201 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Simulating saturation‐excess surface run‐off in a semi‐distributed hydrological model D. Hughes & S. Mazibuko https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13182
2. A global streamflow indices time series dataset for large-sample hydrological analyses on streamflow regime (until 2022) X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4463-2023
3. A short history of philosophies of hydrological model evaluation and hypothesis testing K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1761
4. Hydrological modelling at multiple sub-daily time steps: Model improvement via flux-matching A. Ficchì et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.084
5. Accounting for the influence of vegetation and landscape improves model transferability in a tropical savannah region H. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019574
6. Establishing uncertainty ranges of hydrologic indices across climate and physiographic regions of the Congo River Basin P. Kabuya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100710
7. Five guidelines for selecting hydrological signatures H. McMillan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11300
8. Comparison of GLUE Weighting Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Hydrologic Modeling A. Fathabadi et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.70008
9. Fill-spill process-guided hydrologic modeling: enhanced identification of hydrologically sensitive zones and simulations in semi-arid basins H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135188
10. Improving structure identifiability of hydrological processes by temporal sensitivity with a flexible modeling framework L. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128843
11. Retention of Afforestation Areas as Part of Flood Protection - Research Site and Methodology for Headwater Watershad in Poland / Retencja Leśna Zlewni Jako Element Ochrony Przeciwpowodziowej T. Orczykowski & A. Tiukało https://doi.org/10.1515/ceer-2016-0006
12. Using altimetry observations combined with GRACE to select parameter sets of a hydrological model in a data-scarce region P. Hulsman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3331-2020
13. Hydrological model calibration with uncertain discharge data I. Westerberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1735638
14. Spatiotemporal dynamic runoff generation process and distribution characteristics of the saturation-excess and infiltration-excess modes in the semi-humid and semi-arid regions Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102589
15. Large-scale hydrological modelling by using modified PUB recommendations: the India-HYPE case I. Pechlivanidis & B. Arheimer https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4559-2015
16. SWATtunR: A transparent and reproducible workflow for scripted SWAT+ calibration in R S. Plungė et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2026.107014
17. Characterising baseflow signature variability in the Yellow River Basin S. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118565
18. Conceptual Models and Calibration Performance—Investigating Catchment Bias A. Buzacott et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112424
19. Evaluation of baseflow modelling structure in monthly water balance models using 443 Australian catchments S. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125572
20. Unlocking the potential of stochastic simulation through Bluecat: Enhancing runoff predictions in arid and high‐altitude regions J. Jorquera & A. Pizarro https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15046
21. The importance of aspect for modelling the hydrological response in a glacier catchment in Central Asia H. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11224
22. A hybrid runoff generation modelling framework based on spatial combination of three runoff generation schemes for semi-humid and semi-arid watersheds Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125440
23. Multi-Criteria Process-Based Calibration Using Functional Data Analysis to Improve Hydrological Model Realism S. Larabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1803-6
24. A national flood awareness system for ungauged catchments in complex topography: The case of development, communication and evaluation in New Zealand C. Cattoën et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12864
25. Uncertainty in hydrological signatures for gauged and ungauged catchments I. Westerberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017635
26. Analysing spatio-temporal process and parameter dynamics in models to characterise contrasting catchments B. Guse et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.050
27. Simultaneous Calibration of Hydrologic Model Structure and Parameters Using a Blended Model R. Chlumsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029229
28. The temporally varying roles of rainfall, snowmelt and soil moisture for debris flow initiation in a snow-dominated system K. Mostbauer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3493-2018
29. Using expert knowledge to increase realism in environmental system models can dramatically reduce the need for calibration S. Gharari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4839-2014
30. ADHI: the African Database of Hydrometric Indices (1950–2018) Y. Tramblay et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-1547-2021
31. All models are wrong, but are they useful? Assessing reliability across multiple sites to build trust in urban drainage modelling A. Pedersen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5879-2022
32. Reduction of vegetation-accessible water storage capacity after deforestation affects catchment travel time distributions and increases young water fractions in a headwater catchment M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4887-2021
33. A comprehensive intercomparison study between a lumped and a fully distributed hydrological model across a set of 50 catchments in the United Kingdom S. Sinha et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14544
