55 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Pore water chemistry reveals gradients in mineral transformation across a model basaltic hillslope M. Pohlmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GC006270
2. A Critical Zone Observatory for Detecting Ecosystem Transition: The Constructed Catchment Chicken Creek (Germany) R. Hüttl et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2014.08.009
3. Water Balance Dynamics during Ten Years of Ecological Development at Chicken Creek Catchment W. Schaaf et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.04.0074
4. Impact of sensor failure on the observability of flow dynamics at the Biosphere 2 LEO hillslopes D. Pasetto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.04.014
5. Cellular Automata based Modeling for the Assessment of Ecohydrological Dynamics at the Hillslope Scale: Preliminary Results G. Mendicino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.036
6. Multiresponse modeling of variably saturated flow and isotope tracer transport for a hillslope experiment at the Landscape Evolution Observatory C. Scudeler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4061-2016
7. Critical zone properties control the fate of nitrogen during experimental rainfall in montane forests of the Colorado Front Range E. Hinckley et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0299-8
8. Highly sampled measurements in a controlled atmosphere at the Biosphere 2 Landscape Evolution Observatory J. Arevalo et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00645-5
9. Abiotic and biotic controls of soil moisture spatiotemporal variability and the occurrence of hysteresis S. Fatichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016102
10. The future of hydrology: An evolving science for a changing world T. Wagener et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008906
11. Combining dual-continuum approach with diffusion wave model to include a preferential flow component in hillslope scale modeling of shallow subsurface runoff J. Dusek et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.05.006
12. A portable experimental hillslope for frozen ground studies D. Pratt & J. McDonnell https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11284
13. Thinking inside the box: Investigating peak storm response in a simplified outdoor slope setup F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130064
14. Hysteresis of soil moisture spatial heterogeneity and the “homogenizing” effect of vegetation V. Ivanov et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008611
15. Processes and Modeling of Initial Soil and Landscape Development: A Review T. Maurer & H. Gerke https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.05.0048
16. “Cape Fear”—A Hybrid Hillslope Plot for Monitoring Hydrological Processes F. Tauro et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology4030035
17. Does consideration of water routing affect simulated water and carbon dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems? G. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1423-2014
18. Testing the hybrid‐3‐D hillslope hydrological model in a controlled environment P. Hazenberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018106
19. Climate change impact on a groundwater‐influenced hillslope ecosystem R. Brolsma et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008782
20. A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review M. Hrachowitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183
21. A model-based assessment of the potential use of compound-specific stable isotope analysis in river monitoring of diffuse pesticide pollution S. Lutz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-4505-2013
22. Using hydro-chemograph analyses to reveal runoff generation processes in a Mediterranean catchment A. Cuomo & D. Guida https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10935
23. HESS Opinions On the use of laboratory experimentation: "Hydrologists, bring out shovels and garden hoses and hit the dirt" M. Kleinhans et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-369-2010
24. Hydrological earth observatories and artificial catchments: From observation to modelling H. Holländer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.12.012
25. The Hydrological Open Air Laboratory (HOAL) in Petzenkirchen: a hypothesis-driven observatory G. Blöschl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-227-2016
26. Initial Ecosystem Processes as Key Factors of Landscape Development—A Review T. Raab et al. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.33.4.305
27. Effects of soil heterogeneity and preferential flow on the water flow and isotope transport in an experimental hillslope X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170548
28. Stability of an overland flow scheme in the framework of a fully coupled eco-hydrological model based on the Macroscopic Cellular Automata approach G. Mendicino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.08.021
29. Impact of organic carbon on weathering and chemical denudation of granular basalt K. Dontsova et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2014.05.010
30. Coupling of non-point source pollution and soil characteristics covered by Phyllostachys edulis stands in hilly water source area S. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110657
31. Efficient Estimation of the Number of Water Retention Curves Required for Applying a Scaling Technique to the Forest Soil Y. Hayashi & K. Kosugi https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010089
32. On the non-uniqueness of the hydro-geomorphic responses in a zero-order catchment with respect to soil moisture J. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.03.019
33. Breakdown of hydrologic patterns upon model coarsening at hillslope scales and implications for experimental design T. Mahmood & E. Vivoni https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.011
34. Dynamics of initial ecosystem development at the artificial catchment Chicken Creek, Lusatia, Germany M. Elmer et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2330-2
35. An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology S. Fatichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026
36. Direct Observation of Hillslope Scale StorAge Selection Functions in Experimental Hydrologic Systems: Geomorphologic Structure and Preferential Discharge of Old Water M. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020WR028959
37. What makes Darwinian hydrology "Darwinian"? Asking a different kind of question about landscapes C. Harman & P. Troch https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-417-2014
38. Using stable water isotopes to understand ecohydrological partitioning under contrasting land uses in a drought‐sensitive rural, lowland catchment J. Landgraf et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14779
39. The relative role of soil type and tree cover on water storage and transmission in northern headwater catchments J. Geris et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10289
40. Hillslope-scale experiment demonstrates the role of convergence during two-step saturation A. Gevaert et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3681-2014
41. Picturing and modeling catchments by representative hillslopes R. Loritz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-1225-2017
42. The quixotic search for a comprehensive understanding of hydrologic response at the surface: Horton, Dunne, Dunton, and the role of concept‐development simulation K. Loague et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7834
43. Simulating water flow in variably saturated soils: a comparison of a 3D model with approximation-based formulations L. Hopp et al. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2015.126
44. Incipient subsurface heterogeneity and its effect on overland flow generation – insight from a modeling study of the first experiment at the Biosphere 2 Landscape Evolution Observatory G. Niu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-1873-2014
45. Geohydrology of a Reference Mediterranean Catchment (Cilento UNESCO Geopark, Southern Italy) D. Guida et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10124117
46. A two-dimensional numerical model coupled with multiple hillslope hydrodynamic processes and its application to subsurface flow simulation M. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5347-6
47. The Landscape Evolution Observatory: A large-scale controllable infrastructure to study coupled Earth-surface processes L. Pangle et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.01.020
48. Experimental landscape ecology G. Jenerette & W. Shen https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9797-1
49. Hillslope-storage and rainfall-amount thresholds as controls of preferential stormflow J. Dusek & T. Vogel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.047
50. Long‐Term Changes in Runoff Generation Mechanisms for Two Proglacial Areas in the Swiss Alps II: Subsurface Flow F. Maier et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030223
51. How Water, Carbon, and Energy Drive Critical Zone Evolution: The Jemez–Santa Catalina Critical Zone Observatory J. Chorover et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0132
52. Solid phase evolution in the Biosphere 2 hillslope experiment as predicted by modeling of hydrologic and geochemical fluxes K. Dontsova et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-2273-2009
53. Developing observational methods to drive future hydrological science: Can we make a start as a community? K. Beven et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13622
54. From hillslope to stream: methods to investigate subsurface connectivity T. Blume & H. van Meerveld https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1071
55. Estimation of Total Drainable Water Storage Using GRACE in the Brahmaputra River Basin, India P. Parmita & R. Bhattacharjya https://doi.org/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-6136