154 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Assessment of groundwater potential in terms of the availability and quality of the resource: a case study from Iraq A. Al-Abadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09725-0
2. Spatial mapping of groundwater springs potentiality using grid search-based and genetic algorithm-based support vector regression A. Al-Fugara et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2020.1716396
3. A combined multi-statistical strategy for mapping groundwater spring potential in northeastern Iraq R. Qaradaghy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-025-01715-1
4. Integration of bio-inspired algorithms with machine learning for modeling microplastic contamination transport processes in natural aquatic habitats using morphological features A. Usman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102216
5. Multi-step Lake Urmia water level forecasting using ensemble of bagging based tree models R. Hajian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00857-w
6. Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning and Swarm-Optimized Random Forest for Groundwater Spring Potential Identification in Tropical Regions V. Nhu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15194761
7. Assessment of groundwater potential in the Khenifra-Azrou basin, Central Massif, Morocco using frequency ratio and Shannon's entropy approaches A. Taibou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02616
8. A fuzzy geospatial approach for delineation of groundwater potential zones in Raipur district, India S. Singha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100529
9. K-Fold and State-of-the-Art Metaheuristic Machine Learning Approaches for Groundwater Potential Modelling A. Arabameri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02815-5
10. Natural spring-based water potential in Bangladesh using ensemble machine learning algorithms S. Hosan et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2026.210
11. Comparison of different statistical approaches to assess spring potential mapping in a multi-aquifer system: a case study of Kurdistan Region, Iraq D. Hamamin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11250-1
12. Modeling cyclone-induced multi-hazard risk assessment using analytical hierarchical processing and GIS for coastal West Bengal, India M. Mondal et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101779
13. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model for Forecasting Groundwater Level in the Pravara River Basin, India V. Navale & S. Mhaske https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01639-5
14. Multi-criteria decision-making techniques for groundwater potentiality mapping in arid regions: A case study of Wadi Yiba, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia N. Ejaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101223
15. Groundwater potential assessment of the Sero plain using bivariate models of the frequency ratio, Shannon entropy and evidential belief function S. Khoshtinat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1155-0
16. Spatial modeling of geogenic indoor radon distribution in Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea using enhanced machine learning algorithms F. Rezaie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107724
17. Enhanced groundwater potential mapping using a GIS based chaotic sparrow search algorithm optimized weighted broad learning system: A case study of the Guozhuang spring region, northern China D. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102708
18. A Novel Swarm Intelligence—Harris Hawks Optimization for Spatial Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility D. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163590
19. A tree-based intelligence ensemble approach for spatial prediction of potential groundwater M. Avand et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2020.1718785
20. Comparisons of Diverse Machine Learning Approaches for Wildfire Susceptibility Mapping K. Gholamnia et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040604
21. GIS‐Based Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Information, Frequency Ratio, and Artificial Neural Network Methods in Qinghai Province, Northwestern China B. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4758062
22. Mapping groundwater potentiality by using hybrid machine learning models under the scenario of climate variability: a national level study of Bangladesh S. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04687-2
23. Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory T. Gudiyangada Nachappa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275
24. Multi-Hazard Exposure Mapping Using Machine Learning for the State of Salzburg, Austria T. Nachappa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172757
25. Integrating Digital Twins and Artificial Intelligence Multi-Modal Transformers into Water Resource Management: Overview and Advanced Predictive Framework T. Syed et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai5040098
26. Strategies for Learning Groundwater Potential Modelling Indices under Sparse Data with Supervised and Unsupervised Techniques V. Karimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02555-y
27. Identification of artificial groundwater recharge zones in semi-arid region of southern India using geospatial and integrated decision-making approaches M. Rajasekhar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100278
28. Hybrid and Integrative Evolutionary Machine Learning in Hydrology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis A. Mahdavi-Meymand et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-023-10017-y
29. Meteorological data mining and hybrid data-intelligence models for reference evaporation simulation: A case study in Iraq K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105041
