Articles | Volume 20, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2965-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2965-2016
Research article
 | 
21 Jul 2016
Research article |  | 21 Jul 2016

Improving together: better science writing through peer learning

Mathew A. Stiller-Reeve, Céline Heuzé, William T. Ball, Rachel H. White, Gabriele Messori, Karin van der Wiel, Iselin Medhaug, Annemarie H. Eckes, Amee O'Callaghan, Mike J. Newland, Sian R. Williams, Matthew Kasoar, Hella Elisa Wittmeier, and Valerie Kumer

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (Editor review) (02 Jun 2016) by Sam Illingworth
AR by Mathew Stiller-Reeve on behalf of the Authors (10 Jun 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (13 Jun 2016) by Sam Illingworth
AR by Mathew Stiller-Reeve on behalf of the Authors (14 Jun 2016)  Manuscript 
Download

The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.

Short summary
Scientific writing must improve and the key to long-term improvement of scientific writing lies with the early-career scientist (ECS). We introduce the ClimateSnack project, which aims to motivate ECSs to start writing groups around the world to improve their skills together. Writing groups offer many benefits but can be a challenge to keep going. Several ClimateSnack writing groups formed, and this paper examines why some of the groups flourished and others dissolved.