44 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Modeling spring flow of an Irish karst catchment using Modflow-USG with CLN L. Duran & L. Gill https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125971
2. An alternative approach to investigation of sediment transport through a karst aquifer D. Jukić & V. Denić-Jukić https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130037
3. Numerical simulation of precipitation driven karst spring discharge using a triple media (matrix–fractures–conduits) method H. Fu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-025-02978-0
4. Integrating field work and large-scale modeling to improve assessment of karst water resources A. Hartmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-020-02258-z
5. Laboratory-scale analyses of matrix-conduit exchange in a karst aquifer system using coupled physical and numerical modeling D. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2026.124225
6. Simulating seawater intrusion in a complex coastal karst aquifer using an improved variable-density flow and solute transport–conduit flow process model Z. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1903-2
7. Evaluation of inferred conduit configurations in the Yucatan karst system (Mexico) from gravity and aeromagnetic anomalies, using MODFLOW-CFPv2 M. Moreno-Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-024-02795-x
8. The Chemical Properties and Formation Mechanisms of Shallow Groundwater in the Guohe River Basin, China Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3283185
9. Modelling karst vadose zone hydrology and its relevance for paleoclimate reconstruction A. Hartmann & A. Baker https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.08.001
10. Optimization of the hydrodynamic characteristics of a karst conduit with CFPv2 coupled to OSTRICH Z. Mohammadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.050
11. Joint inversion of groundwater flow, heat, and solute state variables: a multipurpose approach for characterization and forecast of karst systems A. Kavousi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02631-8
12. Simulation of saltwater intrusion in a poorly karstified coastal aquifer in Lebanon (Eastern Mediterranean) W. Khadra & P. Stuyfzand https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1752-z
13. Application of the flow dimension concept for numerical drawdown data analyses in mixed-flow karst systems M. Giese et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1523-7
14. Numerical study of groundwater flow cycling controlled by seawater/freshwater interaction in Woodville Karst Plain Z. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124171
15. Simulating long term nitrate-N contamination processes in the Woodville Karst Plain using CFPv2 with UMT3D Z. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.024
16. Karst aquifer characterization by inverse application of MODFLOW-2005 CFPv2 discrete-continuum flow and transport model A. Kavousi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124922
17. Modelling spring discharge and solute transport in conduits by coupling CFPv2 to an epikarst reservoir for a karst aquifer Y. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.075
18. Rainfall events‐spring flow relationship and karst flow component analysis in a conduit‐matrix coupled system Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14990
19. A Stepwise Modelling Approach to Identifying Structural Features That Control Groundwater Flow in a Folded Carbonate Aquifer System E. Preziosi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14162475
20. Advances, challenges and perspective in modelling the functioning of karst systems: a review H. Jourde & X. Wang https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11034-7
21. Turbulent and Laminar Flow in Karst Conduits Under Unsteady Flow Conditions: Interpretation of Pumping Tests by Discrete Conduit‐Continuum Modeling M. Giese et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020658
22. Numerical simulation of tracer breakthrough curves in karst aquifers by a coupled discrete-continuum model X. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132147
23. Analysis of the Saltwater Wedge in a Coastal Karst Aquifer with a Double Conduit Network, Numerical Simulations and Sensitivity Analysis A. Feo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112311
24. An Approximation of Inner Boundary Conditions for Wells Intersecting Highly Conductive Structures M. Giese et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12947
25. Simulating precipitation-induced karst-stream interactions using a coupled Darcy–Brinkman–Stokes model F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-6285-2025
26. Characterizing the distribution and flow dynamics of shallow karst fissure-type groundwater in urban environments using multi-geophysical time-lapse monitoring combined with saline tracer tests H. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135560
27. Characterisation and modelling of conduit restricted karst aquifers – Example of the Auja spring, Jordan Valley S. Schmidt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.019
28. Simulation of Groundwater Flow in Fractured-Karst Aquifer with a Coupled Model in Maling Reservoir, China J. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041888
29. Groundwater flow modelling in Neoproterozoic carbonate karst based on dye tracer pathways J. Cotta Maciel Dantas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131182
30. Numerical study of groundwater flow cycling controlled by seawater/freshwater interaction in a coastal karst aquifer through conduit network using CFPv2 Z. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.09.003
31. Modeling Monthly Nitrate Concentration in a Karst Spring with and without Discrete Conduit Flow Y. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101622
32. Detection of karst conduit patterns via hydraulic tomography: A synthetic inverse modeling study Z. Mohammadi & W. Illman https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.02.044
33. Causes of groundwater salinization in the plain area of Kashgar River Basin in Xinjiang, China Y. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-10086-x
34. An Analytical Model for Water Inflow into a Karst Tunnel in Vuggy and Fractured Porous Rock Aquifers S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002547
35. Numerical modeling and sensitivity analysis of seawater intrusion in a dual-permeability coastal karst aquifer with conduit networks Z. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-221-2018
36. Development of a discrete‐continuum VDFST‐CFP numerical model for simulating seawater intrusion to a coastal karst aquifer with a conduit system Z. Xu & B. Hu https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018758
37. Toward the estimation of the transfer coefficient in karst systems: Using baseflow recession coefficient under matrix-restrained flow regime M. Shirafkan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129441
38. Influence of precipitation infiltration recharge on hydrological processes of the karst aquifer system and adjacent river F. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131656
39. Improving accuracy and efficiency in discrete-continuum karst models R. de Rooij https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8115-5
40. Groundwater Flow Modeling in Karst Aquifers: Coupling 3D Matrix and 1D Conduit Flow via Control Volume Isogeometric Analysis—Experimental Verification with a 3D Physical Model L. Malenica et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121787
41. Groundwater sustainability: a review of the interactions between science and policy A. Elshall et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8e8c
42. A New Equation Solver for Modeling Turbulent Flow in Coupled Matrix‐Conduit Flow Models B. Hubinger et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12400
43. CHARACTERIZATION AND DFN MODELLING OF THE FRACTURE NETWORK IN A MESOZOIC KARST RESERVOIR: GOMBA OILFIELD, PALEOGENE BASIN, CENTRAL HUNGARY M. Bauer & T. Tóth https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.12678
44. Karst modelling challenge 1: Results of hydrological modelling P. Jeannin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126508