Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Deák Ferenc u. 16, 8360
Keszthely, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Annamária Laborczi
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
András Makó
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Deák Ferenc u. 16, 8360
Keszthely, Hungary
Kálmán Rajkai
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Viewed
Total article views: 4,803 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
3,062
1,634
107
4,803
132
157
HTML: 3,062
PDF: 1,634
XML: 107
Total: 4,803
BibTeX: 132
EndNote: 157
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Total article views: 3,871 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
2,498
1,274
99
3,871
112
134
HTML: 2,498
PDF: 1,274
XML: 99
Total: 3,871
BibTeX: 112
EndNote: 134
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 932 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
564
360
8
932
20
23
HTML: 564
PDF: 360
XML: 8
Total: 932
BibTeX: 20
EndNote: 23
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,803 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,380 with geography defined
and 423 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,871 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,542 with geography defined
and 329 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 932 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 838 with geography defined
and 94 with unknown origin.
This paper analyzes differences in the performance of the indirect and direct mapping method to derive 3-D soil hydraulic maps. Maps of saturated water content, field capacity and wilting point are presented for a 5775 km2 catchment at 100 m resolution. Advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are discussed. The absolute difference in soil water retention values is less than 0.025 cm3 cm−3 between maps derived with indirect and direct methods for 65–86 % of the catchment.
This paper analyzes differences in the performance of the indirect and direct mapping method to...
