Classification of hydro-meteorological conditions and multiple artificial neural networks for streamflow forecasting

Toth, E.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1555-2009

Articles | Volume 13, issue 9

Article
Peer review
Metrics
Related articles

Articles | Volume 13, issue 9

https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-1555-2009

Articles | Volume 13, issue 9

Article
Peer review
Metrics
Related articles

03 Sep 2009

| 03 Sep 2009

Classification of hydro-meteorological conditions and multiple artificial neural networks for streamflow forecasting

E. Toth

University of Bologna, Faculty of Engineering, viale Risorgimento 2, 40136 Bologna, Italy

Cited articles

Abrahart, R. J. and See, L.: Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments, Hydrol. Process., 14(11), 2157–2172, 2000.

Abrahart, R. J. and See, L.: Multi-model data fusion for river flow forecasting: an evaluation of six alternative methods based on two contrasting catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 655–670, 2002.

Anctil, F., Perrin, Ch., and Andreassian V.: Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19, 357–368, 2004.

ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology: Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts, J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 115–123, 2000a.

ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology: Artificial neural networks in hydrology II: hydrologic applications, J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 124–137, 2000b.

Astel, A., Tsakovski, S., Barbieri, P., and Simeonov, V.: Comparison of self-organizing maps classification approach with cluster and principal components analysis for large environmental data sets, Water Res., 41(19), 4566–4578, 2007.

Bowden, G. J., Dandy G. C., and Maier, H. R.: Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1 – background and methodology, J. Hydrol., 301, 75–92, 2005

Cameron, D., Kneale, P., and See, L.: An evaluation of a traditional and a neural net modelling approach to flood forecasting for an upland catchment, Hydrol. Process., 16, 1033–1046, 2002.

Campolo, M., Andreussi, P., and Soldati, A.: River flood forecasting with neural network model, Water Resour. Res., 35(4), 1191–1197, 1999.

Corzo, G. A. and Solomatine, D. P.: Baseflow separation techniques for modular artificial neural networks modelling in flow forecasting, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(3), 491–507, 2007.

Coulibaly, P., Bobée, B., and Anctil, F.: Improving extreme hydrologic events forecasting using a new criterion for artificial neural network selection, Hydrol. Process., 15, 1533–1536, 2001.

Dawson, C. W. and Wilby, R.: An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 43(1), 47–65, 1998.

de Vos, N. J. and Rientjes, T. H. M.: Multi-objective performance comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall-runoff model, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(3), 397–413, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.52.3.397, 2007.

de Vos, N. J. and Rientjes, T. H. M.: Multiobjective training of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08434, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006734, 2008.

Fernando, T. M. K. G., Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C.: Selection of input variables for data driven models: An average shifted histogram partial mutual information estimator approach, J. Hydrol., 367, 165–176, 2009.

Foody, G.: Applications of the self-organising feature map neural network in community data analysis, Ecol. Model., 120, 97–107, 1999.

Foresee, F. D. and Hagan, M. T.: Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian learning, IEEE IJCNN, New York, 3, 1930–1935, 1997.

Furundzic, D.: Application example of neural networks for time series analysis: rainfall-runoff modelling, Signal Process., 64, 383–396, 1998.

Georgakakos, K. P., Seo, D., Gupta, H., Schaake, J., and Butts, M. B.: Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles, J. Hydrol., 298, 222–241, 2004.

Gopakumar R., Takara, K., and James E. J.: Hydrologic Data Exploration and River Flow Forecasting of a Humid Tropical River Basin Using Artificial Neural Networks, Water Resour. Manag., 21(11), 1915–1940, 2007.

Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information, Water Resour. Res., 34, 751–764, 1998.

Hagan, M. T. and Menhaj, M.: Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE T. Neural Networ., 5(6), 989–993, 1994.

Hsu, A. L. and Halgamuge, S. K.: An unsupervised hierarchical dynamic selforganizing approach to cancer class discovery and marker gene identification in microarray data (supplementary information on "Dynamic SOM with hexagonal structure for data mining"), Bioinformatics, 19(16), 2131–2140, 2003.

Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., and Imam, B.: Self-organizing linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1302, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000795, 2002.

