Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Deák Ferenc u. 16, 8360
Keszthely, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Annamária Laborczi
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
András Makó
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Georgikon Faculty, University of Pannonia, Deák Ferenc u. 16, 8360
Keszthely, Hungary
Kálmán Rajkai
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Institute for Soil Sciences and Agricultural Chemistry, Centre for
Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Herman Ottó út
15, 1022 Budapest, Hungary
Viewed
Total article views: 4,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
2,996
1,585
102
4,683
123
147
HTML: 2,996
PDF: 1,585
XML: 102
Total: 4,683
BibTeX: 123
EndNote: 147
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Total article views: 3,761 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
2,434
1,232
95
3,761
104
127
HTML: 2,434
PDF: 1,232
XML: 95
Total: 3,761
BibTeX: 104
EndNote: 127
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Jun 2019)
Total article views: 922 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
562
353
7
922
19
20
HTML: 562
PDF: 353
XML: 7
Total: 922
BibTeX: 19
EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,683 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,259 with geography defined
and 424 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,761 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,430 with geography defined
and 331 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 922 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 829 with geography defined
and 93 with unknown origin.
This paper analyzes differences in the performance of the indirect and direct mapping method to derive 3-D soil hydraulic maps. Maps of saturated water content, field capacity and wilting point are presented for a 5775 km2 catchment at 100 m resolution. Advantages and disadvantages of the two methods are discussed. The absolute difference in soil water retention values is less than 0.025 cm3 cm−3 between maps derived with indirect and direct methods for 65–86 % of the catchment.
This paper analyzes differences in the performance of the indirect and direct mapping method to...
