Articles | Volume 30, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4343-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4343-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
15 Jul 2026
Research article |
| 15 Jul 2026
| 15 Jul 2026
Critical assessment of metrics and methods used to quantify temporal loading of rainfall events
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Mark A. Trigg
School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Cathryn E. Birch
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Rasmus Lau Thejlade Henriksen
Weather research, Danish Meteorological Institute. Sankt Kjelds Plads 11, 2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
Steven J. Böing
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Jonas Wied Pedersen
Weather research, Danish Meteorological Institute. Sankt Kjelds Plads 11, 2100 Copenhagen O, Denmark
DTU Sustain, Technical University of Denmark. Bygningstorvet Building 115, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Related authors
Alexis Comber, Molly Asher, Yiyu Wang, Minh Kieu, Quang-Thanh Bui, Thi Thuy Hang Nguyen, Hoang Huu Phe, and Nick Malleson
AGILE GIScience Ser., 6, 18, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-6-18-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-6-18-2025, 2025
Molly Asher, Yannick Oswald, and Nick Malleson
AGILE GIScience Ser., 4, 18, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-4-18-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-4-18-2023, 2023
Niels Agertoft, Jian Su, Jonas Wied Pedersen, Ida Margrethe Ringgaard, and Morten Andreas Dahl Larsen
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 5641–5668, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5641-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-5641-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Extratropical cyclones (ETCs) drive severe weather and cause significant socio-economic impacts. We present ImpactETC1.0, a framework that identifies ETC tracks and links them to local impacts, here storm surges. It uses global optimisation, BLOB analysis, and several post-processing options to improve tracking quality and identify impact-relevant tracks. Results show ImpactETC1.0 enables efficient, impact-focused ETC tracking.
Declan L. Finney, Alan M. Blyth, Paul R. Field, Martin I. Daily, Benjamin J. Murray, Mengyu Sun, Paul J. Connolly, Zhiqiang Cui, and Steven Böing
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 10907–10929, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10907-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-10907-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present observation-informed modelling from the Deep Convective Microphysics Experiment (DCMEX) to study how environmental conditions and cloud processes affect anvil cloud albedo and radiation. Aerosols influencing cloud droplets or influencing ice formation yield varying radiative effects. We introduce fingerprint metrics to discern these effects. Using detailed observations and modelling, we offer insights into high-cloud radiative effects and feedbacks.
Alexis Comber, Molly Asher, Yiyu Wang, Minh Kieu, Quang-Thanh Bui, Thi Thuy Hang Nguyen, Hoang Huu Phe, and Nick Malleson
AGILE GIScience Ser., 6, 18, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-6-18-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-6-18-2025, 2025
Emma Howard, Steven Woolnough, Nicholas Klingaman, Daniel Shipley, Claudio Sanchez, Simon C. Peatman, Cathryn E. Birch, and Adrian J. Matthews
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3815–3837, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3815-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3815-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes a coupled atmosphere–mixed-layer ocean simulation setup that will be used to study weather processes in Southeast Asia. The set-up has been used to compare high-resolution simulations, which are able to partially resolve storms, to coarser simulations, which cannot. We compare the model performance at representing variability of rainfall and sea surface temperatures across length scales between the coarse and fine models.
Declan L. Finney, Alan M. Blyth, Martin Gallagher, Huihui Wu, Graeme J. Nott, Michael I. Biggerstaff, Richard G. Sonnenfeld, Martin Daily, Dan Walker, David Dufton, Keith Bower, Steven Böing, Thomas Choularton, Jonathan Crosier, James Groves, Paul R. Field, Hugh Coe, Benjamin J. Murray, Gary Lloyd, Nicholas A. Marsden, Michael Flynn, Kezhen Hu, Navaneeth M. Thamban, Paul I. Williams, Paul J. Connolly, James B. McQuaid, Joseph Robinson, Zhiqiang Cui, Ralph R. Burton, Gordon Carrie, Robert Moore, Steven J. Abel, Dave Tiddeman, and Graydon Aulich
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2141–2163, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2141-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2141-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The DCMEX (Deep Convective Microphysics Experiment) project undertook an aircraft- and ground-based measurement campaign of New Mexico deep convective clouds during July–August 2022. The campaign coordinated a broad range of instrumentation measuring aerosol, cloud physics, radar signals, thermodynamics, dynamics, electric fields, and weather. The project's objectives included the utilisation of these data with satellite observations to study the anvil cloud radiative effect.
