Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Zhihao Zhang
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 4,063 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,866
1,100
97
4,063
377
114
146
HTML: 2,866
PDF: 1,100
XML: 97
Total: 4,063
Supplement: 377
BibTeX: 114
EndNote: 146
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Total article views: 3,320 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,461
777
82
3,320
196
100
130
HTML: 2,461
PDF: 777
XML: 82
Total: 3,320
Supplement: 196
BibTeX: 100
EndNote: 130
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Total article views: 743 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
405
323
15
743
181
14
16
HTML: 405
PDF: 323
XML: 15
Total: 743
Supplement: 181
BibTeX: 14
EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,063 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,807 with geography defined
and 256 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,320 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,198 with geography defined
and 122 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 743 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 609 with geography defined
and 134 with unknown origin.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for correcting the Eckhardt method. The results showed that the approach of calibrating the Eckhardt method against the CMB method provides a false calibration of total baseflow by offsetting the inherent biases in the baseflow sequences generated by the two methods. The reason for this phenomenon is the baseflow series generated by the two methods containing different transient water sources.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for...
