Articles | Volume 19, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4317-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4317-2015
© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
23 Oct 2015
Research article |
| 23 Oct 2015
Impacts of grid resolution on surface energy fluxes simulated with an integrated surface-groundwater flow model
Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
C. Simmer
Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems, Geoverbund ABC/J, Jülich, Germany
S. Kollet
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany
Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems, Geoverbund ABC/J, Jülich, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 3,427 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jul 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,025 | 1,205 | 197 | 3,427 | 129 | 144 |
- HTML: 2,025
- PDF: 1,205
- XML: 197
- Total: 3,427
- BibTeX: 129
- EndNote: 144
Total article views: 2,741 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 23 Oct 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,726 | 833 | 182 | 2,741 | 122 | 134 |
- HTML: 1,726
- PDF: 833
- XML: 182
- Total: 2,741
- BibTeX: 122
- EndNote: 134
Total article views: 686 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jul 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 299 | 372 | 15 | 686 | 7 | 10 |
- HTML: 299
- PDF: 372
- XML: 15
- Total: 686
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 10
Cited
33 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Effects of horizontal grid resolution on evapotranspiration partitioning using TerrSysMP P. Shrestha et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.024
- Presentation and discussion of the high-resolution atmosphere–land-surface–subsurface simulation dataset of the simulated Neckar catchment for the period 2007–2015 B. Schalge et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4437-2021
- Water table depth assimilation in integrated terrestrial system models at the larger catchment scale F. Li et al. 10.3389/frwa.2023.1150999
- Role of reservoir regulation and groundwater feedback in a simulated ground‐soil‐vegetation continuum: A long‐term regional scale analysis J. Wei et al. 10.1002/hyp.14341
- Prediction of groundwater quality index to assess suitability for drinking purpose using averaged neural network and geospatial analysis S. Ahn et al. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115485
- On the role of patterns in understanding the functioning of soil-vegetation-atmosphere systems H. Vereecken et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.053
- Flexible vector-based spatial configurations in land models S. Gharari et al. 10.5194/hess-24-5953-2020
- Improvement of surface run‐off in the hydrological model ParFlow by a scale‐consistent river parameterization B. Schalge et al. 10.1002/hyp.13448
- Changeability of simulated watershed hydrographs from different vector scales and cell sizes M. Moradi Dashtpagerdi et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104097
- Representation of spatial and temporal variability in large-domain hydrological models: case study for a mesoscale pre-Alpine basin L. Melsen et al. 10.5194/hess-20-2207-2016
- Studying the influence of groundwater representations on land surface‐atmosphere feedbacks during the European heat wave in 2003 J. Keune et al. 10.1002/2016JD025426
- The Landlab v1.0 OverlandFlow component: a Python tool for computing shallow-water flow across watersheds J. Adams et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-1645-2017
- Modelling convectively induced secondary circulations in the terra incognita with TerrSysMP S. Poll et al. 10.1002/qj.3088
- Why Do Large‐Scale Land Surface Models Produce a Low Ratio of Transpiration to Evapotranspiration? L. Chang et al. 10.1029/2018JD029159
- Estimating dominant runoff modes across the conterminous United States B. Buchanan et al. 10.1002/hyp.13296
- Quantifying the Impact of Subsurface‐Land Surface Physical Processes on the Predictive Skill of Subseasonal Mesoscale Atmospheric Simulations M. Sulis et al. 10.1029/2017JD028187
- Can a Sparse Network of Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensors Improve Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration Estimation at the Larger Catchment Scale? F. Li et al. 10.1029/2023WR035056
- The effects of applying different DEM resolutions, DEM sources and flow tracing algorithms on LS factor and sediment yield estimation using USLE in Barajin river basin (BRB), Iran A. Azizian & S. Koohi 10.1007/s10333-021-00847-6
- Improvement of soil moisture and groundwater level estimations using a scale‐consistent river parameterization for the coupled ParFlow-CLM hydrological model: A case study of the Upper Rhine Basin S. Soltani et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127991
- Effects of Water-Table Configuration on the Planetary Boundary Layer over the San Joaquin River Watershed, California J. Gilbert et al. 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0134.1
- Accuracy of sedimentgraph modeling from topography map scale and DEM mesh size S. Sadeghi et al. 10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.01.002
- Simulating coupled surface–subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities, applications, and ongoing development of an open-source, massively parallel, integrated hydrologic model B. Kuffour et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020
- Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic conductivity and Manning's n parameters lead to new method to scale effective hydraulic conductivity across model resolutions L. M. Foster & R. M. Maxwell 10.1002/hyp.13327
- Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models M. Sulis et al. 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0159.1
- The Limits of Homogenization: What Hydrological Dynamics can a Simple Model Represent at the Catchment Scale? H. Wen et al. 10.1029/2020WR029528
- Intraseasonal scale ensemble forecasts of precipitation and evapotranspiration for the Madeira River basin using different physical parameterizations W. Gomes et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106086
- Impacts of Topography‐Driven Water Redistribution on Terrestrial Water Storage Change in California Through Ecosystem Responses X. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2023WR035572
- Large-sample assessment of varying spatial resolution on the streamflow estimates of the wflow_sbm hydrological model J. Aerts et al. 10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022
- Continental Hydrologic Intercomparison Project, Phase 1: A Large‐Scale Hydrologic Model Comparison Over the Continental United States D. Tijerina‐Kreuzer et al. 10.1029/2020WR028931
- Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe B. Naz et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023
- Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning R. Maxwell & L. Condon 10.1126/science.aaf7891
- A high-resolution, 3D groundwater-surface water simulation of the contiguous US: Advances in the integrated ParFlow CONUS 2.0 modeling platform C. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130294
- Investigating the representation of heatwaves from an ensemble of km-scale regional climate simulations within CORDEX-FPS convection L. Sangelantoni et al. 10.1007/s00382-023-06769-9
33 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Effects of horizontal grid resolution on evapotranspiration partitioning using TerrSysMP P. Shrestha et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.024
- Presentation and discussion of the high-resolution atmosphere–land-surface–subsurface simulation dataset of the simulated Neckar catchment for the period 2007–2015 B. Schalge et al. 10.5194/essd-13-4437-2021
- Water table depth assimilation in integrated terrestrial system models at the larger catchment scale F. Li et al. 10.3389/frwa.2023.1150999
- Role of reservoir regulation and groundwater feedback in a simulated ground‐soil‐vegetation continuum: A long‐term regional scale analysis J. Wei et al. 10.1002/hyp.14341
- Prediction of groundwater quality index to assess suitability for drinking purpose using averaged neural network and geospatial analysis S. Ahn et al. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115485
- On the role of patterns in understanding the functioning of soil-vegetation-atmosphere systems H. Vereecken et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.053
- Flexible vector-based spatial configurations in land models S. Gharari et al. 10.5194/hess-24-5953-2020
- Improvement of surface run‐off in the hydrological model ParFlow by a scale‐consistent river parameterization B. Schalge et al. 10.1002/hyp.13448
- Changeability of simulated watershed hydrographs from different vector scales and cell sizes M. Moradi Dashtpagerdi et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104097
- Representation of spatial and temporal variability in large-domain hydrological models: case study for a mesoscale pre-Alpine basin L. Melsen et al. 10.5194/hess-20-2207-2016
- Studying the influence of groundwater representations on land surface‐atmosphere feedbacks during the European heat wave in 2003 J. Keune et al. 10.1002/2016JD025426
- The Landlab v1.0 OverlandFlow component: a Python tool for computing shallow-water flow across watersheds J. Adams et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-1645-2017
- Modelling convectively induced secondary circulations in the terra incognita with TerrSysMP S. Poll et al. 10.1002/qj.3088
- Why Do Large‐Scale Land Surface Models Produce a Low Ratio of Transpiration to Evapotranspiration? L. Chang et al. 10.1029/2018JD029159
- Estimating dominant runoff modes across the conterminous United States B. Buchanan et al. 10.1002/hyp.13296
- Quantifying the Impact of Subsurface‐Land Surface Physical Processes on the Predictive Skill of Subseasonal Mesoscale Atmospheric Simulations M. Sulis et al. 10.1029/2017JD028187
- Can a Sparse Network of Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensors Improve Soil Moisture and Evapotranspiration Estimation at the Larger Catchment Scale? F. Li et al. 10.1029/2023WR035056
- The effects of applying different DEM resolutions, DEM sources and flow tracing algorithms on LS factor and sediment yield estimation using USLE in Barajin river basin (BRB), Iran A. Azizian & S. Koohi 10.1007/s10333-021-00847-6
- Improvement of soil moisture and groundwater level estimations using a scale‐consistent river parameterization for the coupled ParFlow-CLM hydrological model: A case study of the Upper Rhine Basin S. Soltani et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127991
- Effects of Water-Table Configuration on the Planetary Boundary Layer over the San Joaquin River Watershed, California J. Gilbert et al. 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0134.1
- Accuracy of sedimentgraph modeling from topography map scale and DEM mesh size S. Sadeghi et al. 10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.01.002
- Simulating coupled surface–subsurface flows with ParFlow v3.5.0: capabilities, applications, and ongoing development of an open-source, massively parallel, integrated hydrologic model B. Kuffour et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-1373-2020
- Sensitivity analysis of hydraulic conductivity and Manning's n parameters lead to new method to scale effective hydraulic conductivity across model resolutions L. M. Foster & R. M. Maxwell 10.1002/hyp.13327
- Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models M. Sulis et al. 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0159.1
- The Limits of Homogenization: What Hydrological Dynamics can a Simple Model Represent at the Catchment Scale? H. Wen et al. 10.1029/2020WR029528
- Intraseasonal scale ensemble forecasts of precipitation and evapotranspiration for the Madeira River basin using different physical parameterizations W. Gomes et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106086
- Impacts of Topography‐Driven Water Redistribution on Terrestrial Water Storage Change in California Through Ecosystem Responses X. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2023WR035572
- Large-sample assessment of varying spatial resolution on the streamflow estimates of the wflow_sbm hydrological model J. Aerts et al. 10.5194/hess-26-4407-2022
- Continental Hydrologic Intercomparison Project, Phase 1: A Large‐Scale Hydrologic Model Comparison Over the Continental United States D. Tijerina‐Kreuzer et al. 10.1029/2020WR028931
- Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe B. Naz et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023
- Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning R. Maxwell & L. Condon 10.1126/science.aaf7891
- A high-resolution, 3D groundwater-surface water simulation of the contiguous US: Advances in the integrated ParFlow CONUS 2.0 modeling platform C. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130294
- Investigating the representation of heatwaves from an ensemble of km-scale regional climate simulations within CORDEX-FPS convection L. Sangelantoni et al. 10.1007/s00382-023-06769-9
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Short summary
This study highlights the grid resolution dependence of energy and water balance of the 3-D physically based integrated surface-groundwater model. The non-local controls of soil moisture were found to be highly grid resolution dependent, but the local vegetation control strongly modulates the scaling behavior of surface energy fluxes. For coupled runs, variability in patterns of surface fluxes due to this scale dependence can affect the simulated atmospheric boundary layer and local circulation.
This study highlights the grid resolution dependence of energy and water balance of the 3-D...
