125 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Three-Dimensional Numerical Study on the Interaction Between Dam-Break Wave and Cylinder Array T. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431118400079
2. Methodology for quantitative risk analysis of domino effects triggered by flood T. Zeng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.12.042
3. Numerical modeling of large-scale dam breach experiment C. Kang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01465-9
4. Numerical Assessment of Similitude Parameters and Dimensional Analysis for Water Entry Problems A. Facci & S. Ubertini https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/324961
5. Dam Breach Simulation with the Material Point Method C. Cao & M. Neilsen https://doi.org/10.3390/computation9020008
6. Dam-break of mixtures consisting of non-Newtonian liquids and granular particles X. Li & J. Zhao https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.07.021
7. Wave–Structure Interaction Modeling of Transient Flow Around Channel Obstacles and Contractions S. Oodi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17030424
8. Slug and bubble flows in a flat sheet ultrafiltration module: Experiments and numerical simulation S. Javid et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2016.12.006
9. Detailed Simulation of Complex Hydraulic Problems with Macroscopic and Mesoscopic Mathematical Methods C. Biscarini et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/928309
10. Study of the comprehensive risk analysis of dam-break flooding based on the numerical simulation of flood routing. Part I: model development R. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1154-z
11. A comprehensive study on dam-break flow over dry and wet beds A. Khoshkonesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106279
12. Application of One-Dimensional Shallow Water Model to Flows in Open Channels with Bends K. Ishida et al. https://doi.org/10.7132/jrcsa.KJ00008045231
13. Dam-break on an idealised hill side: Preliminary results of a physical model S. Cordero et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184005002
14. The application of Bayesian model averaging based on artificial intelligent models in estimating multiphase shock flood waves F. Vosoughi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07528-3
15. Accuracy Analysis of a Dam Model from Drone Surveys E. Ridolfi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081777
16. Numerical simulation of water free-surface flows through a front-tracking lattice Boltzmann approach S. Di Francesco et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2014.028
17. A comparative study on the performance characteristics of buffer blocks configurations as energy dissipators N. Sakthi Vasanth et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2024.104202
18. Numerical investigation of the influence of extreme hydrodynamic forces on the geometry of structures using OpenFOAM S. Sarjamee et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2760-3
19. A unified CFD‐DEM approach for modeling of debris flow impacts on flexible barriers D. Felix et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2806
20. 3D numerical simulation of free surface flows over hydraulic structures in natural channels and rivers V. Nguyen https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.01.046
21. Comparison between hydrostatic and total pressure simulations of dam-break flows L. Monteiro et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2019.1671509
22. Experimental validation of a numerical model for the analysis of erosion depth in coarse sand induced by a dam break of water B. Fuentes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.105118
23. Survey of the Ridracoli Dam: UAV–based photogrammetry and traditional topographic techniques in the inspection of vertical structures G. Buffi et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1362039
24. Three-dimensional non-hydrostatic model for dam-break flows C. Ai et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0081094
25. Advances in Dam-Break Modeling for Flood Hazard Mitigation: Theory, Numerical Models, and Applications in Hydraulic Engineering F. Aureli et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16081093
26. Effects of urban-like intersections and urban squares on pedestrian risk in a floodwater–wind joint environment S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106560
27. Modelling flood events with a cumulant CO lattice Boltzmann shallow water model S. Venturi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04378-x
28. Modelling of fast hydraulic transients: issues, challenges, perspectives Y. Zech et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/lhb/20150049
29. Revisiting the time scale and size of the Zanclean flood of the Mediterranean (5.33Ma) from CFD simulations J. Abril & R. Periáñez https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2016.10.008
30. A Brief review of flood forecasting techniques and their applications S. Jain et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1411920
31. Moraine dam breach and glacial lake outburst flood generation by physical and numerical models S. Begam et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.038
32. Water discharge time from the conical surface of an underwater launched vehicle J. Bian et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.01.001
