15 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Plastic and unpredictable responses of stream invertebrates to leaf pack patches across sandy-bottomed streams B. Downes et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF10314
2. Niches and neutral processes contribute to the resource-diversity relationships of stream detritivores J. SIRCOM & S. WALDE https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02533.x
3. Understanding the role of large wood in restoring river systems across scales and structures: A systematic review G. Nassaji Matin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2026.105450
4. Comparison of structural and functional stream assessment methods to detect changes in riparian vegetation and water pH M. RIIPINEN et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01964.x
5. How strong is the evidence – based on macroinvertebrate community responses – that river restoration works? A. Al-Zankana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2019.11.001
6. Effects of shoreline development on the nearshore environment in large deep oligotrophic lakes E. ROSENBERGER et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01990.x
7. Invertebrate community structure and ecosystem functioning in European conifer plantation streams M. RIIPINEN et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02278.x
8. Short-term colonization dynamics of macroinvertebrates in restored channelized streams S. Baumgartner & C. Robinson https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-016-2886-4
9. A comparison of upland stream invertebrates in moorland and coniferous woodland in North York Moors National Park, UK S. Jones & P. Mayhew https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2017.1293318
10. Hydromorphological rehabilitation improves channel morphology, instream biotopes, and macroinvertebrate communities, and thus enhances the conservation of an urban river A. Al‐Zankana et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3697
11. Forest change and stream fish habitat: lessons from ‘Olde’ and New England K. Nislow https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00913.x
12. Wood-decaying fungi in the forest: conservation needs and management options D. Lonsdale et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0182-6
13. The influence of aquatic buffer zone vegetation on river macroinvertebrate communities C. Mc Conigley et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.043
14. Adding large woody material into a headwater stream has immediate benefits for macroinvertebrate community structure and function A. Al‐Zankana et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3529
15. Do freshwater insect assemblages in exotic plantations resemble those from native forest? Evidence from environmental DNA A. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70091