Ben Maybee, Cathryn E. Birch, Steven J. Böing, Thomas Willis, Linda Speight, Aurore N. Porson, Charlie Pilling, Kay L. Shelton, and Mark A. Trigg
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1415–1436, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1415-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-1415-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the development and verification of FOREWARNS, a novel method for regional-scale forecasting of surface water flooding. We detail outcomes from a workshop held with UK forecast users, who indicated they valued the forecasts and would use them to complement national guidance. We use results of objective forecast tests against flood observations over northern England to show that this confidence is justified and that FOREWARNS meets the needs of UK flood responders.
Joseph Smith, Cathryn Birch, John Marsham, Simon Peatman, Massimo Bollasina, and George Pankiewicz
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 567–582, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-567-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-567-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Nowcasting uses observations to make predictions of the atmosphere on short timescales and is particularly applicable to the Maritime Continent, where storms rapidly develop and cause natural disasters. This paper evaluates probabilistic and deterministic satellite nowcasting algorithms over the Maritime Continent. We show that the probabilistic approach is most skilful at small scales (~ 60 km), whereas the deterministic approach is most skilful at larger scales (~ 200 km).
Zhiqiang Cui, Alan Blyth, Ralph Burton, Sandrine Bony, Steven Böing, Alan Gadian, and Leif Denby
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1999, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1999, 2023
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Cumulus clouds near Barbados can influence how much heat and energy reaches the Earth's surface. A cluster of clouds resembling a flower is presented. Satellite images, dropsonde data, and weather data are used to understand how this cloud system developed. A significant feature was the appearance of a large area of rain at the centre of the cloud system during its later stages. The paper also studied the environmental conditions around the cloud system.
Molly Asher, Yannick Oswald, and Nick Malleson
AGILE GIScience Ser., 4, 18, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-4-18-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-4-18-2023, 2023
Mark V. Bernhofen, Mark A. Trigg, P. Andrew Sleigh, Christopher C. Sampson, and Andrew M. Smith
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 2829–2847, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-2829-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The use of different global datasets to calculate flood exposure can lead to differences in global flood exposure estimates. In this study, we use three global population datasets and a simple measure of a river’s flood susceptibility (based on the terrain alone) to explore how the choice of population data and the size of river represented in global flood models affect global and national flood exposure estimates.
Bjorn Stevens, Sandrine Bony, David Farrell, Felix Ament, Alan Blyth, Christopher Fairall, Johannes Karstensen, Patricia K. Quinn, Sabrina Speich, Claudia Acquistapace, Franziska Aemisegger, Anna Lea Albright, Hugo Bellenger, Eberhard Bodenschatz, Kathy-Ann Caesar, Rebecca Chewitt-Lucas, Gijs de Boer, Julien Delanoë, Leif Denby, Florian Ewald, Benjamin Fildier, Marvin Forde, Geet George, Silke Gross, Martin Hagen, Andrea Hausold, Karen J. Heywood, Lutz Hirsch, Marek Jacob, Friedhelm Jansen, Stefan Kinne, Daniel Klocke, Tobias Kölling, Heike Konow, Marie Lothon, Wiebke Mohr, Ann Kristin Naumann, Louise Nuijens, Léa Olivier, Robert Pincus, Mira Pöhlker, Gilles Reverdin, Gregory Roberts, Sabrina Schnitt, Hauke Schulz, A. Pier Siebesma, Claudia Christine Stephan, Peter Sullivan, Ludovic Touzé-Peiffer, Jessica Vial, Raphaela Vogel, Paquita Zuidema, Nicola Alexander, Lyndon Alves, Sophian Arixi, Hamish Asmath, Gholamhossein Bagheri, Katharina Baier, Adriana Bailey, Dariusz Baranowski, Alexandre Baron, Sébastien Barrau, Paul A. Barrett, Frédéric