30. Flood susceptibility mapping using multi-temporal SAR imagery and novel integration of nature-inspired algorithms into support vector regression S. Mehravar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129100
31. A new empirical model to estimate and predict reference evapotranspiration using ERA5 data S. Fatemi & M. Rahimzadegan https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-026-06423-4
32. Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility Using GIS-Based Data Mining Techniques of ANFIS with Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183755
33. Application of GIS-based models of weights of evidence, weighting factor, and statistical index in spatial modeling of groundwater S. Khoshtinat et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.127
34. Is multi-hazard mapping effective in assessing natural hazards and integrated watershed management? H. Pourghasemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.008
35. Groundwater Potential Mapping Using GIS‐Based Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Methods T. Phong et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.13094
36. Radon potential mapping in Jangsu-gun, South Korea using probabilistic and deep learning algorithms F. Rezaie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118385
37. A comparison of machine learning models for the mapping of groundwater spring potential A. Al-Fugara et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08944-1
38. Spatio-temporal cross-validation to predict pluvial flood events in the Metropolitan City of Venice Z. Marco et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128150
39. Artificial intelligence algorithms for prediction and sensitivity analysis of mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A review T. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105929
40. A new approach based on biology-inspired metaheuristic algorithms in combination with random forest to enhance the flood susceptibility mapping S. Razavi-Termeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118790
41. Comprehensive flood risk assessment using AHP and HEC-RAS 2D: insights from the lower Teesta River Basin, India S. Chakraborty & S. Biswas https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06662-x
42. Monthly suspended sediment load prediction using artificial intelligence: testing of a new random subspace method V. Nhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1754419
43. A Google Earth Engine Approach for Wildfire Susceptibility Prediction Fusion with Remote Sensing Data of Different Spatial Resolutions S. Tavakkoli Piralilou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030672
44. Experimental-based groundwater salinization from the carbonate aquifer of eastern Saudi Arabia: Insight into machine learning coupled with meta-heuristic algorithms M. Benaafi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105135
45. Past, Present, and Future of Using Neuro-Fuzzy Systems for Hydrological Modeling and Forecasting Y. Ang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology10020036
46. Flood risk assessment using geospatial data and multi-criteria decision approach: a study from historically active flood-prone region of Himalayan foothill, India S. Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07324-8
47. Improving groundwater potential mapping using metaheuristic approaches S. Razavi-Termeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1828589
48. A Method Combining Seepage Theory and Model Simulation for the Identification of Potential Groundwater Resources K. Wang & D. Shih https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002223
49. Hybrid-based approaches for the flood susceptibility prediction of Kermanshah province, Iran S. Paryani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05701-4
50. Enhancing spatial prediction of groundwater-prone areas through optimization of a boosting algorithm with bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms S. Razavi-Termeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02301-4
51. Machine learning hybrid dynamic best model selection algorithm for real-time fire prediction using IoT-enabled multi-sensor data in buildings M. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2025.100236
52. Positive–Unlabeled Learning-Based Hybrid Models and Interpretability for Groundwater Potential Mapping in Karst Areas B. Bi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17101422
53. Mapping Fire Susceptibility in the Brazilian Amazon Forests Using Multitemporal Remote Sensing and Time-Varying Unsupervised Anomaly Detection A. Luz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14102429
54. A novel hybrid of support vector regression and metaheuristic algorithms for groundwater spring potential mapping S. Paryani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151055
55. Computational Machine Learning Approach for Flood Susceptibility Assessment Integrated with Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia A. Al-Areeq et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215515
56. Comparison of Novel Hybrid and Benchmark Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Groundwater Potentiality: Case of a Drought-Prone Region of Medjerda Basin, Northern Tunisia F. Trabelsi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15010152
57. Enhancing nitrate and strontium concentration prediction in groundwater by using new data mining algorithm D. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136836
58. Soft Computing Ensemble Models Based on Logistic Regression for Groundwater Potential Mapping P. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072469
59. Groundwater potentiality mapping using ensemble machine learning algorithms for sustainable groundwater management S. Sarkar et al. https://doi.org/10.1108/FEBE-09-2021-0044
60. Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using ANFIS ensembled with teaching-learning-based and biogeography-based optimization W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.013