33. Estimating Landfill Landslide Probability Using SAR Satellite Products: A Novel Approach A. García-Gutiérrez et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091618
34. Assessment of PIV-based analysis of water entry problems through synthetic numerical datasets A. Facci et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.03.018
35. A new collision operator for lattice Boltzmann shallow water model: a convergence and stability study S. Venturi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103474
36. GMM-Enhanced Mixture-of-Experts Deep Learning for Impulsive Dam-Break Overtopping at Dikes H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030311
37. Numerical simulations of comminution slurries over complex topographies: Putting together CFD and pipeline integrity T. Trewhela et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2014.03.005
38. On the Effect of Block Roughness in Ogee Spillways with Flip Buckets R. Daneshfaraz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids5040182
39. Dam-break release of a gravity current in a power-law channel section B. Marino & L. Thomas https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/296/1/012008
40. Experimental Investigations of Partial-Breach Dam-Break Flows M. Elkholy et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001185
41. A generalized vertical coordinate transformation based on SPH(2) for efficient free surface flow simulations S. Fujioka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114407
42. Effect of urban neighbourhood layout on the flood intrusion rate of residential buildings and associated risk for pedestrians Z. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104485
43. Numerical Study of the Dynamics and Structure of a Partial Dam-Break Flow Using the VOF Method A. Khoshkonesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02799-2
44. A virtual geographic environment for dynamic simulation and analysis of tailings dam failure D. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2021.1945151
45. Experimental and numerical investigation of breaking bores in straight and meandering channels with different Froude numbers D. Kobayashi & T. Uchida https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2022.2118431
46. OpenFOAM simulation of turbulent flow in a complex dam structure D. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-024-03085-8
47. A 3D Fully Non-Hydrostatic Model for Free-Surface Flows with Complex Immersed Boundaries D. Lo & Y. Tsai https://doi.org/10.3390/w14233803
48. Experimental and Numerical Study of the Effects of Geometric Appendance Elements on Energy Dissipation over Stepped Spillway A. Ghaderi & S. Abbasi https://doi.org/10.3390/w13070957
49. An enhanced 2D model with the HLLC method utilized for local multi-layer SWEs for partial obstructed flows C. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106641
50. Discrete mixed subdomain least squares (DMSLS) meshless method with collocation points for modeling dam-break induced flows B. Fazli Malidareh et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2016.116
51. Dam-break flow dynamics over a stepped channel with vegetation A. Khoshkonesh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128395
52. Large eddy simulation of power-law fluid dam break wave impacting against a vertical wall A. Del Gaudio et al. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.074801
53. Análisis numérico 3D de una rotura de presa utilizando el método VOF y el modelo de turbulencia LES E. Sánchez-Cordero et al. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2018.9374
54. Determination of the flooding zone during a dam break in a channel with a bend in the presence of several obstacles by the VOF method A. Issakhov et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-8823-5
55. Dynamic simulation of dam-break scenarios for risk analysis and disaster management P. Cleary et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2012.716084
56. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of a Dam-Break Flow through Different Contraction Geometries of the Channel S. Kocaman et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12041124
57. Load balanced 2D and 3D adaptive mesh refinement in OpenFOAM D. Rettenmaier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.100317
58. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of the Zanclean catastrophic flood of the Mediterranean (5.33Ma) R. Periáñez & J. Abril https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.02.017
59. Combined numerical investigation of the Yigong rock slide-debris avalanche and subsequent dam-break flood propagation in Tibet, China Y. Zhuang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01449-9
60. 3D numerical simulation of partial breach dam-break flow using the LES andk–ϵ turbulence models L. Larocque et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.734862
61. Effects of building configuration and upstream buildings on pedestrian risk around ideal buildings in a floodwater–wind joint environment S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131865
62. Effects of lift-up building design, building setback, and urban open space on pedestrian danger under the joint effect of floodwater and wind S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102215
