Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Zhihao Zhang
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 4,037 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,847
1,093
97
4,037
376
113
139
HTML: 2,847
PDF: 1,093
XML: 97
Total: 4,037
Supplement: 376
BibTeX: 113
EndNote: 139
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Total article views: 3,295 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,443
770
82
3,295
195
99
123
HTML: 2,443
PDF: 770
XML: 82
Total: 3,295
Supplement: 195
BibTeX: 99
EndNote: 123
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Total article views: 742 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
404
323
15
742
181
14
16
HTML: 404
PDF: 323
XML: 15
Total: 742
Supplement: 181
BibTeX: 14
EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,037 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,787 with geography defined
and 250 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,295 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,180 with geography defined
and 115 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 742 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 607 with geography defined
and 135 with unknown origin.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for correcting the Eckhardt method. The results showed that the approach of calibrating the Eckhardt method against the CMB method provides a false calibration of total baseflow by offsetting the inherent biases in the baseflow sequences generated by the two methods. The reason for this phenomenon is the baseflow series generated by the two methods containing different transient water sources.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for...
