216 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Accuracy of Interpolated Bathymetry in Digital Elevation Models C. Amante & B. Eakins 10.2112/SI76-011
2. Quantifying local flow direction uncertainty G. O'Neil & A. Shortridge 10.1080/13658816.2012.719627
3. Effects of sample and grid size on the accuracy and stability of regression‐based snow interpolation methods J. Moreno et al. 10.1002/hyp.7564
4. Void Filling of Digital Elevation Models with a Terrain Texture Learning Model Based on Generative Adversarial Networks Z. Qiu et al. 10.3390/rs11232829
5. Uncertain seas: probabilistic modeling of future coastal flood zones C. Amante 10.1080/13658816.2019.1635253
6. High-quality seamless DEM generation blending SRTM-1, ASTER GDEM v2 and ICESat/GLAS observations L. Yue et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.11.002
7. Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk J. Corominas et al. 10.1007/s10064-013-0538-8
8. Determining the optimum cell size of digital elevation model for hydrologic application A. SHARMA et al. 10.1007/s12040-011-0092-3
9. Vertical accuracy evaluation of SRTM-GL1, GDEM-V2, AW3D30 and CartoDEM-V3.1 of 30-m resolution with dual frequency GNSS for lower Tapi Basin India A. Jain et al. 10.1080/10106049.2017.1343392
10. Local Knowledge and Professional Background Have a Minimal Impact on Volunteer Citizen Science Performance in a Land-Cover Classification Task C. Salk et al. 10.3390/rs8090774
11. DEM Resolution Effects on Coastal Flood Vulnerability Assessment: Deterministic and Probabilistic Approach M. Fereshtehpour & M. Karamouz 10.1029/2017WR022318
12. Impact of Uncertainty of Floodplain Digital Terrain Model on 1D Hydrodynamic Flow Calculation A. Kiczko & D. Mirosław-Świątek 10.3390/w10101308
13. Demystifying the Differences between Structure-from-MotionSoftware Packages for Pre-Processing Drone Data T. Pell et al. 10.3390/drones6010024
14. Comparing alpine watershed attributes from LiDAR, Photogrammetric, and Contour‐based Digital Elevation Models C. Hopkinson et al. 10.1002/hyp.7155
15. Catchments of German surface water bodies A. Gericke et al. 10.1002/hyp.14272
16. Comparing the accuracy of estimated terrain elevations across spatial resolution M. Ghandehari et al. 10.1080/01431161.2019.1577581
17. The Importance of Digital Elevation Model Selection in Flood Simulation and a Proposed Method to Reduce DEM Errors: A Case Study in Shanghai K. Xu et al. 10.1007/s13753-021-00377-z
18. Remote detection of upland surface water storage capacity in deglaciated terrain B. Van Dam & S. Smith 10.1002/esp.5708
19. Uncertainty due to DEM error in landslide susceptibility mapping C. Qin et al. 10.1080/13658816.2013.770515
20. Uncertainty Assessment in Soil Erosion Modelling Using RUSLE, Multisource and Multiresolution DEMs A. Pandey et al. 10.1007/s12524-021-01351-4
21. How does the choice of DEMs affect catchment hydrological modeling? D. Moges et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164627
22. Heuristic approach to urban sewershed delineation for pluvial flood modeling S. Park et al. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106129
23. Effect of Elevation Resolution on Evapotranspiration Simulations using MODFLOW B. Kambhammettu et al. 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00852.x
24. Embedding rivers in triangulated irregular networks with linear programming M. Kreveld & R. Silveira 10.1080/13658816.2010.488240
25. Generating Nested Wetland Catchments with Readily-Available Digital Elevation Data May Improve Evaluations of Land-Use Change on Wetlands L. McCauley & M. Anteau 10.1007/s13157-014-0571-9
26. Error Characteristics of Pan-Arctic Digital Elevation Models and Elevation Derivatives in Northern Sweden M. Karlson et al. 10.3390/rs13224653
27. Characterizing errors in digital elevation models and estimating the financial costs of accuracy S. Januchowski et al. 10.1080/13658811003591680
28. A probabilistic approach to river network detection in digital elevation models L. Poggio & P. Soille 10.1016/j.catena.2011.07.001
29. Habitat suitability and flood risk modeling for Gazella conservation actions in Mond protected area E. Abbasi et al. 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104816
30. Comparison of differences in resolution and sources of controlling factors for gully erosion susceptibility mapping Y. Garosi et al. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.027
