22 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Hydraulic linkage of a storm water tank to a karst spring (Gallusquelle) M. Tranter et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00767-016-0346-8
2. Insights on modelling of karstic aquifers: A new methodology for the integration of fracture data in groundwater flow modelling C. Pouliaris et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106056
3. Transport-based source tracking of contaminants in a karst aquifer: Model implementation, proof of concept, and application to event-based field data F. Schiperski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118145
4. Use of two artificial sweeteners, cyclamate and acesulfame, to identify and quantify wastewater contributions in a karst spring J. Zirlewagen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.112
5. Delay-aware karst spring discharge prediction S. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130250
6. Reactive Transport Model of Gypsum Karstification in Physically and Chemically Heterogeneous Fractured Media J. Águila et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030761
7. Relationship between organic micropollutants and hydro-sedimentary processes at a karst spring in south-west Germany F. Schiperski et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.007
8. Taking into Account both Explicit Conduits and the Unsaturated Zone in Karst Reservoir Hybrid Models: Impact on the Outlet Hydrograph L. Dal Soglio et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113221
9. Reducing the ambiguity of karst aquifer models by pattern matching of flow and transport on catchment scale S. Oehlmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-893-2015
10. Transport and Attenuation of Particles of Different Density and Surface Charge: A Karst Aquifer Field Study F. Schiperski et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00335
11. The Effects of Exchange Flow on the Karst Spring Hydrograph under the Different Flow Regimes: A Synthetic Modeling Approach M. Shirafkan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13091189
12. Long-distance transport of bacteriophages MS2 and phiX174 in karst aquifers R. Serbe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179111
13. Groundwater Temperature as an Indicator of the Vulnerability of Karst Coastal Aquifers M. Fidelibus & A. Pulido-Bosch https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010023
14. Modeling the Matrix-Conduit Exchanges in Both the Epikarst and the Transmission Zone of Karst Systems L. Dal Soglio et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113219
15. Large-scale spatial reconstitution of groundwater fluxes in a karst aquifer on the basis of hydrodynamic and hydrodispersive measurements P. Fischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130866
16. Impact of model complexity and multi-scale data integration on the estimation of hydrogeological parameters in a dual-porosity aquifer E. Tamayo-Mas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1745-y
17. Rapid transport of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in multimedia environment from karst area H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145698
18. Changes in hydrological regime caused by human intervention in karst: the case of the Rumin Springs O. Bonacci et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1111518
19. A step-wise semi-distributed simulation approach to characterize a karst aquifer and to support dam construction in a data-scarce environment R. Adinehvand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.08.056
20. Spatial Variability of Water Electrical Conductivity and Its Implications for Agricultural Planning J. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001424
21. Numerical Benchmark Studies on Flow and Solute Transport in Geological Reservoirs S. Karmakar et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081310
22. Multi-regression analysis between stable isotope composition and hydrochemical parameters in karst springs to provide insights into groundwater origin and subsurface processes: regional application to Lebanon R. ElGhawi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09519-4