381 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. On the assessment of the impact of reducing parameters and identification of parameter uncertainties for a hydrologic model with applications to ungauged basins M. Huang & X. Liang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.010
2. Real-time flood forecasting using time-varying parameter hydrological model: case study for Ta Trach reservoir C. Tran et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-025-02503-4
3. The Predictive Uncertainty of Land Surface Fluxes in Response to Increasing Ambient Carbon Dioxide K. Schulz et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2551:TPUOLS>2.0.CO;2
4. Spatio‐temporal discretization uncertainty of distributed hydrological models S. Markhali et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14635
5. Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures J. Freer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.037
6. A comparison of similarity indices for catchment classification using a cross-regional dataset G. Ali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.01.008
7. Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Motivation and theoretical development F. Fenicia et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010174
8. Unanswered questions on the Budyko framework W. Berghuijs et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13958
9. The link between land-use management and fluvial flood risk I. Pattison & S. Lane https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133311425398
10. Modeling streamflow variability at the regional scale: (1) perceptual model development through signature analysis F. Fenicia & J. McDonnell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127287
11. Simulating saturation‐excess surface run‐off in a semi‐distributed hydrological model D. Hughes & S. Mazibuko https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13182
12. Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses R. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009505
13. A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1761
14. So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent? K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.007
15. Identifiability of distributed floodplain roughness values in flood extent estimation M. Werner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.012
16. Future changes in the Dominant Source Layer of riparian lateral water fluxes in a subhumid Mediterranean catchment J. Ledesma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126014
17. Why do we have so many different hydrological models? A review based on the case of Switzerland P. Horton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1574
18. Moving beyond heterogeneity and process complexity: A new vision for watershed hydrology J. McDonnell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005467
19. Modeling the effects of vegetation on stream temperature dynamics in a large, mixed land cover watershed in the Great Lakes region H. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124283
20. Ecological classification and mapping for landscape management and science C. Cullum et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133315611573
21. On constraining TOPMODEL hydrograph simulations using partial saturated area information S. Blazkova et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.331
22. A Generalized Subsurface Flow Parameterization Considering Subgrid Spatial Variability of Recharge and Topography M. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM936.1
23. Hydrological field data from a modeller's perspective: Part 2: process‐based evaluation of model hypotheses M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7902
24. Hysteresis and scale in catchment storage, flow and transport J. Davies & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10511
25. Influence of lowland aquifers and anthropogenic impacts on the isotope hydrology of contrasting mesoscale catchments S. McGrane et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9610
26. Unveiling urban process-dependent hydrological responses via rainfall “fingerprints” T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135697
27. On the concept of delivery of sediment and nutrients to stream channels K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5796
28. Generating interpretable rainfall-runoff models automatically from data T. Dantzer & B. Kerkez https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104796
29. The efficacy of calibrating hydrologic model using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and soil moisture for streamflow prediction A. Kunnath-Poovakka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.018
30. Correspondence Between Model Structures and Hydrological Signatures: A Large‐Sample Case Study Using 508 Brazilian Catchments P. David et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030619
31. Have applications of continuous rainfall–runoff simulation realized the vision for process‐based flood frequency analysis? R. Lamb et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10882
32. Continental-scale, data-driven predictive assessment of eliminating the vector-borne disease, lymphatic filariasis, in sub-Saharan Africa by 2020 E. Michael et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0933-2
33. Homogeneous region determination using linear and nonlinear techniques J. Swain et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2016.1211460
34. Regionalization of hydrologic response in the Great Lakes basin: Considerations of temporal scales of analysis J. Kult et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.083
35. A model for assessing water quality risk in catchments prone to wildfire C. Langhans et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.048
36. Bedrock geology controls on catchment storage, mixing, and release: A comparative analysis of 16 nested catchments L. Pfister et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11134
37. Impact of catchment classification on streamflow regionalization in ungauged catchments J. Swain & K. Patra https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0476-6
38. Projecting climate change impacts on stream flow regimes with tracer-aided runoff models - preliminary assessment of heterogeneity at the mesoscale R. Capell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9612
39. An experiment to gauge an ungauged catchment: rapid data assessment and eco-hydrological modelling in a data-scarce rural catchment C. Jackisch et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.870662
40. Testing the Hydrological Landscape Unit Classification System and Other Terrain Analysis Measures for Predicting Low-Flow Nitrate and Chloride in Watersheds C. Poor et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9168-5
41. Natural hazards in Australia: floods F. Johnson et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1689-y
42. Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a catchment treated as ungauged (with uncertainty) S. Blazkova & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000500
43. Regional water resources assessments using an uncertain modelling approach: The example of Swaziland C. Ndzabandzaba & D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.01.002
44. Continuous simulation for computing design hydrographs for water structures S. Blazkova et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11204
45. Impact of Rainfall Movement on Flash Flood Response: A Synthetic Study of a Semi-Arid Mountainous Catchment S. Khosh Bin Ghomash et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14121844
46. Simulating watershed runoff with a new data model F. Reitsma & R. Dubayah https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6410
47. Semi‐distributed modelling of the monthly water balance in an alpine catchment G. Eder et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5888
48. Understanding hydrological flow paths in conceptual catchment models using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis E. Mockler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.08.015
49. Why can't we do better than Topmodel? W. Buytaert et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7125
