Articles | Volume 15, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2763-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2763-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Interpolation of groundwater quality parameters with some values below the detection limit
A. Bárdossy
Institute of Hydraulic Engineering, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart 70569, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 4,247 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 26 May 2011)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,846 | 2,183 | 218 | 4,247 | 212 | 218 |
- HTML: 1,846
- PDF: 2,183
- XML: 218
- Total: 4,247
- BibTeX: 212
- EndNote: 218
Total article views: 3,523 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 01 Sep 2011)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,526 | 1,801 | 196 | 3,523 | 193 | 212 |
- HTML: 1,526
- PDF: 1,801
- XML: 196
- Total: 3,523
- BibTeX: 193
- EndNote: 212
Total article views: 724 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 26 May 2011)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 320 | 382 | 22 | 724 | 19 | 6 |
- HTML: 320
- PDF: 382
- XML: 22
- Total: 724
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 6
Cited
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Trivariate Frequency Analyses of Peak Discharge, Hydrograph Volume and Suspended Sediment Concentration Data Using Copulas N. Bezak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0606-2
- Quantification of contaminant mass discharge and uncertainties: Method and challenges in application at contaminated sites A. Bøllingtoft et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104453
- Factor Copula Models for Replicated Spatial Data P. Krupskii et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1261712
- Simulation of conditional non-Gaussian random fields with directional asymmetry S. Hörning & A. Bárdossy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100872
- Estimating a Representative Value and Proportion of True Zeros for Censored Analytical Data with Applications to Contaminated Site Assessment C. Haslauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05385
- A class of skew-multivariate distributions for spatial data P. Krupskii https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2026.105673
- Multisite precipitation generation using a latent autoregressive model P. Rasmussen https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20164
- Multivariate spatial analysis of groundwater quality using copulas V. Birjandi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01073-w
- A non‐stationary factor copula model for non‐Gaussian spatial data S. Mondal et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.715
- A conceptually superior variant of Shepard's method with modified neighbourhood selection for precipitation interpolation S. Yeggina et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6091
- Copula-based spatio-temporal modeling of air pollutant data incorporating covariate dependence S. Jeon & J. Choi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2025.100951
- Modelling skewed spatial random fields through the spatial vine copula B. Gräler https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2014.01.001
- A holistic approach for understanding the status of water quality and causes of its deterioration in a drought-prone agricultural area of Southeastern India P. Pathakamuri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22906-z
- Comparison of Multivariate Spatial Dependence Structures of DPIL and Flowmeter Hydraulic Conductivity Data Sets at the MADE Site B. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071420
- Stochastic reconstruction of spatio-temporal rainfall patterns by inverse hydrologic modelling J. Grundmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-225-2019
- Space-time simulation of intermittent rainfall with prescribed advection field: Adaptation of the turning band method E. Leblois & J. Creutin https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20190
- Interpolation of precipitation under topographic influence at different time scales A. Bárdossy & G. Pegram https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20307
- The use of personal weather station observations to improve precipitation estimation and interpolation A. Bárdossy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-583-2021
- Improving copula-based spatial interpolation with secondary data S. Gnann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2018.07.001
- A review of GIS-integrated statistical techniques for groundwater quality evaluation and protection D. Machiwal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7872-x
- A spatial copula interpolation in a random field with application in air pollution data D. Thakur et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01484-6
- Collocated cokriging and neural-network multi-attribute transform in the prediction of effective porosity: A comparative case study for the Second Wall Creek Sand of the Teapot Dome field, Wyoming, USA S. Moon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.05.008
- Space‐time conditional disaggregation of precipitation at high resolution via simulation A. Bárdossy & G. Pegram https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018037
- Screening and optimization of interpolation methods for mapping soil-borne polychlorinated biphenyls A. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169498
- Including land use information for the spatial estimation of groundwater quality parameters – 2. Interpolation methods, results, and comparison C. Haslauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.054
25 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Trivariate Frequency Analyses of Peak Discharge, Hydrograph Volume and Suspended Sediment Concentration Data Using Copulas N. Bezak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0606-2
- Quantification of contaminant mass discharge and uncertainties: Method and challenges in application at contaminated sites A. Bøllingtoft et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2024.104453
- Factor Copula Models for Replicated Spatial Data P. Krupskii et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1261712
- Simulation of conditional non-Gaussian random fields with directional asymmetry S. Hörning & A. Bárdossy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100872
- Estimating a Representative Value and Proportion of True Zeros for Censored Analytical Data with Applications to Contaminated Site Assessment C. Haslauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05385
- A class of skew-multivariate distributions for spatial data P. Krupskii https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2026.105673
- Multisite precipitation generation using a latent autoregressive model P. Rasmussen https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20164
- Multivariate spatial analysis of groundwater quality using copulas V. Birjandi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01073-w
- A non‐stationary factor copula model for non‐Gaussian spatial data S. Mondal et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.715
- A conceptually superior variant of Shepard's method with modified neighbourhood selection for precipitation interpolation S. Yeggina et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6091
- Copula-based spatio-temporal modeling of air pollutant data incorporating covariate dependence S. Jeon & J. Choi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2025.100951
- Modelling skewed spatial random fields through the spatial vine copula B. Gräler https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2014.01.001
- A holistic approach for understanding the status of water quality and causes of its deterioration in a drought-prone agricultural area of Southeastern India P. Pathakamuri et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22906-z
- Comparison of Multivariate Spatial Dependence Structures of DPIL and Flowmeter Hydraulic Conductivity Data Sets at the MADE Site B. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11071420
- Stochastic reconstruction of spatio-temporal rainfall patterns by inverse hydrologic modelling J. Grundmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-225-2019
- Space-time simulation of intermittent rainfall with prescribed advection field: Adaptation of the turning band method E. Leblois & J. Creutin https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20190
- Interpolation of precipitation under topographic influence at different time scales A. Bárdossy & G. Pegram https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20307
- The use of personal weather station observations to improve precipitation estimation and interpolation A. Bárdossy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-583-2021
- Improving copula-based spatial interpolation with secondary data S. Gnann et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2018.07.001
- A review of GIS-integrated statistical techniques for groundwater quality evaluation and protection D. Machiwal et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7872-x
- A spatial copula interpolation in a random field with application in air pollution data D. Thakur et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01484-6
- Collocated cokriging and neural-network multi-attribute transform in the prediction of effective porosity: A comparative case study for the Second Wall Creek Sand of the Teapot Dome field, Wyoming, USA S. Moon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.05.008
- Space‐time conditional disaggregation of precipitation at high resolution via simulation A. Bárdossy & G. Pegram https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018037
- Screening and optimization of interpolation methods for mapping soil-borne polychlorinated biphenyls A. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169498
- Including land use information for the spatial estimation of groundwater quality parameters – 2. Interpolation methods, results, and comparison C. Haslauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.054
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 14 Aug 2026