31. On the topology of topography: a review K. Clarke & B. Romero 10.1080/15230406.2016.1164625
32. High-resolution automated detection of headwater streambeds for large watersheds F. Lessard et al. 10.5194/hess-28-1027-2024
33. Spatial Global Sensitivity Analysis of High Resolution classified topographic data use in 2D urban flood modelling M. Abily et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.002
34. Evaluating Digital Elevation Model generation from Sentinel-1 SAR data in challenging tropical environments Z. Zylshal et al. 10.1007/s40808-024-02171-4
35. Perspectives on Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Simulation for Flood Modeling in the Absence of a High-Accuracy Open Access Global DEM L. Hawker et al. 10.3389/feart.2018.00233
36. Accounting for uncertainties in compound flood hazard assessment: The value of data assimilation D. Muñoz et al. 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2021.104057
37. Possibilities of Using Low Quality Digital Elevation Models of Floodplains in Hydraulic Numerical Models I. Laks et al. 10.3390/w9040283
38. Study on the Prediction of Debris Flow Risk Using LS-RAPID N. Kim et al. 10.9798/KOSHAM.2023.23.1.73
39. Terrain-Aided Navigation With Coarse Maps—Toward an Arctic Crossing With an AUV G. Salavasidis et al. 10.1109/JOE.2021.3085941
40. Hydrological data uncertainty and its implications H. McMillan et al. 10.1002/wat2.1319
41. Open-Channel Hydrodynamic Numerical Simulation of Topographically Uncharted River Based on Observational Data-Driven Method G. Li et al. 10.1061/JWRMD5.WRENG-6156
42. Sediment Balance Estimation of the ‘Cuvette Centrale’ of the Congo River Basin Using the SWAT Hydrological Model P. Datok et al. 10.3390/w13101388
43. Bank erosion in agricultural drainage networks: new challenges from structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry for post‐event analysis M. Prosdocimi et al. 10.1002/esp.3767
44. CABra: a novel large-sample dataset for Brazilian catchments A. Almagro et al. 10.5194/hess-25-3105-2021
45. Modeling transport and fate of heavy metals at the watershed scale: State-of-the-art and future directions L. Zhou et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163087
46. Landslide dynamics from high-resolution aerial photographs: A case study from the Western Carpathians, Slovakia R. Prokešová et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.09.033
47. Hydrological and water resources investigations of the Mereb-Gash river basin in Eritrea A. Ghebrehiwot & D. Kozlov 10.22227/1997-0935.2022.12.1687-1706
48. Sensitivity of DEM, slope, aspect and watershed attributes to LiDAR measurement uncertainty T. Goulden et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2016.03.005
49. Rainfall simulation and Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry for the analysis of soil water erosion in Mediterranean vineyards M. Prosdocimi et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.036
50. Inca water channel flow analysis based on 3D models from terrestrial and UAV laser scanning at the Chachabamba archaeological site (Machu Picchu National Archaeological Park, Peru) S. Dominika et al. 10.1016/j.jas.2021.105515
51. InSAR Digital Elevation Model Void-Filling Method Based on Incorporating Elevation Outlier Detection Z. Hu et al. 10.3390/rs16081452
52. ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America L. Laipelt et al. 10.3390/rs16132321
53. Assessing land elevation in the Ayeyarwady Delta (Myanmar) and its relevance for studying sea level rise and delta flooding K. Seeger et al. 10.5194/hess-27-2257-2023
54. Effect of DEM resolution on assessing hydrological connectivity in tropical and semi-arid basins of central Mexico A. Ortíz-Rodríguez et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128104
55. Uncertainty of SWAT model at different DEM resolutions in a large mountainous watershed P. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.018
56. An improved method to represent DEM uncertainty in glacial lake outburst flood propagation using stochastic simulations C. Watson et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.046
57. New elevation data triple estimates of global vulnerability to sea-level rise and coastal flooding S. Kulp & B. Strauss 10.1038/s41467-019-12808-z
58. Comparative Assessment of SWAT Model Performance in two Distinct Catchments under Various DEM Scenarios of Varying Resolution, Sources and Resampling Methods M. Goyal et al. 10.1007/s11269-017-1840-1