34. The effect of forcing and landscape distribution on performance and consistency of model structures T. Euser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10445
35. Predicting Runoff Signatures Using Regression and Hydrological Modeling Approaches Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023325
36. Improving the Predictive Skill of a Distributed Hydrological Model by Calibration on Spatial Patterns With Multiple Satellite Data Sets M. Dembélé et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026085
37. Perceptual perplexity and parameter parsimony K. Beven & N. Chappell https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1530
38. Regional water resources assessments using an uncertain modelling approach: The example of Swaziland C. Ndzabandzaba & D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.01.002
39. Using long time series of agricultural-derived nitrates for estimating catchment transit times O. Fovet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.030
40. Review and comparison of performance indices for automatic model induction J. Chadalawada & V. Babovic https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2017.078
41. Low-flow estimation beyond the mean – expectile loss and extreme gradient boosting for spatiotemporal low-flow prediction in Austria J. Laimighofer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4553-2022
42. Hierarchical mixture of experts and diagnostic modeling approach to reduce hydrologic model structural uncertainty E. Moges et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018266
43. Integrated water system simulation by considering hydrological and biogeochemical processes: model development, with parameter sensitivity and autocalibration Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-529-2016
44. Rapid development of fast and flexible environmental models: the Mobius framework v1.0 M. Norling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1885-2021
45. Catchment response to intense rainfall: Evaluating modelling hypotheses P. Astagneau et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14676
46. Trade-offs between parameter constraints and model realism: a case study F. Jehn et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46963-6
47. Advancing traditional strategies for testing hydrological model fitness in a changing climate A. Todorović et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2104646
48. Demasking the integrated information of discharge: Advancing sensitivity analysis to consider different hydrological components and their rates of change B. Guse et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018894
49. Baseflow signature behaviour of mountainous catchments around the North China Plain S. Lyu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127450
50. The evolution of root-zone moisture capacities after deforestation: a step towards hydrological predictions under change? R. Nijzink et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4775-2016
51. Linking hydrologic signatures to hydrologic processes: A review H. McMillan https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13632
52. Spatio‐temporal discretization uncertainty of distributed hydrological models S. Markhali et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14635
53. RavenR v2.1.4: an open-source R package to support flexible hydrologic modelling R. Chlumsky et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-7017-2022
54. What Are the Key Drivers Controlling the Quality of Seasonal Streamflow Forecasts? I. Pechlivanidis et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026987
55. Disaggregated monthly hydrological models can outperform daily models in providing daily flow statistics and extrapolate well to a drying climate A. John et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126471
56. Facing a future water resources management crisis in sub-Saharan Africa D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100600
57. Verifying model performance using validation of Pareto solutions N. Harvey et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129594
58. Disentangling timing and amplitude errors in streamflow simulations S. Seibert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3745-2016
59. A Brief Analysis of Conceptual Model Structure Uncertainty Using 36 Models and 559 Catchments W. Knoben et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025975
60. Evaluation of hydrological models at gauged and ungauged basins using machine learning-based limits-of-acceptability and hydrological signatures A. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131774
61. Hydrologic Model Evaluation and Assessment of Projected Climate Change Impacts Using Bias-Corrected Stream Flows J. Daraio https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082312
62. Can Improved Flow Partitioning in Hydrologic Models Increase Biogeochemical Predictability? M. Shafii et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024487
63. Diagnostic evaluation of multiple hypotheses of hydrological behaviour in a limits-of-acceptability framework for 24 UK catchments G. Coxon et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10096
64. Spatial combination model for semi-humid and semi-arid watersheds L. Yuhuan et al. https://doi.org/10.18307/2020.0322
65. Benchmarking an operational hydrological model for providing seasonal forecasts in Sweden M. Girons Lopez et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1189-2021
66. An Exploration of Bayesian Identification of Dominant Hydrological Mechanisms in Ungauged Catchments C. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030705
67. Evaluating the transferability of monthly water balance models under changing climate conditions Ž. Topalović et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1725238
68. Testing the realism of a topography-driven model (FLEX-Topo) in the nested catchments of the Upper Heihe, China H. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1895-2014
