23 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Mental models: Exploring how people think about heat flows in the home J. Goodhew et al. 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.012
2. Disturbed Earth: Conceptions of the Deep Underground in Shale Extraction Deliberations in the US and UK T. Partridge et al. 10.3197/096327119X15579936382482
3. Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’ I. Stewart & D. Lewis 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.003
4. The Jurassic Coast Story Book: An approach to geoheritage interpretation from the Jurassic Coast World Heritage Site S. Scriven 10.1016/j.pgeola.2018.09.005
5. Leveraging Earth science research for effective sustainability policy and territorial management in the Chablais UNESCO Global Geopark (France) S. Justice 10.1144/SP530-2022-125
6. Fracking bad language – hydraulic fracturing and earthquake risks J. Roberts et al. 10.5194/gc-4-303-2021
7. Communicating leakage risk in the hydrogen economy: Lessons already learned from geoenergy industries L. Stalker et al. 10.3389/fenrg.2022.869264
8. The imaginary eruption – volcanic activity through kids' eyes M. Todesco et al. 10.5194/gc-5-205-2022
9. Perspectives and ambitions of interdisciplinary connectivity researchers E. Paton et al. 10.5194/hess-23-537-2019
10. Bursting bubbles: can experiments and analogues help stakeholders and the public visualise risks? L. Stalker et al. 10.1071/AJ17091
11. “Do you Know What's Underneath your Feet?”: Underground Landscapes & Place‐Based Risk Perceptions of Proposed Shale Gas Sites in Rural British Communities☆ S. Ryder et al. 10.1111/ruso.12513
12. Transitions: comparing timescales of eruption and evacuation at Volcán de Fuego (Guatemala) to understand relationships between hazard evolution and responsive action A. Naismith et al. 10.1186/s13617-023-00139-0
13. Stakeholders’ perceptions of Helium and Carbon Dioxide risks in a subsurface engineering project in France K. Nadarajah et al. 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.123
14. How do we see fractures? Quantifying subjective bias in fracture data collection B. Andrews et al. 10.5194/se-10-487-2019
15. Fault fictions: systematic biases in the conceptualization of fault-zone architecture Z. Shipton et al. 10.1144/SP496-2018-161
16. The human side of geoscientists: comparing geoscientists' and non-geoscientists' cognitive and affective responses to geology A. Lacchia et al. 10.5194/gc-3-291-2020
17. Role of Subsurface Geo-Energy Pilot and Demonstration Sites in Delivering Net Zero M. Stephenson et al. 10.3389/esss.2022.10045
18. Campylobacteriosis, consumer's risk perception, and knowledge associated with domestic poultry handling in Ireland P. Myintzaw et al. 10.1111/jfs.12799
19. A Three-Stage Psychosocial Engineering-Based Method to Support Controversy and Promote Mutual Understanding between Stakeholders: The Case of CO2 Geological Storage K. Nadarajah et al. 10.3390/en17051014
20. Social geology — integrating sustainability concepts into Earth sciences I. Stewart & J. Gill 10.1016/j.pgeola.2017.01.002
21. The 18th Glossop Lecture: variability and ground hazards: how does the ground get to be ‘unexpected’? J. Skipper 10.1144/qjegh2024-008
22. Comparing Expert and Local Community Perspectives on Flood Management in the Lower Mono River Catchment, Togo and Benin E. Parkoo et al. 10.3390/w14101536
23. Back to Real Pictures B. Axtell & C. Munteanu 10.1145/3351232