59. Uncertainty Analysis of Digital Elevation Models by Spatial Inference From Stable Terrain R. Hugonnet et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3188922
60. Flood Analysis Supported by Low‐cost Geometric Modelling S. Zazo et al. 10.1002/rra.3113
61. Implications of Simulating Global Digital Elevation Models for Flood Inundation Studies L. Hawker et al. 10.1029/2018WR023279
62. The effects of topographic depressions on multiscale overland flow connectivity: A high‐resolution spatiotemporal pattern analysis approach based on connectivity statistics F. Yu & J. Harbor 10.1002/hyp.13409
63. Ranking sources of uncertainty in flood damage modelling: a case study on the cost‐benefit analysis of a flood mitigation project in the Orb Delta, France N. Saint‐Geours et al. 10.1111/jfr3.12068
64. Determining the optimal grid resolution for topographic analysis on an airborne lidar dataset T. Smith et al. 10.5194/esurf-7-475-2019
65. VERTICAL ACCURACY ASSESSMENT OF OPEN ACCESS DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS: BUCARAMANGA-COLOMBIA CASE STUDY J. Aponte Saravia 10.3846/gac.2022.14266
66. Integrating DEM and field data to unravel the impact of bedrock topography on Late Quaternary ice flows: A case study of the Lake Mistassini area, Canada M. El Amrani et al. 10.1007/s12040-023-02251-6
67. The potential of small unmanned aircraft systems and structure-from-motion for topographic surveys: A test of emerging integrated approaches at Cwm Idwal, North Wales T. Tonkin et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.07.021
68. Evaluating the capacity of single photon lidar for terrain characterization under a range of forest conditions J. White et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112169
69. TanDEM-X IDEM precision and accuracy assessment based on a large assembly of differential GNSS measurements in Kruger National Park, South Africa J. Baade & C. Schmullius 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.05.005
70. Impacts of DEM uncertainties on critical source areas identification for non-point source pollution control based on SWAT model F. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.019
71. Evaluation of the Vertical Accuracy of Open Global DEMs over Steep Terrain Regions Using ICESat Data: A Case Study over Hunan Province, China Z. Liu et al. 10.3390/s20174865
72. Application of Filtering Techniques to Smooth a Surface of Hybrid Digital Bathymetric Model J. Lubczonek & G. Zaniewicz 10.3390/rs15194737
73. ‘Benefit Maximizing Routes’: Development and Evaluation Using the Historical Roads of Korea’s Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910) W. Shim et al. 10.5334/jcaa.97
74. Inverse unsaturated-zone flow modeling for groundwater recharge estimation: a regional spatial nonstationary approach M. Karamouz et al. 10.1007/s10040-022-02502-8
75. Analysis of flood modeling through innovative geomatic methods S. Zazo et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.011
76. Topographic uncertainty quantification for flow-like landslide models via stochastic simulations H. Zhao & J. Kowalski 10.5194/nhess-20-1441-2020
77. Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility Using Statistical- and Artificial Intelligence-Based FR–RF Integrated Model and Multiresolution DEMs A. Arabameri et al. 10.3390/rs11090999
78. A Fuzzy Logic Based Method for Modeling the Spatial Distribution of Indicators of Decomposition in a High Mountain Environment N. Hellwig et al. 10.1657/AAAR0015-073
79. Modelling of piping collapses and gully headcut landforms: Evaluating topographic variables from different types of DEM A. Arabameri et al. 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101230
80. Toward Reliable UAV-Enabled Positioning in Mountainous Environments: System Design and Preliminary Results Z. Wang et al. 10.1109/TR.2021.3088132
81. Understanding the scale effects of topographical variables on landslide susceptibility mapping in Sikkim Himalaya using deep learning approaches A. Saha et al. 10.1080/10106049.2022.2136255
82. Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: Comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30 C. Grohmann 10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043
83. A Methodological Framework for Identification of Baseline Scenario and Assessing the Impact of DEM Scenarios on SWAT Model Outputs H. Sukumaran & S. Sahoo 10.1007/s11269-020-02691-5
