJARANO et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02531.x
160. Environmental flows in two highly regulated rivers: the Hawkesbury Nepean in Australia and the Durance in France R. Warner https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12045
161. Integration of deep learning and improved multi-objective algorithm to optimize reservoir operation for balancing human and downstream ecological needs R. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121314
162. Hydro-ecology of groundwater-dependent ecosystems: applying basic science to groundwater management A. Aldous & L. Bach https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.889296
163. Responses of spawning thermal suitability to climate change and hydropower operation for typical fishes below the Three Gorges Dam P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107186
164. A Bayesian Belief Network Decision Support Tool for Watering Wetlands to Maximise Native Fish Outcomes B. Gawne et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-011-0255-7
165. Coştei Hydrographic Diversion Node, a Historical Environment Quality and Biological Resources Accessibility Game Changer; Anthropogenic Induced Problems and Sustainable Solutions ‒ An Ichthyologic Perspective D. Bănăduc et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/trser-2021-0021
166. How can virtual water trade reshape water stress pattern? A global evaluation based on the metacoupling perspective Y. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109712
167. Climate Change and Water Exploitation as Co-Impact Sources on River Benthic Macroinvertebrates F. Salmaso et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192778
168. Assessing hydrological changes in the Ganga River with the range of variability approach M. Mohanty & V. Tare https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2024.2409178
169. Dam-Induced Alteration in Seasonal Fluvial Discharge Time Series in Kali Gandaki Hydropower Dam, Syangja, Nepal: An Application of Wavelet Analysis M. Baniya et al. https://doi.org/10.2965/jwet.20-133
170. Improved assessment of water-saving effects by global virtual water flow in agri-food trade network with an integrated approach Y. Long et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133554
171. Ecological Flow Deficit in a Context of Institutional Rigidities and Climate Change: The Case of Mapocho Alto, Central Chile G. Sturla & E. Figueroa https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12020062
172. Drivers and stressors of freshwater biodiversity patterns across different ecosystems and scales: a review S. Stendera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1183-0
173. River dolphin distribution in regulated river systems: implications for dry‐season flow regimes in the Gangetic basin S. Choudhary et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1240
174. Bringing groundwater models to LIFE: a new way to assess water resource management options M. Streetly et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.853122
175. Assessing Outcomes of Environmental Flows for an Estuary-Dependent Fish Species using a Novel Stochastic Population Model Approach D. Stoessel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-022-01063-z
176. Modeling global water use for the 21st century: the Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative and its approaches Y. Wada et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-175-2016
177. An overview of water reallocation and the barriers to its implementation L. Marston & X. Cai https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1159
178. The comparison of environmental flow assessment - The barrier for investment in Poland or river protection? A. Operacz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.098
179. Environmental flow assessments in estuaries based on an integrated multi-objective method T. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-751-2013
180. Quantification of Environmental Flow Requirements to Support Ecosystem Services of Oasis Areas: A Case Study in Tarim Basin, Northwest China J. Xue et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7105657
181. Landscape-scale environmental variables are associated with burrowing crayfish distribution patterns in an Alabama watershed R. Bearden et al. https://doi.org/10.1086/728986
182. Longitudinal river ecohydrology: flow variation down the lengths of alluvial rivers S. Larned et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.126
183. Drought‐induced changes in flow regimes lead to long‐term losses in mussel‐provided ecosystem services C. Vaughn et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1442
184. Assessing environmental, economic, and social impacts of inter-basin water transfer in China Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130008
185. Reducing river regulation effects on riparian vegetation using flushing flow regimes R. Rivaes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.059
186. Assessing Environmental Flow Targets Using Pre-Settlement Land Cover: A SWAT Modeling Application S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060791
187. Hydrological Effects of the Planned Power Project and Protection of the Natura 2000 Areas: A Case Study of the Adamów Power Plant T. Kałuża et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123079
188. Understanding the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle: An Ecohydrological Perspective A. Govind & J. Kumari https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/712537
189. A Social‐Ecological Framework to Integrate Multiple Objectives for Environmental Flows Management D. Martin et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-704X.2014.03179.x
190. Environmental Flow Assessment Using Water-Sediment Approach at the Sekampung River, Indonesia E. Wahono et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmh.2014.44016
191. Estimating ecological flows for fish overwintering in plain rivers using a method based on water temperature and critical water depth L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2098
192. Eco-geomorphological approach for environmental flows assessment in monsoon-driven highland rivers: A case study of Upper Ganga, India V. Tare et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.07.005
193. Comparing environmental flow scenarios from hydrological methods, legislation guidelines, and hydrodynamic habitat models downstream of the Marathon Dam (Attica, Greece) C. Theodoropoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2019