63. Closure to “Vertical 2D Nonhydrostatic Model Using Mode Splitting for Dam-Break Flows” by Yonghui Zhu and Dechao Hu D. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001628
64. Investigation of dam-break induced shock waves impact on a vertical wall S. Kocaman & H. Ozmen-Cagatay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.040
65. Pedestrian vulnerability assessment of underground staircases in urban flooding W. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106700
66. Comprehensive comparison of NS-SPH and SWE-SPH models for hydrodynamic simulations J. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2025.2578783
67. Experimental study and numerical verification of silted-up dam break F. Vosoughi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125267
68. A two-phase model for dry density-varying granular flows L. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2012.04.001
69. Predicting the Dynamic Parameters of Multiphase Flow in CFD (Dam-Break Simulation) Using Artificial Intelligence-(Cascading Deployment) S. Hosseini Boosari https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4010044
70. Three-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of the Flood-Wave Propagation at a Combining Open-Channel Junction A. Pandey & P. Mohapatra https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001713
71. Generalizing morphologies in dam break simulations using transformer model Z. Mu et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0245680
72. Application of a 3-D CFD model to investigate flood-related engineering problems D. Munoz et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184006004
73. On the approximation of dam-break problems using a fuzzified HR-TVD scheme R. Lochab & V. Kumar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102003
74. A gas-kinetic model for 2D transcritical shallow water flows propagating over dry bed P. Prestininzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2014.06.022
75. A Finite Volume Method for a 2D Dam-Break Simulation on a Wet Bed Using a Modified HLLC Scheme M. Salamttalab et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15213841
76. Gate-Opening Criterion for Generating Dam-Break Flow in Non-Rectangular Wet Bed Channels S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236280
77. Spatiotemporal dam-break flood impact loads: Experimental study and deep learning analysis K. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.120200
78. The effect of lateral channel contraction on dam break flows: Laboratory experiment S. Kocaman & H. Ozmen-Cagatay https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.035
79. Modeling Impact Load on a Vertical Cylinder in Dam-Break Flows D. Mu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11050932
80. Quantifying the role of openings in the impact of a dam-break-induced flood on a porous building Z. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128596
81. 3-D dam break flow simulations in simplified and complex domains D. Munoz & G. Constantinescu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103510
82. Physics-Guided Hydrodynamic Clustering and Probabilistic Prediction of Dam-Break Wave Run-Up in Confined Channels Z. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18182334
83. Experimental investigations of propagation characteristics and wave energy of dam-break waves on wet bed X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117566
84. Modeling dam-break flows in channels with 90 degree bend using an alternating-direction implicit based curvilinear hydrodynamic solver A. Wood & K. Wang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.03.011
85. Numerical study of the dam-break waves and Favre waves down sloped wet rigid-bed at laboratory scale W. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126752
86. Physical vulnerability of pedestrians under the joint effect of wind and floodwater and its application in urban block flooding: Effects of urban block layout, building form and building array skyline L. Gou et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0191951
87. Investigation of Dam-Break Flow Over Abruptly Contracting Channel With Trapezoidal-Shaped Lateral Obstacles H. Ozmen-Cagatay & S. Kocaman https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4007154
88. HydroSedFoam: A new parallelized two-dimensional hydrodynamic, sediment transport, and bed morphology model Z. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.07.008
89. On the modeling and simulation of non-hydrostatic dam break flows A. Caboussat et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791-013-0190-7
90. On the Simulation of Floods in a Narrow Bending Valley: The Malpasset Dam Break Case Study C. Biscarini et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8110545
91. Modeling of Turbulent Flow Due to the Dam Break Against Trapezoidal Barrier B. Moradi Mofrad et al. https://doi.org/10.15412/J.JCEMA.12010104
92. Numerical investigation of the impact of a dam-break induced flood on a structure L. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108669
93. An experimental investigation of dam-break induced flood waves for different density fluids H. Ozmen-Cagatay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110227
94. Three-Dimensional Numerical Modelling of Real-Field Dam-Break Flows: Review and Recent Advances A. Maranzoni & M. Tomirotti https://doi.org/10.3390/w15173130
