102 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Characterisation of river–aquifer exchange fluxes: The role of spatial patterns of riverbed hydraulic conductivities Q. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.019
2. Designing a multi-scale sampling system of stream–aquifer interfaces in a sedimentary basin A. Mouhri et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.09.036
3. Unit-bar migration and bar-trough deposition: impacts on hydraulic conductivity and grain size heterogeneity in a sandy streambed J. Korus et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1661-6
4. Hydraulic conductivity variation within and between layers of a high floodplain profile X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.052
5. Patterns and dynamics of river–aquifer exchange with variably-saturated flow using a fully-coupled model S. Frei et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.038
6. Nonlinear effects of locally heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity fields on regional stream–aquifer exchanges J. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4531-2015
7. Is high-resolution inverse characterization of heterogeneous river bed hydraulic conductivities needed and possible? W. Kurtz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3795-2013
8. Investigating riparian groundwater flow close to a losing river using diurnal temperature oscillations at high vertical resolution T. Vogt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-473-2012
9. Spatial variability in streambed hydraulic conductivity of contrasting stream morphologies: channel bend and straight channel E. Sebok et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10170
10. Continental hydrosystem modelling: the concept of nested stream–aquifer interfaces N. Flipo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3121-2014
11. The efficacy of riparian tree cover as a climate change adaptation tool is affected by hydromorphological alterations R. O'Briain et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13739
12. Temporal Hyporheic Zone Response to Water Table Fluctuations J. Malzone et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12352
13. Two‐phase flow behavior in CO2 geological storage considering spatial parameter heterogeneity Y. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2248
14. Comprehensive two-dimensional analytical modeling of groundwater levels in bi-directional sloping heterogeneous aquifers under variable recharge conditions P. Hsieh & M. Wu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132199
15. Modeling a geologically complex volcanic watershed for integrated water resources management in Mt. Fuji, Japan S. Musy et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06380-z
16. Spatiotemporal assessment of groundwater drought in a river valley aquifer using standardized indices in central Poland E. Krogulec et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.103092
17. Transient infiltration from ephemeral streams: A field experiment at the reach scale J. Batlle‐Aguilar & P. Cook https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012009
18. A simple thermal mapping method for seasonal spatial patterns of groundwater–surface water interaction C. Anibas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.036
19. Determining groundwater‐surface water exchange from temperature‐time series: Combining a local polynomial method with a maximum likelihood estimator G. Vandersteen et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015994
20. Preliminary assessment of hydraulic connectivity between river water and shallow groundwater and estimation of their transfer rate during dry season in the Shidi River, China P. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4949-7
21. Hyporheic flow and transport processes: Mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications F. Boano et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2012RG000417
22. Identification of time‐variant river bed properties with the ensemble Kalman filter W. Kurtz et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011743
23. Simulating the effects of geologic heterogeneity and transient boundary conditions on streambed temperatures — Implications for temperature-based water flux calculations C. Schornberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.04.007
24. Impact of Flow Alteration and Temperature Variability on Hyporheic Exchange L. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026225
25. Spatially telescoping measurements for improved characterization of ground water–surface water interactions C. Kikuchi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.04.002
26. A novel method to evaluate the effect of a stream restoration on the spatial pattern of hydraulic connection of stream and groundwater C. Lehr et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.075
27. Combined use of thermal methods and seepage meters to efficiently locate, quantify, and monitor focused groundwater discharge to a sand‐bed stream D. Rosenberry et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018808
28. Interaction between Surface Water and Groundwater in Yinchuan Plain Z. Cai et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12092635
29. The systematic effect of streambed conductivity heterogeneity on hyporheic flux and residence time G. Laube et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.10.003
30. Parameterisation of an integrated groundwater-surface water model for hydrological analysis of boreal aapa mire wetlands A. Jaros et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.094
31. Direct numerical simulations of turbulence and hyporheic mixing near sediment–water interfaces G. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.173
32. RHEA v1.0: Enabling fully coupled simulations with hydro-geomechanical heterogeneity J. Bastías Espejo​​​​​​​ et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6257-2021
33. Modelling discharge through artesian springs based on a high‐resolution piezometric network P. Martínez‐Santos et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9760
34. A framework for parameter estimation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty analysis for holistic hydrologic modeling using SWAT+ S. Abbas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-21-2024