194. Global Trends in Environmental Flow Assessment: An Overview D. Baghel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-018-0332-5
195. Restoring a flow regime through the coordinated operation of a multireservoir system: The case of the Zambezi River basin A. Tilmant et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008897
196. Protecting environmental flows through enhanced water licensing and water markets T. Erfani et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-675-2015
197. A general analytical approach for assessing the effects of hydroclimatic variability on fish habitat L. Fabris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.023
198. River flow as a determinant of salmonid distribution and abundance: a review M. Warren et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-015-0376-6
199. Living under a Fluctuating Climate and a Drying Congo Basin D. Sonwa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072936
200. Ecological Flow Response Analysis to a Typical Strong Hydrological Alteration River in China R. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032609
201. Hydraulic Properties of the Riffle Crest and Applications for Stream Ecosystem Management G. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12961
202. A Risk-Based Ecohydrological Approach to Assessing Environmental Flow Regimes G. Mcgregor et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0850-3
203. The Coleroon river flow and its effect on the Pichavaram mangrove ecosystem R. Sathyanathan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0313-4
204. Exploring the trade-offs among hydropower benefits, environmental flow, and surface water temperature in a large reservoir under deep uncertainty L. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129913
205. Present and Future Energy Potential of Run-of-River Hydropower in Mainland Southeast Asia: Balancing Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability S. Maroufpoor & X. Qin https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152256
206. River Flow Alterations Caused by Intense Anthropogenic Uses and Future Climate Variability Implications in the Balkans C. Papadaki & E. Dimitriou https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8010007
207. Management of sustainable ecological water levels of endorheic salt lakes in the Inner Mongolian Plateau of China based on eco‐hydrological processes Z. Xing et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14192
208. Definition of Ecological Flow Using IHA and IARI as an Operative Procedure for Water Management M. Greco et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080077
209. A Method to Assess and Define Environmental Flow Rules for Large Jurisdictional Regions1 T. Snelder et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00556.x
210. Quantity of Reasonable Distribution of River Ecological Basic Flow Considering the Economic Value of its Own Ecological Functions: a Case Study in the Baoji Section of the Weihe River, China B. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02487-7
211. Hydroeconomic Analysis: History, Status, and Possibilities F. Ward https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X24300032
212. Understanding the effects of river regulation on Atlantic salmon fry: The importance of channel morphology K. Millidine et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3266
213. Water Management Balance as a Tool for Analysis of a River Basin with Conflicting Environmental and Navigational Water Demands: An Example of the Warta Mouth National Park, Poland D. Pusłowska-Tyszewska https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243628
214. Assessment of Environmental Water Requirement Allocation in Anthropogenic Rivers with a Hydropower Dam Using Hydrologically Based Methods—Case Study H. Hamidifar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14060893
215. Assessing environmental flow requirements and trade-offs for the Lower Zambezi River and Delta, Mozambique R. Beilfuss & C. Brown https://doi.org/10.1080/15715121003714837
216. Management of vegetation encroachment by natural and induced channel avulsions: A physical model L. Javernick & W. Bertoldi https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3494
217. Illustrating a new global-scale approach to estimating potential reduction in fish species richness due to flow alteration S. Yoshikawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-621-2014
218. An integrated modelling framework for regulated river systems W. Welsh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.022
219. Salix regeneration in fluvial landscapes: Empirical findings based on a systematic review D. Díaz-Alba et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2023.107010
220. Simulated natural hydrologic regime of an intermountain playa conservation site J. Sanderson et al. https://doi.org/10.1672/07-76.1
221. Determination of River Ecological Flow Thresholds and Development of Early Warning Programs Based on Coupled Multiple Hydrological Methods X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16141986
222. Transforming Environmental Water Management to Adapt to a Changing Climate S. Capon et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00080
223. Increasing Risk of Ecological Change to Major Rivers of the World With Global Warming J. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021EF002048
224. Desktop-based determination of first derivative environmental flow requirements for the Luvuvhu headwater sub-basins in South Africa A. Gumbo et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2608882
225. Hydrogeomorphic advancements in river science for water security in India V. Jain et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2022.100118
226. Water matters: An assessment of opinion on water management and community engagement in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom A. Rolston et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174957
227. Assessment of environmental flow requirements S. Jain https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9455
228. Establishing Environmental Water Requirements for the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia's Largest Developed River System J. Swirepik et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2975
229. Calculation of multi-objective optimal tradeoffs between environmental flows and hydropower generation E. Fallah-Mehdipour et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7645-6
