Articles | Volume 23, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1339-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1339-2019
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
11 Mar 2019
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 11 Mar 2019

Effects of univariate and multivariate bias correction on hydrological impact projections in alpine catchments

Judith Meyer, Irene Kohn, Kerstin Stahl, Kirsti Hakala, Jan Seibert, and Alex J. Cannon

Viewed

Total article views: 7,281 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
5,397 1,794 90 7,281 345 100 95
  • HTML: 5,397
  • PDF: 1,794
  • XML: 90
  • Total: 7,281
  • Supplement: 345
  • BibTeX: 100
  • EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,281 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,439 with geography defined and 842 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 29 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Several multivariate bias correction methods have been developed recently, but only a few studies have tested the effect of multivariate bias correction on hydrological impact projections. This study shows that incorporating or ignoring inter-variable relations between air temperature and precipitation can have a notable effect on the projected snowfall fraction. The effect translated to considerable consequences for the glacio-hydrological responses and streamflow components of the catchments.