45 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Lateral Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil Horizons Evaluated in Large-Volume Soil Monoliths M. Pirastru et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110862
2. A Novel Method of Quantifying Catchment‐Wide Average Peak Propagation Speed in Hillslopes: Fast Hillslope Responses are Detected During Annual Floods in a Steep Humid Catchment Y. Asano et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025070
3. Multi-step outflow and evaporation experiments – Gaining large undisturbed samples and comparison of the two methods K. Germer & J. Braun https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123914
4. Picturing and modeling catchments by representative hillslopes R. Loritz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1225-2017
5. The role and value of distributed precipitation data in hydrological models R. Loritz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-147-2021
6. Assessing and modeling biocatalysis in field denitrification beds reveals key influencing factors for future constructions V. Grießmeier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116467
7. From hillslope to stream: methods to investigate subsurface connectivity T. Blume & H. van Meerveld https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1071
8. Testing the hybrid‐3‐D hillslope hydrological model in a controlled environment P. Hazenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018106
9. How can we model subsurface stormflow at the catchment scale if we cannot measure it? P. Chifflard et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13407
10. Determination of Anisotropic Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of a Macroporous Slope Soil K. Germer & J. Braun https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.02.0071
11. A Lagrangian model for soil water dynamics during rainfall-driven conditions E. Zehe & C. Jackisch https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3511-2016
12. HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: a thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization and functioning of intermediate scale catchments E. Zehe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014
13. Influence of rainfall event characteristics and antecedent conditions on subsurface stormflow response of two forested hillslopes E. Thoenes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4405-2026
14. Digital modeling of lateral water flows and caesium-137 at the microlandscape level in semi-hydromorphic soils of the Bryansk region V. Linnik et al. https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU0137-0944-17-2024-79-4-51-62
15. Simulation of reactive solute transport in the critical zone: a Lagrangian model for transient flow and preferential transport A. Sternagel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1483-2021
16. Hillslope response to sprinkling and natural rainfall using velocity and celerity estimates in a slate-bedrock catchment A. Scaini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.011
17. Near‐surface water fluxes and their controls in a sloping heterogeneously layered volcanic soil beneath a supra‐wet tropical montane cloud forest (NW Costa Rica) C. Tobón & L. Bruijnzeel https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14426
18. Hillslope subsurface flow is driven by vegetation more than soil properties in colonized valley moraines along a humid mountain elevation F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5267-2025
19. From spatially variable streamflow to distributed hydrological models: Analysis of key modeling decisions F. Fenicia et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017398
20. Aquifer configuration and geostructural links control the groundwater quality in thin-bedded carbonate–siliciclastic alternations of the Hainich CZE, central Germany B. Kohlhepp et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6091-2017
21. Anomaly effect-driven optimization of direct-current geoelectric mapping surveys in large areas S. Klingler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104002
22. Ecohydrological particle model based on representative domains C. Jackisch & E. Zehe https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3639-2018
23. Simple Catchments and Where to Find Them: The Storage-Discharge Relationship as a Proxy for Catchment Complexity F. Jehn et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.631651
24. Flood response for the watersheds of the Fernow Experimental Forest in the central Appalachians N. Bates et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015871
25. Velocity and celerity dynamics at plot scale inferred from artificial tracing experiments and time-lapse ERT A. Scaini et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.035
26. Characterization of soil moisture response patterns and hillslope hydrological processes through a self-organizing map E. Lee & S. Kim https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5733-2021
27. Wavelet analysis of soil water state variables for identification of lateral subsurface flow: Lysimeter vs. field data A. Ehrhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20129
28. Characterizing Spatiotemporal Hydrological Responses During Extreme Flooding: A Residual Analysis Using SMAP Data H. Abeygunasekara et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi15070277
29. Field‐Scale Subsurface Flow Processes Inferred From Continuous Gravity Monitoring During a Sprinkling Experiment M. Reich et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030044
30. Large‐scale lateral saturated soil hydraulic conductivity as a metric for the connectivity of subsurface flow paths at hillslope scale M. Pirastru et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14649
31. A field and modeling study of subsurface stormflow for Huanggou Hillslope Y. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101683
32. Simulating preferential soil water flow and tracer transport using the Lagrangian Soil Water and Solute Transport Model A. Sternagel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-4249-2019
33. 3D stochastic modeling of flow and solute transport in karst vadose zone D. Zeqiraj https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100217
34. Understanding Preferential Flow in the Vadose Zone: Recent Advances and Future Prospects N. Jarvis et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.09.0075
35. Leveraging sap flow data in a catchment-scale hybrid model to improve soil moisture and transpiration estimates R. Loritz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4757-2022
36. Hillslope lag times for flood runoff are extremely short in high-relief meso-scale catchments T. Hajika et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136369
37. Stemflows and Preferential Flows: A Historical Review and Challenges for the Future K. Beven & J. Van Stan https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70556
38. Preferential pathways for fluid and solutes in heterogeneous groundwater systems: self-organization, entropy, work E. Zehe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5337-2021
39. Preferential flow patterns in forested hillslopes of east Tibetan Plateau revealed by dye tracing and soil moisture network F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13294
40. Digital Modeling of Lateral Water and Caesium-137 Flows at the Microlandscape Level in Semihydromorphic Soils of Bryansk Oblast V. Linnik et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147687424700406
41. Study on the Preferential Flow Characteristics under Different Precipitation Amounts in Simian Mountain Grassland of China M. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123489
42. Multidimensional Governing Equations of Matrix Flow Component of Subsurface Stormflow as Function of Bedrock Surface Geometry M. Kavvas et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033433
43. Model‐based exploration of hydrological connectivity and solute transport in a forested hillslope H. Laine‐Kaulio & H. Koivusalo https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2823
44. HESS Opinions: Advocating process modeling and de-emphasizing parameter estimation A. Bahremand https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1433-2016
45. Surface water and groundwater: unifying conceptualization and quantification of the two “water worlds” B. Berkowitz & E. Zehe https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1831-2020