Articles | Volume 19, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-893-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-893-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
12 Feb 2015
Research article |
| 12 Feb 2015
Reducing the ambiguity of karst aquifer models by pattern matching of flow and transport on catchment scale
S. Oehlmann
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Geoscience Center, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
T. Geyer
Geoscience Center, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Landesamt für Geologie, Rohstoffe und Bergbau, Regierungspräsidium Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
T. Licha
Geoscience Center, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
M. Sauter
Geoscience Center, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 3,618 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Aug 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,728 | 1,547 | 343 | 3,618 | 143 | 121 |
- HTML: 1,728
- PDF: 1,547
- XML: 343
- Total: 3,618
- BibTeX: 143
- EndNote: 121
Total article views: 2,870 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Feb 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,316 | 1,229 | 325 | 2,870 | 132 | 116 |
- HTML: 1,316
- PDF: 1,229
- XML: 325
- Total: 2,870
- BibTeX: 132
- EndNote: 116
Total article views: 748 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 04 Aug 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 412 | 318 | 18 | 748 | 11 | 5 |
- HTML: 412
- PDF: 318
- XML: 18
- Total: 748
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 5
Cited
18 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Putting the cat in the box: why our models should consider subsurface heterogeneity at all scales A. Hartmann 10.1002/wat2.1146
- Beyond Classical Observations in Hydrogeology: The Advantages of Including Exchange Flux, Temperature, Tracer Concentration, Residence Time, and Soil Moisture Observations in Groundwater Model Calibration O. Schilling et al. 10.1029/2018RG000619
- Improving hydrogeological understanding through well-test interpretation by diagnostic plot and modelling: a case study in an alluvial aquifer in France T. Garin et al. 10.1007/s10040-021-02426-9
- On the value of water quality data and informative flow states in karst modelling A. Hartmann et al. 10.5194/hess-21-5971-2017
- Evaluation of hydrogeological impact of tunnel engineering in a karst aquifer by coupled discrete-continuum numerical simulations X. Zheng et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125765
- Relationship between organic micropollutants and hydro-sedimentary processes at a karst spring in south-west Germany F. Schiperski et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.007
- Transport and Attenuation of Particles of Different Density and Surface Charge: A Karst Aquifer Field Study F. Schiperski et al. 10.1021/acs.est.6b00335
- Turbulent and Laminar Flow in Karst Conduits Under Unsteady Flow Conditions: Interpretation of Pumping Tests by Discrete Conduit‐Continuum Modeling M. Giese et al. 10.1002/2017WR020658
- Advances, challenges and perspective in modelling the functioning of karst systems: a review H. Jourde & X. Wang 10.1007/s12665-023-11034-7
- Process-based modelling to evaluate simulated groundwater levels and frequencies in a Chalk catchment in south-western England S. Brenner et al. 10.5194/nhess-18-445-2018
- Integrating field work and large-scale modeling to improve assessment of karst water resources A. Hartmann et al. 10.1007/s10040-020-02258-z
- Characterization of karst conduits by tracer tests for an artificial recharge scheme X. Cen et al. 10.1007/s10040-021-02398-w
- Karst groundwater source protection based on the time-dependent vulnerability assessment model: Crnica springs case study, Eastern Serbia V. Živanović et al. 10.1007/s12665-016-6018-2
- Using radar-based quantitative precipitation data with coupled soil- and groundwater balance models for stream flow simulation in a karst area P. Knöll et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124884
- Combining Experimental Methods and Modeling to Quantify the Complex Recharge Behavior of Karst Aquifers M. Mudarra et al. 10.1029/2017WR021819
- Effects of model complexity on karst catchment runoff modeling for flood warning systems P. Knöll et al. 10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100194
- On the assimilation of environmental tracer observations for model-based decision support M. Knowling et al. 10.5194/hess-24-1677-2020
- Numerical Benchmark Studies on Flow and Solute Transport in Geological Reservoirs S. Karmakar et al. 10.3390/w14081310
18 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Putting the cat in the box: why our models should consider subsurface heterogeneity at all scales A. Hartmann 10.1002/wat2.1146
- Beyond Classical Observations in Hydrogeology: The Advantages of Including Exchange Flux, Temperature, Tracer Concentration, Residence Time, and Soil Moisture Observations in Groundwater Model Calibration O. Schilling et al. 10.1029/2018RG000619
- Improving hydrogeological understanding through well-test interpretation by diagnostic plot and modelling: a case study in an alluvial aquifer in France T. Garin et al. 10.1007/s10040-021-02426-9
- On the value of water quality data and informative flow states in karst modelling A. Hartmann et al. 10.5194/hess-21-5971-2017
- Evaluation of hydrogeological impact of tunnel engineering in a karst aquifer by coupled discrete-continuum numerical simulations X. Zheng et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125765
- Relationship between organic micropollutants and hydro-sedimentary processes at a karst spring in south-west Germany F. Schiperski et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.007
- Transport and Attenuation of Particles of Different Density and Surface Charge: A Karst Aquifer Field Study F. Schiperski et al. 10.1021/acs.est.6b00335
- Turbulent and Laminar Flow in Karst Conduits Under Unsteady Flow Conditions: Interpretation of Pumping Tests by Discrete Conduit‐Continuum Modeling M. Giese et al. 10.1002/2017WR020658
- Advances, challenges and perspective in modelling the functioning of karst systems: a review H. Jourde & X. Wang 10.1007/s12665-023-11034-7
- Process-based modelling to evaluate simulated groundwater levels and frequencies in a Chalk catchment in south-western England S. Brenner et al. 10.5194/nhess-18-445-2018
- Integrating field work and large-scale modeling to improve assessment of karst water resources A. Hartmann et al. 10.1007/s10040-020-02258-z
- Characterization of karst conduits by tracer tests for an artificial recharge scheme X. Cen et al. 10.1007/s10040-021-02398-w
- Karst groundwater source protection based on the time-dependent vulnerability assessment model: Crnica springs case study, Eastern Serbia V. Živanović et al. 10.1007/s12665-016-6018-2
- Using radar-based quantitative precipitation data with coupled soil- and groundwater balance models for stream flow simulation in a karst area P. Knöll et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124884
- Combining Experimental Methods and Modeling to Quantify the Complex Recharge Behavior of Karst Aquifers M. Mudarra et al. 10.1029/2017WR021819
- Effects of model complexity on karst catchment runoff modeling for flood warning systems P. Knöll et al. 10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100194
- On the assimilation of environmental tracer observations for model-based decision support M. Knowling et al. 10.5194/hess-24-1677-2020
- Numerical Benchmark Studies on Flow and Solute Transport in Geological Reservoirs S. Karmakar et al. 10.3390/w14081310
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
