Articles | Volume 30, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5735-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5735-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Historical evolution of snowpack capacity to buffer rain-on-snow runoff in a large Columbia River headwaters basin
Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, 59812, USA
Aesir Consulting LLC, Missoula, 59801, USA
Joel Harper
Department of Geosciences, University of Montana, Missoula, 59812, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Andreas Colliander, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Alamgir Hossan, Catherine Walker, and Joel Harper
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5953, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5953, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how melting on an Antarctic ice shelf changes the snow and ice below the surface. By combining satellite microwave measurements with a detailed computer model, we show that meltwater can travel deeper and stay longer than models usually predict. This approach makes it possible to better track hidden melt and improve future estimates of ice loss and sea-level change.
Kirsten L. Gehl, Joel T. Harper, and Neil F. Humphrey
The Cryosphere, 19, 6791–6805, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6791-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6791-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The geometric form of snow grains governs snow compaction and the movement of air and water within the snow. We observed unexpectedly thick and deep layers of faceted snow grains in cores drilled along the flanks of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Based on field measurements and modeling, we find that meltwater infiltration and refreezing in the cold snow generates these grains. As more of the ice sheet is affected by melting, subsurface faceting of snow crystals may become increasingly important.
Alamgir Hossan, Andreas Colliander, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Joel Harper, Lauren Andrews, Jana Kolassa, Julie Z. Miller, and Richard Cullather
The Cryosphere, 19, 6077–6102, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6077-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-6077-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Microwave L-band radiometry offers a promising new tool for estimating the total surface-to-subsurface liquid water amount (LWA) in the snow and firn in polar ice sheets. An accurate modelling of wet snow effective permittivity is a key to this. Here, we evaluated the performance of ten commonly used microwave dielectric mixing models for estimating LWA in the percolation zone of the Greenland Ice Sheet to help an appropriate choice of dielectric mixing model for LWA retrieval algorithms.
Alamgir Hossan, Andreas Colliander, Baptiste Vandecrux, Nicole-Jeanne Schlegel, Joel Harper, Shawn Marshall, and Julie Z. Miller
The Cryosphere, 19, 4237–4258, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4237-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-4237-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We used L-band observations from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission to quantify the surface and subsurface liquid water amounts (LWAs) in the percolation zone of the Greenland ice sheet. The algorithm is described, and the validation results are provided. The results demonstrate the potential for creating an LWA data product across the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS), which will advance our understanding of ice sheet physical processes for better projection of Greenland’s contribution to global sea level rise.
Anja Løkkegaard, Kenneth D. Mankoff, Christian Zdanowicz, Gary D. Clow, Martin P. Lüthi, Samuel H. Doyle, Henrik H. Thomsen, David Fisher, Joel Harper, Andy Aschwanden, Bo M. Vinther, Dorthe Dahl-Jensen, Harry Zekollari, Toby Meierbachtol, Ian McDowell, Neil Humphrey, Anne Solgaard, Nanna B. Karlsson, Shfaqat A. Khan, Benjamin Hills, Robert Law, Bryn Hubbard, Poul Christoffersen, Mylène Jacquemart, Julien Seguinot, Robert S. Fausto, and William T. Colgan
The Cryosphere, 17, 3829–3845, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3829-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3829-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents a database compiling 95 ice temperature profiles from the Greenland ice sheet and peripheral ice caps. Ice viscosity and hence ice flow are highly sensitive to ice temperature. To highlight the value of the database in evaluating ice flow simulations, profiles from the Greenland ice sheet are compared to a modeled temperature field. Reoccurring discrepancies between modeled and observed temperatures provide insight on the difficulties faced when simulating ice temperatures.
Joel Harper, Toby Meierbachtol, Neil Humphrey, Jun Saito, and Aidan Stansberry
The Cryosphere, 15, 5409–5421, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5409-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5409-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We use surface and borehole measurements to investigate the generation and fate of basal meltwater in the ablation zone of western Greenland. The rate of basal meltwater generation at borehole study sites increases by up to 20 % over the winter period. Accommodation of all basal meltwater by expansion of isolated subglacial cavities is implausible. Other sinks for water do not likely balance basal meltwater generation, implying water evacuation through a connected drainage system in winter.
