Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Deák Ferenc u. 16, 8360
Keszthely, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Annamária Laborczi
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
András Makó
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Deák Ferenc u. 16, 8360
Keszthely, Hungary
Kálmán Rajkai
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Viewed
Total article views: 4,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
3,048
1,616
106
4,770
131
154
HTML: 3,048
PDF: 1,616
XML: 106
Total: 4,770
BibTeX: 131
EndNote: 154
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Total article views: 3,841 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
2,485
1,257
99
3,841
111
133
HTML: 2,485
PDF: 1,257
XML: 99
Total: 3,841
BibTeX: 111
EndNote: 133
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 929 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
563
359
7
929
20
21
HTML: 563
PDF: 359
XML: 7
Total: 929
BibTeX: 20
EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,345 with geography defined
and 425 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,841 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,510 with geography defined
and 331 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 929 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 835 with geography defined
and 94 with unknown origin.
This paper analyzes differences in the performance of the indirect and direct mapping method to derive 3-D soil hydraulic maps. Maps of saturated water content, field capacity and wilting point are presented for a 5775 km2 catchment at 100 m resolution. Advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are discussed. The absolute difference in soil water retention values is less than 0.025 cm3 cm−3 between maps derived with indirect and direct methods for 65–86 % of the catchment.
This paper analyzes differences in the performance of the indirect and direct mapping method to...