50. Quantifying the uncertainty contribution in runoff projection and the time scale effects Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135067
51. GLUE Based Assessment on the Overall Predictions of a MIKE SHE Application R. Vázquez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9329-6
52. An assessment of small island hydrological research activity conducted in the Oceania Region C. Leong et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2023.2252406
53. Hydrologic comparison between a lowland catchment (Kielstau, Germany) and a mountainous catchment (XitaoXi, China) using KIDS model in PCRaster X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-21-125-2009
54. Detailed data is welcome, but with a pinch of salt: Accuracy, precision, and uncertainty in flood inundation modeling F. Dottori et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20406
55. Multi‐scale modelling of land‐use change and river training effects on floods in the Rhine basin A. Bronstert et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1036
56. Behind the scenes of streamflow model performance L. Bouaziz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1069-2021
57. Impact of parameter set dimensionality and calibration procedures on streamflow prediction at ungauged catchments D. Poissant et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.05.005
58. Hydrologic synthesis: Across processes, places, and scales G. Blöschl https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004319
59. Evaluating the Ubiquity of Thresholds in Rainfall‐Runoff Response Across Contrasting Environments C. Ross et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027498
60. On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters O. Baez-Villanueva et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5805-2021
61. Information and disinformation in hydrological data across space: The case of streamflow predictions using machine learning A. Gupta https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101607
62. Hydro-geomorphic response models for burned areas and their applications in land management P. Nyman et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313508802
63. Spatial variability of hydrological processes and model structure diagnostics in a 50 km2catchment H. McMillan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9988
64. A spatially hybrid hydrological modeling approach using subbasin-specific model structures Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2026.106944
65. Assessing spatially distributed infiltration capacity to evaluate storm runoff in forested catchments: Implications for hydrological connectivity S. Miyata et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.453
66. Linking the Budyko framework and the Dunne diagram R. Trancoso et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.017
67. A decision‐led evaluation approach for flood forecasting system developments: An application to the Global Flood Awareness System in Bangladesh S. Hossain et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12959
68. Use of a scenario-neutral approach to identify the key hydro-meteorological attributes that impact runoff from a natural catchment D. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.021
69. Numerical analysis of water and solute transport in variably-saturated fractured clayey till A. Rosenbom et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.09.001
70. Interdisciplinary Critical Geographies of Water: Capturing the Mutual Shaping of Society and Hydrological Flows M. Rusca & G. Di Baldassarre https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101973
71. Characterizing Watersheds to Support Land-use Planning in Indonesia: A Case Study of Brantas Tropical Watershed B. Wiwoho et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.06.001
72. An explainable AI approach for interpreting regionally optimized deep neural networks in hydrological prediction F. Hosseini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133689
73. Conceptualizing lateral preferential flow and flow networks and simulating the effects on gauged and ungauged hillslopes M. Weiler & J. McDonnell https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR004867
74. BARUMODEL: Combined Data Based Mechanistic models of runoff response in a managed rainforest catchment N. Chappell et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.008
75. Toward high-resolution flash flood prediction in large urban areas – Analysis of sensitivity to spatiotemporal resolution of rainfall input and hydrologic modeling A. Rafieeinasab et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.045
76. Forecasting daily flow rate-based intelligent hybrid models combining wavelet and Hilbert–Huang transforms in the mediterranean basin in northern Algeria Z. Abda & M. Chettih https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0188-0
77. Watershed model calibration using multi-objective optimization and multi-site averaging X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.11.003
78. Exploring hydrologically similar catchments in terms of the physical characteristics of upstream regions Y. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.191
79. Predicting runoff in ungauged UK catchments H. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2006.159.2.129
80. JAMES BUTTLE REVIEW: Interflow, subsurface stormflow and throughflow: A synthesis of field work and modelling K. McGuire et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15263
81. Physics‐based hydrologic‐response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality B. Ebel & K. Loague https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6388
82. Virtual laboratories: new opportunities for collaborative water science S. Ceola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2101-2015
83. Flexible watershed simulation with the Raven hydrological modelling framework J. Craig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104728
84. A process proof test for model concepts: Modelling the meso-scale H. Hellebrand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.07.019
85. Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology: Qt=(S, R, Δt)A as closure K. Beven https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-609-2006
86. Hybrid-cryo: a modular data-physics hybrid framework for cryospheric runoff simulation Z. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135575
87. Modelling the chloride signal at Plynlimon, Wales, using a modified dynamic TOPMODEL incorporating conservative chemical mixing (with uncertainty) T. Page et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6186
88. Investigating uniqueness and identifiability in auto-calibration of the ARNO daily rainfall-runoff model using the PSO algorithm N. Ensaniyat et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2020.1760290
89. Advances in real–time flood forecasting D. Cox et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2002.1008
90. Correcting bias in rainfall inputs to a semi-distributed hydrological model using downstream flow simulation errors D. Hughes & R. Gray https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1391388
91. Applying Machine Learning Methods to Improve Rainfall–Runoff Modeling in Subtropical River Basins H. Yu & Q. Yang https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152199
92. Separating meteorological condition and soil moisture controls on the variation in stand evapotranspiration of a larch plantation during three hydrological years Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01548
93. Ignorance is bliss: Or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis F. Pappenberger & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004820
94. Importance of Spatial Resolution in Global Groundwater Modeling R. Reinecke et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12996
95. Setting up a hydrological model of Alberta: Data discrimination analyses prior to calibration M. Faramarzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.09.006
96. On hypothesis testing in hydrology: Why falsification of models is still a really good idea K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1278
97. A Three‐Dimensional Structure and Process Model for Integrated Hydro‐Geo‐Pedologic Analysis of a Constructed Hydrological Catchment H. Gerke et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2013.02.0040
