Articles | Volume 21, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1421-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1421-2017
Research article
 | 
09 Mar 2017
Research article |  | 09 Mar 2017

Comparisons of stemflow and its bio-/abiotic influential factors between two xerophytic shrub species

Chuan Yuan, Guangyao Gao, and Bojie Fu

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (further review by Editor and Referees) (27 Nov 2016) by Lixin Wang
AR by Guangyao Gao on behalf of the Authors (03 Dec 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (05 Dec 2016) by Lixin Wang
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (21 Dec 2016)
RR by David Dunkerley (02 Jan 2017)
ED: Publish subject to revisions (further review by Editor and Referees) (11 Jan 2017) by Lixin Wang
AR by Guangyao Gao on behalf of the Authors (16 Feb 2017)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (24 Feb 2017) by Lixin Wang
AR by Guangyao Gao on behalf of the Authors (24 Feb 2017)
Download
Short summary
We computed stemflow yield and efficiency, and analyzed the influential mechanism at smaller scales of leaf and raindrop. We found that precipitation was the most influential meteorological feature on stemflow. The smaller threshold precipitation to start stemflow and the more beneficial leaf traits might partly explain the larger and more efficient stemflow production. At defoliated period, the newly exposed stems replaced leaves to intercept raindrops and might really matter in stemflow yield.