Articles | Volume 20, issue 9
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3799–3830, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3799-2016
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3799–3830, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3799-2016

Review article 14 Sep 2016

Review article | 14 Sep 2016

Determinants of modelling choices for 1-D free-surface flow and morphodynamics in hydrology and hydraulics: a review

Bruno Cheviron and Roger Moussa

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (18 Jan 2016) by Nunzio Romano
AR by Anna Wenzel on behalf of the Authors (20 Jan 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (31 Jan 2016) by Nunzio Romano
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (10 Mar 2016)
RR by Anonymous Referee #4 (05 Apr 2016)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (06 Apr 2016) by Nunzio Romano
AR by Anna Wenzel on behalf of the Authors (12 Jul 2016)  Author's response
ED: Publish as is (23 Jul 2016) by Nunzio Romano
Short summary
This review paper investigates the determinants of modelling choices for numerous applications of 1-D free-surface flow and morphodynamics in hydrology and hydraulics. Each case study has a signature composed of given contexts (spatiotemporal scales, flow typology, and phenomenology) and chosen concepts (refinement and subscales of the flow model). This review proposes a normative procedure possibly enriched by the community for a larger, comprehensive and updated image of modelling strategies.