230. A legislative framework for environmental flow implementation: 30‐years operation in Japan Y. Shinozaki & N. Shirakawa https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3831
231. Revisiting hydro-ecological impacts of climate change on a restored floodplain wetland via hydrological / hydraulic modelling and the UK Climate Projections 2018 scenarios J. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01708-0
232. Meeting Indigenous peoples' objectives in environmental flow assessments: Case studies from an Australian multi-jurisdictional water sharing initiative S. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.047
233. Smart licensing and environmental flows: Modeling framework and sensitivity testing R. Wilby et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011194
234. Predicting Macroinvertebrate Responses to Water Abstraction in Alpine Streams G. Consoli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152121
235. Dismantling artificial levees and channel revetments promotes channel widening and regeneration of riparian vegetation over long river segments V. Martínez-Fernández et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.08.005
236. Assessing the occurrence of egg stranding for trout and salmon in a regulated river H. Skoglund et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4099
237. Securing water for wetland conservation: A comparative analysis of policy options to protect a national nature reserve in China J. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.033
238. Environmental Flows: Concept, Methods, Case Studies and Implementation Challenges in India S. Jain https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.70114
239. Climate Change Impacts on Long-Term Streamflow Sustainability in a Regulated River of Eastern India Using Environmental Flow Envelope S. Mahapatra & M. Jha https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-025-00774-2
240. PREMHYCE : un outil opérationnel pour la prévision des étiages F. Tilmant et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/2020043
241. Analysis of environmental flow requirements for macroinvertebrates in a creek affected by urban drainage (Prague metropolitan area, Czech Republic) K. Dana et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0649-2
242. Environmental flow methodology approach based on ecological impact assessment for hydroelectric power plants and hydraulic structures on stream ecosystems in Turkey B. Meriç https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10100-0
243. Overcoming persistent challenges in putting environmental flow policy into practice: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis G. Dourado et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acc196
244. Legacies, lags and long‐term trends: Effective flow restoration in a changed and changing world R. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13029
245. Assessing the Potential of Agricultural Reservoirs as the Source of Environmental Flow Y. Jo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13040508
246. Environmental flows in the Anthropocence: past progress and future prospects N. Poff & J. Matthews https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.006
247. The survey of ecologically acceptable flows in Slovenia N. Smolar-Žvanut & D. Burja https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1307/4/1/012015
248. Using regional flow classes as references to analyse flow regime anomalies across a set of regulated Canadian rivers F. McLaughlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.015
249. Indexing the Environmental Vulnerability of Mountain Streams in Azerbaijan R. Abbasov & V. Smakhtin https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00012.1
250. Optimization of Dam Operation and Interaction with Groundwater: An Overview Focusing on Greece D. Karakatsanis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15213852
251. Environmental flow requirements assessment in the Halda River, Bangladesh A. Akter & M. Ali https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.644242
252. Evaluation of ecological flows in highly regulated rivers using the mesohabitat approach: A case study on the Nestos River, N. Greece E. Koutrakis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.01.002
253. Environmental flow estimation for regulated rivers under data-scarce condition S. Mahapatra & M. Kumar Jha https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128569
254. Role of discharge and temperature variation in determining invertebrate community structure in a regulated river H. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1006
255. River flow availability for environmental flow allocation downstream of hydropower facilities in the Kafue Basin of Zambia M. Kalumba & E. Nyirenda https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2017.07.003
256. Application of multiscale environmental flow methodologies as tools for optimized management of a Norwegian regulated national salmon watercourse J. Halleraker et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1000
257. Modelling habitat suitability for fish in the fluvial and lacustrine regions of a new Eco-City F. Wang & B. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.07.024
258. Integrated Hydrological and Water Allocation Modelling for Drought Management and Restriction Planning in a Regulated River Basin: Application to the Olt River Basin (Romania) M. Chevereșan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology13020054
259. Rapid Screening of Operational Freshwater Availability Using Global Models M. Straatsma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1327-5
260. Shifts in river-floodplain relationship reveal the impacts of river regulation: A case study of Dongting Lake in China C. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.004
261. Evaluation of river basin restoration options by the application of the Water Framework Directive Explorer in the Zwalm River basin (Flanders, Belgium) A. Mouton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1106
262. Hydrologically Based Environmental Flow Methods Applied to Rivers in the Maritime Provinces (Canada) J. Caissie et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2772
263. Quantifying Tradeoffs Associated with Hydrologic Environmental Flow Methods S. McKay https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12328