Cited articles
Aguado, E., Cayan, D., Riddle, L., and Roos, M.: Climatic Fluctuations and the Timing of West Coast Streamflow, J. Climate, 5, 1468–1483, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1468:CFATTO>2.0.CO;2, 1992.
Alduchov, O. A. and Eskridge, R. E.: Improved Magnus Form Approximation of Saturation Vapor Pressure, J. Appl. Meteorol., 35, 601–609, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035<0601:IMFAOS>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Barnett, T. P., Adam, J. C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions, Nature, 438, 303–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04141, 2005.
Bavay, M. and Egger, T.: MeteoIO 2.4.2: a preprocessing library for meteorological data, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 3135–3151, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-3135-2014, 2014.
Berghuijs, W. R., Woods, R. A., Hutton, C. J., and Sivapalan, M.: Dominant flood generating mechanisms across the United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 4382–4390, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068070, 2016.
Bohr, G. S. and Aguado, E.: Use of April 1 SWE measurements as estimates of peak seasonal snowpack and total cold-season precipitation, Water Resour. Res., 37, 51–60, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900256, 2001.
Broderick, C., Murphy, C., Wilby, R. L., Matthews, T., Prudhomme, C., and Adamson, M.: Using a Scenario‐Neutral Framework to Avoid Potential Maladaptation to Future Flood Risk, Water Resour. Res., 55, 1079–1104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023623, 2019.
Cayan, D. R.: Interannual Climate Variability and Snowpack in the Western United States, J. Climate, 9, 928–948, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0928:ICVASI>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Cho, E., Vuyovich, C. M., Kumar, S. V., Wrzesien, M. L., Kim, R. S., and Jacobs, J. M.: Precipitation biases and snow physics limitations drive the uncertainties in macroscale modeled snow water equivalent, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5721–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, 2022.
Cohen, J., Ye, H., and Jones, J.: Trends and variability in rain-on-snow events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7115–7122, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065320, 2015.
Colbeck, S. C.: A Theory of Water Percolation in Snow, J. Glaciol., 11, 369–385, https://doi.org/10.3189/s0022143000022346, 1972.
Coléou, C. and Lesaffre, B.: Irreducible water saturation in snow: experimental results in a cold laboratory, Ann. Glaciol., 26, 64–68, https://doi.org/10.3189/1998aog26-1-64-68, 1998.
Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S): ERA5-Land hourly data from 1950 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.e2161bac, 2019.
Déry, S. J. and Brown, R. D.: Recent Northern Hemisphere snow cover extent trends and implications for the snow-albedo feedback, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031474, 2007.
DeWalle, D. R. and Rango, A.: Principles of Snow Hydrology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN 978-0-521-82362-3, 2008.
de Vries, I., Sippel, S., Zeder, J., Fischer, E., and Knutti, R.: Increasing extreme precipitation variability plays a key role in future record-shattering event probability, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01622-1, 2024.
Donat, M. G., Alexander, L. V., Yang, H., Durre, I., Vose, R., Dunn, R. J. H., Willett, K. M., Aguilar, E., Brunet, M., Caesar, J., Hewitson, B., Jack, C., Klein Tank, A. M. G., Kruger, A. C., Marengo, J., Peterson, T. C., Renom, M., Oria Rojas, C., Rusticucci, M., Salinger, J., Elrayah, A. S., Sekele, S. S., Srivastava, A. K., Trewin, B., Villarroel, C., Vincent, L. A., Zhai, P., Zhang, X., and Kitching, S.: Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: The HadEX2 dataset, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2098–2118, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50150, 2013.
Essery, R., Morin, S., Lejeune, Y., and Ménard, C. B.: A comparison of 1701 snow models using observations from an alpine site, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 131–148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.013, 2013.
Evan, A. T.: A new method to characterize changes in the seasonal cycle of snowpack, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 58, 131–143, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0150.1, 2019.
Fischer, E. M. and Knutti, R.: Observed heavy precipitation increase confirms theory and early models, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 986–991, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3110, 2016.
Freudiger, D., Kohn, I., Stahl, K., and Weiler, M.: Large-scale analysis of changing frequencies of rain-on-snow events with flood-generation potential, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2695–2709, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2695-2014, 2014.
Haleakala, K., Brandt, W. T., Hatchett, B. J., Li, D., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Gebremichael, M.: Watershed memory amplified the Oroville rain-on-snow flood of February 2017, PNAS Nexus, 2, https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac295, 2023.