84. City-scale high-resolution flood models and the role of topographic data: a case study of Kathmandu, Nepal C. Watson et al. 10.1080/10106049.2024.2387073
85. Forest Road Detection Using LiDAR Data Z. Azizi et al. 10.1007/s11676-014-0544-0
86. Land Cover and Water Quality Patterns in an Urban River: A Case Study of River Medlock, Greater Manchester, UK C. Medupin et al. 10.3390/w12030848
87. Effect of User Decision and Environmental Factors on Computationally Derived River Networks N. Olsen et al. 10.1029/2022JF006873
88. Terrain‐aided navigation for long‐range AUVs in dynamic under‐mapped environments G. Salavasidis et al. 10.1002/rob.21994
89. Modeling the extent of surface water floods in rural areas: Lessons learned from the application of various uncalibrated models D. Bernet et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.005
90. LiDAR-derived slopes for headwater channel network analysis A. Vianello et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2008.09.012
91. Comparison of soil moisture fields estimated by catchment modelling and remote sensing: a case study in South Africa T. Vischel et al. 10.5194/hess-12-751-2008
92. Terrain‐derived measures for basin conservation and restoration planning J. Matt et al. 10.1002/rra.4181
93. Evaluating the Impact of Digital Elevation Models on Urban Flood Modeling: A Comprehensive Analysis of Flood Inundation, Hazard Mapping, and Damage Estimation Z. Zandsalimi et al. 10.1007/s11269-024-03862-4
94. Accuracy assessment of the TanDEM-X 90 Digital Elevation Model for selected floodplain sites L. Hawker et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111319
95. Digital Elevation Model Quality Assessment Methods: A Critical Review L. Polidori & M. El Hage 10.3390/rs12213522
96. Statistical relationship between land surface altitude and soil salinity in the enclosed desert depressions of arid regions N. Bakr & R. Ali 10.1007/s12517-019-4969-9
97. DEM resolution influences on peak flow prediction: a comparison of two different based DEMs through various rescaling techniques A. Suliman et al. 10.1080/10106049.2019.1622599
98. Piezometry mapping accuracy based on elevation extracted from various spatial data sources I. Hentati et al. 10.1007/s12665-016-5589-2
99. Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: rainfall, river discharge and water quality H. McMillan et al. 10.1002/hyp.9384
100. 3‐D uncertainty‐based topographic change detection with structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry: precision maps for ground control and directly georeferenced surveys M. James et al. 10.1002/esp.4125
101. Geostatistical approach for identifying scale-specific correlations between soil thickness and topographic attributes H. Bourennane et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.05.026
102. Disaster Risk Reduction Based on a GIS Case Study of the Čađavica River Watershed R. Ristić et al. 10.15177/seefor.17-12
103. The agricultural impact of the 2015–2016 floods in Ireland as mapped through Sentinel 1 satellite imagery R. O’Hara et al. 10.2478/ijafr-2019-0006
104. Impacts of DEM resolution, source, and resampling technique on SWAT-simulated streamflow M. Tan et al. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.07.014
105. Determination of sensitivity of drainage morphometry towards hydrological response interactions for various datasets A. Jain et al. 10.1007/s10668-020-00652-x
106. Drainage Structure Datasets and Effects on LiDAR-Derived Surface Flow Modeling R. Li et al. 10.3390/ijgi2041136
107. Exploring the sensitivity of coastal inundation modelling to DEM vertical error H. West et al. 10.1080/13658816.2018.1444165
108. A GIS based approach for the mitigation of surface runoff to a shallow lowland reservoir J. Dąbrowska et al. 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2018.07.002
109. Assessing potential coastal flood exposure along the Port-Bouët Bay in Côte d’Ivoire using the enhanced bathtub model M. Kouakou et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/acfdfa
110. Enhancing debris flow simulation accuracy through high-resolution terrain information: a case study utilizing LS-RAPID and UAV-derived models N. Kim & B. Jun 10.1007/s10346-024-02290-0
111. Use of bathymetry and clay mineralogy of reservoir sediment to reconstruct the recent changes in sediment yields from a mountain catchment in the Western High Atlas region, Morocco A. Gourfi et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2020.104560