Batier, Andreas Behrendt, Arne Bendinger, Florent Beucher, Sebastien Bigorre, Edmund Blades, Peter Blossey, Olivier Bock, Steven Böing, Pierre Bosser, Denis Bourras, Pascale Bouruet-Aubertot, Keith Bower, Pierre Branellec, Hubert Branger, Michal Brennek, Alan Brewer, Pierre-Etienne Brilouet, Björn Brügmann, Stefan A. Buehler, Elmo Burke, Ralph Burton, Radiance Calmer, Jean-Christophe Canonici, Xavier Carton, Gregory Cato Jr., Jude Andre Charles, Patrick Chazette, Yanxu Chen, Michal T. Chilinski, Thomas Choularton, Patrick Chuang, Shamal Clarke, Hugh Coe, Céline Cornet, Pierre Coutris, Fleur Couvreux, Susanne Crewell, Timothy Cronin, Zhiqiang Cui, Yannis Cuypers, Alton Daley, Gillian M. Damerell, Thibaut Dauhut, Hartwig Deneke, Jean-Philippe Desbios, Steffen Dörner, Sebastian Donner, Vincent Douet, Kyla Drushka, Marina Dütsch, André Ehrlich, Kerry Emanuel, Alexandros Emmanouilidis, Jean-Claude Etienne, Sheryl Etienne-Leblanc, Ghislain Faure, Graham Feingold, Luca Ferrero, Andreas Fix, Cyrille Flamant, Piotr Jacek Flatau, Gregory R. Foltz, Linda Forster, Iulian Furtuna, Alan Gadian, Joseph Galewsky, Martin Gallagher, Peter Gallimore, Cassandra Gaston, Chelle Gentemann, Nicolas Geyskens, Andreas Giez, John Gollop, Isabelle Gouirand, Christophe Gourbeyre, Dörte de Graaf, Geiske E. de Groot, Robert Grosz, Johannes Güttler, Manuel Gutleben, Kashawn Hall, George Harris, Kevin C. Helfer, Dean Henze, Calvert Herbert, Bruna Holanda, Antonio Ibanez-Landeta, Janet Intrieri, Suneil Iyer, Fabrice Julien, Heike Kalesse, Jan Kazil, Alexander Kellman, Abiel T. Kidane, Ulrike Kirchner, Marcus Klingebiel, Mareike Körner, Leslie Ann Kremper, Jan Kretzschmar, Ovid Krüger, Wojciech Kumala, Armin Kurz, Pierre L'Hégaret, Matthieu Labaste, Tom Lachlan-Cope, Arlene Laing, Peter Landschützer, Theresa Lang, Diego Lange, Ingo Lange, Clément Laplace, Gauke Lavik, Rémi Laxenaire, Caroline Le Bihan, Mason Leandro, Nathalie Lefevre, Marius Lena, Donald Lenschow, Qiang Li, Gary Lloyd, Sebastian Los, Niccolò Losi, Oscar Lovell, Christopher Luneau, Przemyslaw Makuch, Szymon Malinowski, Gaston Manta, Eleni Marinou, Nicholas Marsden, Sebastien Masson, Nicolas Maury, Bernhard Mayer, Margarette Mayers-Als, Christophe Mazel, Wayne McGeary, James C. McWilliams, Mario Mech, Melina Mehlmann, Agostino Niyonkuru Meroni, Theresa Mieslinger, Andreas Minikin, Peter Minnett, Gregor Möller, Yanmichel Morfa Avalos, Caroline Muller, Ionela Musat, Anna Napoli, Almuth Neuberger, Christophe Noisel, David Noone, Freja Nordsiek, Jakub L. Nowak, Lothar Oswald, Douglas J. Parker, Carolyn Peck, Renaud Person, Miriam Philippi, Albert Plueddemann, Christopher Pöhlker, Veronika Pörtge, Ulrich Pöschl, Lawrence Pologne, Michał Posyniak, Marc Prange, Estefanía Quiñones Meléndez, Jule Radtke, Karim Ramage, Jens Reimann, Lionel Renault, Klaus Reus, Ashford Reyes, Joachim Ribbe, Maximilian Ringel, Markus Ritschel, Cesar B. Rocha, Nicolas Rochetin, Johannes Röttenbacher, Callum Rollo, Haley Royer, Pauline Sadoulet, Leo Saffin, Sanola Sandiford, Irina Sandu, Michael Schäfer, Vera Schemann, Imke Schirmacher, Oliver Schlenczek, Jerome Schmidt, Marcel Schröder, Alfons Schwarzenboeck, Andrea Sealy, Christoph J. Senff, Ilya Serikov, Samkeyat Shohan, Elizabeth Siddle, Alexander Smirnov, Florian Späth, Branden Spooner, M. Katharina Stolla, Wojciech Szkółka, Simon P. de Szoeke, Stéphane Tarot, Eleni Tetoni, Elizabeth Thompson, Jim Thomson, Lorenzo Tomassini, Julien Totems, Alma Anna Ubele, Leonie Villiger, Jan von Arx, Thomas Wagner, Andi Walther, Ben Webber, Manfred Wendisch, Shanice Whitehall, Anton Wiltshire, Allison A. Wing, Martin Wirth, Jonathan Wiskandt, Kevin Wolf, Ludwig Worbes, Ethan Wright, Volker Wulfmeyer, Shanea Young, Chidong Zhang, Dongxiao Zhang, Florian Ziemen, Tobias Zinner, and Martin Zöger
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4067–4119, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4067-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4067-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The EUREC4A field campaign, designed to test hypothesized mechanisms by which clouds respond to warming and benchmark next-generation Earth-system models, is presented. EUREC4A comprised roughly 5 weeks of measurements in the downstream winter trades of the North Atlantic – eastward and southeastward of Barbados. It was the first campaign that attempted to characterize the full range of processes and scales influencing trade wind clouds.