98. Modelling suspended-sediment propagation and related heavy metal contamination in floodplains: a parameter sensitivity analysis R. Hostache et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3539-2014
99. Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process‐based hydrologic models M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017910
100. Testing the distributed water table predictions of TOPMODEL (allowing for uncertainty in model calibration): The death of TOPMODEL? S. Blazkova et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000912
101. Characterizing the vadose zone and a perched aquifer near the Vosges ridge at the La Soutte experimental site, Obernai, France P. Sailhac et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2009.07.015
102. Uncertainties in Structural Behavior for Model-Based Occupant Localization Using Floor Vibrations S. Drira et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.602118
103. Climate change and fluvial flood risk in the UK: more of the same? R. Wilby et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6847
104. Hydrological modelling, process understanding and uncertainty in a southern African context: lessons from the northern hemisphere D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10721
105. Evaluation and uncertainty assessment of weather data and model calibration on daily streamflow simulation in a large-scale regulated and snow-dominated river basin Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129103
106. Regionalization as a learning process W. Buytaert & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007359
107. From engineering hydrology to Earth system science: milestones in the transformation of hydrologic science M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1665-2018
108. Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity T. Wagener et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.x
109. Phreatophytic vegetation responses to groundwater depth in a drying mediterranean‐type landscape B. Sommer et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12178
110. Exploring the effects of catchment morphometry on overland flow response to extreme rainfall using a 2D hydraulic-hydrological model (IBER) L. Garzon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130405
111. Guidance for parameterizing post‐fire hydrologic models with in situ infiltration measurements T. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5633
112. On the value of a history of hydrology and the establishment of a History of Hydrology Working Group K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2452357
113. Nonparametric direct mapping of rainfall‐runoff relationships: An alternative approach to data analysis and modeling? I. Iorgulescu & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003094
114. Improving the interpretability and predictive power of hydrological models: Applications for daily streamflow in managed and unmanaged catchments P. Bhasme & U. Bhatia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130421
115. Understanding hydrologic variability across Europe through catchment classification A. Kuentz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2863-2017
116. Reply to ‘The emergence of a new kind of relativism in environmental modelling: a commentary’ by Philippe Baveye K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2003.1257
117. A fuzzy decision tree to predict phosphorus export at the catchment scale M. Schärer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.05.034
118. Technical note: How many models do we need to simulate hydrologic processes across large geographical domains? W. Knoben et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025
119. Implementation of an automatic calibration procedure for HYDROTEL based on prior OAT sensitivity and complementary identifiability analysis M. Bouda et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9882
120. Understanding watershed hydrogeochemistry: 1. Development of RT‐Flux‐PIHM C. Bao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018934
121. Process‐based hydrological modelling: The potential of a bottom‐up approach for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments M. Antonetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11232
122. Parameter conditioning and prediction uncertainties of the LISFLOOD-WB distributed hydrological model X. MO et al. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.1.45
123. Hydrological field data from a modeller's perspective: Part 1. Diagnostic tests for model structure H. McMillan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7841
124. A System Identification Methodology to monitor construction activities using structural responses R. Soman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.12.006
125. The treatment of uncertainties in reactive pollution dispersion models at urban scales A. Tomlin et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FD00159E
126. Hybridized artificial intelligence models with nature-inspired algorithms for river flow modeling: A comprehensive review, assessment, and possible future research directions H. Tao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107559
127. Scaling up and out in runoff process understanding: insights from nested experimental catchment studies C. Soulsby et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6338
128. A signature‐based approach to quantify soil moisture dynamics under contrasting land‐uses R. Araki et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14553
129. Flood forecasting for River Mekong with data‐based models K. Shahzad & E. Plate https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015072
130. Unravelling runoff processes in Andean basins in northern Ecuador through hydrological signatures J. Gordillo & L. Pineda https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14354
131. On environmental models of everywhere on the GRID K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5090
132. Developing predictive insight into changing water systems: use-inspired hydrologic science for the Anthropocene S. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-5013-2013
133. Flow Prediction in Ungauged Catchments Using Probabilistic Random Forests Regionalization and New Statistical Adequacy Tests C. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023254
134. Modelling everything everywhere: a new approach to decision‐making for water management under uncertainty K. BEVEN & R. ALCOCK https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02592.x
135. Six principles for managing forests as ecologically sustainable ecosystems D. Lindenmayer & S. Cunningham https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9720-9
136. Field Investigation and Modeling of Rapid Subsurface Stormflow through Preferential Pathways in a Vegetated Hillslope of Northeast India R. Sarkar & S. Dutta https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000431
137. What makes Darwinian hydrology "Darwinian"? Asking a different kind of question about landscapes C. Harman & P. Troch https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-417-2014
138. Explaining changes in rainfall–runoff relationships during and after Australia's Millennium Drought: a community perspective K. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-6073-2022
139. Toward essential union between evolutionary strategy and data assimilation for model diagnostics: An application for reducing the search space of optimization problems using hydrologic genome map G. Dumedah https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.025
140. Estimating spatial catchment natural hydrological response characteristics in Swaziland C. Ndzabandzaba & D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2018.05.007
141. Concepts of Information Content and Likelihood in Parameter Calibration for Hydrological Simulation Models K. Beven & P. Smith https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000991
142. Application of the Distributed Hydrological Model, TOPNET, to the Big Darby Creek Watershed, Ohio, USA A. Guzha & T. Hardy https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9482-6