95. An efficient three-dimensional non-hydrostatic model for undular bores in open channels C. Ai et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0073241
96. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) investigation of two-dimensional dam break flows M. Diwakar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-025-10027-3
97. Analytical solution of dam-break flood wave propagation in a dry sloped channel with an irregular-shaped cross-section B. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2016.11.003
98. Entrainment of bed material by Earth‐surface mass flows: Review and reformulation of depth‐integrated theory R. Iverson & C. Ouyang https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000447
99. Hydraulic determinism as a constraint on the evolution of organisms and ecosystems S. Thompson & G. Katul https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2012.732969
100. Dynamic visualisation of storm surge flood routing based on three‐dimensional numerical simulation X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12252
101. Three-dimensional numerical analysis on a new design of hydraulic structure for water treatment W. Tu et al. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2021.27476
102. Feasibility of Kinetic Umbrellas as Deployable Flood Barriers during Landfalling Hurricanes S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003295
103. Investigation of dam-break flood waves in a dry channel with a hump H. Ozmen-Cagatay et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.01.005
104. Two-dimensional modeling of flood wave propagation in residential areas after a dam break with application of diffusive and dynamic wave approaches H. Marangoz & T. Anilan https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04953-w
105. The Effect of Dam Break Speed on Flood Evolution in a Downstream Reservoir of a Cascade Reservoir System H. Bo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202993
106. Flow Pattern and Escape Hazards of People from Flood Intrusion into the Staircase of Underground Spaces with Multiple Rest Platforms Z. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14040941
107. Integrated UAV-LiDAR and three-dimensional CFD modeling for compound dam-break flood hazard assessment in a semi-urban basin H. Kaplan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-026-01985-3
108. Well-balanced central-upwind scheme for a fully coupled shallow water system modeling flows over erodible bed X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2015.07.043
109. Numerical study on characteristics of dam-break wave S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.011
110. Simulation of dam/levee-break hydrodynamics with a three-dimensional implicit unstructured-mesh finite element model T. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-017-9530-3
111. A Dynamically Adaptive Cell-Centred Lattice Boltzmann Framework for Shallow-Water Flows with Wetting and Drying J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16168304
112. Diffusive terms applied in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations of incompressible and isothermal Newtonian fluid flows C. Filho & F. Piccoli https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03158-3
113. A fully 3-D numerical model to predict flood wave propagation and assess efficiency of flood protection measures D. Munoz & G. Constantinescu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.014
114. Discussion of “Three-Dimensional Numerical Modeling of Dam-Break Flows with Sediment Transport over Movable Beds” by Reza Marsooli and Weiming Wu D. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001086
115. Communication Optimization for Multiphase Flow Solver in the Library of OpenFOAM Z. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101461
116. Calibration of finite element models of concrete arch-gravity dams using dynamical measures: the case of Ridracoli G. Buffi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.169
117. A dual finite volume method scheme for catastrophic flash floods in channel networks H. Yoshioka et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.05.021
118. Numerical study of dam-break induced tsunami-like bore with a hump of different slopes D. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-017-0078-2
119. Dam-Break Flows: Comparison between Flow-3D, MIKE 3 FM, and Analytical Solutions with Experimental Data H. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8122456
120. Modelling the impact of a dam‐break wave on a vertical wall A. Del Gaudio et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.5817
121. Comparative study on calculation methods of dam-break wave S. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2018.1494057
122. Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Two-Dimensional Dam-Break Flows L. LaRocque et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000705
123. Initial stages of a three dimensional dam break flow E. Fetahu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103325
124. Unsteady overland flow on flat surfaces induced by spatial permeability contrasts S. Thompson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.05.012
125. Current and Emerging Deep Learning Methods for Flood Simulation B. Li & Y. Gao https://doi.org/10.62051/ijcsit.v2n2.12