Articles | Volume 28, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2831-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-2831-2024
Research article
 | 
03 Jul 2024
Research article |  | 03 Jul 2024

Using the classical model for structured expert judgment to estimate extremes: a case study of discharges in the Meuse River

Guus Rongen, Oswaldo Morales-Nápoles, and Matthijs Kok

Viewed

Total article views: 4,042 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,842 1,041 159 4,042 402 201 306
  • HTML: 2,842
  • PDF: 1,041
  • XML: 159
  • Total: 4,042
  • Supplement: 402
  • BibTeX: 201
  • EndNote: 306
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Mar 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,042 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,042 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Latest update: 11 May 2026
Download
Short summary
This study proposes a new method for predicting extreme events such as floods on the river Meuse. The current method was shown to be unreliable as it did not predict a recent flood. We developed a model that includes information from experts and combines this with measurements. We found that this approach gives more accurate predictions, particularly for extreme events. The research is important for predictions of extreme flood levels that are necessary for protecting communities against floods.
Share