Hamlet, A. F., Mote, P. W., Clark, M. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Effects of Temperature and Precipitation Variability on Snowpack Trends in the Western United States, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3538.1, 2005.
Hatchett, B. J. and McEvoy, D. J.: Exploring the origins of snow drought in the northern sierra nevada, california, Earth Interact., 22, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-17-0027.1, 2018.
Judi, D. R., Rakowski, C. L., Waichler, S. R., Feng, Y., and Wigmosta, M. S.: Integrated modeling approach for the development of climate-informed, actionable information, Water (Switzerland), 10, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10060775, 2018.
Juras, R., Würzer, S., Pavlásek, J., Vitvar, T., and Jonas, T.: Rainwater propagation through snowpack during rain-on-snow sprinkling experiments under different snow conditions, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 4973–4987, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-4973-2017, 2017.
Lehning, M., Bartlet, P., Brown, B., Russi, T., Stöckli, U., and Zimmerli, M.: SNOWPACK model calculations for avalanche warning based upon a new network of weather and snow stations, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 30, 145–157, 1999.
Lehning, M., Bartelt, P., Brown, B., Fierz, C., and Satyawali, P.: A physical SNOWPACK model for the Swiss avalanche warning: Part II. Snow microstructure, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 35, 147–167, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-232X(02)00073-3, 2002.
Lehning, M., Völksch Ingo, I., Gustafsson, D., Nguyen, T. A., Stähli, M., and Zappa, M.: ALPINE3D: A detailed model of mountain surface processes and its application to snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 2111–2128, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6204, 2006.
Li, C., Sun, Q., Wang, J., Liang, Y., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X., and Li, T.: Constraining Projected Changes in Rare Intense Precipitation Events Across Global Land Regions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105605, 2024.
Li, D., Lettenmaier, D. P., Margulis, S. A., and Andreadis, K.: The Role of Rain-on-Snow in Flooding Over the Conterminous United States, Water Resour. Res., 55, 8492–8513, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024950, 2019.
Luce, C. H., Lopez-Burgos, V., and Holden, Z.: Sensitivity of snowpack storage to precipitation and temperature using spatial and temporal analog models, Water Resour. Res., 50, 9447–9462, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014844, 2014.
Marks, D., Kimball, J., Tingey, D., and Link, T.: The sensitivity of snowmelt processes to climate conditions and forest cover during rain-on-snow: a case study of the 1996 Pacific Northwest flood, Hydrol. Process., 12, 1569–1587, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199808/09)12:10/11<1569::AID-HYP682>3.0.CO;2-L, 1998.
McCabe, G. J., Clark, M. P., and Hay, L. E.: Rain-on-snow events in the western United States, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 319–328, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-3-319, 2007.
Mote, P. W., Hamlet, A. F., Clark, M. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Declining mountain snowpack in Western North America, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 39–50, 2005.
Mote, P. W., Li, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Xiao, M., and Engel, R.: Dramatic declines in snowpack in the western US, NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0012-1, 2018.
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021, 2021.
Musselman, K. N., Molotch, N. P., and Margulis, S. A.: Snowmelt response to simulated warming across a large elevation gradient, southern Sierra Nevada, California, The Cryosphere, 11, 2847–2866, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-2847-2017, 2017.
Musselman, K. N., Lehner, F., Ikeda, K., Clark, M. P., Prein, A. F., Liu, C., Barlage, M., and Rasmussen, R.: Projected increases and shifts in rain-on-snow flood risk over western North America, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 808–812, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0236-4, 2018.
Musselman, K. N., Addor, N., Vano, J. A., and Molotch, N. P.: Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources, Nat. Clim. Change, 11, 418–424, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-9, 2021.
Ohba, M. and Kawase, H.: Rain-on-Snow events in Japan as projected by a large ensemble of regional climate simulations, Clim. Dynam., 55, 2785–2800, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05419-8, 2020.
Pall, P., Tallaksen, L. M., and Stordal, F.: A Climatology of Rain-on-Snow Events for Norway, J. Climate, 32, 6995–7016, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0529.1, 2019.