143. Combination of lumped hydrological and remote-sensing models to evaluate water resources in a semi-arid high altitude ungauged watershed of Sierra Nevada (Southern Spain) J. Jódar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.300
144. On the Value of Hydrological Models Developed in the Context of Undergraduate Education for Discharge Prediction and Reservoir Management H. Bormann & O. Caspari https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1015-x
145. Toward improved deep learning-based regionalized streamflow modeling : Exploiting the power of basin similarity Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106374
146. Large-sample hydrology: a need to balance depth with breadth H. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-463-2014
147. Streamflow regime-based classification and hydrologic similarity analysis of catchment behavior using differentiable modeling with multiphysics outputs Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132766
148. Streamflow prediction in ungauged catchments by using the Grunsky method B. Marchezepe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.06.004
149. Hydrologic model calibration approaches for highly regulated river basin: A comprehensive assessment M. Sheikh & P. Coulibaly https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102198
150. Predicting hourly flows at ungauged small rural catchments using a parsimonious hydrological model A. Tsegaw et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.090
151. Enhancing runoff prediction accuracy of deep learning model using baseflow separation method and timestamp information C. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134044
152. Challenges of modelling climate change impacts on hydrology and water resources: AI is the game changer—a review C. Onyutha https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae2a60
153. Data‐supported robust parameterisations in land surface–atmosphere flux predictions: towards a top‐down approach K. Schulz & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1331
154. Catchment transit times and landscape controls—does scale matter? M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7510
155. Formulation of the Evolutionary-Based Data Assimilation, and its Implementation in Hydrological Forecasting G. Dumedah https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0107-0
156. An overview of approaches for reducing uncertainties in hydrological forecasting: Progress and challenges A. Panchanathan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104956
157. Subsurface flow contribution in the hydrological cycle: lessons learned and challenges ahead—a review M. Ghasemizade & M. Schirmer https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2329-8
158. Use of a parsimonious rainfall–run‐off model for predicting hydrological response in ungauged basins T. Skaugen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10315
159. Physics‐based hydrologic response simulation: platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool K. Loague & J. VanderKwaak https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5737
160. Science versus politics: truth and uncertainty in predictive modelling R. Ivanović & J. Freer https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7406
161. Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework H. Choi & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.012
162. Identification of Dominant Hydrological Mechanisms Using Bayesian Inference, Multiple Statistical Hypothesis Testing, and Flexible Models C. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028338
163. Lifelines for a drowning science ‐ improving findability and synthesis of hydrologic publications L. Stein et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14742
164. Influence of errors in radar rainfall estimates on hydrological modeling prediction uncertainty M. Borga et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004559
165. Deriving distributed roughness values from satellite radar data for flood inundation modelling G. Schumann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.06.024
166. A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183
167. Sensor Data Interpretation in Bridge Monitoring—A Case Study B. Raphael & A. Harichandran https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00148
168. Prediction of storm transfers and annual loads with data-based mechanistic models using high-frequency data M. Ockenden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6425-2017
169. Global big data laboratory experiment, integrated with kernel-based algorithm with an improved nonlinear ensemble for compressive strength modeling B. Salami et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58908-9
170. A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures T. Euser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1893-2013
171. How to make advances in hydrological modelling K. Beven https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.134
172. Classification of watersheds into integrated social and biophysical indicators with clustering analysis A. Mayer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.030
173. Structural identification with systematic errors and unknown uncertainty dependencies J. Goulet & I. Smith https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.07.009
174. Mapping the landscape of water and society research: Promising combinations of compatible and complementary disciplines M. Muller et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1701
175. Assessment of multiple precipitation products over major river basins of China Y. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1339-0
176. HYDROGEIOS: a semi-distributed GIS-based hydrological model for modified river basins A. Efstratiadis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-12-989-2008
177. Evaluation of storage–discharge relationships and recession analysis-based distributed hourly runoff simulation in large-scale, mountainous and snow-influenced catchment T. Hailegeorgis et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2016.1170939
178. Uncertainty Analyses in Hydrologic/Hydraulic Modeling: Challenges and Proposed Resolutions C. Pathak et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001231
179. Simulating runoff changes and evaluating under climate change using CMIP6 data and the optimal SWAT model: a case study S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74269-9
180. Biodiversity research: data without theory—theory without data M. Rillig et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00020
181. Uncertainty in hydrological signatures for gauged and ungauged catchments I. Westerberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017635
182. Hydrological similarity of catchments in the southern area of Colombian Andean region G. Carrillo-Soto et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1388/1/012042
183. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
184. Simple Catchments and Where to Find Them: The Storage-Discharge Relationship as a Proxy for Catchment Complexity F. Jehn et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.631651
185. Are we unnecessarily constraining the agility of complex process-based models? P. Mendoza et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015820
186. Landscape evolution space and the relative importance of geomorphic processes and controls J. Phillips https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.01.007
187. Model Averaging Techniques for Quantifying Conceptual Model Uncertainty A. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00642.x
188. Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.0986
189. How does landscape structure influence catchment transit time across different geomorphic provinces? D. Tetzlaff et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7240
190. Deeper Engagement with Material and Non-Material Aspects of Water in Land System Science: An Introduction to the Special Issue J. Vadjunec et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122095
191. What we see now: Event-persistence and the predictability of hydro-eco-geomorphological systems K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.07.019
192. SuperflexPy 1.3.0: an open-source Python framework for building, testing, and improving conceptual hydrological models M. Dal Molin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7047-2021