35. Raumzeitmuster des See-Grundwasser-Austausches in einem sauren Tagebaurestsee J. Fleckenstein et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00767-009-0113-1
36. New empirical relationship between grain size distribution and hydraulic conductivity for ephemeral streambed sediments J. Rosas et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3484-2
37. Effects of hydraulic conductivity on simulating groundwater–land surface interactions over a typical endorheic river basin Z. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131542
38. Identifying the influential aquifer heterogeneity factor on nitrate reduction processes by numerical simulation E. Jang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.11.007
39. When perchlorate degradation in the riverbank cannot impede the contamination of drinking water wells C. Delbart et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-021-02326-y
40. Groundwater data assimilation under prior misspecification: A comparative study of state-of-the-art methods Y. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.136334
41. Characterization of meter-scale spatial variability of riverbed hydraulic conductivity in a lowland river (Aa River, Belgium) G. Ghysels et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.002
42. Quantifying the impact of climate and management strategies on groundwater conservation in the High Plains Aquifer Z. Xiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179656
43. Dual stable isotopes to rethink the watershed-scale spatiotemporal interaction between surface water and groundwater X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119728
44. Using selected pharmaceutical compounds as indicators for surface water and groundwater interaction in the hyporheic zone of a low permeability riverbank S. Banzhaf et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9435
45. Importance of stream infiltration data for modelling surface water–groundwater interactions J. Batlle-Aguilar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.012
46. Advancing measurements and representations of subsurface heterogeneity and dynamic processes: towards 4D hydrogeology T. Hermans et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-255-2023
47. Stochastic modeling of two-dimensional transient unconfined groundwater flow in terms of its time–space evolutionary probability distribution K. Naditha Imbulana & M. Levent Kavvas https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135437
48. The effect of streambed heterogeneity on groundwater-surface water exchange fluxes inferred from temperature time series D. Irvine et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015769
49. Assessing Transmission Losses through Ephemeral Streams: A Methodological Approach Based on the Infiltration of Treated Effluents Released into Streams I. Portoghese et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14223758
50. Actively heated high‐resolution fiber‐optic‐distributed temperature sensing to quantify streambed flow dynamics in zones of strong groundwater upwelling M. Briggs et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018219
51. Spatial and depth variability of streambed vertical hydraulic conductivity under the regional flow regimes J. Song et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13241
52. Statistical Distribution of Streambed Vertical Hydraulic Conductivity along the Platte River, Nebraska C. Cheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9698-5
53. Long‐term ecological patterns of alpine streams: An imprint of glacial legacies M. Sertić Perić et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10069
54. Assessing regional‐scale spatio‐temporal patterns of groundwater–surface water interactions using a coupled SWAT‐MODFLOW model R. Bailey et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10933
55. Statistical distribution of hydraulic conductivity of rocks in deep-incised valleys, Southwest China Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.016
56. Assessing Groundwater Contribution to Streamflow of a Large Alpine River with Heat Tracer Methods and Hydrological Modelling G. Ravazzani et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2921
57. Seasonal River Infiltration: Processes, Controls, and Quantitative Approaches L. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.70703
58. Towards improved instrumentation for assessing river-groundwater interactions in a restored river corridor P. Schneider et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2531-2011
59. Upward groundwater flow in boils as the dominant mechanism of salinization in deep polders, The Netherlands P. de Louw et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.10.009
60. Analytical solutions for the advection-dispersion model for radon-222 production and transport in shallow porewater profiles A. Buenavista et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129575
61. A Holistic System Approach to Understanding Underground Water Dynamics in the Loess Tableland: A Case Study of the Dongzhi Loess Tableland in Northwest China C. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0647-6
62. Numerical and Experimental Validation of the Applicability of Active‐DTS Experiments to Estimate Thermal Conductivity and Groundwater Flux in Porous Media N. Simon et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028078
63. Quantifying the Spatial Variations of Hyporheic Water Exchange at Catchment Scale Using the Thermal Method: A Case Study in the Weihe River, China J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6159325
64. Reporting of Stream-Aquifer Flow Distribution at the Regional Scale with a Distributed Process-Based Model A. Pryet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0832-7
65. Water and acrylamide monomer transfer rates from a settling basin to groundwaters S. Binet et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3106-2
66. Seasonal variability of hyporheic water exchange of the Weihe River in Shaanxi Province, China J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.039
67. Effects of Heterogeneous Stream‐Groundwater Exchange on the Source Composition of Stream Discharge and Solute Load Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR029079