Jennifer Saxby, Julia Crook, Simon Peatman, Cathryn Birch, Juliane Schwendike, Maria Valdivieso da Costa, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, Chris Holloway, Nicholas P. Klingaman, Ashis Mitra, and Huw Lewis
Weather Clim. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-46, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-2021-46, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses the ability of the new Met Office IND1 numerical model to simulate tropical cyclones and their associated hazards, such as high winds and heavy rainfall. The new system consists of both atmospheric and oceanic models coupled together, allowing us to explore the sensitivity of cyclones to important air–sea feedbacks. We find that the model can accurately simulate tropical cyclone position, structure, and intensity, which are crucial for predicting and mitigating hazards.
Cited articles
Alavinia, M., Saleh, F. N., and Asadi, H.: Effects of rainfall patterns on runoff and rainfall-induced erosion, Int. J. Sediment Res., 34, 270–278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.11.001, 2019. a
Amin, S., Sepaskhah, A. R., and Keshmiripour, B.: Rainfall intensity distribution patterns in climatological conditions of four stations in Fars province, Iran, Iran. J. Sci. Technol., 24, 89–98, 2000. a
Aryal, R., Furumai, H., Nakajima, F., and Jinadasa, H.: The role of inter-event time definition and recovery of initial/depression loss for the accuracy in quantitative simulations of highway runoff, Urban Water J., 4, 53–58, 2007. a
Asher, M., Pedersen, J. W., Böing, S., Birch, C., Trigg, M., and Kendon, E.: Extreme rainfall and temporal loading in Great Britain: Analysis of present and future trends using a convection-permitting climate model, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 62, 102750, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102750, 2025a. a, b
Asher, M., Trigg, M., Boïng, S., and Birch, C.: The Sensitivity of Urban Pluvial Flooding to the Temporal Distribution of Rainfall Within Design Storms, J. Flood Risk Manag., 18, e70097, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70097, 2025b. a
Boughton, W. and Droop, O.: Continuous simulation for design flood estimation—a review, Environ. Modell. Softw., 18, 309–318, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00004-5, 2003. a, b
Cai, Y., Yang, Y., Tan, Q., Dai, C., Zhu, Z., and Zhang, X.: Impacts of temporal/spatial rainfall heterogeneities on peak runoff distribution and intensities for an urban river basin of south China, River, 3, 24–37, https://doi.org/10.1002/rvr2.77, 2024. a, b
Centre for Ecology & Hydrology: The Flood Estimation Handbook (five volumes), Volume 3: Statistical procedures for flood frequency estimation, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, 1, ISBN 978-1-906698-03-4, 999. a
de Lima, J. L., Carvalho, S. C., and P de Lima, M. I.: Rainfall simulator experiments on the importance of when rainfall burst occurs during storm events on runoff and soil loss, Z. Geomorphol. Supp., 57, 91–109, https://doi.org/10.1127/0372-8854/2012/S-00096, 2013. a
Dey, P.: On the Structure of the Intermittency of Rainfall, Water Resour. Manage., 37, 1461–1472, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03441-z, 2023. a
DMI: Climate Data – DMI Open Data, DMI [data set], https://www.dmi.dk/friedata/dokumentation/climate-data (last access: 22 June 2025), 2025. a
Dolšak, D., Bezak, N., and Šraj, M.: Temporal characteristics of rainfall events under three climate types in Slovenia, J. Hydrol., 541, 1395–1405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.047, 2016. a
Dunkerley, D.: Identifying individual rain events from pluviograph records: a review with analysis of data from an Australian dryland site, Hydrol. Process.l, 22, 5024–5036, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7122, 2008. a, b
Dunkerley, D.: Intra-event intermittency of rainfall: An analysis of the metrics of rain and no-rain periods, Hydrol. Process., 29, 3294–3305, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10454, 2015. a, b, c
