73 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A multi-tracer approach to quantifying groundwater inflows to an upland river; assessing the influence of variable groundwater chemistry A. Atkinson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10122
2. Understanding parafluvial exchange and degassing to better quantify groundwater inflows using 222Rn: The King River, southeast Australia I. Cartwright et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.04.009
3. Assessing the impacts of irrigated agriculture on hydrological regimes in an oasis-desert system X. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125976
4. Combining flux estimation techniques to improve characterization of groundwater–surface-water interaction in the Zenne River, Belgium J. Dujardin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1159-4
5. The Importance of Bank Storage in Supplying Baseflow to Rivers Flowing Through Compartmentalized, Alluvial Aquifers K. Rhodes et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021619
6. Analysis of space–time non-stationary patterns of rainfall–groundwater interactions by integrating empirical orthogonal function and cross wavelet transform methods H. Yu & Y. Lin https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.057
7. Estimating the Role of Bank Flow to Stream Discharge Using a Combination of Baseflow Separation and Geochemistry H. Hofmann https://doi.org/10.3390/w15050844
8. Intra-annual patterns in biofilm communities and cellulose decomposition in a headwater stream network with spatially variable groundwater inputs L. Banks et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-023-10038-6
9. Celebrating a pioneer in geochemical tracer science for groundwater and surface water research: Professor Ian Cartwright D. Irvine et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2023.105849
10. Assessment of groundwater–surface water interaction using long-term hydrochemical data and isotope hydrology: Headwaters of the Condamine River, Southeast Queensland, Australia J. Martinez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.031
11. Assessing groundwater-surface water connectivity using radon and major ions prior to coal seam gas development (Richmond River Catchment, Australia) M. Atkins et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.07.012
12. Quantitative assessment of groundwater discharge using hydrograph separation and spring discharge in the Ouémé valley, southern Benin B. Guidah Chabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2025.101459
13. Hydrochemical and Isotopic Evolution of Groundwater Flowing Downstream of the Daqing River (Liaodong Bay, China) Q. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-19-00114.1
14. Evaluating the interactions between surface water and groundwater in the arid mid-eastern Yanqi Basin, northwestern China M. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1500744
15. Sub-surface water contribution to recession flow in a mountain headwater stream system based on single monitoring campaign R. Neupane et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10678
16. Investigating Groundwater Discharge into a Major River under Low Flow Conditions Based on a Radon Mass Balance Supported by Tritium Data M. Schubert et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102838
17. Radon-222 as a groundwater discharge tracer to surface waters D. Adyasari et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104321
18. Comparison of environmental tracers including organic micropollutants as groundwater exfiltration indicators into a small river of a karstic catchment C. Glaser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13909
19. Development of an integrated numerical flow model in the Prairie Environment – A case study of the Leech Lake Aquifer system, Saskatchewan, Canada A. Haque et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100869
20. Patterns in Radon Activity in California Groundwater E. Grande & J. Moran https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.1c00226
21. Estimating groundwater discharge in the dam-affected rivers using 222Rn L. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132574
22. Characteristics and controls of variability in soil moisture and groundwater in a headwater catchment H. McMillan & M. Srinivasan https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1767-2015
23. Mass fluxes of dissolved arsenic discharging to the Meghna River are sufficient to account for the mass of arsenic in riverbank sediments Y. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2022.104068
24. Characterizing groundwater – surface water interaction across the Brazos River watershed, Texas, with uranium isotopes B. Prince et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105491
25. Temporal responses of groundwater‐surface water exchange to successive storm events M. Dudley‐Southern & A. Binley https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016623
26. Quantification of Hyporheic Nitrate Removal at the Reach Scale: Exposure Times Versus Residence Times S. Frei et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025540
27. Linking Spatial Patterns of Groundwater Table Dynamics and Streamflow Generation Processes in a Small Developed Catchment N. Orlowski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w6103085
28. Mapping and quantifying groundwater inflows to Deep Creek (Maribyrnong catchment, SE Australia) using 222Rn, implications for protecting groundwater-dependant ecosystems I. Cartwright & B. Gilfedder https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.11.020
29. Groundwater Dominates Water Fluxes in a Headwater Catchment During Drought R. Kaule & B. Gilfedder https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.706932
30. Groundwater-surface water interactions derived by hydrochemical and isotopic (222Rn, deuterium, oxygen-18) tracers in the Nomhon area, Qaidam Basin, NW China D. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.066
31. A conceptual model for water resources circulation patterns in Andarokh-Kardeh region (NE, Iran) H. Mohammadzadeh & M. Heydarizad https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2019.125593
32. Characteristics of groundwater discharge to river and related heavy metal transportation in a mountain mining area of Dabaoshan, Southern China Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.273
33. Basin-Scale Assessment of Operational Base Flow Separation Methods T. Stadnyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001089
34. Developing the fusion of MODFLOW simulation and data-driven approaches for river-aquifer recharge modeling Z. Kayhomayoon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135169
35. Water 222Rn for evaluating the variation in groundwater inflows to discharge of the Big Sioux River in different flow periods R. Neupane & S. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-020-00369-9
36. Parametric study of fluidization conditions of bed sediments in the hyporheic zone M. Marciniak et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14650
