The referees's comments were quite relevant, as it was also recognised by the authors in their replies. The answers to all the comments are interesting and deserve to be included somehow in the revised version of the manuscript.
I expect that the authors can significantly improve the scientific quality of the paper by revising the text and the figures.
In their replies, the authors propose to make no changes to the text in response to some of the referees' comments. I recommend the authors to carefully consider those comments and to evaluate whether rephrasing or reorganization of the text might avoid any possible misunderstanding by the readers.

Both referees provided a positive assessment of the revised version of the manuscript and rated it good to excellent. therefore, the paper can be published in its present form.