Dunkerley, D.: The importance of incorporating rain intensity profiles in rainfall simulation studies of infiltration, runoff production, soil erosion, and related landsurface processes, J. Hydrol., 603, 126834, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126834, 2021a. a, b
Dunkerley, D.: Intermittency of rainfall at sub-daily timescales: New quantitative indices based on the number, duration, and sequencing of interruptions to rainfall, Atmos. Res., 253, 105475, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105475, 2021b. a, b
Dunkerley, D.: Huff quartile classification of rainfall intensity profiles ('storm patterns'): A modified approach employing an intensity threshold, Catena, 216, 106371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2022.106371, 2022. a
Dunkerley, D.: Rainfall intensity and intermittency over timescales of minutes: Measurement using low sampling-rate acoustic recording, Atmos. Res., 290, 106814, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106814, 2023. a
Dunkerley, D. L.: How do the rain rates of sub-event intervals such as the maximum 5-and 15-min rates (I5 or I30) relate to the properties of the enclosing rainfall event?, Hydrol. Process., 24, 2425–2439, 2010. a
Dunkerley, D. L.: Rainfall intensity bursts and the erosion of soils: An analysis highlighting the need for high temporal resolution rainfall data for research under current and future climates, Earth Surface Dynamics, 7, 345–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-345-2019, 2019. a
Einfalt, T., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Golz, C., Jensen, N.-E., Quirmbach, M., Vaes, G., and Vieux, B.: Towards a roadmap for use of radar rainfall data in urban drainage, J. Hydrol., 299, 186–202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.08.004, 2004. a
Fan, L., Lehmann, P., Zheng, C., and Or, D.: Rainfall intensity temporal patterns affect shallow landslide triggering and hazard evolution, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085994, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085994, 2020. a, b, c
Formetta, G., Prosdocimi, I., Stewart, E., and Bell, V.: Estimating the index flood with continuous hydrological models: an application in Great Britain, Hydrol. Res., 49, 123–133, https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2017.251, 2018. a
Fowler, H. J., Lenderink, G., Prein, A. F., Westra, S., Allan, R. P., Ban, N., Barbero, R., Berg, P., Blenkinsop, S., Do, H. X., Guerreiro, S., Haerter, J. O., Kendon, E. J., Lewis, E., Schaer, C., Sharma, A., Villarini, G., Wasko, C., and Zhang, X.: Anthropogenic intensification of short-duration rainfall extremes, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2, 107–122, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-00128-6, 2021. a, b
Freitas, E. d. S., Coelho, V. H. R., Xuan, Y., de CD Melo, D., Gadelha, A. N., Santos, E. A., Galvão, C. d. O., Ramos Filho, G. M., Barbosa, L. R., Huffman, G. J., Petersen, W. A., and Almeida, C. d. O.: The performance of the IMERG satellite-based product in identifying sub-daily rainfall events and their properties, J. Hydrol., 589, 125128, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125128, 2020. a
Fu, X., Liu, J., Mei, C., Luan, Q., Wang, H., Shao, W., Sun, P., and Huo, Y.: Effect of typhoon rainstorm patterns on the spatio-temporal distribution of non-point source pollution in a coastal urbanized watershed, J. Clean. Prod., 292, 126098, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126098, 2021. a
Gao, G., Liang, Y., Liu, J., Dunkerley, D., and Fu, B.: A modified RUSLE model to simulate soil erosion under different ecological restoration types in the loess hilly area, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 12, 258–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.08.007, 2024. a
Ghanghas, A., Sharma, A., and Merwade, V.: Unveiling the evolution of extreme rainfall storm structure across space and time in a warming climate, Earths Future, 12, e2024EF004675, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF004675, 2024. a
Gholami, L., Khaledi Darvishan, A., Spalevic, V., Cerdà, A., and Kavian, A.: Effect of storm pattern on soil erosion in damaged rangeland: Field rainfall simulation approach, J. Mt. Sci., 18, 706–715, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5633-2, 2021. a