264. A large-scale environmental flow experiment for riparian restoration in the Colorado River Delta P. Shafroth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.016
265. Justification for the necessity of regional environmental quality standards for water bodies: the Ilek River basin, Kazakhstan B. Kapsalyamov & G. Zholmuratova https://doi.org/10.32523/vry54642
266. Variation in the suitability of Chinese sturgeon spawning habitat after construction of dams on the Yangtze River W. Jiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13914
267. Multicomponent assessment of the impact of hydropower cascade on fish metrics V. Akstinas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167541
268. Benthic macroinvertebrates response to water management in a lowland river: effects of hydro-power vs irrigation off-stream diversions F. Salmaso et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6390-8
269. Establishing Standards and Assessment Criteria for Ecological Instream Flow Needs in Agricultural Regions of Canada D. Peters et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0094
270. Impacts of river regulation and fragmentation on platypuses in the northern Murray–Darling Basin J. Khurana et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF24037
271. Effect of urbanization on stream hydraulics D. Anim et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3293
272. Estuarine environmental flow assessment based on the flow-ecological health index relation model: a case study in Yangtze River Estuary, China W. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12487-4
273. Environmental flow assessment of Kayan River: managing sustainability indicator of hydropower project E. Wahono et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/930/1/012073
274. A study on the development of hydropower potential in Turkey C. Koç https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.111
275. Assessment of Environmental Flow Requirements by Entropy-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Z. Kim & V. Singh https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0493-y
276. Modeling U.S. water resources under climate change E. Blanc et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EF000214
277. Linking fish population dynamics to habitat conditions: insights from the application of a process-oriented approach to several Great Lakes species D. Hayes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-009-9103-8
278. High levels of endocrine pollutants in US streams during low flow due to insufficient wastewater dilution J. Rice & P. Westerhoff https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2984
279. Agricultural economic losses caused by protection of the ecological basic flow of rivers B. Cheng & H. Li https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.065
280. The Efficacy of Reservoir Flow Regulation for Cooling Migration Temperature for Sockeye Salmon in the Nechako River Watershed of British Columbia J. Macdonald et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2012.675946
281. Nature-based solutions for floods AND droughts AND biodiversity: Do we have sufficient proof of their functioning? E. Penning et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/wat.2023.12
282. Integrated Hydrologic-Economic-Institutional Model of Environmental Flow Strategies for Rio Yaqui Basin, Sonora, Mexico A. Munoz-Hernandez et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000108
283. Protecting Indigenous Values in Water Management: A Challenge to Conventional Environmental Flow Assessments M. Finn & S. Jackson https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9476-0
284. Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive M. ACREMAN & A. FERGUSON https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x
285. Hydrodynamic and primary production effects on seasonal DO variability in the Danube River J. Maier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-5123-2025
286. Human pressures and ecological status of European rivers B. Grizzetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00324-3
287. A methodology for historical assessment of compliance with environmental water allocations: lessons from the Crocodile (East) River, South Africa E. Riddell et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.853123
288. A regional-scale ecological risk framework for environmental flow evaluations G. O'Brien et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-957-2018
289. Optimizing reservoir operation to avoid downstream physical habitat loss using coupled ANFIS- metaheuristic model M. Sedighkia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00671-w
290. Monitoring and modeling water‐vegetation interactions in groundwater‐dependent ecosystems F. Orellana et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000383
291. Establishing environmental flows for intermittent tropical rivers: Why hydrological methods are not adequate? U. Sharma & V. Dutta https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02680-6
292. Climatic and dam-induced impacts on river water temperature: Assessment and management implications M. Kędra & Ł. Wiejaczka https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.044
293. Assessment of brown trout habitat suitability in the Jucar River Basin (SPAIN): Comparison of data-driven approaches with fuzzy-logic models and univariate suitability curves R. Muñoz-Mas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.074
294. Environmental Flow Assessments Are Not Realizing Their Potential as an Aid to Basin Planning J. King & C. Brown https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00113
295. Towards dynamic flow regime management for floodplain restoration in the Atchafalaya River Basin, Louisiana J. Kozak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.020
296. Discussion of “Water Quality–Based Environmental Flow under Plausible Temperature and Pollution Scenarios” by Shushobhit Chaudhary, C. T. Dhanya, Arun Kumar, and Rehana Shaik V. Tare et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001912
297. Threshold Responses of Macroinvertebrate Communities to Stream Velocity in Relation to Hydropower Dam: A Case Study from The Guayas River Basin (Ecuador) T. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091195
298. Environmental flow assessment, evaluation, and suggestions for dying riverine ecosystem of the transboundary Amudarya River, Central Asia R. Mahmood et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111419
