Articles | Volume 22, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1193-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1193-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Feb 2018
Research article |
| 12 Feb 2018
Parametric soil water retention models: a critical evaluation of expressions for the full moisture range
Raneem Madi
Dept. Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle, Germany
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Dept. Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Halle, Germany
Henrike Mielenz
Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Julius Kühn-Institut – JKI, Braunschweig, Germany
Juliane Mai
Dept. Computational Hydrosystems, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany
currently at: Dept. Civil & Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 3,651 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Apr 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,872 | 1,649 | 130 | 3,651 | 512 | 102 | 118 |
- HTML: 1,872
- PDF: 1,649
- XML: 130
- Total: 3,651
- Supplement: 512
- BibTeX: 102
- EndNote: 118
Total article views: 2,588 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Feb 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,377 | 1,114 | 97 | 2,588 | 512 | 62 | 71 |
- HTML: 1,377
- PDF: 1,114
- XML: 97
- Total: 2,588
- Supplement: 512
- BibTeX: 62
- EndNote: 71
Total article views: 1,063 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Apr 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 495 | 535 | 33 | 1,063 | 40 | 47 |
- HTML: 495
- PDF: 535
- XML: 33
- Total: 1,063
- BibTeX: 40
- EndNote: 47
Cited
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A Family of Soil Water Retention Models Based on Sigmoid Functions P. Li et al. 10.1029/2022WR033160
- A novel segmental model to describe the complete soil water retention curve from saturation to oven dryness C. Du 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124649
- A comparison of methods to estimate groundwater recharge from bare soil based on data observed by a large‐scale lysimeter Z. Zhang et al. 10.1002/hyp.13769
- A New Principle for Measuring the Average Relative Humidity in Large Volumes of Non-Homogenous Gas D. Lazik et al. 10.3390/s19235073
- Technical note: A sigmoidal soil water retention curve without asymptote that is robust when dry-range data are unreliable G. de Rooij 10.5194/hess-26-5849-2022
- Laboratory and Physical Prototype Tests for the Investigation of Hydraulic Hysteresis of Pyroclastic Soils M. Pirone et al. 10.3390/geosciences10080320
- Combination of Measurement Methods for a Wide-Range Description of Hydraulic Soil Properties T. Weninger et al. 10.3390/w10081021
- Innovative Overview of SWRC Application in Modeling Geotechnical Engineering Problems K. Onyelowe et al. 10.3390/designs6050069
- Sigmoidal water retention function with improved behaviour in dry and wet soils G. de Rooij et al. 10.5194/hess-25-983-2021
- A modification to the van Genuchten model for improved prediction of relative hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils X. Kuang et al. 10.1111/ejss.13034
- Time-lapse magnetic resonance sounding measurements for numerical modeling of water flow in variably saturated media A. Legchenko et al. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.103984
- Prediction of absolute unsaturated hydraulic conductivity – comparison of four different capillary bundle models A. Peters et al. 10.5194/hess-27-4579-2023
- Comparison of the performance of 22 models describing soil water retention curves from saturation to oven dryness C. Du 10.1002/vzj2.20072
- Prediction of the absolute hydraulic conductivity function from soil water retention data A. Peters et al. 10.5194/hess-27-1565-2023
- Characterizing physical and hydraulic properties of soils in Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia A. Al-Saeedi 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.061
- A Phase-Dependent Effect That Enables Multi-Scale Moisture Measurements in Heterogeneous Substrates Using Tubular RH Sensors D. Lazik 10.3390/s22103887
- Physics‐Informed Neural Networks With Monotonicity Constraints for Richardson‐Richards Equation: Estimation of Constitutive Relationships and Soil Water Flux Density From Volumetric Water Content Measurements T. Bandai & T. Ghezzehei 10.1029/2020WR027642
- Transformation of structural organization of model soil constructions with different structure in conditions of Moscow M. Suslenkova et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/368/1/012051
- Anatomy of the 2018 agricultural drought in the Netherlands using in situ soil moisture and satellite vegetation indices J. Buitink et al. 10.5194/hess-24-6021-2020
- Quality of Soil Simulation by the INM RAS–MSU Soil Scheme as a Part of the SL-AV Weather Prediction Model S. Travova et al. 10.3103/S1068373922030013
- Ten strategies towards successful calibration of environmental models J. Mai 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129414
- Comparison of Seven Weibull Distribution Models for Predicting Relative Hydraulic Conductivity J. Shan et al. 10.1029/2021WR030683
- Data‐Driven Discovery of Soil Moisture Flow Governing Equation: A Sparse Regression Framework W. Song et al. 10.1029/2022WR031926
- Determination of specific LNAPL volumes in soils having a multimodal pore-size distribution M. Alfaro Soto et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.077
