Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1137–1149, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1137-2014
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 1137–1149, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1137-2014

Research article 26 Mar 2014

Research article | 26 Mar 2014

# Generalized combination equations for canopy evaporation under dry and wet conditions

J. P. Lhomme and C. Montes J. P. Lhomme and C. Montes
• IRD (UMR LISAH), 2 Place Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France

Abstract. The formulation of canopy evaporation is investigated on the basis of the combination equation derived from the Penman equation. All the elementary resistances (surface and boundary layer) within the canopy are taken into account, and the exchange surfaces are assumed to be subject to the same vapour pressure deficit at canopy source height. This development leads to generalized combination equations: one for completely dry canopies and the other for partially wet canopies. These equations are rather complex because they involve the partitioning of available energy within the canopy and between the wet and dry surfaces. By making some assumptions and approximations, they can provide simpler equations similar to the common Penman–Monteith model. One of the basic assumptions of this down-grading process is to consider that the available energy intercepted by the different elements making up the canopy is uniformly distributed and proportional to their respective area. Despite the somewhat unrealistic character of this hypothesis, it allows one to retrieve the simple formulations commonly and successfully used up to now. Numerical simulations are carried out by means of a simple one-dimensional model of the vegetation–atmosphere interaction with two different leaf area profiles. In dry conditions and when the soil surface is moist (low surface resistance), there is a large discrepancy between the generalized formulation and its simpler Penman–Monteith form, but much less when the soil surface is dry. In partially wet conditions, the Penman–Monteith-type equation substantially underestimates the generalized formulation when leaves are evenly distributed, but provides better estimates when leaves are concentrated in the upper half of the canopy.

Share