61. Earth Observation in the EMMENA Region: Scoping Review of Current Applications and Knowledge Gaps M. Eliades et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174202
62. Groundwater Potential Mapping Using an Integrated Ensemble of Three Bivariate Statistical Models with Random Forest and Logistic Model Tree Models S. Razavi-Termeh et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081596
63. A Review of Groundwater Management Models with a Focus on IoT-Based Systems B. Aderemi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010148
64. Estimation of the undrained shear strength of sensitive clays using optimized inference intelligence system Q. Tran et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-06891-5
65. Modeling the total hardness (TH) of groundwater in aquifers using novel hybrid soft computing optimizer models H. Moayedi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11618-x
66. Simulation-optimization model for groundwater replenishment from the river: a case study in the Hutuo River alluvial fan, China P. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.280
67. Overcoming Generalization Issues in Flood Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach Across Multiple Basins U. Yükseler et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18104724
68. Application of hybrid model-based machine learning for groundwater potential prediction in the north central of Vietnam H. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01209-y
69. Assessment of influencing factor method for delineation of groundwater potential zones with geospatial techniques. Case study of Bostanlik district, Uzbekistan B. Alikhanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100548
70. Optimized Conditioning Factors Using Machine Learning Techniques for Groundwater Potential Mapping B. Kalantar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091909
71. GIS-MCDA-Based Assessment of Groundwater Abstraction Potential Under Data Constraints: A Case Study from the Rzeszów Region, Poland W. Wałachowski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15030130
72. Application of Machine Learning Algorithms for Geogenic Radon Potential Mapping in Danyang-Gun, South Korea F. Rezaie et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.753028
73. Spatial modeling of radon potential mapping using deep learning algorithms M. Panahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2022011
74. Groundwater spring potential mapping using population-based evolutionary algorithms and data mining methods W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.312
75. Assessing groundwater artificial recharge suitability in the Mi River basin using GIS, RS, and FAHP: a comprehensive analysis with seasonal variations Q. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-025-02362-z
76. Recycled aggregate concrete confined with FRP under compression: A machine learning-driven framework and parametric analysis H. Saberi & H. Saberi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.101090
77. Landslide susceptibility modeling based on ANFIS with teaching-learning-based optimization and Satin bowerbird optimizer W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.07.012
78. Mapping Burned Areas with Multitemporal–Multispectral Data and Probabilistic Unsupervised Learning R. Negri et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14215413
79. Advanced machine learning for predicting groundwater decline and drought in the Rabat–Salé–Kénitra region, Morocco A. Elmotawakkil & N. Enneya https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2024.328
80. Bedload transport rate prediction: Application of novel hybrid data mining techniques K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124774
81. Determination of compound channel apparent shear stress: application of novel data mining models Z. Khozani et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2019.037
82. Predictive performance assessment of recycled coarse aggregate concrete using artificial intelligence: A review P. Kumari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2024.100263
83. Multi-hazard probability assessment and mapping in Iran H. Pourghasemi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.203
84. Hybrids of Support Vector Regression with Grey Wolf Optimizer and Firefly Algorithm for Spatial Prediction of Landslide Susceptibility R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13244966
85. Point and interval forecasting for carbon price based on an improved analysis-forecast system C. Tian & Y. Hao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.10.022
86. Groundwater spring potential prediction using a deep-learning algorithm S. Moughani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01053-0
87. Assessing groundwater potential in the western High Atlas (Morocco): An integrated approach based on remote sensing, GIS techniques, frequency ratio, and Shannon entropy A. Harroud et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02930
88. Flood Spatial Modeling in Northern Iran Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Comparison between Evidential Belief Functions and Its Ensemble with a Multivariate Logistic Regression Model D. Tien Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131589
89. Stochastic Modeling of Groundwater Fluoride Contamination: Introducing Lazy Learners K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12963
90. Application of novel framework approach for prediction of nitrate concentration susceptibility in coastal multi-aquifers, Bangladesh A. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149811
91. Prediction of embankments dam break peak outflow: a comparison between empirical equations and ensemble-based machine learning algorithms K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06060-4
92. Solving water scarcity challenges in arid regions: A novel approach employing human-based meta-heuristics and machine learning algorithm for groundwater potential mapping S. Razavi-Termeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142859