193. Validating model-based data interpretation methods for quantification of reserve capacity S. Pai & I. Smith https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101231
194. Scale effects in conceptual hydrological modeling R. Merz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR007872
195. Predicting the ungauged basin: model validation and realism assessment T. van Emmerik et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00062
196. Finite‐element modelling of physics‐based hillslope hydrology, Keith Beven, and beyond K. Loague & B. Ebel https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10762
197. Using tracers to upscale flow path understanding in mesoscale mountainous catchments: two examples from Scotland C. Soulsby et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.12.042
198. Modelling hydrologic responses in a small forested catchment (Panola Mountain, Georgia, USA): a comparison of the original and a new dynamic TOPMODEL N. Peters et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1128
199. Catchment Morphing (CM): A Novel Approach for Runoff Modeling in Ungauged Catchments J. Zhang & D. Han https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021403
200. Soil and water management: opportunities to mitigate nutrient losses to surface waters in the Northern Great Plains H. Baulch et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2018-0101
201. DATA-BASED MECHANISTIC MODELLING AND RIVER FLOW FORECASTING P. Young https://doi.org/10.3182/20060329-3-AU-2901.00118
202. Exploring Drivers of Regional Water‐Quality Change Using Differential Spatially Referenced Regression—A Pilot Study in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed J. Chanat & G. Yang https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022403
203. Hydrological model calibration using a short period of observations T. Tada & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8302
204. Spatial analysis of streamflow trends in burned watersheds across the western contiguous United States W. Long & H. Chang https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14949
205. Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA K. Sawicz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2895-2011
206. Uncertainty assessment of a process-based integrated catchment model of phosphorus S. Dean et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0273-z
207. Landscape archetypes for ecological classification and mapping C. Cullum et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316671103
208. Measurement of flood peak effects as a result of soil and land management, with focus on experimental issues and scale C. Deasy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.027
209. Advances in the use of observed spatial patterns of catchment hydrological response R. Grayson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00060-X
210. Unsupervised hydrologic classification of rivers: Watershed controls on natural and anthropogenic flow regimes, Alabama, USA S. Praskievicz & C. Luo https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13394
211. Simultaneous calibration of hydrological models in geographical space A. Bárdossy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2913-2016
212. Large-scale risk screening of raw water quality in the context of drinking water catchments and integrated response strategies C. Vorstius et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.012
213. The quantity and quality of information in hydrologic models G. Nearing & H. Gupta https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015895
214. Evaluation of the number of events’ influence on model performance and uncertainty in urban data-scarce areas based on behavioral parameter ranking method Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131298
215. Fuzzy committees of specialized rainfall-runoff models: further enhancements and tests N. Kayastha et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4441-2013
216. Ensemble flood forecasting: A review H. Cloke & F. Pappenberger https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.005
217. HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology M. Hrachowitz & M. Clark https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017
218. Application and performance of a Low Power Wide Area Sensor Network for distributed remote hydrological measurements S. Ketcheson et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45474-9
219. Transition to transpiration-dominated evapotranspiration on the Loess Plateau: spatially divergent driving mechanism and threshold effect after two decades of reforestation Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135191
220. Streamflow naturalization methods: a review M. Terrier et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1839080
221. Barriers to progress in distributed hydrological modelling O. Semenova & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10434
222. Entropy-Based Experimental Design for Optimal Model Discrimination in the Geosciences W. Nowak & A. Guthke https://doi.org/10.3390/e18110409
223. Integrating urban water fluxes and moving beyond impervious surface cover: A review C. Oswald et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129188
224. A Brief Analysis of Conceptual Model Structure Uncertainty Using 36 Models and 559 Catchments W. Knoben et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025975
225. Parameter uncertainty drives important incongruities between simulated chlorophyll-a and phytoplankton functional group dynamics in a mechanistic management model N. Nelson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104708
226. Assessing soil water content variation in a small mountainous catchment over different time scales and land covers using geographical variables F. Mallet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125593
227. HESS Opinions: Advocating process modeling and de-emphasizing parameter estimation A. Bahremand https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1433-2016
228. Mapping first‐order controls on streamflow from drainage basins: the T3 template J. Buttle https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6519
229. Improvement and comparative assessment of a hydrological modelling approach on 20 catchments of various sizes under different climate conditions C. Gaba et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1330542
230. Fit-for-purpose environmental modeling: Targeting the intersection of usability, reliability and feasibility S. Hamilton et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105278
231. Methodology Maps for Model-Based Sensor-Data Interpretation to Support Civil-Infrastructure Management S. Pai & I. Smith https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2022.801583
232. Towards a methodology for testing models as hypotheses in the inexact sciences K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0862
233. Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty T. Wagener & H. Wheater https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.015
234. Regional catchment classification with respect to low flow risk in a Pleistocene landscape B. Thomas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.020
235. Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding F. Fenicia et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006386
236. Conceptual frameworks in peatland ecohydrology: looking beyond the two‐layered (acrotelm–catotelm) model P. Morris et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.191
237. Vadose Zone Flow Model Uncertainty as Conditioned on Geophysical Data A. Binley & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02576.x
238. How can expert knowledge increase the realism of conceptual hydrological models? A case study based on the concept of dominant runoff process in the Swiss Pre-Alps M. Antonetti & M. Zappa https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4425-2018
239. How do geological map details influence the identification of geology-streamflow relationships in large-sample hydrology studies? T. do Nascimento et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-7173-2025
240. Outlier-Detection Methodology for Structural Identification Using Sparse Static Measurements M. Proverbio et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061702
