Articles | Volume 19, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-675-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-675-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
03 Feb 2015
Research article |
| 03 Feb 2015
Protecting environmental flows through enhanced water licensing and water markets
T. Erfani
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Chadwick Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
O. Binions
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Chadwick Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
J. J. Harou
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Chadwick Building, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 4,136 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Mar 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,971 | 1,923 | 242 | 4,136 | 142 | 109 |
- HTML: 1,971
- PDF: 1,923
- XML: 242
- Total: 4,136
- BibTeX: 142
- EndNote: 109
Total article views: 2,724 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Feb 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,436 | 1,084 | 204 | 2,724 | 129 | 104 |
- HTML: 1,436
- PDF: 1,084
- XML: 204
- Total: 2,724
- BibTeX: 129
- EndNote: 104
Total article views: 1,412 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Mar 2014)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 535 | 839 | 38 | 1,412 | 13 | 5 |
- HTML: 535
- PDF: 839
- XML: 38
- Total: 1,412
- BibTeX: 13
- EndNote: 5
Cited
28 citations as recorded by crossref.
- CURRENT STATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW METHODOLOGIES: OBJECTIVES, METHODS AND THEIR APPROACHES Y. SHINOZAKI & N. SHIRAKAWA 10.2208/jscejhe.75.15
- Trading‐off tolerable risk with climate change adaptation costs in water supply systems E. Borgomeo et al. 10.1002/2015WR018164
- Using ecosystem services to represent the environment in hydro-economic models A. Momblanch et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.019
- Hydro-Economic Modeling of Water Resources Management Challenges: Current Applications and Future Directions J. Ortiz-Partida et al. 10.1142/S2382624X23400039
- Modelling the impacts of a water trading scheme on freshwater habitats J. Garbe & L. Beevers 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.057
- The Impact of Climate Change on Hydroecological Response in Chalk Streams A. Visser et al. 10.3390/w11030596
- Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban and rural water scarcity and its influencing factors across the world Y. Dai & Z. Liu 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110386
- What do economic water storage valuations reveal about optimal vs. historical water management? M. Khadem et al. 10.1016/j.wre.2020.100158
- Reliability and Robustness Analysis of the Masinga Dam under Uncertainty H. Postle-Floyd & T. Erfani 10.3390/cli5010012
- Interval Optimization Model Considering Terrestrial Ecological Impacts for Water Rights Transfer from Agriculture to Industry in Ningxia, China L. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41598-017-02734-9
- Advancing towards functional environmental flows for temperate floodplain rivers D. Hayes et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.221
- Simulating Crop-Water Production Functions Using Crop Growth Models to Support Water Policy Assessments T. Foster & N. Brozović 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.019
- Estimating the Economic Value of Interannual Reservoir Storage in Water Resource Systems M. Khadem et al. 10.1029/2017WR022336
- Bridging gaps between environmental flows theory and practices in China A. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.wse.2019.12.002
- Relationships between agricultural energy and farming indicators V. Martinho 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110096
- Impact of government subsidy on the optimal strategies of improving water use efficiency for a high-water-consumption manufacturer W. Ma & X. Li 10.1108/K-09-2021-0805
- An evolutionary approach to solve a system of multiple interrelated agent problems T. Erfani & R. Erfani 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.049
- Systematic Review of Water-Economy Modeling Applications M. Bekchanov et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000793
- A State‐of‐the‐Art Review of Optimal Reservoir Control for Managing Conflicting Demands in a Changing World M. Giuliani et al. 10.1029/2021WR029927
- George Baxter E. Neachell & G. Petts 10.1177/0309133317732922
- Agent-based modeling of participants' behaviors in an inter-sectoral groundwater market M. Zolfagharipoor & A. Ahmadi 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113560
- Classifying Dams for Environmental Flow Implementation in China A. Chen et al. 10.3390/su12010107
- An electricity market-based approach to finance environmental flow restoration A. Dalcin et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120231
- Local water market development based on multi-agent based simulation approach A. Nouri et al. 10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100826
- Improving the performance of agricultural temporary water markets: The role of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies Y. Duan et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109062
