51 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A generic and practical wave overtopping model that includes uncertainty T. Pullen et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmaen.2017.31
2. Development of a Stepwise-Clustered Hydrological Inference Model Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001165
3. Value of process understanding in the era of machine learning: A case for recession flow prediction P. Istalkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130350
4. Runoff forecasting by artificial neural network and conventional model A. Ghumman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2012.01.005
5. Coupled Model for Assessing the Present and Future Watershed Vulnerabilities to Climate Change Impacts A. Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040711
6. Estimation of parameters of the transient storage model by means of multi-layer perceptron neural networks / Estimation des paramètres du modèle de transport TSM au moyen de réseaux de neurones perceptrons multi-couches P. ROWIŃSKI & A. PIOTROWSKI https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.1.165
7. SUITABILITY OF NEURAL NETWORK TECHNIQUES FOR RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING OVER A RIVER BASIN: A COMPREHENSIVE LITERATURE REVIEW K. SANJEEV et al. https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.13.4.14434
8. Comparing various artificial neural network types for water temperature prediction in rivers A. Piotrowski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.044
9. Comparative Analysis of Training Methods and Different Data for the Rainfall-Runoff Predication Using Artificial Neural Networks K. Solaimani & Z. Darvari https://doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2008.353.365
10. Impacts of future climate change on river discharge based on hydrological inference: A case study of the Grand River Watershed in Ontario, Canada Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.002
11. A Bayesian Hierarchical Network Model for Daily Streamflow Ensemble Forecasting Á. Ossandón et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029920
12. A Statistical Hydrological Model for Yangtze River Watershed Based on Stepwise Cluster Analysis F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.742331
13. Application of artificial neural networks to X‐ray fluorescence spectrum analysis F. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.2996
14. Artificial Neural Network and Multiple Linear Regression for Flood Prediction in Mohawk River, New York K. Tsakiri et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091158
15. Bayesian hierarchical network model for forecasting daily river stage for rainfed river networks N. Rastogi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132894
16. Prediction of side weir discharge coefficient by support vector machine technique H. Azamathulla et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2016.014
17. Embedding machine learning techniques into a conceptual model to improve monthly runoff simulation: A nested hybrid rainfall-runoff modeling U. Okkan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126433
18. Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds J. Shortridge et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2611-2016
19. Study of teleconnection between hydrological variables and climatological variables in a headwater basin of the Maipo River for forecast model application J. Montalva et al. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2025-04-04
20. Daily Stream Flow Prediction Capability of Artificial Neural Networks as influenced by Minimum Air Temperature Data M. Nayebi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.012
21. Two decades of anarchy? Emerging themes and outstanding challenges for neural network river forecasting R. Abrahart et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133312444943
22. On the reconstruction of Ito models on the basis of time series with long-tail distributions A. Rozmarynowska https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-008-0074-2
23. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: Current status and future directions H. Maier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.003
24. ANN-SCS-based hybrid model in conjunction with GCM to evaluate the impact of climate change on the flow scenario of the River Subansiri S. Barman & R. Bhattacharjya https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2019.221
25. Deep learning rainfall–runoff predictions of extreme events J. Frame et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3377-2022
26. Multi-objective performance comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall—runoff model N. DE VOS & T. RIENTJES https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.3.397
27. Comparison of performance of twelve monthly water balance models in different climatic catchments of China P. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.015
28. Ensemble Based Forecasting and Optimization Framework to Optimize Releases from Water Supply Reservoirs for Flood Control V. Ramaswamy & F. Saleh https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02481-8
29. Letter to the Editor on “Precipitation Forecasting Using Wavelet-Genetic Programming and Wavelet-Neuro-Fuzzy Conjunction Models” by Ozgur Kisi & Jalal Shiri [Water Resources Management 25 (2011) 3135–3152] D. Beriro et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0049-6
30. Comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall–runoff model in the simulation of ephemeral streamflow I. Daliakopoulos & I. Tsanis https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1154151
31. Multistep ahead streamflow forecasting: Role of calibration data in conceptual and neural network modeling E. Toth & A. Brath https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005383
32. A comparison of methods to avoid overfitting in neural networks training in the case of catchment runoff modelling A. Piotrowski & J. Napiorkowski https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.019
33. The skill of seasonal ensemble low-flow forecasts in the Moselle River for three different hydrological models M. Demirel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-275-2015
34. Product-Units neural networks for catchment runoff forecasting A. Piotrowski & J. Napiorkowski https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.016
35. Prediction and Sensitivity Analysis of the Cetane Number of Different Biodiesel Fuels Using an Artificial Neural Network S. Hao et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01957
36. The effects of online-training artificial neural network mechanism and multi-stage parametric modeling method on simulation-based design system for ship optimization L. Du et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118284
37. Multiobjective training of artificial neural networks for rainfall‐runoff modeling N. de Vos & T. Rientjes https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006734
38. Neural network modelling of non-linear hydrological relationships R. Abrahart & L. See https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1563-2007
39. Efficient solution of linear inverse problems using an iterative linear neural network with a generalization training approach Q. Tieng et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/abebcf
40. A step towards considering the spatial heterogeneity of urban key features in urban hydrology flood modelling J. Leandro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.060
41. Estimation of the Budyko model parameter for small basins in China P. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13577
42. Technical note: Data assimilation and autoregression for using near-real-time streamflow observations in long short-term memory networks G. Nearing et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5493-2022
43. Current awareness https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5823
44. Fugacity modelling of the fate of micropollutants in aqueous systems — Uncertainty and sensitivity issues Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134249
45. Indian summer monsoon rainfall prediction using artificial neural network P. Singh & B. Borah https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0695-0
46. Stream flow forecasting by artificial neural network (ANN) model trained by real coded genetic algorithm (GA) S. A et al. https://doi.org/10.5917/jagh1987.48.233
47. Optimization of the generalization capability for rainfall–runoff modeling by neural networks: the case of the Lez aquifer (southern France) L. Kong A Siou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1450-9
48. Study of teleconnection between hydrological variables and climatological variables in a headwater basin of the Maipo River for forecast model application J. Montalva et al. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-16-4-3
49. Discussion of “River flow estimation from upstream flow records by artificial intelligence methods” by M.E. Turan, M.A. Yurdusev [J. Hydrol. 369 (2009) 71–77] N. Mount & R. Abrahart https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.004
50. HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts C. Dawson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.06.008
51. One-Day-Ahead Streamflow Forecasting Using Artificial Neural Networks and a Meteorological Mesoscale Model A. Linares-Rodriguez et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001163