112. TanDEM-X Water Indication Mask: Generation and First Evaluation Results A. Wendleder et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2210999
113. A similarity index for storm runoff due to saturation excess overland flow B. Bates & S. Aryal 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.021
114. Identifying Surface Runoff Pathways for Cost-Effective Mitigation of Pollutant Inputs to Drinking Water Reservoir J. Dąbrowska et al. 10.3390/w10101300
115. Effects of DEM Depression Filling on River Drainage Patterns and Surface Runoff Generated by 2D Rain-on-Grid Scenarios P. Costabile et al. 10.3390/w14070997
116. Impacts of Dem Uncertainty on Estimated Surface Solar Radiation and Extracted River Network L. Wang & K. Wang 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00285.1
117. Identification of karst sinkholes in a forested karst landscape using airborne laser scanning data and water flow analysis J. Hofierka et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.02.004
118. Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEMs, SRTM and ASTER GDEM on Selected Chinese Sites H. Han et al. 10.3390/rs13071304
119. An algorithm to extract more accurate stream longitudinal profiles from unfilled DEMs J. Byun & Y. Seong 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.03.015
120. A Novel Airborne Dual-Antenna InSAR Calibration Method for Backprojection Imaging Model X. Hu et al. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3066098
121. Evaluating the performance of various interpolation techniques on digital elevation models in highly dense forest vegetation environment S. Adedapo & H. Zurqani 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102646
122. Multi-Task Learning of Relative Height Estimation and Semantic Segmentation from Single Airborne RGB Images M. Lu et al. 10.3390/rs14143450
123. Multiple thematic spatial integration technique to identify the groundwater recharge potential zones—a case study along the Courtallam region, Tamil Nadu, India B. Panda et al. 10.1007/s12517-020-06223-8
124. Utilization of Satellite-based Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for Hydrologic Applications: A Review S. Zaidi et al. 10.1007/s12594-018-1016-5
125. Evaluation of ASTER GDEM2, SRTMv3.0, ALOS AW3D30 and TanDEM-X DEMs for the Peruvian Andes against highly accurate GNSS ground control points and geomorphological-hydrological metrics M. González-Moradas & W. Viveen 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111509
126. Topographic uncertainty and catchment-based models A. Gericke 10.5004/dwt.2010.1908
127. How large is the Upper Indus Basin? The pitfalls of auto-delineation using DEMs A. Khan et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.028
128. Evaluating Vertical Accuracies of Open-Source Digital Elevation Models over Multiple Sites in China Using GPS Control Points X. Liu et al. 10.3390/rs14092000
129. Position paper: Sensitivity analysis of spatially distributed environmental models- a pragmatic framework for the exploration of uncertainty sources H. Koo et al. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104857
130. Assessing modern ground survey methods and airborne laser scanning for digital terrain modelling: A case study from the Lake District, England M. Gallay et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.08.015
131. Validation of digital elevation models (DEMs) and comparison of geomorphic metrics on the southern Central Andean Plateau B. Purinton & B. Bookhagen 10.5194/esurf-5-211-2017
132. Evaluation of the U.S. Geological Survey standard elevation products in a two-dimensional hydraulic modeling application for a low relief coastal floodplain E. Witt 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.051
133. Assessment of Open Access Global Elevation Model Errors Impact on Flood Extents in Southern Niger R. Muench et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.880840
134. Best Practices for Elevation-Based Assessments of Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Exposure D. Gesch 10.3389/feart.2018.00230
135. An application-driven approach to terrain model construction A. Darnell et al. 10.1080/13658810903318889
136. The Impact of DEM Resolution on Runoff and Sediment Modelling Results G. Ghaffari 10.3923/rjes.2011.691.702
