Articles | Volume 26, issue 16
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022
Research article
 | 
29 Aug 2022
Research article |  | 29 Aug 2022

Large-sample assessment of varying spatial resolution on the streamflow estimates of the wflow_sbm hydrological model

Jerom P. M. Aerts, Rolf W. Hut, Nick C. van de Giesen, Niels Drost, Willem J. van Verseveld, Albrecht H. Weerts, and Pieter Hazenberg

Viewed

Total article views: 3,119 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,322 742 55 3,119 43 42
  • HTML: 2,322
  • PDF: 742
  • XML: 55
  • Total: 3,119
  • BibTeX: 43
  • EndNote: 42
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Dec 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,119 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,977 with geography defined and 142 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
In recent years gridded hydrological modelling moved into the realm of hyper-resolution modelling (<10 km). In this study, we investigate the effect of varying grid-cell sizes for the wflow_sbm hydrological model. We used a large sample of basins from the CAMELS data set to test the effect that varying grid-cell sizes has on the simulation of streamflow at the basin outlet. Results show that there is no single best grid-cell size for modelling streamflow throughout the domain.