119 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Shadow effect of the pH distribution of surface waters around the Kakkonda geothermal field, Japan Y. Suzuki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102111
2. An efficient algorithm for assignment of flow direction over flat surfaces in raster DEMs based on distance transform C. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-016-0249-3
3. LAND-SE: a software for statistically based landslide susceptibility zonation, version 1.0 M. Rossi & P. Reichenbach https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3533-2016
4. Modified Priority-Flood algorithm for hydrologic modelling-based digital terrain analysis using a hash heap structure L. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2026.2617191
5. Delineation of site-specific management zones for pest control purposes: Exploring precision agriculture and species distribution modeling approaches L. Méndez-Vázquez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105101
6. Reconstruction of North American drainage basins and river discharge since the Last Glacial Maximum A. Wickert https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-4-831-2016
7. A statistical test for drainage network recognition using MeanStreamDrop analysis C. Cencetti et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2014.897655
8. The development and disintegration of a Classic Maya center and its climate context K. Prufer et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333221112359
9. A novel approach for high-quality drainage network extraction in flat terrains by using a priori knowledge of hydrogeomorphic features to extend DEMs: A case study in the Hoh Xil region of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau S. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108138
10. Case-based knowledge formalization and reasoning method for digital terrain analysis – application to extracting drainage networks C. Qin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3379-2016
11. Absolute and relative height-pixel accuracy of SRTM-GL1 over the South American Andean Plateau F. Satge et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.09.003
12. Stream network conflation with topographic DEMs B. Yadav & K. Hatfield https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.01.009
13. Humans, water, and the colonization of Australia M. Bird et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608470113
14. Intersecting near-real time fluvial and pluvial inundation estimates with sociodemographic vulnerability to quantify a household flood impact index M. Preisser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-3941-2022
15. Efficient Digital-Elevation-Model-Based Flow Direction Estimation Using Priority Queue with Flow Distance and Zigzag Route Considerations P. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17091273
16. Automated operational logging plan considering multi-criteria optimization E. Görgens et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105253
17. Modulation of Economic Losses From European Floods by the North Atlantic Oscillation S. Zanardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081956
18. Impact of climate change on European winter and summer flood losses M. Sassi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.05.014
19. Retaining Relative Height Information: An Enhanced Technique for Depression Treatment in Digital Elevation Models B. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13233347
20. Efficiently computing the drainage network on massive terrains using external memory flooding process T. Gomes et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-015-0225-y
21. Preparing GIS data for analysis of stream monitoring data: The R package openSTARS M. Kattwinkel et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239237
22. GeoNet: An open source software for the automatic and objective extraction of channel heads, channel network, and channel morphology from high resolution topography data H. Sangireddy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.026
23. Parallel Priority-Flood depression filling for trillion cell digital elevation models on desktops or clusters R. Barnes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.001
24. An integrated algorithm for depression filling and assignment of drainage directions over flat surfaces in digital elevation models C. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-015-0223-5
25. Land Use Influencing the Distribution of Pesticides in Surface Water: The Case of the Ma River and Its Tributaries in Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-023-01018-w
26. Extraction of Terrain Feature Lines from Elevation Contours Using a Directed Adjacent Relation Tree C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7050163
27. The Forest Line Mapper: A Semi-Automated Tool for Mapping Linear Disturbances in Forests G. Queiroz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244176
28. Dynamic hydrological discharge modelling for coupled climate model simulations of the last glacial cycle: the MPI-DynamicHD model version 3.0 T. Riddick et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4291-2018
29. Rapid Model Development for GSFLOW With Python and pyGSFLOW J. Larsen et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.907533
30. Global Topographic Slope Enforcement to Ensure Connectivity and Drainage in an Urban Terrain M. Barnes et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001306
31. Handling high predictor dimensionality in slope-unit-based landslide susceptibility models through LASSO-penalized Generalized Linear Model D. Camilo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.08.003
32. GeoAI in the US Geological Survey for topographic mapping E. Usery et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12830
33. An automated, objective and open source tool for stream threshold selection and upstream riparian corridor delineation A. Bhowmik et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.017
34. An expanded role for river networks J. Benstead & D. Leigh https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1593
35. A combined algorithm for automated drainage network extraction from digital elevation models Y. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11479
36. Topographic hydro-conditioning to resolve surface depression storage and ponding in a fully distributed hydrologic model A. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2023.104449
37. Patterns and processes of channel and floodout adjustment in a discontinuous dryland river, semi-arid eastern Australia B. Graves et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.109004
38. High-performance parallel implementations of flow accumulation algorithms for multicore architectures B. Kotyra et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.104741
39. Delineating wetland catchments and modeling hydrologic connectivity using lidar data and aerial imagery Q. Wu & C. Lane https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3579-2017
40. Evaluation of Priority Queues in the Priority Flood Algorithm for Hydrological Modelling L. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223202