299. Applicability of macrobenthos indexes in health assessment upstream of a large river: A case study in the Babian River of the Red River Basin, China K. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101958
300. Effect of Climate Change on Environmental Flow Indicators in the Narew Basin, Poland M. Piniewski et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0386
301. Estimation of a Suitable Range of Discharges for the Development of Instream Flow Recommendations C. Papadaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00456-1
302. Long-term trends in river flow: a case study of the Soła River (Polish Carpathians) M. Kędra et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20171902012
303. Good Water Governance for the Sustainable Development of the Arid and Semi-arid Areas of Northwest China S. Xu & J. Ou https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/199/2/022033
304. A case study on solar, wind and hydro energy resource potential of Prizren region in Kosovo S. Sarker et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016703001
305. Community structure and ecological responses to hydrological changes in benthic algal assemblages in a regulated river: application of algal metrics and multivariate techniques in river management E. Atazadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13546-w
306. Geomorphological evolution along international riverine borders: The flow of the Aras River through Iran, Azerbaijan, and Armenia K. Fazelpoor et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112599
307. A habitat suitability model for Chinese sturgeon determined using the generalized additive method Y. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.055
308. Using discharge dynamics characteristics to predict the effects of climate change on macroinvertebrates in lowland streams P. Verdonschot & M. van den Hoorn https://doi.org/10.1899/09-154.1
309. Assessing climate change impacts on river flows and environmental flow requirements at catchment scale G. Gül et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.92
310. Assessing improvements in environmental flow estimation through the use of a coupled surface-groundwater model G. Castellanos-Osorio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101426
311. Environmental Flow Assessment Based on Different Metrics of Hydrological Alteration D. Peres & A. Cancelliere https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1394-7
312. Climate change uncertainty in environmental flows for the Mekong River J. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.842074
313. River fragmentation and flow alteration metrics: a review of methods and directions for future research S. Jumani et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abcb37
314. Reservoir operation optimization for balancing hydropower generation and biodiversity conservation in a downstream wetland C. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118885
315. Hydrological assessment for the availability of water for off-stream uses of Karatoa-Atrai River in Bangladesh S. Nowreen et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2020.034
316. Incorporating thermal regimes into environmental flows assessments: modifying dam operations to restore freshwater ecosystem integrity J. OLDEN & R. NAIMAN https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02179.x
317. Trade-Offs between Human and Environment: Challenges for Regional Water Management under Changing Conditions E. Hassanzadeh https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091773
318. A simulation tool for managing environmental flows in regulated rivers C. Steinfeld et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.08.006
319. A GIS-based methodological framework to identify superficial water sources and their corresponding conduction paths for gravity-driven irrigation systems in developing countries J. Valencia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106048
320. Mesohabitat modelling in fish ecology: A global synthesis B. Wegscheider et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12477
321. An environmental flow assessment method based on the relationships between flow and ecological response: A case study of the Three Gorges Reservoir and its downstream reach J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5193-6
322. The use of wetted perimeter as habitat proxy to assess environmental flows in Southern Quebec rivers (Canada) L. Berthot et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108283
323. Assessing coalition in meeting environmental flow based on Shapley value and nash equilibrium: case study Aras River M. Rashidi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03855-5
324. An environmental flow assessment of a river’s blocking effect on a lake in a river-lake system: application in the Yangtze-Poyang system F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6825-x
325. A flexible framework for regionalization of base flow for river habit maintenance and its thresholds H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162748
326. Towards a Healthy Ganga—Improving River Flows Through Understanding Trade Offs N. Kaushal et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00083
327. Evaluating the ecological influence of hydraulic projects: A review of aquatic habitat suitability models Y. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.138
328. Assessing minimum environmental flows in nonpermanent rivers: The choice of thresholds C. Aguilar & M. Polo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.003
329. Modelling of environmental flow requirements using hydraulic and habitation models A. Uday Kumar & K. Jayakumar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107046
330. Regional regression models for estimating monthly streamflows Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135729
331. Cost–Benefit Analysis of Samanalawewa Hydroelectric Project in Sri Lanka: An Ex Post Analysis E. Udayakumara & U. Gunawardena https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-018-0060-z
332. State of the World's Rivers S. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111022-020951
333. Multi-objective analysis of dam release flows in rivers downstream from hydropower reservoirs F. Cioffi & F. Gallerano https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.09.077
334. Dam operations may improve aquatic habitat and offset negative effects of climate change R. Benjankar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.066