69. Mitigating impacts of climate change on flow regimes through management of small dams and abstractions R. Morden et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133583
70. Storage in South‐Eastern Australian Catchments A. Buzacott & R. Vervoort https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR029799
71. Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 3: Runoff signatures in Austria A. Viglione et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-2263-2013
72. Hydrological signatures describing the translation of climate seasonality into streamflow seasonality S. Gnann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-561-2020
73. Validation of a national hydrological model H. McMillan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.043
74. Hunting for Information in Streamflow Signatures to Improve Modelled Drainage R. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14010110
75. A dependency-guided symbolic regression framework for overcoming error compensation in hybrid AI–physical models Q. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136201
76. A Prior Estimation of the Spatial Distribution Parameter of Soil Moisture Storage Capacity Using Satellite-Based Root-Zone Soil Moisture Data Y. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212580
77. A hydrological model modified for application to flood forecasting in medium and small-scale catchments W. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2314-0
78. Geospatial Analysis of Population Exposure to Flooding in the Sudd Region, South Sudan D. Chol et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70168
79. Quantifying impacts of lakes on baseflow dynamics in headwaters of the Yellow River, Tibetan Plateau J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135348
80. Understanding hydrologic variability across Europe through catchment classification A. Kuentz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2863-2017
81. The influence of conceptual model structure on model performance: a comparative study for 237 French catchments W. van Esse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4227-2013
82. Parsimonious statistical learning models for low-flow estimation J. Laimighofer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-129-2022
83. Quantifying ‘realistic’ uncertainty bounds as a part of sound hydrological modelling practice in data scarce regions of southern Africa D. Hughes & D. Lawrence https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106112
84. Signatures of human intervention – or not? Downstream intensification of hydrological drought along a large Central Asian river: the individual roles of climate variability and land use change A. Roodari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-1943-2021
85. Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periods C. Broderick et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018850
86. Evaluating model performance: towards a non-parametric variant of the Kling-Gupta efficiency S. Pool et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1552002
87. Event-based hydrological modeling for detecting dominant hydrological process and suitable model strategy for semi-arid catchments P. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.001
88. Calibration of hydrological models for ecologically relevant streamflow predictions: a trade-off between fitting well to data and estimating consistent parameter sets? T. Hallouin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1031-2020
89. Hydrological modelling, process understanding and uncertainty in a southern African context: lessons from the northern hemisphere D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10721
90. Unravelling abiotic and biotic controls on the seasonal water balance using data-driven dimensionless diagnostics S. Seibert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-2817-2017
91. A step toward global-scale applicability and transferability of flow duration curve studies: A flow duration curve review (2000–2020) C. Leong & Y. Yokoo https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126984
92. Uncertainty in hydrological signatures I. Westerberg & H. McMillan https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3951-2015
93. A Genetic Programming Approach to System Identification of Rainfall-Runoff Models J. Chadalawada et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1719-1
94. Reply to STOTEN 802 (2022) 149713: The fallacy in the use of the “best-fit” solution in hydrologic modeling C. Schürz & K. Schulz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153402
95. Delineating modelling uncertainty in river flow indicators with representative parameter sets A. Sikorska-Senoner https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104024
96. Hydrological hysteresis and its value for assessing process consistency in catchment conceptual models O. Fovet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-105-2015
97. Evaluation of Remote Sensing-Based Evapotranspiration Datasets for Improving Hydrological Model Simulation in Humid Region of East China S. Pan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14184546
98. Hydrological modelling of large-scale karst-dominated basin using a grid-based distributed karst hydrological model L. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130459
99. Improving the Representation of Long‐Term Storage Variations With Conceptual Hydrological Models in Data‐Scarce Regions P. Hulsman et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028837
100. Constraining Conceptual Hydrological Models With Multiple Information Sources R. Nijzink et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR021895
101. A multi-catchment evaluation of hydrological model transferability and ensemble averaging under contrasting hydroclimatic conditions in Iran A. Jahanshahi & M. Booij https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135878
102. A guideline for spatio‐temporal consistency in water quality modelling in rural areas N. Fohrer et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14711
