Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Zhihao Zhang
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,583 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,544
962
77
3,583
326
89
116
HTML: 2,544
PDF: 962
XML: 77
Total: 3,583
Supplement: 326
BibTeX: 89
EndNote: 116
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Total article views: 2,884 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,149
667
68
2,884
171
78
103
HTML: 2,149
PDF: 667
XML: 68
Total: 2,884
Supplement: 171
BibTeX: 78
EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Total article views: 699 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
395
295
9
699
155
11
13
HTML: 395
PDF: 295
XML: 9
Total: 699
Supplement: 155
BibTeX: 11
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,583 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,333 with geography defined
and 250 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,884 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,770 with geography defined
and 114 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 699 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 563 with geography defined
and 136 with unknown origin.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for correcting the Eckhardt method. The results showed that the approach of calibrating the Eckhardt method against the CMB method provides a false calibration of total baseflow by offsetting the inherent biases in the baseflow sequences generated by the two methods. The reason for this phenomenon is the baseflow series generated by the two methods containing different transient water sources.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for...
