Articles | Volume 17, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1365-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
10 Apr 2013
Research article |
| 10 Apr 2013
Derivation of RCM-driven potential evapotranspiration for hydrological climate change impact analysis in Great Britain: a comparison of methods and associated uncertainty in future projections
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 10 Apr 2013)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 15 Jan 2013)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC C73: 'Comments on hess-2012-518', Marie Ekstrom, 12 Feb 2013
-
RC C120: 'Review of C. Prudhomme and J. Williamson paper on RCM driven PET - comparison of methods', Chris Beales, 21 Feb 2013
-
AC C138: 'Reply to M. Ekstrom and C. Beales comments', Christel Prudhomme, 26 Feb 2013
-
AC C138: 'Reply to M. Ekstrom and C. Beales comments', Christel Prudhomme, 26 Feb 2013
-
SC C207: 'Comments', Jean-Philippe Vidal, 04 Mar 2013
-
EC C320: 'Editor's comment', Bettina Schaefli, 12 Mar 2013