137. Bathymetric mapping and estimation of water storage in a shallow lake using a remote sensing inversion method based on machine learning H. Yang et al. 10.1080/17538947.2022.2069873
138. Influence of resolution on slope in areas with different topographic characteristics C. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.028
139. DEM Fusion using a modifiedk-means clustering algorithm C. Fuss et al. 10.1080/17538947.2016.1208685
140. Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM G. Schumann et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.004
141. Dune migration and volume change from airborne LiDAR, terrestrial LiDAR and Structure from Motion-Multi View Stereo C. Grohmann et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104569
142. Assessing ecological risk through automated drainage extraction and watershed delineation L. Mantelli et al. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.04.003
143. Sandy beach evolution in the low-energy microtidal Baltic Sea: Attribution of changes to hydrometeorological forcing M. Eelsalu et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108383
144. Effects of best management practices on nitrogen load reduction in tea fields with different slope gradients using the SWAT model W. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.08.020
145. Comparison of ASTER GDEM3, SRTM3, NASADEM, TanDEM-X90, AW3D30, and ALOS PALSAR data with TanDEM-X12: a case study of Tagragra of Akka inlier, Moroccan Anti-Atlas Z. Adiri et al. 10.1007/s12517-022-10885-x
146. Breakdown of hydrologic patterns upon model coarsening at hillslope scales and implications for experimental design T. Mahmood & E. Vivoni 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.011
147. Variations in multiscale curvature distribution and signatures of LiDAR DTM errors G. Sofia et al. 10.1002/esp.3363
148. Application of LiDAR Data for Hydrologic Assessments of Low-Gradient Coastal Watershed Drainage Characteristics D. Amatya et al. 10.4236/jgis.2013.52017
149. Improving the Accuracy of Open Source Digital Elevation Models with Multi-Scale Fusion and a Slope Position-Based Linear Regression Method Y. Tian et al. 10.3390/rs10121861
150. Finite Mixture Models in the Evaluation of Positional Accuracy of Geospatial Data J. Rodríguez-Avi & F. Ariza-López 10.3390/rs14092062
151. Measuring ground surface elevation changes in a slow-moving colluvial landslide using combinations of regional airborne lidar, UAV lidar and UAV photogrammetric surveys S. Johnson et al. 10.1144/qjegh2022-078
152. An Improved Flow Direction Algorithm That Considers Mass Conservation for Sediment Transport Simulations H. Wei et al. 10.3390/w15234111
153. A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran A. Arabameri et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.021
154. Hillslope-to-valley transition morphology: New opportunities from high resolution DTMs P. Tarolli & G. Dalla Fontana 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.006
155. Evaluating Applicability of SRTM DEM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Digital Elevation Model) in Hydrologic Analysis: A Case Study of Geum River and Daedong River Areas Y. Her & S. Yoo 10.5389/KSAE.2013.55.6.101
156. Bathymetric Inversion and Mapping of Two Shallow Lakes Using Sentinel-2 Imagery and Bathymetry Data in the Central Tibetan Plateau H. Yang et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3177227
157. Assessing Tidal Hydrodynamics in a Tropical Seascape Using Structure‐from‐Motion Photogrammetry and 2D Flow Modelling C. Vulliet et al. 10.1007/s12237-023-01288-6
158. On the uncertainty of stream networks derived from elevation data: the error propagation approach T. Hengl et al. 10.5194/hess-14-1153-2010
159. Impacts of Agro-Ecological Practices on Soil Losses and Cash Crop Yield D. De Benedetto et al. 10.3390/agriculture7120103
160. Development of a Simulation Model for Estimation of Potential Recharge in a Semi-arid Foothill Region S. Banimahd et al. 10.1007/s11269-017-1593-x
161. Uncertainty in primary and secondary topographic attributes caused by digital elevation model spatial resolution S. Salekin et al. 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107320
162. Short‐term Forecasting Tools for Agricultural Nutrient Management Z. Easton et al. 10.2134/jeq2016.09.0377
163. The Influence of the DSM Spatial Resolution in Rockfall Simulation and Validation with In Situ Data M. Kakavas et al. 10.3390/geosciences13020057