Gregersen, I. B., Sørup, H. J. D., Madsen, H., Rosbjerg, D., Mikkelsen, P. S., and Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K.: Assessing future climatic changes of rainfall extremes at small spatio-temporal scales, Climatic Change, 118, 783–797, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0669-0, 2013. a
Haerter, J. O. and Berg, P.: Unexpected rise in extreme precipitation caused by a shift in rain type?, Nat. Geosci., 2, 372–373, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo523, 2009. a
Haile, A. T., Rientjes, T. H. M., Habib, E., Jetten, V., and Gebremichael, M.: Rain event properties at the source of the Blue Nile River, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1023–1034, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1023-2011, 2011. a
Hettiarachchi, S., Wasko, C., and Sharma, A.: Increase in flood risk resulting from climate change in a developed urban watershed – the role of storm temporal patterns, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2041–2056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2041-2018, 2018. a
Horner, W. and Jens, S.: Surface runoff determination from rainfall without using coefficients, T. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 107, 1039–1075, https://doi.org/10.1061/TACEAT.0005496, 1942. a, b
Hu, S., Feng, F., Liu, W., and She, D.: Changes in temporal inequality and persistence of precipitation over China during the period 1961–2013, Hydrol. Res., 49, 1283–1291, 2018. a
Huff, F. A.: Time distribution of rainfall in heavy storms, Water Resour. Res., 3, 1007–1019, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i004p01007, 1967. a
Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., and Flynn, P. J.: Data clustering: a review, ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR), 31, 264–323, https://doi.org/10.1145/331499.331504, 1999. a
Jun, C., Qin, X., Chen, M., and Seo, H.: Investigating event-based temporal patterns of design rainfall in a tropical region, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 66, 1986–1996, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1967958, 2021. a
Keifer, C. J. and Chu, H. H.: Synthetic storm pattern for drainage design, J. Hydr. Eng. Div.-ASCE, 83, 1332–1, https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0000104, 1957. a
Kendall, M. G.: A new measure of rank correlation, Biometrika, 30, 81–93, 1938. a
Klamkowski, K., Treder, W., and Tryngiel-Gać, A.: The effect of rainfall intensity and floor management practices on changes in soil water status in an apple orchard, Acta Hortic., 1038, 539–544, https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1038.67, 2012. a
Knighton, J. O. and Walter, M. T.: Critical rainfall statistics for predicting watershed flood responses: rethinking the design storm concept, Hydrol. Process., 30, 3788–3803, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10888, 2016. a, b
Kottegoda, N. and Kassim, A.: Classification of storm profiles using crossing properties, J. Hydrol., 127, 37–53, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(91)90107-S, 1991. a, b
Koutsoyiannis, D. and Foufoula-Georgiou, E.: A scaling model of a storm hyetograph, Water Resour. Res., 29, 2345–2361, https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00395, 1993. a
Krvavica, N. and Rubinić, J.: Evaluation of design storms and critical rainfall durations for flood prediction in partially urbanized catchments, Water, 12, 2044, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12072044, 2020. a
Li, T., Lee, G., and Kim, G.: Case study of urban flood inundation—impact of temporal variability in rainfall events, Water, 13, 3438, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233438, 2021. a
Liang, Y., Gao, G., Liu, J., Dunkerley, D., and Fu, B.: Runoff and soil loss responses of restoration vegetation under natural rainfall patterns in the Loess Plateau of China: The role of rainfall intensity fluctuation, Catena, 225, 107013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107013, 2023. a
Liu, J., Liang, Y., Gao, G., Dunkerley, D., and Fu, B.: Quantifying the effects of rainfall intensity fluctuation on runoff and soil loss: From indicators to models, J. Hydrol., 607, 127494, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127494, 2022. a
