91 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A Multiscale Method to Improve Social Vulnerability Estimation for Water Infrastructure System Planning and Management S. Rivera et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6444
2. The March 2015 catastrophic flood event and its impacts in the city of Copiapó (southern Atacama Desert). An integrated analysis to mitigate future mudflow derived damages T. Izquierdo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102975
3. A framework for a microscale flood damage assessment and visualization for a building using BIM–GIS integration S. Amirebrahimi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2015.1034201
4. Determining Vulnerability Indicators of Buildings for Sea-Level Rise and Floods in Urban Coastal Areas İ. Çal & A. Ciravoğlu https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010027
5. Flash Flood Risk Analysis for Sustainable Heritage: Vulnerability Configurations and Disaster Resilience Strategies of Huizhou Covered Bridges M. Yan & X. Xuan https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16030616
6. Risk Assessment of Population Loss Posed by Earthquake-Landslide-Debris Flow Disaster Chain: A Case Study in Wenchuan, China X. Han et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10060363
7. Application of Sensitivity Analysis for Process Model Calibration of Natural Hazards C. Chow et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8060218
8. Recent advances in vulnerability assessment for the built environment exposed to torrential hazards: Challenges and the way forward S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.067
9. A new methodology for probabilistic flood displacement risk assessment: the case of Fiji and Vanuatu L. Rossi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2024.1345258
10. Repose time patterns of debris‐flow events in alpine catchments M. Heiser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5533
11. Flood Risk Assessment of Buildings Based on Vulnerability Curve: A Case Study in Anji County S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14213572
12. The Effect of Flood Protection Works on Flood Risk G. Mitsopoulos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233936
13. Nonlinear Simulation and Vulnerability Analysis of Masonry Structures Impacted by Flash Floods Q. Fang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6682234
14. Resilience of persons with disabilities to climate induced landslide hazards in the vulnerable areas of Mount Elgon, Uganda M. Ssennoga et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103212
15. Methodological approach for mapping the flood physical vulnerability index with geographical open-source data: an example in a small-middle city (Ponferrada, Spain) L. Tascón-González et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06370-7
16. Flood Risk Analysis by Building Use in Urban Planning for Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation I. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313006
17. Determination of building flood risk maps from LiDAR mobile mapping data Y. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101759
18. Physical vulnerability to dynamic flooding: Vulnerability curves and vulnerability indices M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127501
19. A comparison of social vulnerability indices specific to flooding in Ecuador: principal component analysis (PCA) and expert knowledge A. Bucherie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102897
20. Characterization of damages in buildings after floods in Vega Baja County (Spain) in 2019. The case study of Almoradí municipality R. Moya Barbera et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03004
21. A multilevel fluid/structure model for predicting the damage behavior induced by flash floods in masonry structures U. De Maio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2024.11.101
22. Dynamic impact analysis of masonry buildings subjected to flood actions P. Lonetti & R. Maletta https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.076
23. Flood depth-damage and fragility functions derived with structured expert judgment G. Pita et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126982
24. Coupling Flood Propagation Modeling and Building Collapse in Flash Flood Studies L. Milanesi & M. Pilotti https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001941
25. Multi-level assessment of flood risk perception and flood behaviour R. Coloma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2525-2026
26. Morphometric analysis of debris flow hazard and risk assessment in the mountain terrains of northern Pakistan using remote sensing and field data N. Shah et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01807-y
27. Development of a spatial framework for flash flood damage assessment and mitigation by coupling analytics of machine learning and household level survey data – A case study of rapid collaborative assessments and disbursement of public funds to the affectees of floods 2022, Punjab Pakistan U. Saeed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104463
28. Vulnerability to Flash Floods: A Simplified Structural Model for Masonry Buildings L. Milanesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022577
29. Probabilistic life-cycle cost-benefit analysis of portfolios of buildings under flood hazard Y. Dong & D. Frangopol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.063
30. Flood risk perception and adaptation capacity: a contribution to the socio-hydrology debate S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3183-2017
31. Calculating Economic Flood Damage through Microscale Risk Maps and Data Generalization: A Pilot Study in Southern Italy G. Festa et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106286
32. A rapid numerical-based vulnerability assessment method for masonry buildings subject to flood G. Capparelli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104001
33. A bibliometric analysis and overview of the effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions in catchment scale flood mitigation P. Herath et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100235
34. Introducing energy-based seismic and flood demand (EBSFD) for multi-hazard vulnerability analysis of buildings D. Samadian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2026.116558
35. Vulnerability assessment of flash floods in Wadi Dahab Basin, Egypt M. Prama et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-8860-5
36. Stability investigation of the flood protection structure at Nava Nakorn industrial estate, Thailand M. Hoy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106279
37. Flood risk susceptibility analysis in Larkana district Pakistan using multi criteria decision analysis and geospatial techniques W. Khoso et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96107-2
38. Assessing Multidimensional Vulnerability of Rural Areas to Flooding: An Index-Based Approach S. Rasool et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00547-9
39. Experimental analyses of impact forces on buildings exposed to fluvial hazards M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.070
40. Evaluation of the benefits of facility for disaster mitigation based on the risk of debris flow S. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01776-5
41. High-resolution flood risk assessment using Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) climate change scenarios I. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2025.16.1.025
42. Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.007
43. Probabilistic assessment of structural damage from coupled multi-hazards P. Korswagen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.08.001
44. Flood damage functions based on a single physics- and data-based impact parameter that jointly accounts for water depth and velocity T. Lazzarin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127485
45. Flood vulnerability assessment of buildings using geospatial data and machine learning classifiers T. Tam et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01527-9
46. Multi-temporal analysis to support the management of torrent control structures S. Cucchiaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2023.107599