335. Examination of wetlands system using ecological network analysis: A case study of Baiyangdian Basin, China X. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.047
336. The hydromorphological state in mountain rivers subject to human impacts: a case study in the North-West of Italy C. Dresti et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5102-3
337. How low is too low? Partnering with stakeholders and managers to define ecologically based low‐flow thresholds in a perennial temperate river L. Rack et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4301
338. DEFINING MINIMUM ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS AT REGIONAL SCALE: APPLICATION OF MESOSCALE HABITAT MODELS AND CATCHMENTS CLASSIFICATION P. Vezza et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1571
339. Basin-Scale Approach to Integration of Agro- and Hydroecological Monitoring for Sustainable Environmental Management: A Case Study of Belgorod Oblast, European Russia Z. Buryak et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020927
340. Ecosystem approach to water resources management using the MIKE 11 modeling system in the Strymonas River and Lake Kerkini C. Doulgeris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.023
341. The Global Dimension of Water Governance: Why the River Basin Approach Is No Longer Sufficient and Why Cooperative Action at Global Level Is Needed A. Hoekstra https://doi.org/10.3390/w3010021
342. Evaluation of Economic and Ecological Benefits of Reservoir Ecological Releases Based on Reservoir Optimization Operation Z. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179441
343. Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities A. ARTHINGTON et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02340.x
344. Connection of neighboring wastewater treatment plants: economic and environmental assessment S. Morera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.047
345. Application of ecological and aesthetic parameters for riparian quality assessment of a small tropical river in eastern India D. Saha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106627
346. A review of environmental flow assessment: methodologies and application in the Qianhe River C. Hao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/39/1/012067
347. Unraveling the Effects of Long-Distance Water Transfer for Ecological Recharge W. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001272
348. Ecological drivers of taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic beta diversity of macroinvertebrates in Wei River Basin of northwest China J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1410915
349. Environmental flow assessment for improvement of ecological integrity in the Haihe River Basin, China T. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1219-5
350. Comparison of environmental flow assessment methods with a case study on a runoff river–type hydropower plant using hydrological methods Y. Karakoyun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7107-3
351. Comparing Past and Present Hydrologic Aspects of a Mediterranean Wetland from a Sustainable Management Perspective A. Gul https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0969-z
352. Hydrodynamics and sediment processes shaping fish habitat suitability: insights from the Yellow River J. Ghani et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2026.2644252
353. Sensitivity of streamflow patterns to river regulation and climate change and its implications for ecological and environmental management R. Patil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115680
354. A Geospatial Assessment of Small-Scale Hydropower Potential in Sub-Saharan Africa A. Korkovelos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113100
355. First spatio-temporal study of macroinvertebrates in the Santa Cruz River: a large glacial river about to be dammed without a comprehensive pre-impoundment study M. Tagliaferro & M. Pascual https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2850-3
356. Least-Cost Provision of Ecosystem Services from Water: When, Where, and How Much? G. Torell et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001511
357. Exploring groundwater-surface water interactions and recharge in fractured mountain systems: an integrated approach S. Ortenzi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1755-2026
358. Conceptualization and pilot application of a model-based environmental flow assessment adapted for intermittent rivers C. Theodoropoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0605-0
359. Estimation of environmental flow incorporating water quality and hypothetical climate change scenarios B. Walling et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5942-2
360. Assessment of ecological instream flow requirements under climate change Pseudorasbora parva Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1166-1
361. Exploring the role of hydrological pathways in modulating multi-annual climate teleconnection periodicities from UK rainfall to streamflow W. Rust et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2223-2021
362. Classification of natural flow regimes in Poland M. Piniewski https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3153
363. Methodology development for including environmental water requirement in the water stress index considering the case of Thailand P. Nilsalab et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.130
364. Optimizing turbine withdrawal from a tropical reservoir for improved water quality in downstream wetlands M. Kunz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20358
365. Status and trends in EFlows in southern Africa C. Brown et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12190
366. The Value of Environmental Base Flow in Water-Scarce Basins: A Case Study of Wei River Basin, Northwest China S. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070848
367. Assessment of flow–ecology relationships for environmental flow standards: a synthesis focused on the southeast USA S. Praskievicz & C. Luo https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1714051
368. Compatibility of Reservoir Sediment Flushing and River Protection F. Gallerano & G. Cannata https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000419
369. Agriculture's Historic Twin-Challenge Toward Sustainable Water Use and Food Supply for All J. Jägermeyr https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00035
370. Determination of Environmental Flows in Data-Poor Estuaries—Wami River Estuary in Saadani National Park, Tanzania A. Saha et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020033