41. GSFLOW–GRASS v1.0.0: GIS-enabled hydrologic modeling of coupled groundwater–surface-water systems G. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4755-2018
42. Parameter-free delineation of slope units and terrain subdivision of Italy M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107124
43. Least Cost Path Extraction of Topographic Features for Storm Impact Scale Mapping https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-11-00126.1
44. Flow network derivation from a high resolution DEM in a low relief, agrarian landscape W. Schwanghart et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3452
45. Watershed delineation using hydrographic features and a DEM in plain river network region Z. Lai et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10612
46. High-efficient extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation models constrained by enhanced flow enforcement from known river maps T. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.04.022
47. Assessment of vineyard water status variability by thermal and multispectral imagery using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) J. Baluja et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-012-0382-9
48. Geomatic methods at the service of water resources modelling J. Molina et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.034
49. Parallel non-divergent flow accumulation for trillion cell digital elevation models on desktops or clusters R. Barnes https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.02.022
50. Field-based landslide susceptibility assessment in a data-scarce environment: the populated areas of the Rwenzori Mountains L. Jacobs et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-105-2018
51. An efficient variant of the Priority-Flood algorithm for filling depressions in raster digital elevation models G. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.02.021
52. Least-Cost Path Analysis to Identify Retrofit Surface-Water Conveyance Solutions J. Diaz-Nieto et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001315
53. Using Public Landslide Inventories for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment at the Basin Scale: Application to the Torto River Basin (Central-Northern Sicily, Italy) C. Martinello et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169449
54. GIS-Based Detection of Gullies in Terrestrial LiDAR Data of the Cerro Llamoca Peatland (Peru) B. Höfle et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5115851
55. Comparative Analysis of Different Mobile LiDAR Mapping Systems for Ditch Line Characterization Y. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132485
56. Geomorphometric assessment of drainage systems in a semi-arid region of Argentina using geospatial tools and multivariate statistics S. Genchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-016-0258-2
57. An attention U-Net model for detection of fine-scale hydrologic streamlines Z. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.104992
58. Performance comparison among typical open global DEM datasets in the Fenhe River Basin of China S. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2021.1891577
59. An Efficient Algorithm for Calculating Drainage Accumulation in Digital Elevation Models Based on the Basin Tree Index C. Su et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2014.2345561
60. Impact of sampling for landslide susceptibility assessment using interpretable machine learning models B. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-024-03980-8
61. A GIS-based methodological framework to identify superficial water sources and their corresponding conduction paths for gravity-driven irrigation systems in developing countries J. Valencia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106048
62. Review on algorithms of dealing with depressions in grid DEM Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2019.1604571
63. Hydraulic geometry hypothesis allows reverse engineering of 3D quasi-equilibrium landscapes from 2D channel networks: Earth, Mars, Titan L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2513733123
64. An efficient and comprehensive method for drainage network extraction from DEM with billions of pixels using a size-balanced binary search tree R. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.02.028
65. Automatic delineation of geomorphological slope units with r.slopeunits v1.0 and their optimization for landslide susceptibility modeling M. Alvioli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3975-2016
66. Input data processing tools for the integrated hydrologic model GSFLOW M. Gardner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.07.020
67. An integrated algorithm to evaluate flow direction and flow accumulation in flat regions of hydrologically corrected DEMs H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.12.009
68. Deep learning Using Physically-Informed Input Data for Wetland Identification G. O'Neil et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104665
69. IDA: An implicit, parallelizable method for calculating drainage area A. Richardson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014326
70. A flooding algorithm for extracting drainage networks from unprocessed digital elevation models A. Rueda et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.06.001
71. Invertebrate turnover along gradients of anthropogenic salinisation in rivers of two German regions T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141986
72. Increasing the fidelity of hyperlocal simulations of urban pluvial flooding through street flooding observations S. Annis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2026.105223
73. A model for the Guaraní expansion in the La Plata Basin and littoral zone of southern Brazil M. Bonomo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2014.10.050
74. A hierarchical pyramid method for managing large-scale high-resolution drainage networks extracted from DEM R. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.06.019
75. Open Source Riverscapes: Analyzing the Corridor of the Naryn River in Kyrgyzstan Based on Open Access Data F. Betz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162533
76. The Changing Character of Agricultural Infrastructure: Investigating Historic Terrace Systems in Catalonia Using Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis C. Sevara et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662035.2024.2445927
77. Quality assessment of DEM derived from topographic maps for geomorphometric purposes B. Szypuła https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2019-0066
78. Computing water flow through complex landscapes – Part 1: Incorporating depressions in flow routing using FlowFill K. Callaghan & A. Wickert https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-737-2019
79. Channel breakdown and avulsion in arroyos feeding the Little Colorado River, Arizona, USA B. Graves et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2024.109501