103. A comprehensive sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for discharge and nitrate-nitrogen loads involving multiple discrete model inputs under future changing conditions C. Schürz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1211-2019
104. Impact of model structure on flow simulation and hydrological realism: from a lumped to a semi-distributed approach F. Garavaglia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3937-2017
105. Goodness-of-fit criteria for hydrological models: Model calibration and performance assessment D. Althoff & L. Rodrigues https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126674
106. What has Global Sensitivity Analysis ever done for us? A systematic review to support scientific advancement and to inform policy-making in earth system modelling T. Wagener & F. Pianosi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.04.006
107. Revisiting the tension water storage capacity distribution in conceptual rainfall-runoff modeling: A large-sample approach Y. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131834
108. Adaptation of root zone storage capacity to climate change and its effects on future streamflow in Alpine catchments: towards non-stationary model parameters M. Ponds et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3545-2025
109. Process consistency in models: The importance of system signatures, expert knowledge, and process complexity M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015484
110. TOSSH: A Toolbox for Streamflow Signatures in Hydrology S. Gnann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104983
111. Predicting the temporal transferability of model parameters through a hydrological signature analysis D. Jayathilake & T. Smith https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-019-0755-y
112. Influences of the Runoff Partition Method on the Flexible Hybrid Runoff Generation Model for Flood Prediction B. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15152738
113. Investigating the Role of Hydrological Model Parameter Uncertainties in Future Streamflow Projections V. Chilkoti et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001994
114. Influence of soil and climate on root zone storage capacity T. de Boer‐Euser et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018115
115. Identifying model consistency through stepwise calibration to capture streamflow variability D. Kundu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.013
116. The importance of topography-controlled sub-grid process heterogeneity and semi-quantitative prior constraints in distributed hydrological models R. Nijzink et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1151-2016
117. Newton method–GR1 coupling to model rainfall–runoff relationship: case study—Boumessaoud basin (NO of Algeria) and Seine basin (NO of France) O. Noureddine et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01373-y
118. On the Calibration of Spatially Distributed Hydrologic Models for Poorly Gauged Basins: Exploiting Information from Streamflow Signatures and Remote Sensing-Based Evapotranspiration Data T. Alemayehu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081252
119. Future changes in annual, seasonal and monthly runoff signatures in contrasting Alpine catchments in Austria S. Hanus et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-3429-2021
120. How the performance of hydrological models relates to credibility of projections under climate change V. Krysanova et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1446214
121. Attributing uncertainty in streamflow simulations due to variable inputs via the Quantile Flow Deviation metric S. Shoaib et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.01.022
122. Impact of Dataset Size on the Signature-Based Calibration of a Hydrological Model S. Mohammed et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070970
123. Do we need a Community Hydrological Model? M. Weiler & K. Beven https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016731
124. Using sensitivity analysis and soft calibration of geological regions to improve the representation of hydrological processes in a SWAT+ model A. Sánchez-Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2446268
125. Information content of snow hydrological signatures based on streamflow, precipitation and air temperature I. Horner et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13762
126. CAMELS-DK: hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for 3330 Danish catchments with streamflow observations from 304 gauged stations J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1551-2025
127. Review: Sources of Hydrological Model Uncertainties and Advances in Their Analysis E. Moges et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010028
128. Structural calibration of an semi-distributed hydrological model of the Liard River basin G. Brown & J. Craig https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2020.1803143
129. Improving Information Extraction From Simulated Discharge Using Sensitivity‐Weighted Performance Criteria B. Guse et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025605
130. Improving representation of hydrological process heterogeneity in grid-Xin’anjiang model through a stepwise approach Q. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132897
131. Processes and Modeling of Initial Soil and Landscape Development: A Review T. Maurer & H. Gerke https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.05.0048
132. Understanding the Information Content in the Hierarchy of Model Development Decisions: Learning From Data S. Gharari et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027948
133. Learning from satellite observations: increased understanding of catchment processes through stepwise model improvement P. Hulsman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-957-2021
134. Impact of rainfall spatiotemporal variability and model structures on flood simulation in semi-arid regions Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02050-9
135. Technical note: How many models do we need to simulate hydrologic processes across large geographical domains? W. Knoben et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2361-2025