Jain, A., Sudheer, K. P., and Srinivasulu, S.: Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models, Hydrol. Process., 18, 571–581, 2004.

Jain, A. and Srinivasulu, S.: Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques, J. Hydrol., 317, 291–306, 2006.

Kalteh, A. M., Hjorth, P., and Berndtsson, R.: Review of the self-organizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: Analysis, modelling and application, Environ. Modell. Softw. 23, 835–845, 2008.

Khan, M. S. and Coulibaly, P.: Bayesian neural network for rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 42(7), W07409, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003971, 2006.

Kohonen, T.: Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biol. Cybern., 43, 59–69, 1982.

Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps (third edn.), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001.

Legates, D.R. and McCabe, G.J.: Evaluating the use of `goodness-of-fit' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241, 1999.

Madsen, H.: Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives, J. Hydrol., 235, 267–288, 2000.

Maier, H. and Dandy, G.: Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and applications, Environ. Modell. Softw., 15(1), 101–104, 2000.

Mangiameli, P., Chen, S. K., and West, D.: A comparison of SOM neural network and hierarchical clustering methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 93, 402–417, 1996.

Minns, A. W. and Hall, M. J.: Artificial neural networks as rainfall runoff models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 41, 399–417, 1996.

Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S: Improved streamflow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks, J. Hydrol., 295, 246–262, 2004.

Parasuraman, K. and Elshorbagy, A.: Cluster-based hydrologic prediction using genetic-algorithm trained neural networks, J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(1), 52–62, 2007.

Shamseldin, A. Y., Nasr, A. E., and O'Connor, K. M.: Comparison of different forms of the Multi-layer Feed-Forward Neural Network method used for river flow forecasting, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 671–684, 2002.

Shamseldin, A. Y., O'Connor, K. M., and Liang, G. C.,: Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall-runoff rodels, J. Hydrol., 197, 203–229, 1997.

Shamseldin, A. Y., O'Connor, K. M., and Nasr, A. E.: A comparative study of three neural network forecast combination methods for simulated river flows of different rainfall-runoff models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(5), 896–916, 2007. natural phenomena, Neural Networks, 19, 215–224, 2006.

Shirazi, J. and Menhaj, M. B.: A SOM Based 2500-Isolated-Farsi-Word Speech Recognizer, in: ICANN 2005, LNCS 3696, edited by: Duch, W., Kacprzyk, J., Oja, E., and Zadrony, S., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 589–595, 2005.

Solomatine, D. P. and Siek, M. B.: Modular learning models in forecasting

Solomatine, D. P. and Dulal, K. N.: Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall-runoff modelling, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48(3), 399–411, 2003.

Srivastav, R. K., Sudheer, K. P., and Chaubey, I.: A simplified approach to quantifying predictive and parametric uncertainty in artificial neural network hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 23(10), W10407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005352, 2007.

Tang, Y., Reed, P., and Wagener, T.: How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 289–307, 2006.

Toth, E. and Brath, A.: Multistep ahead streamflow forecasting: Role of calibration data in conceptual and neural network modeling, Water Resour. Res., 43, W11405, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005383, 2007.

Van der Voort, M., Dougherty, M., and Watson, S.: Combining Kohonen maps with ARIMA time series models to forecast traffic flow, Transport. Res., C4(5), 307–318, 1996.

Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bastidas, L. A., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S.: Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1–19, 2003.

Wang, W., Gelder, P., Vrijling, J. K., and Ma, J.: Forecasting daily streamflow using hybrid ANN models, J. Hydrol., 324(1), 383–399, 2006.

Wheater, H. S., Jakeman, A. J., and Beven, K. J.: Progress and directions in rainfall-runoff modelling, in: Modelling change in environmental systems, edited by: Jakeman, A. J., Beck, M. B., and McAleer, M. J., Wiley, Chichester, 101–132, 1993.

World Meteorological Organization: Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models, WMO Publications, Geneva, Swiss, 1992.

Young, P. C.: Advances in real-time flood forecasting, Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond., 360, 1433–1450, 2002.

Zhang, B. and Govindaraju, S.: Prediction of Watershed Runoff using Bayesian Concepts and Modular Neural Networks, Water Resour. Res., 36(3), 753–762, 2000.