37. Combining passive and active distributed temperature sensing measurements to locate and quantify groundwater discharge variability into a headwater stream N. Simon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1459-2022
38. Short-lived natural radionuclides as tracers in hydrogeological studies – A review M. Schubert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170800
39. Surface water–groundwater interactions of Xiluodu Reservoir based on the dynamic evolution of seepage, temperature, and hydrochemistry due to impoundment Z. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14304
40. Uncertainty of natural tracer methods for quantifying river–aquifer interaction in a large river Y. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.071
41. Investigating River Water/Groundwater Interaction along a Rivulet Section by 222Rn Mass Balancing M. Schubert et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113027
42. Hyporheic flow in aquatic Ranunculus habitats in temperate lowland rivers in Central Europe M. Marciniak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110422
43. Combining isotopic tracers (222Rn and δ13C) for improved modelling of groundwater discharge to small rivers K. Lefebvre et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10405
44. A Multi-Scale Approach for Improved Characterization of Surface Water—Groundwater Interactions: Integrating Thermal Remote Sensing and in-Stream Measurements D. Varli & K. Yilmaz https://doi.org/10.3390/w10070854
45. Surface water–groundwater interactions in catchment scale water resources assessments—understanding and hypothesis testing with a hydrological model J. Tanner & D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2015.1052453
46. A way to determine groundwater contributions to large river systems: The Elbe River during drought conditions J. Zill et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101595
47. Multi Frequency Isotopes Survey to Improve Transit Time Estimation in a Situation of River-Aquifer Interaction A. Poulain et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192695
48. Sensitivity Analysis and Calibration of an Integrated Hydrologic Model in an Irrigated Agricultural Basin With a Groundwater‐Dependent Ecosystem D. Tolley et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024209
49. How effective is river restoration in re-establishing groundwater–surface water interactions? – A case study A. Kurth et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2663-2015
50. Interaction between Surface Water and Groundwater in Yinchuan Plain Z. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092635
51. The deterioration of groundwater quality by seawater intrusion in the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand M. Heydarizad et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11023-0
52. Use of geochemical tracers for estimating groundwater influxes to the Big Sioux River, eastern South Dakota, USA R. Neupane et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1597-x
53. Understanding surface water–groundwater interaction, submarine groundwater discharge, and associated nutrient loading in a small tropical island watershed C. Shuler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124342
54. The Gippsland Lakes: management challenges posed by long-term environmental change P. Boon et al. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14222
55. Links between geomorphology and hydrogeology in mountain karst catchments. Implications for a better understanding groundwater-surface water exchange J. Rovira-Medina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2026.110365
56. Residence times and mixing of water in river banks: implications for recharge and groundwater–surface water exchange N. Unland et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-5109-2014
57. A method for long-term high resolution 222Radon measurements using a new hydrophobic capillary membrane system S. Durejka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2019.05.012
58. Constraining the response of continental-scale groundwater flow to climate change B. Mather et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08384-w
59. Identifying locations and sources of groundwater discharge into Poyang Lake (eastern China) using radium and stable isotopes (deuterium and oxygen-18) F. Liao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140163
60. Groundwater-surface water exchange affects nitrogen and phosphorus exports from tideless rivers to a ria coast in the sea of Japan T. Nakajima & R. Sugimoto https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128045
61. Travel time estimation from river to aquifer: Correlating tritium and stable water isotopes in the Moselle River J. Landgraf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103408
62. The Stable Isotope Characteristics of Precipitation in the Middle East Highlighting the Link between the Köppen Climate Classifications and the δ18O and δ2H Values of Precipitation M. Heydarizad et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13172397
63. Quantification of Groundwater Discharge in a Subalpine Stream Using Radon-222 E. Avery et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020100
64. Combined effects of precipitation anomalies and dams on streamwater-groundwater interaction in the Fen River basin, China Y. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172704
65. The effects of moisture sources and local parameters on the ¹⁸O and ²H contents of precipitation in the west of Iran and the east of Iraq H. Mohammadzadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2020.1721224
66. A comprehensive study of the parameters affecting the stable isotopes in the precipitation of the Bangkok metropolitan area using model-based statistical approaches M. Heydarizad et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2023.2178431
67. Characterization of Diffuse Groundwater Inflows into Stream Water (Part II: Quantifying Groundwater Inflows by Coupling FO-DTS and Vertical Flow Velocities) H. Le Lay et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122430
68. Spatio-temporal dynamics of groundwater storage changes in the Yellow River Basin M. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.016
69. Estimating Groundwater Discharge Into a Curved River Using 222Rn Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70388
70. Using geochemistry to identify and quantify the sources, distribution, and fluxes of baseflow to an intermittent river impacted by climate change: The upper Wimmera River, southeast Australia Z. Zhou & I. Cartwright https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149725
71. Using radon to understand parafluvial flows and the changing locations of groundwater inflows in the Avon River, southeast Australia I. Cartwright & H. Hofmann https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3581-2016
72. Solute transport processes in flow-event-driven stream–aquifer interaction Y. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.031
73. Examining the utility of continuously quantified Darcy fluxes through the use of periodic temperature time series T. Glose et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125675