93. Groundwater spring potential zonation using AHP and fuzzy-AHP in Eastern Himalayan region: Papum Pare district, Arunachal Pradesh, India P. Ranjan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26769-w
94. Delineating flood-prone areas using advanced integration of reduced-error pruning tree with different ensemble classifier algorithms E. Nohani et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01238-7
95. Identification of landslide-prone zones using a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis and region-growing algorithm in uncertain conditions S. Beheshtifar https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05603-5
96. Suspended sediment load modeling using advanced hybrid rotation forest based elastic network approach K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127963
97. New DRASTIC framework for groundwater vulnerability assessment: bivariate and multi-criteria decision-making approach coupled with metaheuristic algorithm B. Lakshminarayanan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15966-0
98. Enhancing the predictive accuracy of recycled aggregate concrete’s strength using machine learning and statistical approaches: a review J. Tariq et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01192-9
99. Integration of group method of data handling (GMDH) algorithm and population-based metaheuristic algorithms for spatial prediction of potential groundwater S. Amiri-Doumari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10593-5
100. Unveiling spring origins in the Lesser Himalayas using fuzzy-AHP and geoelectrical techniques P. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.08.029
101. A country-wide assessment of Iran's land subsidence susceptibility using satellite-based InSAR and machine learning M. Panahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2086631
102. Daily streamflow prediction using optimally pruned extreme learning machine R. Adnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123981
103. Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using machine learning methods with Grey Wolf and Sparrow Search Algorithms R. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127977
104. A coupled novel framework for assessing vulnerability of water resources using hydrochemical analysis and data-driven models A. Islam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130407
105. An Integrated Approach for Groundwater Potential Prediction Using Multi-Criteria and Heuristic Methods A. Bozdağ et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17081212
106. Application of a GIS-Based Slope Unit Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping in Helong City: Comparative Assessment of ICM, AHP, and RF Model C. Yu & J. Chen https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12111848
107. Enhanced machine learning model to estimate groundwater spring potential based on digital elevation model parameters M. Msaddek et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.2007292
108. New hybrid-based approach for improving the accuracy of coastal aquifer vulnerability assessment maps K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145416
109. River Water Salinity Prediction Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models A. Melesse et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102951
110. Soil water erosion susceptibility assessment using deep learning algorithms K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129229
111. Understanding the evolutionary processes and causes of groundwater drought using an interpretable machine learning model Z. Gan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-05316-2
112. Human-based metaheuristics and non-parametric learning for groundwater-prone area mapping S. Razavi-Termeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103326
113. Groundwater Spring Potential Mapping Using Artificial Intelligence Approach Based on Kernel Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and Alternating Decision Tree Models W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020425
114. A New Approach Based on Deep Neural Networks and Multisource Geospatial Data for Spatial Prediction of Groundwater Spring Potential V. Nhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3360337
115. Evaluating the application of metaheuristic approaches for flood simulation using GIS: A case study of Baitarani river Basin, India S. Samantaray et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.561
116. Integration of statistical models and ensemble machine learning algorithms (MLAs) for developing the novel hybrid groundwater potentiality models: a case study of semi-arid watershed in Saudi Arabia J. Mallick et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1939439
117. Leveraging machine learning in porous media M. Delpisheh et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA00251B
118. SEVUCAS: A Novel GIS-Based Machine Learning Software for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment S. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173495
119. Groundwater spring potential assessment using new ensemble data mining techniques S. Yousefi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107652
120. A general framework and guidelines for benchmarking computational intelligence algorithms applied to forecasting problems derived from an application domain-oriented survey M. Oprea https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106103
121. Spatial mapping of water spring potential using four data mining models A. Al-Shabeeb et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.087
122. Interpretable groundwater spring potential mapping in complex terrain of Liulin County, China, using SSA-XGBoost with GIS-based validation D. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103197
123. Optimization of statistical and machine learning hybrid models for groundwater potential mapping P. Yariyan et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2020.1870164