- Changing mechanism of global water scarcity events: Impacts of socioeconomic changes and inter-annual hydro-climatic variability T. Veldkamp et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.011
- Managing for Sustainability: The Development of Environmental Flows Implementation in China A. Chen & M. Wu 10.3390/w11030433
- Collaborative Management of Water‐Energy‐Food‐Ecosystems Nexus in Central Asia Under Uncertainty Y. Ma et al. 10.1029/2023WR035166
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- CURRENT STATE OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW METHODOLOGIES: OBJECTIVES, METHODS AND THEIR APPROACHES Y. SHINOZAKI & N. SHIRAKAWA 10.2208/jscejhe.75.15
- Trading‐off tolerable risk with climate change adaptation costs in water supply systems E. Borgomeo et al. 10.1002/2015WR018164
- Using ecosystem services to represent the environment in hydro-economic models A. Momblanch et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.019
- Hydro-Economic Modeling of Water Resources Management Challenges: Current Applications and Future Directions J. Ortiz-Partida et al. 10.1142/S2382624X23400039
- Modelling the impacts of a water trading scheme on freshwater habitats J. Garbe & L. Beevers 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.057
- The Impact of Climate Change on Hydroecological Response in Chalk Streams A. Visser et al. 10.3390/w11030596
- Spatiotemporal heterogeneity of urban and rural water scarcity and its influencing factors across the world Y. Dai & Z. Liu 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110386
- What do economic water storage valuations reveal about optimal vs. historical water management? M. Khadem et al. 10.1016/j.wre.2020.100158
- Reliability and Robustness Analysis of the Masinga Dam under Uncertainty H. Postle-Floyd & T. Erfani 10.3390/cli5010012
- Interval Optimization Model Considering Terrestrial Ecological Impacts for Water Rights Transfer from Agriculture to Industry in Ningxia, China L. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41598-017-02734-9
- Advancing towards functional environmental flows for temperate floodplain rivers D. Hayes et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.221
- Simulating Crop-Water Production Functions Using Crop Growth Models to Support Water Policy Assessments T. Foster & N. Brozović 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.019
- Estimating the Economic Value of Interannual Reservoir Storage in Water Resource Systems M. Khadem et al. 10.1029/2017WR022336
- Bridging gaps between environmental flows theory and practices in China A. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.wse.2019.12.002
- Relationships between agricultural energy and farming indicators V. Martinho 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110096
- Impact of government subsidy on the optimal strategies of improving water use efficiency for a high-water-consumption manufacturer W. Ma & X. Li 10.1108/K-09-2021-0805
- An evolutionary approach to solve a system of multiple interrelated agent problems T. Erfani & R. Erfani 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.07.049
- Systematic Review of Water-Economy Modeling Applications M. Bekchanov et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000793
- A State‐of‐the‐Art Review of Optimal Reservoir Control for Managing Conflicting Demands in a Changing World M. Giuliani et al. 10.1029/2021WR029927
- George Baxter E. Neachell & G. Petts 10.1177/0309133317732922
- Agent-based modeling of participants' behaviors in an inter-sectoral groundwater market M. Zolfagharipoor & A. Ahmadi 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113560
- Classifying Dams for Environmental Flow Implementation in China A. Chen et al. 10.3390/su12010107
- An electricity market-based approach to finance environmental flow restoration A. Dalcin et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120231
- Local water market development based on multi-agent based simulation approach A. Nouri et al. 10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100826
- Improving the performance of agricultural temporary water markets: The role of technology-based and transaction-based subsidies Y. Duan et al. 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109062
- Changing mechanism of global water scarcity events: Impacts of socioeconomic changes and inter-annual hydro-climatic variability T. Veldkamp et al. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.011
- Managing for Sustainability: The Development of Environmental Flows Implementation in China A. Chen & M. Wu 10.3390/w11030433
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (preprint)
Latest update: 31 Dec 2024
Short summary
This paper simulates river basin water markets under two licensing regimes: fixed volumetric allowances and scalable licensing with dynamic environmental minimum flow requirements. The model is applied to the Great Ouse River basin in eastern England, with each water user from four main sectors represented individually. The results suggest that the scalable licensing system is more effective in protecting environmental flows, at the opportunity cost of 10-15% of economic benefits to water users.
This paper simulates river basin water markets under two licensing regimes: fixed volumetric...
