Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Zhihao Zhang
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 3,782 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,665
1,032
85
3,782
355
99
127
HTML: 2,665
PDF: 1,032
XML: 85
Total: 3,782
Supplement: 355
BibTeX: 99
EndNote: 127
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Total article views: 3,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,265
718
72
3,055
181
87
113
HTML: 2,265
PDF: 718
XML: 72
Total: 3,055
Supplement: 181
BibTeX: 87
EndNote: 113
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Total article views: 727 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
400
314
13
727
174
12
14
HTML: 400
PDF: 314
XML: 13
Total: 727
Supplement: 174
BibTeX: 12
EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,782 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,533 with geography defined
and 249 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,055 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,941 with geography defined
and 114 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 727 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 592 with geography defined
and 135 with unknown origin.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for correcting the Eckhardt method. The results showed that the approach of calibrating the Eckhardt method against the CMB method provides a false calibration of total baseflow by offsetting the inherent biases in the baseflow sequences generated by the two methods. The reason for this phenomenon is the baseflow series generated by the two methods containing different transient water sources.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for...