124. Optimization of state-of-the-art fuzzy-metaheuristic ANFIS-based machine learning models for flood susceptibility prediction mapping in the Middle Ganga Plain, India A. Arora et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141565
125. Evidential-bio-inspired algorithms for modeling groundwater total hardness: A pioneering implementation of evidential neural network for feature selection in water resources management A. Usman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2025.02.012
126. Potentialities and development of groundwater resources applying machine learning models in the extended section of Manbhum-Singhbhum Plateau, India A. Ghosh & B. Bera https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2023.11.002
127. Optimization of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for groundwater potential mapping S. Termeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02017-9
128. Combination of Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms and Machine Learning Methods for Groundwater Potential Mapping S. AlAyyash et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032499
129. Performance evaluation of convolutional neural network and vision transformer models for groundwater potential mapping B. Sadeghi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132840
130. Slope Stability Monitoring Using Novel Remote Sensing Based Fuzzy Logic H. Moayedi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19214636
131. A novel per pixel and object-based ensemble approach for flood susceptibility mapping T. Gudiyangada Nachappa & S. Meena https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1833990
132. Model identification and accuracy for estimation of suspended sediment load K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2142964
133. Groundwater-Potential Mapping Using a Self-Learning Bayesian Network Model: A Comparison among Metaheuristic Algorithms S. Karimi-Rizvandi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050658
134. Flood Detection and Susceptibility Mapping Using Sentinel-1 Remote Sensing Data and a Machine Learning Approach: Hybrid Intelligence of Bagging Ensemble Based on K-Nearest Neighbor Classifier H. Shahabi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020266
135. A novel artificial intelligence technique to predict compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using ICA-XGBoost model J. Duan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01003-0
136. Predicting groundwater phosphate levels in coastal multi-aquifers: A geostatistical and data-driven approach M. Mamun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176024
137. Evaluation of the prediction capability of AHP and F-AHP methods in flood susceptibility mapping of Ernakulam district (India) R. Vilasan & V. Kapse https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05248-4
138. Spatial variability of soil water erosion: Comparing empirical and intelligent techniques A. Golkarian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101456
139. Spring protection and sustainable management of groundwater resources in a spring field Q. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124498
140. Groundwater prospective mapping using remote sensing and GIS techniques: the case of Meki watershed in Central Rift Valley, Ethiopia D. Doyo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00775-1
141. Groundwater level dynamics in a subtropical fan delta region and its future prediction using machine learning tools: Sustainable groundwater restoration S. Mahammad et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101385
142. Short-term River streamflow modeling using Ensemble-based additive learner approach K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2021.07.003
143. Fluvial bedload transport modelling: advanced ensemble tree-based models or optimized deep learning algorithms? K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2024.2346221
144. Groundwater salinity prediction using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system methods: a case study in Azarshahr, Ajabshir and Maragheh plains, Iran H. Nazari et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09455-3
145. Groundwater potential delineation using geodetector based convolutional neural network in the Gunabay watershed of Ethiopia A. Tegegne et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.117790
146. Global review of groundwater potential models in the last decade: Parameters, model techniques, and validation N. Thanh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128501
147. GIS-based multi-criteria decision making and entropy approaches for groundwater potential zones delineation E. Forootan & F. Seyedi https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-021-00576-8
148. Groundwater spring potential mapping: Assessment the contribution of hydrogeological factors R. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.038
149. Evaluating the usage of tree-based ensemble methods in groundwater spring potential mapping W. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124602
150. Intelligent flow discharge computation in a rectangular channel with free overfall condition K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07112-9
151. A hybrid framework based on LSTM for predicting karst spring discharge using historical data W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130946
152. Convolutional neural network approach for spatial prediction of flood hazard at national scale of Iran K. Khosravi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125552
153. Predicting Landslides Susceptible Zones in the Lesser Himalayas by Ensemble of Per Pixel and Object-Based Models U. Sur et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14081953
154. A New Method for Determination of Optimal Borehole Drilling Location Considering Drilling Cost Minimization and Sustainable Groundwater Management A. Khan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06854