47. Vulnerability indicators for natural hazards: an innovative selection and weighting approach M. Papathoma-Köhle et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50257-2
48. A Framework Proposal for Regional-Scale Flood-Risk Assessment of Cultural Heritage Sites and Application to the Castile and León Region (Central Spain) J. Garrote et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020329
49. Unravelling the impacts to the built environment caused by floods in a river heavily perturbed by volcanic eruptions S. Basso-Báez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102655
50. Probabilistic framework to evaluate scenario-based building vulnerability under landslide run-out impacts X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107274
51. Short communication: A model to predict flood loss in mountain areas S. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.026
52. Assessing Flood Risk Dynamics in Southern Laos: A Comparative Analysis of HEC-RAS, Empirical and Physically Based Froude Number Models along the Xekaman River K. PHOMMAVONG et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345748125500137
53. A reliability-based approach for the impact vulnerability assessment of bridge piers subjected to debris flows S. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105567
54. Risk Assessment of Debris Flow in a Mountain-Basin Area, Western China Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14122942
55. Probabilistic vulnerability evaluation of buildings under landslide runout impacts considering the 3D dynamic interaction processes X. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108164
56. Building-scale flood loss estimation through vulnerability pattern characterization: application to an urban flood in Milan, Italy A. Taramelli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-3543-2022
57. Development of structural debris flow fragility curves (debris flow buildings resistance) using momentum flux rate as a hazard parameter J. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.014
58. Experimental measurements of flood-induced impact forces on exposed elements M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184005005
59. Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards M. Papathoma-Köhle https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
60. Approaches to analyse and model changes in impacts: reply to discussions of “How to improve attribution of changes in drought and flood impacts” H. Kreibich et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1701194
61. A generic physical vulnerability model for floods: review and concept for data-scarce regions M. Malgwi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2067-2020
62. 3-D hydrodynamic modelling of flood impacts on a building and indoor flooding processes B. Gems et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1351-2016
63. The object-specific flood damage database HOWAS 21 P. Kellermann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-2503-2020
64. Physical vulnerability assessment procedures for confined and unconfined (unreinforced) clay brick masonry buildings due to mass movements, rigid foundation A. Silva-Ceron et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108091
65. Effective emergency planning strategies for enhancing flood response A. Youssef et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07867-z
66. Understanding impact dynamics on buildings caused by fluviatile sediment transport M. Sturm et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.016
67. Cascading processes in a changing environment: Disturbances on fluvial ecosystems in Chile and implications for hazard and risk management B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.217
68. A Method for Assessing Flood Vulnerability Based on Vulnerability Curves and Online Data of Residential Buildings—A Case Study of Shanghai Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14182840
69. Structural fragility curves for brick-concrete buildings subjected to debris flow loading in northern China using momentum flux approach X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2026.112344
70. Physical vulnerability assessment to flash floods using an indicator‐based methodology based on building properties and flow parameters M. Leal et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12712
71. Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of Dam-Break Flood Impacting Problem with VOF Method and Different Turbulence Closures L. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-023-03530-z
72. Micro-sized enterprises: vulnerability to flash floods K. Karagiorgos et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2476-9
73. What do biphasic flow experiments reveal on the variability of exposure on alluvial fans and which implications for risk assessment result from this? H. Diaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-05169-8
74. Channel changes during and after extreme floods in two catchments of the Northern Apennines (Italy) V. Scorpio & F. Comiti https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109355
75. Civil engineering works versus self-protection measures for the mitigation of floods economic risk. A case study from a new classification criterion for cost-benefit analysis J. Garrote et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101157
76. Is local flood hazard assessment in urban areas significantly influenced by the physical complexity of the hydrodynamic inundation model? P. Costabile et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124231
77. Regional risk assessment of debris flows in China—An HRU-based approach Q. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.027
78. Vulnerability assessment for flash floods using GIS spatial modeling and remotely sensed data in El-Arish City, North Sinai, Egypt S. Mohamed & M. El-Raey https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03571-x
79. Physics of building vulnerability to debris flows, floods and earth flows H. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105611
80. Landslide damage incurred to buildings: A case study of Shenzhen landslide W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.10.025
81. Sensitivity analysis of a built environment exposed to the synthetic monophasic viscous debris flow impacts with 3-D numerical simulations X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-871-2023
82. Quantifying the role of openings in the impact of a dam-break-induced flood on a porous building Z. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128596
83. A Multiscale FE Framework for Flood–Structure Interaction: Integrated Hydraulic Actions and Structural Damage Prediction U. De Maio et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16081503
84. A review of flood damage analysis for a building structure and contents M. Marvi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-03941-w
85. Numerical investigation of the impact of a dam-break induced flood on a structure L. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108669
86. Quantifying the damage susceptibility to extreme events of mountain stream check dams using Rough Set Analysis B. Mazzorana et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12333
87. Enhancing sediment flux control and natural hazard risk mitigation through a structured conceptual planning approach S. Simoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.026
88. Flood Risk Assessment to Enable Improved Decision-Making for Climate Change Adaptation Strategies by Central and Local Governments I. Yu & H. Jung https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114335
89. Reliability-based vulnerability assessment of steel truss bridge components S. López et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2025.102623
90. An integrated framework for 3D time history analysis of steel special moment-resisting frame buildings under sequential flood and earthquake hazards D. Samadian et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2025.2591815
91. Implementation of property‐level flood risk adaptation (PLFRA) measures: Choices and decisions M. Attems et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1404