80. Big data analysis for the hydropower development potential of ASEAN-8 based on the hydropower digital planning model Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5013679
81. Assessment of Cartosat-1 DEM for Modeling Floods in Data Scarce Regions P. Jena et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1226-9
82. Extracting an accurate river network: Stream burning re-revisited Q. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.114333
83. Watershed Characteristics Extraction and Subsequent Terrain Analysis Based on Digital Elevation Model in Flat Region S. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000961
84. A pastoral landscape for millennia: Investigating pastoral mobility in northeastern Jordan using quantitative spatial analyses J. Meister et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.08.038
85. Measuring terrain distances through extracted channel networks C. Stuetzle et al. https://doi.org/10.1145/2078296.2078301
86. Predicting current and future background ion concentrations in German surface water under climate change T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0004
87. Contribution of waste water treatment plants to pesticide toxicity in agriculture catchments T. Le et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.07.027
88. Delineation of the riparian zone in data-scarce regions using fuzzy membership functions: An evaluation based on the case of the Naryn River in Kyrgyzstan F. Betz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.01.024
89. GIS-based morphometric analysis for sub-watershed prioritization of the Seonath River Basin in Rajnandgaon District, Chhattisgarh, India T. Kuhade et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00558-7
90. Gradual demise of a thin southern Laurentide ice sheet recorded by Mississippi drainage A. Wickert et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12609
91. Transfer learning with convolutional neural networks for hydrological streamline delineation N. Jaroenchai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106165
92. Priority-flood: An optimal depression-filling and watershed-labeling algorithm for digital elevation models R. Barnes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.04.024
93. Spatial Network in SQL Databases for Real-Time Multimodal Emergency Routing in Wildland Fires M. Ilba https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14030110
94. Depression detection in billion-scale DEM grids in digital terrain analysis using HRBTree L. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-02050-1
95. Automated extraction of watershed boundary and drainage network from SRTM and comparison with Survey of India toposheet G. Gopinath et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0919-0
96. An Efficient Method for Mapping High-Resolution Global River Discharge Based on the Algorithms of Drainage Network Extraction J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040533
97. The Mississippi River records glacial-isostatic deformation of North America A. Wickert et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav2366
98. GIS-based approach for assessing the energy potential and the financial feasibility of run-off-river hydro-power in Alpine valleys G. Garegnani et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.043
99. Influence of DEM Elaboration Methods on the USLE Model Topographical Factor Parameter on Steep Slopes E. Kruk et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213540
100. An open source high-performance solution to extract surface water drainage networks from diverse terrain conditions L. Stanislawski et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2017.1337524
101. Hydrography90m: a new high-resolution global hydrographic dataset G. Amatulli et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4525-2022
102. Impact of identical digital elevation model resolution and sources on morphometric parameters of Tena watershed, Ethiopia T. Tesema https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08345
103. lumpR 2.0.0: an R package facilitating landscape discretisation for hillslope-based hydrological models T. Pilz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3001-2017
104. River network completion without height samples using geometry-based induced terrain T. Lau & W. Franklin https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2013.780785
105. A fast and optimal pathfinder using airborne LiDAR data M. Yermo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.11.014
106. GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS M. Neteler et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.014
107. Landform classification: a high-performing mapping unit partitioning tool for landslide susceptibility assessment—a test in the Imera River basin (northern Sicily, Italy) C. Martinello et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-021-01781-8
108. Assessment of drainage network extractions in a low-relief area of the Cuvelai Basin (Namibia) from multiple sources: LiDAR, topographic maps, and digital aerial orthophotographs F. Persendt & C. Gomez https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.047
109. Effects of LiDAR DEM Smoothing and Conditioning Techniques on a Topography‐Based Wetland Identification Model G. O'Neil et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024784
110. Extensibility of U-Net Neural Network Model for Hydrographic Feature Extraction and Implications for Hydrologic Modeling L. Stanislawski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122368
111. Preparing first-time slope failures hazard maps: from pixel-based to slope unit-based G. Domènech et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01279-4
112. QGIS‐based support tools to simplify the complex design challenges of subsurface drainage systems A. Falasy & R. Cooke https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.3011
113. REFLEX—A novel method for the rapid estimation of flood extent M. Arcorace et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.13034
114. Detection of land use/land cover changes in a watershed: A case study of the Murredu watershed in Telangana state, India P. Raja Shekar & A. Mathew https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsee.2022.12.003
115. Sensibilidade da estimativa de vazões máximas para o dimensionamento de obras hidráulicas com informações derivadas de Modelo Digital de Elevação R. Lindjhenys de Oliveira Jorge et al. https://doi.org/10.36659/dae.2022.071
116. A new GRASS GIS toolkit for Hortonian analysis of drainage networks J. Jasiewicz & M. Metz https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.03.003
117. Quantitative landslide risk analysis with limited dataset by leveraging geospatial approaches in Indonesia D. Melati et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07645-x
118. What are the drivers of Caspian Sea level variation during the late Quaternary? S. Koriche et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107457
119. Integrating remote sensing classification techniques for land use mapping in semi-arid regions: a case study of the Tamlouka basin, Algeria L. Bouchagoura et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12757-1