371. Habitat modeling in high‐gradient streams: the mesoscale approach and application P. Vezza et al. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-2066.1
372. Ecological flow in southern Europe: Status and trends in non-perennial rivers M. Leone et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118097
373. Problems and Solutions Related to Hydroelectric Power Plants Constructed on the Buyuk Menderes and the West Mediterranean Basin C. Koç https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2012.674084
374. Impacts of Climate Change on Riverine Ecosystems: Alterations of Ecologically Relevant Flow Dynamics in the Danube River and Its Major Tributaries J. Stagl & F. Hattermann https://doi.org/10.3390/w8120566
375. Environmental flows in India: towards sustainable water management S. Jain & P. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.896996
376. Optimal Hedging Rules for Two-Objective Reservoir Operation: Balancing Water Supply and Environmental Flow C. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000699
377. Modeling Approach for Water-Quality Management to Control Pollution Concentration: A Case Study of Ravi River, Punjab, Pakistan M. Iqbal et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10081068
378. Revealing the influence of hyporheic water exchange on the composition and abundance of bottom-dwelling macroinvertebrates in a temperate lowland river M. Grygoruk et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2021036
379. Analyzing hydrological alteration and environmental flows in a highly anthropized agricultural river basin system using SWAT+, WEAP and IAHRIS S. Asadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101738
380. Ecological flow considering hydrological season and habitat suitability for a variety of fish X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110625
381. Damming consequences: Quantifying the effects on channel geometry and floodplain inundation A. Amanambu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107634
382. Spring discharge and thermal regime of a groundwater dependent ecosystem in an arid karst environment T. Caldwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124947
383. An Improved Aggregation–Decomposition Optimization Approach for Ecological Flow Supply in Parallel Reservoir Systems I. Min et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177475
384. A sustainability study of the flow regulation impacts by dams in a carp breeding river using the hydrodynamic model and building block analysis P. Saha et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1417-0
385. Mapping inundation in the heterogeneous floodplain wetlands of the Macquarie Marshes, using Landsat Thematic Mapper R. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.029
386. Water-Level Fluctuation Effects on Centrarchid Reproductive Success in Reservoirs: A Modeling Analysis M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1577/M07-106.1
387. Harmonizing human-hydrological system under climate change: A scenario-based approach for the case of the headwaters of the Tagus River A. Lobanova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.015
388. Environmental flow assessment for rivers feeding a coastal wetland complex in the Pacific coast of northwest Mexico R. Hernández‐Guzmán et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12423
389. The influence of hydrology and hydraulics on salmonids between spawning and emergence: implications for the management of flows in regulated rivers I. MALCOLM et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2011.00836.x
390. Environmental hydraulics research for river health: recent advances and challenges P. Rowiński et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2021.12.003
391. Assessing the Difference between Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Simulated Pre-Development and Observed Developed Loading Regimes S. Zeiger & J. Hubbart https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5020029
392. Dilemmas of integrated water resources management implementation in the Awash River Basin, Ethiopia: irrigation development versus environmental flows A. Mersha et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12638
393. Environmental flow assessment as a tool for achieving environmental objectives of African water policy, with examples from East Africa M. McClain et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2013.781913
394. Re-Thinking Ecological Flow in Romania: A Sustainable Approach to Water Management for a Healthier Environment C. Ilinca & C. Anghel https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129502
395. Drought in a human-modified world: reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches A. Van Loon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3631-2016
396. History, hydrology and hydraulics: Rethinking the ecological management of large rivers M. Mallen‐Cooper & B. Zampatti https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1965
397. Assessment of Environmental Flows from Complexity to Parsimony—Lessons from Lesotho A. Tegos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101293
398. Fluctuating water levels influence access to critical habitats for threatened Cowichan Lake lamprey C. Chaudhuri et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2019-0054
399. Salmonids and flows: a perspective on the state of the science and its application N. MILNER et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/fme.12016
400. Sensitivity of fish habitat suitability to multi-resolution hydraulic modeling and field-based description of meso-scale river habitats D. Farò et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2023.100160
401. Environmental water quantity projections under market-driven and sustainability-driven future scenarios in the Narew basin, Poland M. Piniewski et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.888068
402. A Simple Harmonic Model for FAPAR Temporal Dynamics in the Wetlands of the Volga-Akhtuba Floodplain A. Kozlov et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8090762
403. Assessment of consistency of low-flow indices of a hydrogeologically non-homogeneous catchment: A case study of the Ljubljanica river catchment, Slovenia K. Sapač et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124621
404. A new approach to rapid, desktop-level, environmental flow assessments for rivers in South Africa D. Hughes et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.818220