241. Multi-basin and regional calibration based identification of distributed precipitation–runoff models for hourly runoff simulation: calibration and transfer of full and partial parameters T. Hailegeorgis & K. Alfredsen https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2015.174
242. Top‐down and data‐based mechanistic modelling of rainfall–flow dynamics at the catchment scale P. Young https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1328
243. Fusing dynamic physical constraints with PINN-xLSTM to enhance accuracy and physical consistency in runoff prediction under extreme hydrological events Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135310
244. Implications of model uncertainty for the mapping of hillslope‐scale soil erosion predictions R. Brazier et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.266
245. Conceptualising Scale in Regional Studies and Catchment Science – Towards an Integrated Characterisation of Spatial Units D. MacKinnon & D. Tetzlaff https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00231.x
246. Land cover effects on runoff patterns in eastern Piedmont (USA) watersheds J. Julian & R. Gardner https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9692
247. Is the current flood of data enough? A treatise on research needs for the improvement of flood modelling G. Di Baldassarre & S. Uhlenbrook https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8226
248. Identifying dynamical models of nitrate propagation in agricultural drinking water: how can we help agronomists? V. Laurain et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.12.152
249. Does hydrological connectivity improve modelling of coarse sediment delivery in upland environments? S. Reid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.023
250. Water Resources Management: The Myth, the Wicked, and the Future P. Reed & J. Kasprzyk https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000047
251. Using flow signatures and catchment similarities to evaluate the E-HYPE multi-basin model across Europe C. Donnelly et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1027710
252. Using UKCP09 probabilistic climate information for UK water resource planning B. Christierson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.020
253. Calibration of stormwater management model using flood extent data B. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.12.00051
254. Unraveling the hydrology of a Himalayan catchment through integration of high resolution in situ data and remote sensing with an advanced simulation model S. Ragettli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.01.013
255. Process consistency in models: The importance of system signatures, expert knowledge, and process complexity M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015484
256. A distributed modeling approach to water balance implications from changing land cover dynamics in permafrost environments N. Ahmed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2024.06.004
257. Structural calibration of an semi-distributed hydrological model of the Liard River basin G. Brown & J. Craig https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2020.1803143
258. Retention of Afforestation Areas as Part of Flood Protection - Research Site and Methodology for Headwater Watershad in Poland / Retencja Leśna Zlewni Jako Element Ochrony Przeciwpowodziowej T. Orczykowski & A. Tiukało https://doi.org/10.1515/ceer-2016-0006
259. Scale and model resolution effects on the distributions of advective solute travel times in catchments A. Darracq et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7588
260. Towards an alternative blueprint for a physically based digitally simulated hydrologic response modelling system K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.343
261. Palaeoflood records to assist in design of civil infrastructure in ephemeral rivers with scarce hydrological data: Ugab River, Namibia G. Cloete et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101263
262. Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology K. Beven & J. Freer https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8
263. Effects of Within-Storm Variability on Allochthonous Flash Flooding: A Synthetic Study S. Khosh Bin Ghomash et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040645
264. A brief history of information and disinformation in hydrological data and the impact on the evaluation of hydrological models K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2332616
265. Uncertainty analysis of the rainfall runoff model LisFlood within the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) F. Pappenberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635227
266. The importance of topography-controlled sub-grid process heterogeneity and semi-quantitative prior constraints in distributed hydrological models R. Nijzink et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1151-2016
267. Development of neuro-fuzzy models to account for temporal and spatial variations in a lumped rainfall–runoff model A. Nasr & M. Bruen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.060
268. Progress in and prospects for fluvial flood modelling D. Cox et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2002.1007
269. A network approach for multiscale catchment classification using traits F. Ciulla & C. Varadharajan https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1617-2024
270. Communicating uncertainty in hydro‐meteorological forecasts: mission impossible? M. Ramos et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/met.202
271. Global patterns in observed hydrologic processes H. McMillan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00407-w
272. Impacts of land use on the hydrological response of tropical Andean catchments B. Ochoa‐Tocachi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10980
273. BCUB – a large-sample ungauged basin attribute dataset for British Columbia, Canada D. Kovacek & S. Weijs https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-259-2025
274. Solute export patterns across the contiguous USA D. Kincaid et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15197
275. Response of the parameters of excess infiltration and excess storage model to land use cover change Y. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2020-0006
276. A downscaling method of topographic index distribution for matching the scales of model application and parameter identification N. Pradhan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6098
277. An Exploration of Bayesian Identification of Dominant Hydrological Mechanisms in Ungauged Catchments C. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030705
278. Simulating regional full-chain water balance using a novel surface water-groundwater coupled model H. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2026.101584
279. Multimodel evaluation of twenty lumped hydrological models under contrasted climate conditions G. Seiller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1171-2012
280. Parameter optimization of distributed hydrological model with a modified dynamically dimensioned search algorithm X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.028
281. Flux parameterization in the representative elementary watershed approach: Application to a natural basin P. Reggiani & T. Rientjes https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003693
282. Scaling of dominant runoff generation processes: Nested catchments approach using multiple tracers J. Didszun & S. Uhlenbrook https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005242
283. Multi-dimensional hydrological–hydraulic model with variational data assimilation for river networks and floodplains L. Pujol et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6085-2022
284. Drivers of Dissolved Organic Carbon Mobilization From Forested Headwater Catchments: A Multi Scaled Approach T. Adler et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.578608
285. Simple spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: A review N. Hunter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021
286. Grope in the Dark – Hydrological modelling of the artificial Chicken Creek catchment without validation possibilities H. Hölzel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.04.017
