Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1069–1095, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1069-2021
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1069–1095, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1069-2021

Research article 02 Mar 2021

Research article | 02 Mar 2021

Behind the scenes of streamflow model performance

Laurène J. E. Bouaziz et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,830 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,976 827 27 2,830 57 33 33
  • HTML: 1,976
  • PDF: 827
  • XML: 27
  • Total: 2,830
  • Supplement: 57
  • BibTeX: 33
  • EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Apr 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Apr 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,419 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,414 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 25 Oct 2021
Download
Short summary
We quantify the differences in internal states and fluxes of 12 process-based models with similar streamflow performance and assess their plausibility using remotely sensed estimates of evaporation, snow cover, soil moisture and total storage anomalies. The dissimilarities in internal process representation imply that these models cannot all simultaneously be close to reality. Therefore, we invite modelers to evaluate their models using multiple variables and to rely on multi-model studies.