Makridakis, S. and Hibon, M.: The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications, Int. J. Forecasting, 16, 451–476, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00057-1, 2000. a
Medina-Cobo, M., García-Marín, A., Estévez, J., and Ayuso-Muñoz, J.: The identification of an appropriate Minimum Inter-event Time (MIT) based on multifractal characterization of rainfall data series, Hydrol. Process., 30, 3507–3517, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10875, 2016. a
Meier, C. I., Moraga, J. S., Pranzini, G., and Molnar, P.: Describing the interannual variability of precipitation with the derived distribution approach: effects of record length and resolution, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4177–4190, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4177-2016, 2016. a
Molina-Sanchis, I., Lázaro, R., Arnau-Rosalén, E., and Calvo-Cases, A.: Rainfall timing and runoff: The influence of the criterion for rain event separation, J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 64, 226, https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2016-0024, 2016. a, b
Nguyen, D. T. and Chen, S.-T.: Generating continuous rainfall time series with high temporal resolution by using a stochastic rainfall generator with a copula and modified huff rainfall curves, Water, 14, 2123, https://doi.org/10.3390/w14132123, 2022. a
Pan, C., Wang, X., Liu, L., Huang, H., and Wang, D.: Improvement to the huff curve for design storms and urban flooding simulations in Guangzhou, China, Water, 9, 411, https://doi.org/10.3390/w9060411, 2017. a
Parsons, A. and Stone, P.: Effects of intra-storm variations in rainfall intensity on interrill runoff and erosion, Catena, 67, 68–78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.03.002, 2006. a, b
Pathiraja, S., Westra, S., and Sharma, A.: Why continuous simulation? The role of antecedent moisture in design flood estimation, Water Resour. Res., 48, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010997, 2012. a
Restrepo-Posada, P. J. and Eagleson, P. S.: Identification of independent rainstorms, J. Hydrol., 55, 303–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(82)90136-6, 1982. a, b
Rivera, D., Arumí, J. L., and Lillo-Saavedredra, M.: Spatio-Temporal Patterns in Soil Water Content Time Series: Influence of the Time Series Length and Precipitation Events, in: 21st Century Watershed Technology: Improving Water Quality and the Environment Conference Proceedings, Bari, Italy, 27 June 2012, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.41447, 2012. a
Römkens, M. J., Helming, K., and Prasad, S.: Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes, Catena, 46, 103–123, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(01)00161-8, 2002. a
Rousseeuw, Peter, J.: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 20, 53–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7, 1987. a
Schilling, W.: Rainfall data for urban hydrology: what do we need?, Atmos. Res., 27, 5–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(91)90003-F, 1991. a
Schleiss, M.: How intermittency affects the rate at which rainfall extremes respond to changes in temperature, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 955–968, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-955-2018, 2018. a
Schleiss, M. and Smith, J. A.: Two simple metrics for quantifying rainfall intermittency: The burstiness and memory of interamount times, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 421–436, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0078.1, 2016. a
Smith, A. A. and Lee, K.-B.: The rational method revisited, Can. J. Civil Eng., 11, 854–862, https://doi.org/10.1139/l84-103, 1984. a
Terranova, O. G. and Iaquinta, P.: Temporal properties of rainfall events in Calabria (southern Italy), Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 751–757, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-751-2011, 2011. a
Thomassen, E. D., Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K., Sørup, H. J. D., Langen, P. L., Olsson, J., Pedersen, R. A., and Christensen, O. B.: Spatial and temporal characteristics of extreme rainfall: Added benefits with sub-kilometre-resolution climate model simulations?, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 149, 1913–1931, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4488, 2023. a