287. Modeling Hydrological Response to Climate Change in a Data-Scarce Glacierized High Mountain Astore Basin Using a Fully Distributed TOPKAPI Model I. Atif et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7110127
288. Prediction in ungauged basins: a grand challenge for theoretical hydrology M. Sivapalan https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5155
289. Runoff observation in a tropical Brantas watershed as observed from long-term globally available TerraClimate data 2001–2020 B. Wiwoho & I. Astuti https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-022-00214-5
290. Multi-station Joint Runoff Forecasting Using Graph Neural Network Coupled with Spatial Connectivity of Hydrological Stations Q. Wang & S. Zhu https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-024-10167-0
291. Current Awareness https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.469
292. Impact of measurement error and limited data frequency on parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification F. Khorashadi Zadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.022
293. Scale Issues in Soil Hydrology H. Vogel https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2019.01.0001
294. Data-Interpretation Methodologies for Practical Asset-Management S. Pai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan8020036
295. Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2012.01.005
296. Deriving hydrological inferences from a machine learning model to understand the physical drivers of flow duration curves S. Jain et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134687
297. Bayesian conditioning of a rainfall‐runoff model for predicting flows in ungauged catchments and under land use changes N. Bulygina et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009240
298. The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow J. Freer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000872
299. Patterns of similarity of seasonal water balances: A window into streamflow variability over a range of time scales W. Berghuijs et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015692
300. Mind, the gap in landscape‐evolution modelling J. Wainwright & J. Millington https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2008
301. Matching hydrologic response to measured effective hydraulic conductivity O. Vigiak et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5916
302. The Impact of an Open Water Balance Assumption on Understanding the Factors Controlling the Long‐Term Streamflow Components A. Ballarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR032413
303. Which catchment characteristics control the temporal dependence structure of daily river flows? A. Chiverton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10252
304. Methods for detecting change in hydrochemical time series in response to targeted pollutant mitigation in river catchments C. Lloyd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.036
305. Flood design recipes vs. reality: can predictions for ungauged basins be trusted? A. Efstratiadis et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1417-2014
306. Hydrological aspects of meteorological verification F. Pappenberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.171
307. Downscaling coarse grid hydrodynamic model simulations over large domains G. Schumann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.051
308. Influence of hydro-meteorological data spatial aggregation on streamflow modelling M. Girons Lopez & J. Seibert https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.026
309. Simpler models in environmental studies and predictions E. Hong et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1393264
310. Identification of Pumping Influences in Long‐Term Water Level Fluctuations D. Harp & V. Vesselinov https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00725.x
311. Deep learning, hydrological processes and the uniqueness of place K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13805
312. Using multiple objective calibrations to explore uncertainty in extreme event modeling A. Roche et al. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2020-0275
313. Does an interagency meeting in Washington imply uncertainty? K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5573
314. Prediction of Rainfall-Runoff in an Ungauged Basin: Case Study in the Mountainous Region of Northern Thailand T. Piman & M. Babel https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000573
315. A data-based regional scale autoregressive rainfall-runoff model: a study from the Odra River T. Niedzielski https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0077-y
316. A multiple hydrograph separation technique for identifying hydrological model structures and an interpretation of dominant process controls on flow duration curves C. Leong & Y. Yokoo https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14569
317. Processes affecting transfer of sediment and colloids, with associated phosphorus, from intensively farmed grasslands: a critical note on modelling of phosphorus transfers T. Krueger et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6596
318. Akım Ölçümü Alınmayan İki Alt Havzanın Dolaysız Akış Hidrograflarının Anlık Birim Hidrograf Yaklaşımıyla Karşılaştırılması H. AKAY & M. BADUNA KOÇYİĞİT https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.516396
319. On the similarity of hillslope hydrologic function: a clustering approach based on groundwater changes F. Maina et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3805-2022
320. Transferability of hydrological model parameter spaces in the estimation of runoff in ungauged catchments M. Zelelew & K. Alfredsen https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.838003
321. Comparing Structural Identification Methodologies for Fatigue Life Prediction of a Highway Bridge S. Pai et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2017.00073
322. A step toward global-scale applicability and transferability of flow duration curve studies: A flow duration curve review (2000–2020) C. Leong & Y. Yokoo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126984
323. Model uncertainty analysis by variance decomposition P. Willems https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.003
324. Design and experimentation of an empirical multistructure framework for accurate, sharp and reliable hydrological ensembles G. Seiller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.002
325. Runoff processes, stream water residence times and controlling landscape characteristics in a mesoscale catchment: An initial evaluation C. Soulsby et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.024
326. Hydrograph and recession flows simulations using deep learning: Watershed uniqueness and objective functions A. Gupta & S. McKenna https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100198
327. Review: Sources of Hydrological Model Uncertainties and Advances in Their Analysis E. Moges et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010028
328. Catchment processes and heterogeneity at multiple scales—benchmarking observations, conceptualization and prediction D. Tetzlaff et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7784
329. Transit times—the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1155
330. On doing hydrology with dragons: Realizing the value of perceptual models and knowledge accumulation T. Wagener et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1550
331. A linked spatial and temporal model of the chemical and biological status of a large, acid-sensitive river network C. Evans et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.037
332. Evaluating Autoselection Methods Used for Choosing Solutions from Pareto-Optimal Set: Does Nondominance Persist from Calibration to Validation Phase? G. Dumedah et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000389
333. Uncertainties in Data and Models to Describe Event Dynamics of Agricultural Sediment and Phosphorus Transfer T. Krueger et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0179
334. Comparing sensitivity analysis methods to advance lumped watershed model identification and evaluation Y. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-793-2007
