46 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The Water Quality of the River Enborne, UK: Observations from High-Frequency Monitoring in a Rural, Lowland River System S. Halliday et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6010150
2. Agriculture, community, river eutrophication and the Water Framework Directive C. Neal & H. Jarvie https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5903
3. Controlling nitrate pollution: An integrated approach L. O’Shea & A. Wade https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.017
4. Water quality, nutrients and the water framework directive in an agricultural region: The lower Humber Rivers, northern England C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.059
5. Hydro-ecological functioning of the Pang and Lambourn catchments, UK: An introduction to the special issue H. Wheater et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.035
6. A simple model of variable residence time flow and nutrient transport in the chalk B. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.045
7. Controls on the spatial and temporal variability of 222Rn in riparian groundwater in a lowland Chalk catchment N. Mullinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.015
8. Chlorophyll-a in the rivers of eastern England C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.039
9. Water quality, nutrients and the European union's Water Framework Directive in a lowland agricultural region: Suffolk, south-east England N. Howden et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.12.040
10. Predicting river water quality across North West England using catchment characteristics J. Rothwell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.015
11. The water quality of the River Dun and the Kennet and Avon Canal C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.017
12. Macronutrient cycles and climate change: Key science areas and an international perspective P. Whitehead & J. Crossman https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.08.046
13. Nitrate transport in Chalk catchments: monitoring, modelling and policy implications B. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.10.006
14. Catchment data for process conceptualization: simply not enough? C. Soulsby et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7068
15. Nitrate concentrations in river waters of the upper Thames and its tributaries C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.031
16. Nutrient hydrochemistry for a groundwater-dominated catchment: The Hampshire Avon, UK H. Jarvie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.012
17. Suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus in surface waters of the upper Thames Basin, UK C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.016
18. Phosphorus concentrations in the River Dun, the Kennet and Avon Canal and the River Kennet, southern England C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.009
19. Sensitivity analysis of a catchment-scale nitrogen model N. McIntyre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.04.010
20. Decreasing boron concentrations in UK rivers: Insights into reductions in detergent formulations since the 1990s and within-catchment storage issues C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.074
21. Delivery and cycling of phosphorus in rivers: A review P. Withers & H. Jarvie https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.002
22. High‐frequency water quality monitoring in an urban catchment: hydrochemical dynamics, primary production and implications for the Water Framework Directive S. Halliday et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10453
23. Declines in phosphorus concentration in the upper River Thames (UK): Links to sewage effluent cleanup and extended end-member mixing analysis C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.055
24. Over-parameterised, uncertain ‘mathematical marionettes’ — How can we best use catchment water quality models? An example of an 80-year catchment-scale nutrient balance A. Wade et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.030
25. Methods for detecting change in hydrochemical time series in response to targeted pollutant mitigation in river catchments C. Lloyd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.036
26. Nutrient dynamics in relation to surface–subsurface hydrological exchange in a groundwater fed chalk stream J. Pretty et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.013
27. Water quality of treated sewage effluent in a rural area of the upper Thames Basin, southern England, and the impacts of such effluents on riverine phosphorus concentrations C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.025
28. Catchment-scale modelling of flow and nutrient transport in the Chalk unsaturated zone B. Jackson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.07.005
29. An approach to identify urban groundwater recharge E. Vázquez-Suñé et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2085-2010
30. The water quality of the River Carnon, west Cornwall, November 1992 to March 1994: the impacts of Wheal Jane discharges C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.09.003
31. Within-river nutrient processing in Chalk streams: The Pang and Lambourn, UK H. Jarvie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.014
32. Trace levels of sewage effluent are sufficient to increase class 1 integron prevalence in freshwater biofilms without changing the core community K. Lehmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.035
33. Streamflow generation in the Pang and Lambourn catchments, Berkshire, UK J. Griffiths et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.044
34. Phosphorus dynamics and productivity in a sewage-impacted lowland chalk stream E. Palmer-Felgate et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.036
35. Sewage-effluent phosphorus: A greater risk to river eutrophication than agricultural phosphorus? H. Jarvie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.038
36. Uncertainty assessment of a process-based integrated catchment model of phosphorus S. Dean et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0273-z
37. River water quality of the River Cherwell: An agricultural clay-dominated catchment in the upper Thames Basin, southeastern England C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.040
38. Ecological dynamics in the riverine aquifers of a gaining and losing river S. T. Larned et al. https://doi.org/10.1086/678350
39. Seasonality of epCO2 at different scales along an integrated river continuum within the Dee basin, NE Scotland J. Dawson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7402
40. Lowland river water quality: a new UK data resource for process and environmental management analysis C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8344
41. Weekly water quality monitoring data for the River Thames (UK) and its major tributaries (2009–2013): the Thames Initiative research platform M. Bowes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1637-2018
42. Water quality along a river continuum subject to point and diffuse sources C. Neal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.034
43. Towards an improved understanding of the nitrate dynamics in lowland, permeable river-systems: Applications of INCA-N A. Wade et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.04.023
44. Radon in Chalk streams: Spatial and temporal variation of groundwater sources in the Pang and Lambourn catchments, UK N. Mullinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.03.010
45. Stream discharge characteristics through urbanization gradient in Danshui River, Taiwan: perspectives from observation and simulation J. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2374-2
46. Hydrochemical processes in lowland rivers: insights from in situ, high-resolution monitoring A. Wade et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4323-2012