Todisco, F.: The internal structure of erosive and non-erosive storm events for interpretation of erosive processes and rainfall simulation, J. Hydrol., 519, 3651–3663, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.002, 2014. a, b
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Rasmussen, R. M., and Parsons, D. B.: The changing character of precipitation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1205–1218, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205, 2003. a
Urgilés, G., Célleri, R., Bendix, J., and Orellana-Alvear, J.: Identification of spatio-temporal patterns in extreme rainfall events in the Tropical Andes: A clustering analysis approach, Meteorol. Appl., 31, e70005, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70005, 2024. a
Vantas, K., Sidiropoulos, E., and Vafeiadis, M.: Optimal temporal distribution curves for the classification of heavy precipitation using hierarchical clustering on principal components, Global NEST J., 21, 530–538, https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.002997, 2019. a
Visser, J. B., Wasko, C., Sharma, A., and Nathan, R.: Changing storm temporal patterns with increasing temperatures across Australia, J. Climate, 36, 6247–6259, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0694.1, 2023. a, b
Wang, F.: Temporal pattern analysis of local rainstorm events in China during the flood season based on time series clustering, Water, 12, 725, https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030725, 2020. a, b
Wang, H., Chen, R., Leung, A. K., and Garg, A.: Hydrological responses to early-peak rainfall in unsaturated rooted soils, Heliyon, 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16042, 2023. a
Wang, W., Yin, S., Xie, Y., Liu, B., and Liu, Y.: Effects of four storm patterns on soil loss from five soils under natural rainfall, Catena, 141, 56–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.019, 2016. a, b
Wang, W., Yin, S., Xie, Y., and Nearing, M. A.: Minimum inter-event times for rainfall in the eastern monsoon region of China, T. ASABE, 62, 9–18, https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12878, 2019. a
Wartalska, K. and Kotowski, A.: Model hyetographs of short-term rainfall for Wrocław in the perspective of 2050, Atmosphere, 11, 663, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11060663, 2020. a
Wasko, C. and Sharma, A.: Steeper temporal distribution of rain intensity at higher temperatures within Australian storms, Nat. Geosci., 8, 527–529, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2456, 2015. a
Watt, E. and Marsalek, J.: Critical review of the evolution of the design storm event concept, Can. J. Civil Eng., 40, 105–113, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2011-0594, 2013. a
Wu, S.-J., Yang, J.-C., and Tung, Y.-K.: Identification and stochastic generation of representative rainfall temporal patterns in Hong Kong territory, Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 20, 171–183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0245-5, 2006. a
Yeo, I.-K. and Johnson, R. A.: A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry, Biometrika, 87, 954–959, https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.4.954, 2000. a
Zhang, X., Norton, L., and Hickman, M.: Rain pattern and soil moisture content effects on atrazine and metolachlor losses in runoff, Tech. rep., Wiley Online Library, https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600060013x, 1997. a
Zhang, Y., Liang, K., and Liu, C.: Time distribution pattern and spatial heterogeneity of hourly scale event-based extreme precipitation in China, J. Hydrol., 622, 129712, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129712, 2023. a
Short summary
How rainfall is distributed over the course of a storm can critically shape flooding, erosion, and water resource impacts. This study reviews nearly fifty metrics used to describe storm patterns and tests their performance when rainfall events are processed differently or are at different resolutions. Our results reveal which metrics are most robust, how they overlap or diverge, and introduce a unifying framework that clarifies storm structure for future research and applied use.
How rainfall is distributed over the course of a storm can critically shape flooding, erosion,...