136. Climate change potentially induces ecological change in the Ethiopian Rift Valley Lakes Basin T. Abraham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101543
137. Correcting bias in rainfall inputs to a semi-distributed hydrological model using downstream flow simulation errors D. Hughes & R. Gray https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1391388
138. Towards reducing the high cost of parameter sensitivity analysis in hydrologic modeling: a regional parameter sensitivity analysis approach S. Larabi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3241-2023
139. Improving the realism of hydrologic model functioning through multivariate parameter estimation O. Rakovec et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019430
140. Investigating the appropriate model structure for simulation of a karst catchment from the aspect of spatial complexity Y. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-8017-y
141. Spatial variability of hydrological processes and model structure diagnostics in a 50 km2catchment H. McMillan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9988
142. The soil water characteristic as new class of closed-form parametric expressions for the flow duration curve M. Sadegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.027
143. Extra constraint on actual evaporation in a semi-distributed conceptual model to improve model physical realism S. Hsu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2025.2468846
144. CAMELS-AUS v2: updated hydrometeorological time series and landscape attributes for an enlarged set of catchments in Australia K. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4079-2025
145. A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183
146. Time‐Varying Sensitivity Analysis Reveals Relationships Between Watershed Climate and Variations in Annual Parameter Importance in Regions With Strong Interannual Variability R. Basijokaite & C. Kelleher https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028544
147. Advancing objective functions in hydrological modelling: Integrating knowable moments for improved simulation accuracy A. Pizarro & J. Jorquera https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131071
148. Monthly flow indicators can be used to infer daily stream flow behaviour across Australia R. Morden et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129078
149. Distributed rainfall-runoff simulation for a large-scale karst catchment by incorporating landform and topography into the DDRM model parameters S. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127853
150. Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process‐based hydrologic models M. Clark et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017910
151. Climate change and other trends in streamflow observations in Australian forested catchments since 1970 R. Vervoort et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13999
152. Hydrological performance of the ERA5 reanalysis for flood modeling in Tunisia with the LISFLOOD and GR4J models E. Cantoni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101169
153. A multi-criteria penalty function approach for evaluating a priori model parameter estimates K. Yilmaz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.012
154. Process verification of a hydrological model using a temporal parameter sensitivity analysis M. Pfannerstill et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4365-2015
155. Equifinality and Flux Mapping: A New Approach to Model Evaluation and Process Representation Under Uncertainty S. Khatami et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023750
156. Using hysteretic behaviour and hydrograph classification to identify hydrological function across the “hillslope–depression–stream” continuum in a karst catchment R. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13793
157. Assessing the performance and robustness of two conceptual rainfall-runoff models on a worldwide sample of watersheds T. Mathevet et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124698
158. Probabilistic Predictions of Ecologically Relevant Hydrologic Indices Using a Hydrological Model J. Hernandez‐Suarez & A. Nejadhashemi https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031104
159. Large Scale Evaluation of Relationships Between Hydrologic Signatures and Processes H. McMillan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031751
160. Differences analysis of flood simulations and response evaluation of impact factors in semi-arid areas L. Yuhuan et al. https://doi.org/10.18307/2022.0224
161. Future evolution and uncertainty of river flow regime change in a deglaciating river basin J. Mackay et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1833-2019
162. Diagnosing the impacts of landscape characteristics on hydrologic signatures in the Krycklan catchment in Sweden using a flexible hydrological model R. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2024.103565
163. Evaluating rainfall-driven LSTM for statistical analysis of low-flow regimes in the Nakagawa basin, Japan D. Kim & N. Shirakawa https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103366
164. Global-scale massive feature extraction from monthly hydroclimatic time series: Statistical characterizations, spatial patterns and hydrological similarity G. Papacharalampous et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144612
165. A review of hydrologic signatures and their applications H. McMillan https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1499
166. HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology M. Hrachowitz & M. Clark https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017
167. A diagnostic approach to constraining flow partitioning in hydrologic models using a multiobjective optimization framework M. Shafii et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019736
168. Regional analysis of parameter sensitivity for simulation of streamflow and hydrological fingerprints S. Höllering et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-203-2018