164. Flood Forecasting in Large River Basins Using FOSS Tool and HPC U. Dutta et al. 10.3390/w13243484
165. Shaping the Global High-Resolution TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model M. Huber et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3095178
166. Lidar DEM error analyses and topographic depression identification in a hummocky landscape in the prairie region of Canada S. Li et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.02.020
167. A wrapper feature selection approach for efficient modelling of gully erosion susceptibility mapping H. Rouhani et al. 10.1177/0309133320979897
168. FLIAT, An Object-Relational GIS Tool for Flood Impact Assessment in Flanders, Belgium S. Van Ackere et al. 10.3390/w11040711
169. Evaluation of Selected Sub-Elements of Spatial Data Quality on 3D Flood Event Modeling: Case Study of Prešov City, Slovakia M. Bindzárová Gergeľová et al. 10.3390/app10030820
170. Accuracy assessment of ALOS World 3D-30m DEMs using field data from Lagos and Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria C. Okolie & I. Arungwa 10.1080/10106049.2022.2060320
171. Accuracy assessment of global DEMs for the mapping of coastal flooding on a low-lying sandy environment: Cassino Beach, Brazil I. Emmendorfer et al. 10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103535
172. Fusion of multi-scale DEMs using a regularized super-resolution method L. Yue et al. 10.1080/13658816.2015.1063639
173. Assessing Coastal Squeeze of Tidal Wetlands D. Torio & G. Chmura 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-12-00162.1
174. Scale-dependency of LiDAR derived terrain attributes in quantitative soil-landscape modeling: Effects of grid resolution vs. neighborhood extent J. Maynard & M. Johnson 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.021
175. Quality assessment from a hydrological perspective of a digital elevation model derived from WorldView-2 remote sensing data J. Novoa et al. 10.1080/02626667.2013.875179
176. An optimized use of limited ground based topographic data for river applications M. Jaballah et al. 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.11.002
177. A comparative analysis of the vertical accuracy of multiple open-source digital elevation models for the mountainous terrain of the north-western Himalaya P. Ganie et al. 10.1007/s40808-022-01641-x
178. Effect of Target Moisture on Laser Scanner Intensity S. Kaasalainen et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2036841
179. Improving the identification of hydrologically sensitive areas using LiDAR DEMs for the delineation and mitigation of critical source areas of diffuse pollution I. Thomas et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.183
180. A systematic review and meta-analysis of Digital elevation model (DEM) fusion: pre-processing, methods and applications C. Okolie & J. Smit 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.03.016
181. Modelling topo-bathymetric surface using a triangulation irregular network (TIN) of Tunga Dam in Nigeria P. Ibrahim et al. 10.1007/s12518-022-00438-y
182. The influence of DEM resolution on simulated solar radiation‐induced glacier melt C. Hopkinson et al. 10.1002/hyp.7531
183. Evaluation of TanDEM-X elevation data for geomorphological mapping and interpretation in high mountain environments — A case study from SE Tibet, China I. Pipaud et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.025
184. Impact of data sources to DEM construction and application to runoff and sediment yield modelling using LISEM model C. de Barros et al. 10.1007/s12040-020-01547-1
185. Determination of subcatchment and watershed boundaries in a complex and highly urbanized landscape A. Kayembe & C. Mitchell 10.1002/hyp.13229
186. Yükselen ve Alçalan Yörüngeye Ait TerraSAR-X Görüntülerinden Üretilen Sayısal Yükseklik Modellerinin Doğruluk Karşılaştırması A. TORUN 10.21605/cukurovaumfd.1146081
187. Visualization of Features in 3D Terrain S. Dübel & H. Schumann 10.3390/ijgi6110357
188. The influence of resolution and topographic uncertainty on melt modelling using hypsometric sub‐grid parameterization F. Hebeler & R. Purves 10.1002/hyp.7034
189. Evaluating the impact of DEM interpolation algorithms on relief index for soil resource management M. Habib et al. 10.1515/geo-2022-0667
