Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Zhihao Zhang
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Ministry
of Education), Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment,
Jilin University, Changchun 130021, PR China
National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of In-situ Conversion,
Drilling and Exploitation Technology for Oil Shale, Jilin University,
Changchun 130021, PR China
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, No. 2519,
Jiefang Road, Changchun 130021, PR China
Viewed
Total article views: 1,900 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,345
541
14
1,900
170
17
24
HTML: 1,345
PDF: 541
XML: 14
Total: 1,900
Supplement: 170
BibTeX: 17
EndNote: 24
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Total article views: 1,321 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
969
344
8
1,321
89
9
16
HTML: 969
PDF: 344
XML: 8
Total: 1,321
Supplement: 89
BibTeX: 9
EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 06 Apr 2021)
Total article views: 579 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
376
197
6
579
81
8
8
HTML: 376
PDF: 197
XML: 6
Total: 579
Supplement: 81
BibTeX: 8
EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Oct 2020)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,900 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,691 with geography defined
and 209 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,321 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,244 with geography defined
and 77 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 579 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 447 with geography defined
and 132 with unknown origin.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for correcting the Eckhardt method. The results showed that the approach of calibrating the Eckhardt method against the CMB method provides a false calibration of total baseflow by offsetting the inherent biases in the baseflow sequences generated by the two methods. The reason for this phenomenon is the baseflow series generated by the two methods containing different transient water sources.
This study analyzed the effectiveness of the conductivity mass balance (CMB) method for...