169. The stationarity paradigm revisited: Hypothesis testing using diagnostics, summary metrics, and DREAM(ABC) M. Sadegh et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016805
170. A novel multi-objective model calibration method for ecohydrological applications J. Hernandez-Suarez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105161
171. Using Functional Data Analysis to Calibrate and Evaluate Hydrological Model Performance S. Larabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001669
172. Multiscale and Multivariate Evaluation of Water Fluxes and States over European River Basins O. Rakovec et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-15-0054.1
173. Tradeoff between economic and environmental costs and benefits of hydropower production at run-of-river-diversion schemes under different environmental flows scenarios M. Bejarano et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.048
174. Optimizing hydrological consistency by incorporating hydrological signatures into model calibration objectives M. Shafii & B. Tolson https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016520
175. Diagnostic calibration and cross‐catchment transferability of a simple process‐consistent hydrologic model T. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10955
176. Simulation of streamflow and instream loads of total suspended solids and nitrate in a large transboundary river basin using Source model and geospatial analysis K. Ly et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140656
177. Identifying the connective strength between model parameters and performance criteria B. Guse et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5663-2017
178. A hybrid time- and signature-domain Bayesian inference framework for calibration of hydrological models: a case study in the Ren River basin in China S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02282-3
179. On the evaluation of climate change impact models T. Wagener et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.772
180. Snow hydrology signatures for model identification within a limits‐of‐acceptability approach B. Schaefli https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10972
181. Estimating spatial catchment natural hydrological response characteristics in Swaziland C. Ndzabandzaba & D. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2018.05.007
182. Large-sample hydrology: a need to balance depth with breadth H. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-463-2014
183. Enhanced identification of a hydrologic model using streamflow and satellite water storage data: A multicriteria sensitivity analysis and optimization approach F. Yassin et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11267
184. Metrics that matter: objective functions and their impact on signature representation in conceptual hydrological models P. Wagener et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4867-2026
185. Identification of Dominant Hydrological Mechanisms Using Bayesian Inference, Multiple Statistical Hypothesis Testing, and Flexible Models C. Prieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028338
186. When does a parsimonious model fail to simulate floods? Learning from the seasonality of model bias P. Astagneau et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2021.1923720
187. Spatial Combination Modeling Framework of Saturation-Excess and Infiltration-Excess Runoff for Semihumid Watersheds P. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5173984
188. Validation of a Hydrological Model Intended for Impact Study: Problem Statement and Solution Example for Selenga River Basin A. Gelfan & T. Millionshchikova https://doi.org/10.1134/S0097807818050354
189. Physical Parameterization of IDF Curves Based on Short-Duration Storms A. Gutierrez-Lopez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091813
190. Automatic Model Structure Identification for Conceptual Hydrologic Models D. Spieler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR027009
191. Frequency-based performance measure for hydrologic model evaluation R. Teegavarapu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127583
192. Improving the hydrological consistency of a process-based solute-transport model by simultaneous calibration of streamflow and stream concentrations J. Salmon-Monviola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-127-2025
193. Glacio-hydrological melt and run-off modelling: application of a limits of acceptability framework for model comparison and selection J. Mackay et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-2175-2018
194. The Impact of Climate Change on Hydroecological Response in Chalk Streams A. Visser et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030596
195. Streamflow characteristics from modeled runoff time series – importance of calibration criteria selection S. Pool et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-5443-2017
196. Replication of ecologically relevant hydrological indicators following a modified covariance approach to hydrological model parameterization A. Visser-Quinn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-3279-2019
197. Flexible watershed simulation with the Raven hydrological modelling framework J. Craig et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104728
198. National‐Scale Detection of Reservoir Impacts Through Hydrological Signatures S. Salwey et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022WR033893
199. The Value of Using Multiple Hydrometeorological Variables to Predict Temporal Debris Flow Susceptibility in an Alpine Environment D. Prenner et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022985
200. Estimation of Average Diffuse Aquifer Recharge Using Time Series Modeling of Groundwater Heads C. Obergfell et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024235
201. Unpacking some of the linkages between uncertainties in observational data and the simulation of different hydrological processes using the Pitman model in the data scarce Zambezi River basin D. Hughes & F. Farinosi https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14141