405. Ecosystem‐based environmental flow assessment in a Greek regulated river with the use of 2D hydrodynamic habitat modelling C. Theodoropoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3284
406. Developing environmental standards for abstractions from UK rivers to implement the EU Water Framework Directive / Développement de standards environnementaux sur les prélèvements d'eau en rivière au Royaume Uni pour la mise en œuvre de la directive cadre sur l'eau de l'Union Européenne M. ACREMAN et al. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.6.1105
407. PRELIMINARY METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSAL FOR ESTIMATING ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS IN PROJECTS APPROVED BY THE MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (MADS), COLOMBIA G. Pinilla Agudelo et al. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v19n1.38040
408. New grassland riparian zone delineation method for calculating ecological water demand to guide management goals D. Lan & Y. Rui‐Hong https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3707
409. Macroinvertebrate community responses to river impoundment at multiple spatial scales H. Krajenbrink et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.264
410. Trends in low flows in Spain in the period 1949–2009 A. Coch & L. Mediero https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1081202
411. An environmental flow method applied in small and medium-sized mountainous rivers X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wse.2021.10.003
412. Assessment of the physico-chemical water quality, distribution and abundance of Macrobrachium species in Okwagbe River, Delta State, Nigeria J. Ekelemu et al. https://doi.org/10.2989/16085914.2025.2598278
413. Renewing Urban Streams with Recycled Water for Streamflow Augmentation: Hydrologic, Water Quality, and Ecosystem Services Management H. Bischel et al. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2012.0201
414. Rapid environmental flow assessment for sustainable water resource management in Tanzania's Lower Rufiji River Basin: A scoping review O. Kimambo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22509
415. Influence of hydrologically based environmental flow methods on flow alteration and energy production in a run-of-river hydropower plant A. Kuriqi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.358
416. Quantitative Analysis of Drainage Basin Parameters towards better Management of Damodar River, Eastern India P. Ghosh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-021-1753-8
417. Temporal Patterns and Effects of Surface‐Water Diversions on Daily Flows and Aquatic Habitats: Bega‐Bemboka River, New South Wales, Australia I. REINFELDS et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2006.00410.x
418. A Procedure for Assessment of Environmental Flows Incorporating Inter- and Intra-Annual Variability in Dam-Regulated Watersheds R. Verma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03502-3
419. Current awareness https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5997
420. Assessing the Sustainability of Instream Flow Under Climate Change Considering Reservoir Operation in a Multi-Dam Watershed W. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17111610
421. Characteristics of Runoff Variations and Attribution Analysis in the Poyang Lake Basin over the Past 55 Years R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030944
422. How do low magnitudes of hydrologic alteration impact riverine fish populations and assemblage characteristics? R. Rolls & A. Arthington https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.12.017
423. 30-year response to damming of a Mediterranean river in California, USA F. Magdaleno et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2017.1361755
424. From an irrigation system to an ecological asset: adding environmental flows establishes recovery of a threatened fish species I. Stuart et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF19197
425. The Loading Capacity of the Elands River: A Case Study of the Waterval Boven Wastewater Treatment Works, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa S. Dlamini et al. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2019.118062
426. A framework for determining recommended environmental flows for balancing agricultural and ecosystem water demands A. Pang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.816425
427. Future river flows and flood extent in the Upper Niger and Inner Niger Delta: GCM-related uncertainty using the CMIP5 ensemble J. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1383608
428. Development of an eco-hydrological distance index and improved environmental flow assessment by integrating ecological monitoring and hydrological modeling C. Arrighi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178961
429. Analysis of Identification and Driving Factors of Ecological Base Flow Noncompliance in Major Rivers of China P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-022-03368-x
430. Analysing and evaluating environmental flows through hydrological methods in the regulated Indus River Basin K. Mehmood et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2624
431. Ecological status of rivers in preserved areas: Effects of meteorological parameters V. Belgiorno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.039
432. Making global river ecosystem health assessments objective, quantitative and comparable C. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.379
433. Environmental flow methodologies to protect fisheries resources in human‐modified large lowland rivers V. Huckstorf et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1131
434. Optimizing monthly ecological flow regime by a coupled fuzzy physical habitat simulation–genetic algorithm method M. Sedighkia et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-021-09809-z
435. Environmental flows assessment integrating snow trout habitat requirements in the Shakhimardan basin, Central Asia D. Hayes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06761-2
436. Texas environmental flow standards and the hydrology-based environmental flow regime methodology D. Opdyke et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.892600
437. Hydrologic cost-effectiveness ratio favors switchgrass production on marginal croplands over existing grasslands Y. Yimam et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181924