190. The evaluation of unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning to generate DEMs of agricultural watersheds M. Ouédraogo et al. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.016
191. Assessment of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) aggregation methods for hydrological modeling: Lake Chad basin, Africa M. Le Coz et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2008.07.009
192. Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional GRASS-GIS models for flood mapping R. Marzocchi et al. 10.1007/s12518-014-0140-1
193. Drainage basin morphometry: a global snapshot from the shuttle radar topography mission P. Guth 10.5194/hess-15-2091-2011
194. A sequential iterative dual-filter for Lidar terrain modeling optimized for complex forested environments C. Véga et al. 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.021
195. Use of environmental predictors for vegetation mapping in semi-arid mountain rangelands and the determination of conservation hotspots K. Brinkmann et al. 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01097.x
196. Quantification of global Digital Elevation Model (DEM) – A case study of the newly released NASADEM for a river basin in Central Vietnam T. Tran et al. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101282
197. Scale-dependent predictability of DEM-based landform attributes for soil spatial variability in a coastal dune system D. Kim & Y. Zheng 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.06.002
198. A Network‐Based Flow Accumulation Algorithm for Point Clouds: Facet‐Flow Networks (FFNs) A. Rheinwalt et al. 10.1029/2018JF004827
199. A review of statistically-based landslide susceptibility models P. Reichenbach et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.03.001
200. Impacts of spatial data resolution on simulated discharge, a case study of Xitiaoxi catchment in South China G. Zhao et al. 10.5194/adgeo-21-131-2009
201. Sampling‐Based Methods for Uncertainty Propagation in Flood Modeling Under Multiple Uncertain Inputs: Finding Out the Most Efficient Choice M. Hajihassanpour et al. 10.1029/2022WR034011
202. Soil-Landscape Modeling and Remote Sensing to Provide Spatial Representation of Soil Attributes for an Ethiopian Watershed N. Mehammednur Seid et al. 10.1155/2013/798094
203. GIS Water-Balance Approach to Support Surface Water Flood-Risk Management J. Diaz-Nieto et al. 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000416
204. Mapping of flood hazard induced by land subsidence in Semarang City, Indonesia, using hydraulic and spatial models B. Yuwono et al. 10.1007/s11069-023-06398-9
205. Geomorphic Change Analysis Using ASTER and SRTM Digital Elevation Models in Central Massachusetts, USA S. Blanchard et al. 10.2747/1548-1603.47.1.1
206. The influence of elevation error on the morphometrics of channel networks extracted from DEMs and the implications for hydrological modelling J. Lindsay & M. Evans 10.1002/hyp.6728
207. Techniques for quantifying the accuracy of gridded elevation models and for mapping uncertainty in digital terrain analysis N. Gonga-Saholiariliva et al. 10.1177/0309133311409086
208. Absolute and relative height-pixel accuracy of SRTM-GL1 over the South American Andean Plateau F. Satge et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.09.003
209. Fusion of UAV-based DEMs for vertical component accuracy improvement I. Ajibola et al. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.023
210. The influence of elevation uncertainty on derivation of topographic indices F. Hebeler & R. Purves 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.026
211. Effects of dynamic land use inputs on improvement of SWAT model performance and uncertainty analysis of outputs Q. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.063
212. Streamflow Modelling: A Primer on Applications, Approaches and Challenges D. Bourdin et al. 10.1080/07055900.2012.734276
213. Finding appropriate interpolation techniques for topographic surface generation for mudslide risk zonation A. Vansarochana et al. 10.1080/10106040802547735
214. Visualisation of spatial uncertainty in hydrological modelling K. Benke et al. 10.1080/14498596.2011.567412
215. DEM generation using Cartosat-1 stereo data: issues and complexities in Himalayan terrain D. Giribabu et al. 10.5721/EuJRS20134625
216. Modeling Lahars on a Poorly Eroded Basaltic Shield: Karthala Volcano, Grande Comore Island A. Dille et al. 10.3389/feart.2020.00369