Articles | Volume 21, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1809-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1809-2017
Research article
 | 
28 Mar 2017
Research article |  | 28 Mar 2017

A site-level comparison of lysimeter and eddy covariance flux measurements of evapotranspiration

Martin Hirschi, Dominik Michel, Irene Lehner, and Sonia I. Seneviratne

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (14 Oct 2016) by Nunzio Romano
AR by Martin Hirschi on behalf of the Authors (16 Dec 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by Editor and Referees) (28 Dec 2016) by Nunzio Romano
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (29 Dec 2016) by Nunzio Romano
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (03 Jan 2017)
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (24 Jan 2017)
ED: Publish as is (05 Feb 2017) by Nunzio Romano
AR by Martin Hirschi on behalf of the Authors (07 Feb 2017)
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
We compare lysimeter and eddy covariance (EC) flux measurements of evapotranspiration at a research catchment in Switzerland. The measurements are compared on various timescales, and with respect to a 40-year long-term lysimeter time series. Overall, the lysimeter and EC measurements agree well, especially on the annual timescale. Furthermore, we identify that lack of reliable EC data during/after rainfall events significantly contributes to an underestimation of EC evapotranspiration.