335. Streamflow Estimation in Ungauged Catchments Using Regional Flow Duration Curve: Comparative Study J. Swain & K. Patra https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001509
336. Modeling of evapotranspiration changes with forest management practices: A genealogical review H. Komatsu & T. Kume https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124835
337. Source identification of sudden water pollution events in the Dongliao River using a hybrid machine learning framework Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41724-8
338. A Saturated Excess Runoff Pedotransfer Function for Vegetated Watersheds T. Steenhuis et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2013.03.0060
339. A novel operational water quality mobile prediction system with LSTM-Seq2Seq model L. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106290
340. Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration W. Immerzeel & P. Droogers https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.017
341. Repeating patterns in runoff time series: A basis for exploring hydrologic similarity of precipitation and catchment wetness conditions A. Hövel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130585
342. Assessment of the SWMM model uncertainties within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework for a high-resolution urban sewershed N. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9869
343. Will catchment characteristics moderate the projected effects of climate change on flow regimes in the Scottish Highlands? R. Capell et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9626
344. Flood Risk Assessment, Future Trend Modeling, and Risk Communication: A Review of Ongoing Research A. Salman & Y. Li https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000294
345. Regionalization of land‐use impacts on streamflow using a network of paired catchments B. Ochoa‐Tocachi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018596
346. Using hydrological and climatic catchment clusters to explore drivers of catchment behavior F. Jehn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1081-2020
347. Evaluating rainfall-driven LSTM for statistical analysis of low-flow regimes in the Nakagawa basin, Japan D. Kim & N. Shirakawa https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103366
348. Future Korean Water Resources Projection Considering Uncertainty of GCMs and Hydrological Models D. Bae et al. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.5.389
349. Interdisciplinary information for achieving water security L. James & M. Shafiee-Jood https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2017.10.001
350. Rainfall nowcasting models: state of the art and possible future perspectives D. De Luca et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2490780
351. Assessing the simulation of streamflow with the LSTM model across the continental United States using the MOPEX dataset A. Tounsi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08922-1
352. High-resolution hydrometeorological data from a network of headwater catchments in the tropical Andes B. Ochoa-Tocachi et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.80
353. Predictability of hydrologic response at the plot and catchment scales: Role of initial conditions E. Zehe & G. Blöschl https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002869
354. Runoff generation in ephemeral streams of the Virgin Islands: The case of Salt River, St. Croix D. Hensley et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102372
355. Toward catchment hydro‐biogeochemical theories L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1495
356. Modeling water quantity and quality for a typical agricultural plain basin of northern China by a coupled model B. Xue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148139
357. Application of Regional Climatic Models to Assess the Performance Evaluation of Changes on Flood Frequency in Woybo Catchment, Ethiopia T. Ukumo et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3351375
358. Comment on “Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models” by M. Thiemann, M. Trosset, H. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian K. Beven & P. Young https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001183
359. HESS Opinions On the use of laboratory experimentation: "Hydrologists, bring out shovels and garden hoses and hit the dirt" M. Kleinhans et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-369-2010
360. Evolutionary geomorphology: thresholds and nonlinearity in landform response to environmental change J. Phillips https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-731-2006
361. Quantification of predictive uncertainty in hydrological modelling by harnessing the wisdom of the crowd: A large-sample experiment at monthly timescale G. Papacharalampous et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103470
362. Impact of modellers' decisions on hydrological a priori predictions H. Holländer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2065-2014
363. Assessing hydrological change: deterministic general circulation models or spurious solar correlation? S. Franks https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.600
364. Impact of the numbers of observations and calibration parameters on equifinality, model performance, and output and parameter uncertainty Y. Her & I. Chaubey https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10487
365. Regional scale simulations of daily suspended sediment concentration at gauged and ungauged rivers using deep learning A. Gupta & D. Feng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133111
366. What Role Does Hydrological Science Play in the Age of Machine Learning? G. Nearing et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028091
367. Spatial distribution of groundwater recharge, based on regionalised soil moisture models in Wadi Natuf karst aquifers, Palestine C. Messerschmid & A. Aliewi https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1043-2022
368. Catchment classification by runoff behaviour with self-organizing maps (SOM) R. Ley et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2947-2011
369. Reply to comment by Melsen et al. on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” C. Hutton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020476
370. Using internal catchment information to reduce the uncertainty of discharge and baseflow predictions F. Gallart et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.06.005
371. Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH) – a community perspective G. Blöschl et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1620507
372. METHODOLOGIES FOR CALIBRATION AND PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS OF A WATERSHED MODEL1 J. Doherty & J. Johnston https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04381.x
373. The effect of forcing and landscape distribution on performance and consistency of model structures T. Euser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10445
374. Land use scenario development as a tool for watershed management within the Rio Mannu Basin A. De Girolamo & A. Lo Porto https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.005
375. A new regionalization approach and its application to predict flow duration curve in ungauged basins M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.039
376. Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 2. Application and experimental insights D. Kavetski & F. Fenicia https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010748
377. Effects of temporal resolution of river routing on hydrologic modeling and aquatic ecosystem health assessment with the SWAT model H. Qiu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105232
378. A method to obtain the spatial distribution of free water storage capacity based on topo-graphic index T. Bingxing et al. https://doi.org/10.18307/2017.0522
379. On the dynamic nature of hydrological similarity R. Loritz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3663-2018
380. Incremental model breakdown to assess the multi-hypotheses problem F. Jehn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-4565-2018
381. Do we need a Community Hydrological Model? M. Weiler & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016731