- Pedotransfer functions for water contents at specific pressure heads of silty soils from Amazon rainforest A. Kotlar et al. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114098
- The relevance of measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity: Sensitivity analysis and functional evaluation J. De Pue et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.079
- A Modular Framework for Modeling Unsaturated Soil Hydraulic Properties Over the Full Moisture Range T. Weber et al. 10.1029/2018WR024584
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- A Family of Soil Water Retention Models Based on Sigmoid Functions P. Li et al. 10.1029/2022WR033160
- A novel segmental model to describe the complete soil water retention curve from saturation to oven dryness C. Du 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124649
- A comparison of methods to estimate groundwater recharge from bare soil based on data observed by a large‐scale lysimeter Z. Zhang et al. 10.1002/hyp.13769
- A New Principle for Measuring the Average Relative Humidity in Large Volumes of Non-Homogenous Gas D. Lazik et al. 10.3390/s19235073
- Technical note: A sigmoidal soil water retention curve without asymptote that is robust when dry-range data are unreliable G. de Rooij 10.5194/hess-26-5849-2022
- Laboratory and Physical Prototype Tests for the Investigation of Hydraulic Hysteresis of Pyroclastic Soils M. Pirone et al. 10.3390/geosciences10080320
- Combination of Measurement Methods for a Wide-Range Description of Hydraulic Soil Properties T. Weninger et al. 10.3390/w10081021
- Innovative Overview of SWRC Application in Modeling Geotechnical Engineering Problems K. Onyelowe et al. 10.3390/designs6050069
- Sigmoidal water retention function with improved behaviour in dry and wet soils G. de Rooij et al. 10.5194/hess-25-983-2021
- A modification to the van Genuchten model for improved prediction of relative hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils X. Kuang et al. 10.1111/ejss.13034
- Time-lapse magnetic resonance sounding measurements for numerical modeling of water flow in variably saturated media A. Legchenko et al. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.103984
- Prediction of absolute unsaturated hydraulic conductivity – comparison of four different capillary bundle models A. Peters et al. 10.5194/hess-27-4579-2023
- Comparison of the performance of 22 models describing soil water retention curves from saturation to oven dryness C. Du 10.1002/vzj2.20072
- Prediction of the absolute hydraulic conductivity function from soil water retention data A. Peters et al. 10.5194/hess-27-1565-2023
- Characterizing physical and hydraulic properties of soils in Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia A. Al-Saeedi 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.061
- A Phase-Dependent Effect That Enables Multi-Scale Moisture Measurements in Heterogeneous Substrates Using Tubular RH Sensors D. Lazik 10.3390/s22103887
- Physics‐Informed Neural Networks With Monotonicity Constraints for Richardson‐Richards Equation: Estimation of Constitutive Relationships and Soil Water Flux Density From Volumetric Water Content Measurements T. Bandai & T. Ghezzehei 10.1029/2020WR027642
- Transformation of structural organization of model soil constructions with different structure in conditions of Moscow M. Suslenkova et al. 10.1088/1755-1315/368/1/012051
- Anatomy of the 2018 agricultural drought in the Netherlands using in situ soil moisture and satellite vegetation indices J. Buitink et al. 10.5194/hess-24-6021-2020
- Quality of Soil Simulation by the INM RAS–MSU Soil Scheme as a Part of the SL-AV Weather Prediction Model S. Travova et al. 10.3103/S1068373922030013
- Ten strategies towards successful calibration of environmental models J. Mai 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129414
- Comparison of Seven Weibull Distribution Models for Predicting Relative Hydraulic Conductivity J. Shan et al. 10.1029/2021WR030683
- Data‐Driven Discovery of Soil Moisture Flow Governing Equation: A Sparse Regression Framework W. Song et al. 10.1029/2022WR031926
- Determination of specific LNAPL volumes in soils having a multimodal pore-size distribution M. Alfaro Soto et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.077
- Pedotransfer functions for water contents at specific pressure heads of silty soils from Amazon rainforest A. Kotlar et al. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114098
- The relevance of measuring saturated hydraulic conductivity: Sensitivity analysis and functional evaluation J. De Pue et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.079
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 02 Nov 2024
Short summary
Water flows through soils with more difficulty when the soil is dried out. Scant rainfall in deserts may therefore result in a seemingly wet soil, but the water will often not penetrate deeply enough to replenish the groundwater. We compared the mathematical functions that describe how well different soils hold their water and found that only a few of them are realistic. The function one chooses to model the soil can have a large impact on the estimate of groundwater recharge.
Water flows through soils with more difficulty when the soil is dried out. Scant rainfall in...