68. A simplified approach for the evaluation of groundwater flow in stream–aquifer interaction M. Saxena & R. Singh https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-020-00517-x
69. Effects of Streambed Conductance on Stream Depletion G. Lackey et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7010271
70. Evaluating Spatiotemporal Variations of Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction Using an Integrated Hydrological Model in Huashan Basin, China L. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114325
71. A modified approach for modelling river–aquifer interaction of gaining rivers in MODFLOW, including riverbed heterogeneity and river bank seepage G. Ghysels et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-01941-0
72. Groundwater flow in a two-region aquifer: A 2D analytical solution with recharge forcing M. Wu & P. Hsieh https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2026233
73. Geochemical fluxes in sandy beach aquifers: Modulation due to major physical stressors, geologic heterogeneity, and nearshore morphology X. Geng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103800
74. Characterization of spatially variable riverbed hydraulic conductivity using electrical resistivity tomography and induced polarization S. Benoit et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1862-7
75. Uncertainty in 1D Heat‐Flow Analysis to Estimate Groundwater Discharge to a Stream G. Ferguson & V. Bense https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00735.x
76. Abiotic Mixing‐Dependent Reaction in a Laboratory Simulated Hyporheic Zone K. Santizo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR027090
77. Is the Hyporheic Zone Relevant beyond the Scientific Community? J. Lewandowski et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112230
78. Modelling hyporheic processes for regulated rivers under transient hydrological and hydrogeological conditions D. Siergieiev et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-329-2015
79. River–aquifer interactions in a semi‐arid environment stressed by groundwater abstraction A. McCallum et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9229
80. Nested monitoring approaches to delineate groundwater trichloroethene discharge to a UK lowland stream at multiple spatial scales J. Weatherill et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.12.001
81. The hydraulic conductivity structure of gravel-dominated vadose zones within alluvial floodplains R. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.046
82. River Corridor Model Constrained by Time‐Lapse Seismic Acquisition M. Dangeard et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028911
83. Characterizing preferential groundwater discharge through boils using temperature A. Vandenbohede et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.006
84. Inter‐disciplinary perspectives on processes in the hyporheic zone S. Krause et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.176
85. The influence of riverbed heterogeneity patterns on river-aquifer exchange fluxes under different connection regimes Q. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.031
86. Quantifying water and salt fluxes in a lowland polder catchment dominated by boil seepage: a probabilistic end-member mixing approach P. de Louw et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2101-2011
87. Combining passive and active distributed temperature sensing measurements to locate and quantify groundwater discharge variability into a headwater stream N. Simon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-1459-2022
88. Estimation of seepage rates in a losing stream by means of fiber-optic high-resolution vertical temperature profiling T. Vogt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.033
89. The influence of connected heterogeneity on groundwater flow and salinity distributions in coastal volcanic aquifers P. Kreyns et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124863
90. Rapid identification of transience in streambed conductance by inversion of floodwave responses G. Gianni et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017154
91. Spatial variability and associated factors of riverbed infiltration in two intermittent rivers in arid northwestern China L. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2026.103960
92. Spatial Variability Pattern of Hyporheic Exchange in a braided River G. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824601098
93. Combined effects of geological heterogeneity and discharge events on groundwater and surface water mixing G. Nogueira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131467
94. Hydrogeological and isotope mapping of the karstic River Savica in NW Slovenia M. Brenčič & P. Vreča https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5479-7
95. Factors Affecting Water Drainage Long-Time Series in the Salinized Low-Lying Coastal Area of Ravenna (Italy) B. Giambastiani et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010256
96. Improved Prediction of Management‐Relevant Groundwater Discharge Characteristics Throughout River Networks J. Barclay et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028027
97. Multiple-point statistical modeling of three-dimensional glacial aquifer heterogeneity for improved groundwater management N. Kawo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-023-02658-x
98. Uncertainty assessment of quantifying spatially concentrated groundwater discharge to small streams by distributed temperature sensing F. Lauer et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012537
99. Implications of Hyporheic Flow on Temperature-Based Estimates of Groundwater/Surface Water Interactions A. Brookfield & E. Sudicky https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000726
100. Identification of Groundwater–Surface Water Interaction Using Combined Hydraulic and Hydrogeochemical Methods Z. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16192777
101. Modeling groundwater transit time distributions and means across a Nebraska watershed: Effects of heterogeneity in the aquifer, riverbed, and recharge parameters C. Zeyrek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128891
102. From streambed temperature measurements to spatial-temporal flux quantification: using the LPML method to study groundwater-surface water interaction C. Anibas et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10588