Pan, M., Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., Mitchell, K. E., Houser, P. R., Schaake, J. C., Robock, A., Lohmann, D., Cosgrove, B., Duan, Q., Luo, L., Higgins, R. W., Pinker, R. T., and Tarpley, J. D.: Snow process modeling in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): 1. Evaluation of model simulated snow water equivalent, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003994, 2003.
Pederson, G. T., Gray, S. T., Woodhouse, C. A., Betancourt, J. L., Fagre, D. B., Littell, J. S., Watson, E., Luckman, B. H., and Graumlich, L. J.: The Unusual Nature of Recent Snowpack Declines in the North American Cordillera, Science, 333, 332–335, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1201570, 2011.
Rahmstorf, S. and Coumou, D.: Increase of extreme events in a warming world, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 17905–17909, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1101766108, 2011.
Raleigh, M. S., Lundquist, J. D., and Clark, M. P.: Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3153–3179, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015, 2015.
Robinson, A., Lehmann, J., Barriopedro, D., Rahmstorf, S., and Coumou, D.: Increasing heat and rainfall extremes now far outside the historical climate, NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci., 4, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-021-00202-w, 2021.
Schmitt, J., Tseng, K. C., Hughes, M., and Johnson, N. C.: Illuminating Snow Droughts: The Future of Western United States Snowpack in the SPEAR Large Ensemble, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039754, 2024.
Seneviratne, S. I., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C., Luca, A. D., Ghosh, S., Iskandar, I., Kossin, J., Lewis, S., Otto, F., Pinto, I., Satoh, M., Vicente-Serrano, S., Wehner, M., and Zhou, B.: Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate, in: Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 1513–1766, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.013, 2021.
Serreze, M. C., Clark, M. P., Armstrong, R. L., McGinnis, D. A., and Pulwarty, R. S.: Characteristics of the western United States snowpack from snowpack telemetry (SNOTEL) data, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2145–2160, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900090, 1999.
Sourp, L., Gascoin, S., Jarlan, L., Pedinotti, V., Bormann, K. J., and Baba, M. W.: Evaluation of high-resolution snowpack simulations from global datasets and comparison with Sentinel-1 snow depth retrievals in the Sierra Nevada, USA, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 597–611, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-597-2025, 2025.
Sui, J. and Koehler, G.: Rain-on-snow induced flood events in Southern Germany, J. Hydrol.-Amst., 252, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00460-7, 2001.
Wayand, N. E., Lundquist, J. D., and Clark, M. P.: Modeling the influence of hypsometry, vegetation, and storm energy on snowmelt contributions to basins during rain-on-snow floods, Water Resour. Res., 51, 8551–8569, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016576, 2015.
Würzer, S., Jonas, T., Wever, N., and Lehning, M.: Influence of initial snowpack properties on runoffformation during rain-on-snow events, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 1801–1815, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0181.1, 2016.
Yan, H., Sun, N., Wigmosta, M., Skaggs, R., Hou, Z., and Leung, R.: Next-Generation Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves for Hydrologic Design in Snow-Dominated Environments, Water Resour. Res., 54, 1093–1108, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021290, 2018.
yetiskier: yetiskier/snowpack-buffering-capacity: snowpack-buffering-capacity (Version v1.0.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17290309, 2025.
Zanewich, K. P. and Rood, S. B.: Regional Differences in High Elevation Snowpack Decline Along the North American Rocky Mountains, Hydrol. Process., 39, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70153, 2025.
Zeng, X., Broxton, P., and Dawson, N.: Snowpack Change From 1982 to 2016 Over Conterminous United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12940–12947, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079621, 2018.
Zhou, Y., North, J. S., Rhoades, A. M., Tao, J., Rudisill, W., Risser, M. D., and Collins, W. D.: Atmospheric River Frequency-Category Characteristics Shape U.S. West Coast Runoff, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD041805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041805, 2025.
Short summary
We present daily analysis of a 72-year snowpack evolution model driven by climate reanalysis data over a large Columbia River headwaters basin. Trends in cold content and total capillary retention reveal decreasing capacity to buffer against rain-on-snow flood events with the largest changes occurring during the last 5 weeks of the accumulation period. We demonstrate that seasonality of changes in factors related to snowpack buffering capacity is important when assessing rain-on-snow flood risk.
We present daily analysis of a 72-year snowpack evolution model driven by climate reanalysis...