21 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Modeling groundwater transit time distributions and means across a Nebraska watershed: Effects of heterogeneity in the aquifer, riverbed, and recharge parameters C. Zeyrek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128891
2. Application of the Multimodel Ensemble Kalman Filter Method in Groundwater System L. Xue https://doi.org/10.3390/w7020528
3. Nonlinear effects of locally heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity fields on regional stream–aquifer exchanges J. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4531-2015
4. Data assimilation in integrated hydrological modelling in the presence of observation bias J. Rasmussen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-2103-2016
5. A modified approach for modelling river–aquifer interaction of gaining rivers in MODFLOW, including riverbed heterogeneity and river bank seepage G. Ghysels et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01941-0
6. Improved geohydraulic characterization of river bed sediments based on freeze-core sampling – Development and evaluation of a new measurement approach D. Strasser et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.074
7. Effects of Streambed Conductance on Stream Depletion G. Lackey et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7010271
8. The influence of riverbed heterogeneity patterns on river-aquifer exchange fluxes under different connection regimes Q. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.031
9. Scale-dependent spatial variabilities of hydrological exchange flows and transit time in a large regulated river X. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126283
10. A review on groundwater–surface water interaction highlighting the significance of streambed and aquifer properties on the exchanging flux M. Tripathi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09897-9
11. Geostatistical features of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivities in Frenchman Creek Watershed in Western Nebraska O. Abimbola et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13823
12. TerrSysMP–PDAF (version 1.0): a modular high-performance data assimilation framework for an integrated land surface–subsurface model W. Kurtz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1341-2016
13. Characterisation of river–aquifer exchange fluxes: The role of spatial patterns of riverbed hydraulic conductivities Q. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.019
14. Assimilation of temperature and hydraulic gradients for quantifying the spatial variability of streambed hydraulics X. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018408
15. Blueprint for a coupled model of sedimentology, hydrology, and hydrogeology in streambeds D. Partington et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000530
16. Influence of watershed characteristics on streambed hydraulic conductivity across multiple stream orders O. Abimbola et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60658-3
17. Advances in understanding river‐groundwater interactions P. Brunner et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017RG000556
18. Estimating the Spatial Extent of Unsaturated Zones in Heterogeneous River‐Aquifer Systems O. Schilling et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020409
19. Characterization of meter-scale spatial variability of riverbed hydraulic conductivity in a lowland river (Aa River, Belgium) G. Ghysels et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.002
20. Improved interpretation of groundwater-surface water interactions along a stream reach using 3D high-resolution combined DC resistivity and induced polarization (DC-IP) geoelectrical imaging K. Robinson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128468
21. Advancing Physically‐Based Flow Simulations of Alluvial Systems Through Atmospheric Noble Gases and the Novel 37Ar Tracer Method O. Schilling et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020754